Brooke Anna Lorenzen, 19, of Palm Coast, was charged with DUI manslaughter and DUI with property damage in the 2020 crash that killed Mario Joseph Bizier, 56, on I-95. A warrant for her arrest was issued this morning and she was expected to turn herself in at the county jail today.
The crash took place in the early morning of May 6, 2020, near the Matanzas Woods Parkway interchange. Lorenzen, 18 at the time, a recent graduate of Pedro Menendez High School in St. Augustine and a resident of Crossgate Court West in Palm Coast, had worked that night at a restaurant in St. Augustine, then visited a friend beachside up there, where there’d been drinking. Lorenzen’s blood alcohol level, when it would be tested after the crash–she’d consented to a blood draw–read 0.111. In Florida the legal limit for drivers is 0.08.
Lorenzen was also “distracted by her phone,” as she told a Florida Highway Patrol investigator after the crash. At 3:19 that May morning, she was in the center lane close to a truck–a three-axle flatbed carrying building materials including plaster and lumber. Mario Joseph Bizier, 56, was driving the truck, a Mack 600. Like Lorenzen, a cheerleader at her school, Bizier was popular among his peers and people he worked with. He drove for Gleckler and Sons, the Jacksonville building supply company.
As she was on her phone, Lorenzen realized she’d approached too close to Bizier’s truck in front of her. She drifted to the outside lane of the three-lane southbound highway. She overcorrected, causing her first to rotate into the outside shoulder then veer back in across the driving lanes, right in front of Bizier’s truck, close enough to graze fenders. The Florida Highway Patrol investigator who investigated the crash said Bizier took evasive action to avoid crashing into her, but because of the heavy load and the type of materials he was carrying, the load shifted, causing him to lose control, run off to the the emergency lane, overturning and crashing into the guardrail. Lorenzen’s car was still drifting and again collided with the truck before sliding back across the lanes and coming to a rest past the shoulder on the right side of the road. (See a diagram of the crash below.)
Mario Joseph Bizier was pronounced deceased by a Flagler County Fire Rescue paramedic at 3:50 that morning, at the scene.
“He actually saved her life, really,” the FHP investigator said, describing Bizier’s evasive maneuver to avoid crashing into Lorenzen. “In talking to the boss and family, and in talking to the wife, that’s the kind of man he was, he’d probably take his own life than take somebody else’s.”
Lorenzen was herself hurt and transported to AdventHealth Palm Coast. Both sides of I-95 were affected by the crash, which was cleared by John’s Towing of Bunnell. The crash resulted in an insurance payout to Gleckler and Sons, the building supply company, of $104,355 for cargo and collision damages, according to court papers.
For Lorenzen, who had earned a scholarship to a Southeastern Conference university, the criminal charges are only part of the consequences of the crash. That October, Bizier’s wife, Tammy Michelle Bizier, filed a civil suit against Lorenzen and her insurance company for damages in excess of $30,000. Lorenzen has denied negligence: her answer in court places the blame for Bizier’s death on Bizier’s own negligence “and that his negligence was a contributing cause of this accident.” The answer also alleges that Bizier “failed to use an available and operational seat-belt or other safety equipment,” though the crash report contradicts that: “Shoulder and lap belt used,” it states. The accident, Lorenzen’s answer states, “was caused by an independent and/or intervening cause.”
As of three weeks ago, Tammy Bizier’s lawyers had not succeeded, despite repeated attempts to depose Lorenzen, leading to a motion to compel–a request to the court to order Lorenzen to be deposed. Last week, Lorenzen filed a motion to delay the trial, which had originally been scheduled for Dec. 13. She argued through her attorney–Michael McCoy of Jacksonville–that “the Traffic Homicide Report and all the evidence relating to the traffic homicide investigation still has not been released.” That is no longer the case: FHP’s work ended now that the warrant for Lorenzen’s arrest has been signed, starting the criminal proceedings’ trial clock. The next case management conference in the case is scheduled for November 30 before Circuit Judge Terence Perkins.
That is only one of two civil suits Lorenzen faces. In July, The insurer for Bizier’s Jacksonville company filed suit to recover the more than $100,000 in damages in the crash. Alfred Romero, who owned the Mercedes in the crash, is also named a defendant in that suit.
