There never was a doubt that the Sentinel would endorse John Mica: besides its traditional vassalage for establishment candidates, the paper and its readership reflexively badger federal spending, but when it comes to federal spending on Orlando and environs, they’ll take every penny they can get. Mica is their double-edged shovel, the kind you find in every corner of Congress: spending cuts are for the other guys. As far as he’s concerned, he’s on the Bob Byrd plan (recognizing that the late Bob Byrd of West Virginia was the Democrats’ emperor of pork, though he had an excuse: he was an ex-butcher, longing for his old loins): the more federal spending he can shovel this way, the more votes he can buy. It’s working. Mica’s endorsements will always, always cite his ability to secure money for his district, including the very same money he voted against in a larger context.
- Mica Challenger Heather Beaven’s First TV Ad Soldiers On, Without a Fight
- Heather Beaven’s WTF Campaign
- Cash for Clunkers: The Mica-Beaven Money Race
The Sentinel’s endorsement is particularly duplicitous in that regard: “The 61-mile commuter-rail service would not be coming to metro Orlando in 2013 if Mr. Mica hadn’t spent years fighting for it, and hadn’t recently landed federal commitments to fund more than $300 million of its cost,” the Sentinel writes. True enough, and SunRail is a relatively good thing when you look past its pandering dealmaking, at taxpayers’ expense, on CSX’s behalf (which made out like a modern robber baron in the deal). But that $300 million commitment was finally freed up as part of the Obama administration’s commitment to mass transportation, and, in that larger context, as part of stimulus funding that’ll help pay for high-speed rail in the western portion of the state–the high-speed rail lines that’ll eventually tie into SunRail and make SunRail more viable. Yet Mica is going around the district proudly touting his vote against the $787 billion stimulus package Congress passed, without a single Republican vote, in 2009.
“Mr. Mica also landed millions for improvements to Sanford’s airport,” the endorsement continues, “And he’s worked well with Democrats on the transportation committee, advocating for upgrades to the nation’s infrastructure.” No, he hasn’t: he’s worked hard to scale back regulations and environmental oversight on infrastructure improvements, what he calls, attractively, fast-tracking–until a bridge collapses on you faster than you can say scheiße. The Sentinel gave Heather Beaven a patronizing pat on the head: Mica faces “a smart, well-qualified challenger in Heather Beaven, a Navy veteran and CEO of a non-profit that helps at-risk kids,” leaving that well-qualified hanging there, and addressing not a single issue (besides a stab at partisanship and passing mentions of the candidates’ interests) beyond the meaty home dollars. It’s as if the national conversation (and fracture) over the economy, health care, environmental concerns, those two wars over there and the irresponsible war on taxes over here, with Mica reloading those cannons every chance he gets, didn’t exist.
Say this in the Sentinel’s defense: like so many regional and local papers anymore, it’s in hock to provincialism. The rest of the conversation doesn’t take place because it doesn’t exist for it. It’s telling that between the first and second paragraphs of the five-paragraph endorsement, online, this message appeared, splitting the editorial: “Vote for you favorite local celebrity in the Celebrity Smackdown and you could win an iPad, Bose system or flat screen TV! Click here to log in and play.”
Smart and well-qualified has no chance against that sort of priorities.
The excerpt from the Sentinel editorial board’s interview with Mica begins with an erroneous question: The editor asks Mica about the vote on the $700 billion bank bailout, which the editor says, incorrectly, came after the election of Obama, and which Mica voted against. No word in the exchange about “It’s still estimated that we’ll lose $120 to $180 billion from the TARP bill.” On Sept. 30, The Times reported: “Now Treasury reckons that taxpayers will lose less than $50 billion at worst, but at best could break even or even make money.”
The board appears not to have been reading the papers.
The Sentinel also not only misunderstood but mis-characterized what Beaven meant by a “unified budget” between the Veterans and Defense departments. She did not talk about cutting bureaucracy “by combining veterans and defense departments.” She wants to ensure that “never again will the cost of being [at] war not include our veterans, making them whole when they return or giving them the care that they need when they return.”
So much for smarts and qualifications from that board. No wonder misinformation is the strongest incumbent.
PC MAN says
I wonder if the teabaggers will protest Mica’s headquarters for his love of pork ? That’s been the republican playbook, vote against everything and then campaign on how much you brought home. This is why I have no respect for republicans.
Didn’t you ran an entire article bemoaning all of Mrs. Beaven’s flaws and short-comings where her candidacy was concerned, but now you criticize Mica being endorsed? Seems to me that you are quite the flip-flopper yourself Mr. Tristam.
Pierre Tristam says
SoccerMom, you’re referring to a piece I wrote about Beaven’s early campaign, linked above, when it was an embarrassing mess. She’s come a long way since. She still has her issues and she’s far from an ideal candidate (not that I can think of a single ideal congressman still breathing). But Mica has been an ideological bore hole all along. Ideologues bore me. So do commenters who see life in black and white (Ansel Adams fans excluded obviously).
Robert L says
John Mica is the best congressman that money and big oil can buy.
howard huge says
More republican hypocrisy at it’s best…socialism for the wealthy..”free market” for the masses
Layla Hansen says
John Mica has a lifetime rating of 71% with the non profit Council for Citizens Against Government Waste (ccagwratings.org).
It was interesting to me that Heather Bevin turned down several invitations to join 33 other state wide candidates at the TEA Party Candidate Night in August in Palm Coast. There were well over 1,000 people there in just 3 hours. In listening to her interview, she is clearly taking a page from the Tea Party, running prime time ads on Fox during Glenn Beck, while trying to distance herself from them. Who is paying for all this, Heather?
My one major objection to her at this point is hearing her state early on in her candidacy that she wanted to support President Obama’s agenda for the district in Washington. Quite frankly, I’m not interested in sending ANYONE to Washington right now who wants to do that.
PC MAN says
re Layla Hansen, I thought you may have taught me something with your information about Mica from the web site Council fior Citizens Against Government Waste. It didn’t take too long to figure out what kind of site it was, in the second paragraph was the line “the Obama administration’s relentless pro-spending agenda”.
Did Rush have any input on Mica ? What about Beck ? Fox News ?
You are the typical teabagger who reads nothing but right wing crap and thinks it’s the truth.
P.C. 94 says
Layla, I asked the Beaven campaign about the Tea Party meeting. She was never notified of it. She has attended other Tea Party meetings that she was invited to.
The fact remains, all three district newspapers have stated that Heather Beaven is a very qualified candidate, but they endorse Mica because he brings home the pork. Isn’t this exactly what the Tea Party is against? Where are they then???? They should be outraged.
That’s the thing P.C. 94, the Tea Party is just an extension of the GOP, the militant arm that is, they will have their wins in city, county, state and national political races, but in the end they will be absorbed by the GOP, the two party system will never allow for a third party to exist, the whole system is rigged, the only way that will ever change is for a complete collapse of the political system and that won’t be a pretty thing to witness.
P.C. 94 says
Layla, more news on the Tea Party candidate forum. There were NO Democrats invited. The Tea Party website says they are non-partisan. Doug Courtney heard about it and walked in. He was the only Dem there.
Today was the 9th candidate forum that John Mica didn’t show up for. Why doesn’t he want to talk/answer questions from his constituents?
Tom McKean says
AstroTurf much Beaven campaign?
P.C. 94 says
I have no idea what that means.