No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

In a Historic Breakthrough, County Will Cede Old Courthouse to Bunnell for Its New City Hall

| July 9, 2012

Coming soon: Bunnell's new city hall.

Coming soon: Bunnell’s new city hall. (© FlaglerLive)

It will soon be the old Flagler County Courthouse no more.

Monday afternoon, the Flagler County Commission agreed to cede the 86-year-old courthouse—one of the oldest and certainly stateliest buildings in the county—to Bunnell, which will have virtually full ownership of the older portion of the building and will turn it into its city hall. Bunnell, which has secured $1.5 million to refurbish the building, hopes to do so in time for the city’s centenary celebrations next year. The agreement ends five years of costly uncertainty for the old courthouse, and almost three years of negotiations and plans roller-coasting on a succession of hopes and disappointments.

Click On:

No money will change hands, though the transaction isn’t quite free for either side.

At a joint meeting of their respective governments Monday, Bunnell and the county signed off on a mutual agreement drafted by the two panels’ administrations, though they still have to formally approve the agreement. The county is ceding only the older, 13,000 square-foot portion of the building, built in 1926, not the 36,000 square-foot annex built in 1982. The county is reserving the annex for a possible sheriff’s headquarters, if it can find the money to make the move.

But the conveyance of the old courthouse’s ownership to Bunnell, at no cost to Bunnell, is a coup for the small city—and a relief for the county: Bunnell’s government administration has been leeching off the county’s graces for almost four years, occupying county offices rent free in the county’s administration building, and holding its meetings in the government chambers usually reserved for county and school board business. Bunnell exiled itself from its own city hall in 2009 after heavy rains leaked through the old coquina building’s roof. That building is now the Bunnell Police Department’s home.

For the county, getting rid of the older portion of the courthouse is a financial advantage in some ways. The county has spent $1 million maintaining and repairing the old courthouse (including the annex) since vacating it in 2007, when court staff moved to its new digs next to the county administration building. The county is spending $75,000 a year just in basic maintenance. That cost won’t be erased: it’ll still have to spend money to maintain the annex. But it should be reduced considerably.

The three-page joint agreement with Bunnell is revealing in another way: the county was leery—to not say mistrustful—of handing the building to Bunnell without a series of conditions. Besides ensuring that the building may only be used for government purposes, the county is maintaining responsibility for “all interior spaces, to include sidewalks and parking areas,” prorating the cost of those repairs with the city. The county will also “be responsible for maintaining all building facades, not to include the Historic Courthouse roof, windows and doors. This will essentially include the brick, stone work and other historical, ornate features.”

That provision reflects several county commissioners’ and the Flagler County Historical Society’s concern to maintain the historic value and look of the building, although the society was conspicuously excluded from the talks that led to the deal. A plan two years ago that would have ensured a move of the society’s archives to the old courthouse was also absent from the new deal. The county will continue to mow the lawns around the entirety of the building, its old and newer portions.

“In lieu of the county giving the city the building at no cost,” the agreement also reads,  “the county will handle the contracting and construction of improvements to ensure a similar quality and appearance throughout both buildings.” Meaning the annex and the old portion of the courthouse. “The county will also ensure both buildings are brought up to all current building codes for [Americans with Disabilities Act] compliance, fire safety, electrical, and other life safety measures. This will be done in conjunction with the city’s representatives similar to the way the Government Services Building was constructed, with constant input from the school board representatives.”

The administration building was an entirely joint project because it entailed joint occupancy under the same roof. The old courthouse and annex are, in fact, distinct buildings. Bunnell could have been responsible for code compliance just as it would be for any of its other buildings (if it had any significant ones to speak of). The county is choosing to maintain a level of control to ensure that the work is accomplished by its standards as opposed to Bunnell’s. The county is maintaining a share of the cost of insuring the structure, leaving Bunnell to bear just a little over quarter of the cost of insurance. That’s based on the square footage split between the two governments.

Those arrangements did not please Commissioner Nate McLaughlin, who got testy when he raised issues with the agreement.

“If there’s no deed, there’s no ownership. Plain and simple,” McLaughlin said. “If you want ownership, that’s not what you’re getting.”

“That’s not true,” Barbara Revels, who chairs the commission, said, as commissioner Alan Peterson joined her to counter McLaughlin’s view.

Nate McLaughlin (© FlaglerLive)

“I’m sorry. I wasn’t speaking your opinion, I was speaking mine. Thank you,” McLaughlin shot back. “I respect your opinions. But that’s my opinion. I think it would be—what’s the word I’m looking for—I just don’t like the idea of saying to  Flagler Beach and Palm Coast and the other municipalities that though we won’t help you with your city hall, we will help Bunnell with theirs. I think turning the whole property over, if our intent is to put the sheriff in the annex—that’s just my opinion—put the sheriff in the annex and we make that agreement with them that they’ll allow them to go in there. But for us to use the county tax dollars to maintain the grounds around another city hall, is just so foreign to me.”