On the criminal side, DUI manslaughter is a second-degree felony with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison, and a minimum mandatory sentence of just over 10 years in prison in addition to probation and the permanent revocation of the driver’s license, if the individual is convicted. But a so-called “downward departure” from the minimum mandatory sentence is possible, meaning that it is within the judge’s discretion to go for a lesser punishment. But to do so, the judge would have to find mitigating circumstances. Even with that downward departure, the law caps the departure to a minimum of a four-year sentence. Put another way: absent an extraordinary plea deal, which would still have to be ratified by the judge, Lorenzen is facing an uphill battle to avoid prison time, if convicted.
If she were to turn down a plea deal and opt for a trial, she would risk a conviction and the replacement of the magnanimity of a plea offer with harsher terms come sentencing–as was the case with Josh Carver, the Palatka man a jury found guilty on Wednesday of leaving the scene of a crash with a death, now exposing him to up to 30 years in prison. That severe a penalty is very unlikely, given his clean record until now. But the judge is unlikely to revert to the plea terms offered him by prosecutors before trial: two to three years in prison, and seven years of probation.
Lorenzen also faces a charge of DUI with property damage, a first degree misdemeanor. Once booked at the jail, Lorenzen was expected to post bail on $50,000 bond.
Eileen Araujo says
pay a lawyer enough, you can get away with anything….sad
Peaches McGee says
You mean, her parents will be paying a lawyer enough. There goes her college fund and her life. She might be spared prison but a felony is still a felony and lifelong.
Internet Warrior says
That almost sounds like sympathy.
Just a thought says
Blaming the victim. That, in of it self, should be criminal. But for her action, he would not have crashed.
JimBob says
Putting aside the boilerplate legalese (a term of art for BS), it’s surprising that the suit does not name the Estate of Steve Jobs, whose IPhone invention has caused innumerable traffic deaths.
Mark says
Is it true what it says on the booking site that Brooke also killed an unborn child? Either wayamy years will be served in prison for killing some while drunk driving
FlaglerLive says
That is not correct. It is a different case, different individual.
Mark says
So a different Brooke Lorenzen that is 19 yrs old was booked into the FCSO on 10/1 for dui and death of an unborn child. Same name, same age, same county, similar incident, but youre saying it’s different?
FlaglerLive says
Sorry, the first reply was in error. The charge is listed correctly. law addresses a DUI death to a person or an unborn child. In this case the death was to a person. Had, for example, the pregnant mother of an unborn child been the victim of a crash and survived, but the unborn she was carrying had not, the same charge would apply.
Mark says
Ok I understand thank you. I guess my next point would be that the general public has already formed an opinion of this case and young lady under the idea she killed a unborn child as posted on the booking site. Also was she distracted by a phone or was it dui?
FlaglerLive says
She told FHP investigators she was distracted by her phone and her blood-alcohol returned a reading of 0.111, making it DUI.
Concerned Citizen says
My condolences to the family. Loosing a loved one this way is never easy.
Not long ago I was behind an older gentleman on his phone. And was not able to pass right away This is what I observed.
He was unable to maintain a stable speed. He would speed up and slow down. He was all over his lane and would veer close to oncoming traffic. As we approached a stop sign he went straight thru never slowing down. Thankfully I turned right. And finally got away from him.
I’ve had EVOC as a retired public safety employee and had training before I was allowed to get my full license. At nearly 60 and accident/ticket free I consider myself quite capable behind the wheel. I will tell you that I worry more about others than myself. The amount of aggressive distracted driving out there now is insane.
Some years ago my company insituted a strict no distracted driving policy. We are not allowed to text nor can we use a device in our hand. Handsfree calls may only be made when conditions are deemed safe. In short it can wait.
This whole accident was preventable and on so many levels. One life was taken needlessly. And one life has been ruined at a young age by a poor choice. I hope the judge sentences her to the fullest extent of the law. I lost a loved one many years ago to a drunk driver. It sucks.
Folks I implore you to put those devices down and stop fooling around with all the onboard systems. It can wait promise !! We also need to learn patience and to be kind again. The tailgating you do flashing your lights makes zero difference in getting to your destination.
Life is short. No need to make it shorter by being stupid.
Raymond bizier says
Thank you for that. He was my father. And it never gets easier its so hard not having my dad here with us on holidays. Life is too short.
Mary Fusco says
Several years ago my brother was an over the road truck driver. He was traveling along when a woman cut him off to get in front of him. In order to keep from hitting and killing her, he ran his truck off the road. He damaged the truck, lost his job, his insurance basically everything because it is almost impossible to get hired after such an incident. Luckily, he wasn’t killed. It should be against the law for any driver to have a phone turned on when driving. It is not necessary. People have become idiotic slaves to electronic devices. People do not understand that trucks cannot stop on a dime but their reckless driving while taking a call takes all precedence. Sickening!