• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Measure Forbidding Local Governments From Using Red-Light Cameras Advances

February 4, 2016 | FlaglerLive | 6 Comments

red light cameras palm coast
Red-light cameras are an endangered species. (© FlaglerLive)

Senate Transportation Chairman Jeff Brandes’ latest proposal to drive red-light cameras out of Florida squeezed through its first committee Thursday.


The proposal (SB 168) was backed by the Brandes-led Senate Transportation Committee in a 4-3 vote along party lines, with opposition also coming from local-government lobbyists and the Florida Police Chiefs Association.

Brandes’ measure would repeal a law known as the Mark Wandall Traffic Safety Act of 2010 and, as a result, prevent local governments from using the cameras for traffic enforcement. It’s the third year in a row that Brandes has tried in one way or another to repeal the Mark Wandall Act, which gave local governments authority to install red-light cameras.

Palm Coast installed cameras–illegally–in 2007, when state law did not permit their installation locally. A Florida Supreme Court decision in 2014 ruled those installations illegal, clearing the way for motorists who’d been ticketed under the old scheme to get reimbursements. But the court did not address the constitutionality of red-light cameras, deferring to the 2010 state law. That’s the law Brandes and others have been attempting to repeal.

Brandes, R-St. Petersburg, contends local governments use revenue from the cameras as a “backdoor” or “hidden” tax increase and that intersections are not made safer by any changes to driving habits related to the cameras.

Click On:


  • Palm Coast May Reduce Red-Light Cameras to 5, But Won’t Scrap Program For Fear of ATS
  • Palm Coast Close To Suspending Red-Light Camera Program as Legal Challenges Mount
  • Palm Coast Suspends Part of Red-Light Camera Enforcement, But $158 Fines Still Being Issued
  • Palm Coast Memo on Red-Light Camera Clash With Court Shows Missteps and Assumptions
  • Palm Coast’s Red-Light Cameras: How the City Council Locked In a Fraud on Taxpayers Through 2019
  • For 2nd Time in 6 Weeks, a Flagler Judge Declares Palm Coast’s Red-Light Camera System “Improper” and Issues
  • Judge Craig Indicts Palm Coast’s “Bad Faith” Red-Light Cameras and Exposes City’s Legal Flaws as He Contests Violation
  • Palm Coast Getting Fleeced of Red-Light Camera Dollars, Harming Local Economy
  • Red-Light Camera Ticket Revenue: Palm Coast, 14%, Private Company, 86%
  • State Study Skeptical of Red-Light Cameras’ Effectiveness
  • Palm Coast Sours on Traffic Cameras, Calling Fines “Outrageous,” “Overkill” and “Unfriendly”
  • Without Evidence But Plenty of Cash, Palm Coast Approves 52 Spy Cameras, Up from 10
  • Palm Coast Opts to Keep Red-Light Cameras On Despite Legal Cautions and Dearth of Evidence
  • Illegal for 4 Years, Palm Coast’s Red-Light Cameras to Comply With State Law; Cash Dips
  • Spy-and-Snap Red-Light Cameras Will Enrich Private Company At Palm Coast’s Expense

“The simple truth is red-light cameras don’t increase safety, that they’re essentially a revenue-generation tool,” said Brandes, who has repeatedly sought to revamp or unplug the cameras in recent years.

There is no conclusive evidence showing red-light cameras as an effective traffic-safety tool. Evidence shows that while they reduce one type of accidents such as t-boning, they increase rear-end accidents. At one point, Palm Coast had upward of 40 cameras spread around town. But the scheme came under increasing attack from motorists and even local judges, who criticized Palm Coast government’s administration of the system. Last year, an appeal court decision found the administrative scheme controlling the levying of fines to be illegally conducted across Florida, including in Palm Coast. That caused many cities to end their program. Palm Coast scaled back its installations to just five cameras, and voted to end the contract with American Traffic Solutions, the private company running the scheme, in 2017 instead of in 2019.

Previous measures at the Legislature have sought to lengthen the time for yellow lights and to improve signage at intersections. Also, in 2014 Brandes put the brakes on a proposal to prevent local governments from using the cameras when he wasn’t able to line up enough votes in support.

It remains to be seen how much mileage Brandes gets on this year’s effort.

Democratic members of the committee said local governments should maintain the option to use the cameras and that the technology changes driving habits for the better.

“I’ve had one red-light ticket. And after I got it I never got another one because I stopped doing it, and that was probably like three or four years ago,” said Sen. Oscar Braynon, D-Miami Gardens. “So I kind of believe personally that they work.”

A staff analysis of the bill noted that numerous studies have been conducted on the safety impact of red-light cameras “and the studies are contradictory.”

Sen. Geraldine Thompson, D-Orlando, said the measure goes against local control.

“I think it continues to take us down the road of thinking that we know best here in Tallahassee, rather than the people who represent the cities and represent the counties and are closer to the people,” Thompson said.

Scott Dudley, Florida League of Cities legislative director, took exception to Brandes saying municipalities use the cameras as a tax source.

“You called these a hidden tax,” Dudley said. “I think it’s a hidden tax that can be easily avoided by not running a red light. If you don’t do it, you don’t pay the tax.”

Dudley added that the league doesn’t support or oppose the technology, but it argues local governments should maintain the option to use cameras.

Owners of vehicles photographed going through red lights are subject to $158 fines. For each fine, $75 is retained by the local government and the rest goes to the state Department of Revenue.

