No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Costlier and Behind Schedule, Holland Park Renovation Swings For Another $50,000

| April 12, 2016

holland park renovation

An aerial view of Holland Park renovation as it was at the beginning of the month. (Palm Coast)

“You’re all aware that we’ve had some struggles” with Holland Park, Palm Coast City Manager Jim Landon told the city council this morning, his voice laboring as he introduced the latest discussion of the latest delays or cost overruns at the city’s venerable park. But he also quickly distanced himself from the origins of the struggles: “The project was started before I came here, so, about 10 years ago, that’s how long some of these things take as we go through budget,” he said, with engineers initially hired 10 years ago to work the project. “They have obviously put more hours into it than anticipated,” he said.

Holland Park closed 16 months ago—in January 2015—for what was projected to be an 18-month, $4.28 million renovation of the 26.8-acre park ($4.7 million when a 10 percent contingency is included). The council in December 2014 had approved the contract with Contractor Tumbleson White Construction Inc. of Gainesville, and the engineering firm of Arcadis US Inc. The contract was to extend 420 days to “substantial completion,” or about 14 months, and 30 additional days “from substantial to final completion.”

That completion was to have taken place in March. It hasn’t, and it won’t, until July, possibly sooner. “That’s the latest and greatest schedule from the contractor,” Carl Cote, the city’s construction manager, said, pegging the opening of the park to July 4.

Delays started early on. Construction was to start in January. It started three weeks late, on February 2, 2015, though that was nobody’s fault: gopher tortoises had to be moved.

The agreement also included a provision for liquidated damages—meaning the amount of money the city was to collect if there was a breach in the contract, such as delays: “$1,000 per day for each day the project extends beyond Substantial Completion and an additional $250 per day for each day the project extends beyond Final Completion.”

At the time, the council also approved an additional $100,000—or $60,000 for Arcadis and $40,000 for Littlejohn Engineering—as an “extension” of an existing contract for engineering services related to the renovation.

That additional $100,000 has proven insufficient, even though those services were to have been used as little as possible. On Tuesday, Landon asked the council to approve an additional $50,000 for Arcadis and Littlejohn.

This morning’s presentation reprised a slide from a few months ago, when the administration last provided an update, showing the gap between the projected work schedule and the actual (delayed) work schedule. Cote explained that one of the problems was caused by a subcontractor that has since been fired, but whose work had to be redone. “We weren’t making much progress because we were redoing work that had already been completed,” he said. “We’re starting to ramp back up, hopefully to bring us back towards our timeline.”

The city hopes to recoup some of those additional costs through the liquidated damages provision of the contract. “Many times when you have a project that is delayed, that’s why we have liquidated damages, it costs us more money, and so then we pass on those costs to the contractor because of the delays. We can’t tell you exactly what that’s going to be.” The reason for the uncertainty: like the tortoises, not all the delays are the contractor’s fault.

“But we’re going to recoup some of this,” council member Steven Nobile asked. Yes, Landon said, but only if the delays can be ascribed to the contractor. It’s the city’s burden to demonstrate that the delays cost the city money. There would normally be a final payment to the contractor when the project is completed and all the change orders have been tabulated (assuming there would be additional change orders, though the city does not expect any). “When you get to that final payment then there would be a determination as to whether it gets charged back to that final payment,” city attorney Bill Reischmann said.

When it’s all done, the dog park will have been expanded, two baseball fields and two soccer fields regraded and sodded, a new restroom built. Also returning: tennis, bocce and shuffleboard, basketball courts, handball, a completely redone playground. And, possibly, a cell tower site.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

13 Responses for “Costlier and Behind Schedule, Holland Park Renovation Swings For Another $50,000”

  1. YankeeExPat says:

    I went to the Holland Park for years, and never knew there was a Pond (probably retention) in it. Is that a new feature or was it there all the time?

  2. woodchuck says:

    Maybe the Riff Raff will move from Ralph Carter Park to the renovated Holland park.They might enjoy new atmosphere.

  3. BeenThereDoneThat says:

    It’s a great thing to see Flagler Counry investing so much of its tax dollars into parks still…

    That way when home values have sunk so low due to lack of high-paying jobs, high crime rates, and eventual high foreclosure again, the folks living there will have a place to go to forget about life for a while.

    Life well run right? yea…

  4. r&r says:

    Why do they whine about the golf course and the extra money needed to run it. The city council should look at what it takes for the people who enjoy these amenities for living here.

  5. Outsider says:

    What? The park isn’t going to turn a profit? Sell it! Sell it right now! At least the golf course isn’t overrun with hoodlums and muggers.

  6. Tommy says:

    The pond was added. That area was behind pavilion 3 in the back and was wooded

  7. Mark says:

    Looks like white privilege to me.

  8. Carol says:

    Taxpayer dollars hard at work once again

  9. Anonymous says:

    Who hired the sub-contractor that caused all the rework? THE CONTRACTOR.
    So why would the city fork over an additional $50k?

  10. YankeeExPat says:

    Please enlighten us Mark

    From what I can see there are No Polo Pony Stables, nor is there a Cribbage Auditorium for Thurston, Lovey and myself. Furthermore I don’t see any provisions for a proper Cotillion.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Since moving to Palm Coast, I have witnessed too many people, especially juveniles, streaming in and out of the park areas as though they were either high or on their way to becoming so. I have almost been run down by them on five occasions. That’s five too many, in my book.

  12. suewho1010 says:

    I appreciate that the city finally stepped up and redid the most popular park in Palm Coast for families. It is used by many families with children , adults on recreational teams, teenagers, seniors and so on. It needs to reopen soon the wait has been way too long.

  13. confidential says:

    So much noise abut the 5 millions cost of the repair and reopening of the Palm Harbor Golf course and they just spend as much in just one park and no one says zit!. Holland Park is a city amenity as much as the Palm Harbor Golf Course is…difference is that golfers pay to use the court, the community using Holland Park doesn’t. So detractors of the Golf Course out there imagine how much each park cost because we have several so far I remember Carter Park, Water Front Park, Herschel King Park, etc etc. and also to maintain those parks, before raising cane against our Palm Harbor Golf Course. Lets try a little fairness here when it comes to the fair distribution of our tax funds among us.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in