But McLaughlin had no support from other commissioners. Among Bunnell City Commissioners, John Rogers and Elbert Tucker were all for taking full ownership of the building, but the panel wasn’t ready to talk about that until it met on its own later in the evening. And Revels said the full ownership idea had not been on the table.


“We have not discussed this as a  board to take the whole courthouse,” Bunnell Mayor Catherine Robinson said. “What we have discussed are the finances to do the work.” The city secured a revolving $2.5 million loan from Intracoastal bank. It is devoting $1.5 million of that toward courthouse construction.

“Our banker’s here, the money is waiting,” Armando Martinez, the Bunnell city manager, said.

“This thing with the courthouse has been long enduring, and we are very, very close,” Robinson said later in the evening, at the end of her commission’s meeting. “So I’m really excited. Wouldn’t it be a neat thing if we could actually move all of our staff into the courthouse in next year’s hundred-year anniversary of the city of Bunnell. And there’s actually discussion about having a reenactment of the first commission meeting. We could do it in the courthouse. In the courtroom. Wouldn’t that be cool? In dress.”

Flagler County historic courthouse presentation

15 Responses for “In a Historic Breakthrough, County Will Cede Old Courthouse to Bunnell for Its New City Hall”

  1. Wasted says:

    A million dollars has been wasted maintaining the old courthouse since 2007. WASTED!!!! No wonder our taxes are going to be increased, and we have a $7 million dollar county deficit. If our commissioners were working for us don’t you think a plan would have been in place for this courthouse before it was ever vacated? The county wants to have all these stipulations and still say they’re turning it over to Bunnell. Come on Bunnell wake up and read the fine print!

    If you don’t have a deed what gives you ownership to real estate? I may own property I don’t know I own.

  2. Biker says:

    Flagler county politics. What a joke.

  3. JGA says:

    @ Biker, the joke is on us, they keep waisting and we keep paying and putting them right back in office.

  4. tulip says:

    Bunnell has used that part of the building for free and the county paid for it’s upkeep. Now Bunnell will own that part of the building, be responsible for its upkeep and maintenance and the County will now spend LESS money because they only have to maintain the annex that was built in 1982.

    There’s nothing wrong with that proposal and Bunnell “pays its share.”

  5. Ken Dodge says:

    Bunnell’s city hall is bigger than Palm Coast’s city hall. How embarrassing!

    • Angela says:

      That’s by Palm Coast’s own doing! They had a city hall and chose to sell it. Then they crammed themselves into a place much too small for them so that they could complain and try to force tax payers to pay for a shiny new city hall. I smell BS on that one.

    • Think first, act second says:

      And it did not cost them the $10 million Palm Coast wants to spend.

  6. tulip says:

    @ Ken, maybe so, but Palm Coast has better shopping. (lol)

  7. Lefty Loon says:

    Oh gee……I was hoping they would turn it into a homeless shelter and raise taxes some more to restore the old building. Keep raising those taxes…..keep it going…..this is the only way to make sure our beloved Obama will complete his mission of less private sector jobs and more people on welfare and disability. He is doing goo, there were 85,000 put on disability last month and only 80000 jobs created…….he is really doing it now.

    • Shelia says:

      Lefty I thought the governor was going to create jobs??? What happened to that??? I he hired his friend to waste $65 million on redo the Unemployment website 4 times since he has been in office. He should have using that money to help create jobs like he said he would. Stop blaming the President for this mess. He was given a huge mess and has done a GREAT JOB considering a lot of people think he is trying to socialize America.

  8. question says:

    CONGRATULATIONS Bunnell…on your brand new, bouncing baby City Hall.

    Very happy this cool ole historic building will live on!

    May you have many, many years of great governance within its walls and grounds.

  9. Rain says:

    Besides the million dollars plus already spent, why is a landscaping company mowing the lawn and basic grounds keeping? What expenses will the City of Bunnell take over? Knock the thing down and let the City build their own City Hall and pay for it!

  10. PJ says:

    Bunnell is saving a little bit of our history with a sense of professionalism and class.

    Congratulations to the Commissions of Bunnell and the City Manager with the smarts to get it done, WOW!!!!!!!!!!

    And yea it’s BUNNELL…………………

  11. Jennifer Lopez says:

    Oh boy , I can only imagine what will go on in that building,
    How far is the Chief of Police from the Finance Director. ?
    many things to come I am sure

  12. Ron Hubbard says:

    Why didn’t they turn it into another Dollar General or Family Dollar store? We definitely need another one!
    The city would have actually made money.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in