State numbers indicate that 75 jurisdictions operated red-light cameras in the most recently completed fiscal year.

The Senate committee Thursday also made a change to the bill so that it would take effect July 1, 2019. The proposal initially was to be effective when signed into law. Brandes said the change is in part to allow existing contracts between municipalities and red-light camera companies to expire.

The bill must still get through two more Senate panels. A similar measure in the House (HB 4027) was approved last month by the Economic Affairs Committee and has only one more stop — the Appropriations Committee — before reaching the House floor.

–FlaglerLive and Jim Turner, News Service of Florida

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. James C. Walker says

    February 4, 2016 at 5:51 pm

    There is a VERY real chance to end the money grab scam of red light cameras statewide. Florida residents need to call or write their state Representatives, Senators, and the Governor to politely but clearly insist that the bills HB4027 and SB168 to ban red light cameras become law. Let each official know you find the cameras to be unacceptable and that complete removal is the only acceptable solution. Contact information: http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/sections/representatives/myrepresentative.aspx
    http://www.flsenate.gov/senators/find
    http://www.flgov.com/contact-governor/

    ACT to end the scam of red light cameras statewide.

    James C. Walker, Life Member – National Motorists Association

  2. Brad W says

    February 5, 2016 at 7:26 am

    Here’s a question, IF the red light cameras are seen as a “hidden tax” then isn’t every traffic fine levied by municipalities (or even the state) also the same thing and therefore be ended? Why should speeding detection by a radar gun and subsequent fines be allowed? Drivers seen to be driving through a red light by a Deputy should not be fined? Drivers passing school buses and the idea of installing cameras on them to hold offending drivers should be “illegal” and eliminate yet another way to try and help keep our children safe?

    Basically what we’ve heard throughout this entire argument is that people can be left to follow the rules and there is no problem, but that is false. All of the “unconstitutional” stuff is merely junk because what people are upset with is that people got caught and held accountable by a more efficient system. I’m actually in favor of the red light cameras and adding speeding and school bus cameras. And if you want to address the “who’s driving argument” simply issue front license plates and grab the photo/video from both angles.

  3. Billy Bob says

    February 5, 2016 at 2:21 pm

    Brad W:
    Why not go ahead and give Big Brother ALL of our personal freedoms? Install cameras in our cars and homes and schools so that police can monitor 24/7 and catch every infraction? After all, a law is a law and everyone must be in 100% compliance at all times.

    I certainly don’t condone somebody blasting through a red light with willful disregard. But it’s been proven that the vast majority of red light tickets were for harmless right on red turns as that turned out to be a huge revenue stream. When they put a red light camera at the emergency entrance to Florida Hospital Flagler on SR 100 I lost any remaining respect I had for them. I’m glad the cameras are (mostly) gone.

    I for one do NOT want the government monitoring my every move. Not for nefarious reasons but because I truly believe it’s a slippery slope to give away your personal freedoms, despite the best of intentions. The argument “if I’m not doing anything wrong, why should I care if the government is watching me?” is flawed logic.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument

  4. Brad W says

    February 5, 2016 at 5:29 pm

    So, Billy Bob, who then picks and chooses which infractions are “harmless” and which are not? Aren’t drivers supposed to come to a complete stop before turning on red? Yes, they are.

    So what is the difference if we plant a human being there who then issues tickets at lights? Is that OK?

    Sounds like to me the argument is about a more efficient system for catching people doing what they shouldn’t be doing in the first place.

  5. Roll on 2 says

    February 9, 2016 at 5:10 pm

    Good! Get rid of them. I have lost count of how many times I had to blow thru a red light to avoid being rear-ended or go around someone who panic stops in front of me to avoid rear-ending them.

  6. Richard says

    March 12, 2016 at 8:43 pm

    I personally have no problem with red light cameras. I got a red light camera ticket once, it was justified, I paid the fine and now I’m more carefully. End of story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Pierre Tristam on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, May 22, 2025
  • Rhonda Conway on Margaritaville’s Compass Hotel in Flagler Beach Opens in Buffett-Themed Celebration of a Downtown Remade
  • Rhonda Conway on Margaritaville’s Compass Hotel in Flagler Beach Opens in Buffett-Themed Celebration of a Downtown Remade
  • Km on Flagler County Clears Construction of 124 Single-Family Houses at Veranda Bay in Latest Phases of 453-Unit Development
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Friday, May 23, 2025
  • Laurel on Sheriff Warns of Scammer Peddling Fake Arrest Warrant
  • Ed P on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, May 22, 2025
  • Sherry on Maga’s Fearful War on Universities
  • Sherry on Israel’s Catastrophic Starvation of Gaza’s Millions
  • Laurel on Margaritaville’s Compass Hotel in Flagler Beach Opens in Buffett-Themed Celebration of a Downtown Remade
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, May 22, 2025
  • Sherry on Afrikaners are South African Opportunists, Not Refugees
  • Laurel on Palm Coast’s Golden Chopsticks Buffet Open Again 2 Days After Sanitation Inspection Ordered It Closed
  • Laurel on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, May 22, 2025
  • TR on Palm Coast City Attorney Calls Mayor Norris ‘Unprofessional and Inappropriate’ 3 Weeks After Censure for Similar Behavior
  • Joe D on Flagler Emergency Management Director Jonathan Lord Warns of a Different Disaster Ahead: the Vanishing of FEMA Money

Log in