• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Proposal to Let Death Row Inmates Represent Themselves on Appeal Sparks Sharp Opposition

December 22, 2021 | FlaglerLive | Leave a Comment

David Snelgrove, right, formerly a Palm Coast resident convicted of murdering an elderly couple, had been on death row until, following a change in law, his lawyers successfully argued for a commutation to life in prison. Snelgrove, whose mental competency was always in question, may not have been capable of achieving the same result had he represented himself. (© FlaglerLive)
David Snelgrove, right, formerly a Palm Coast resident convicted of murdering an elderly couple, had been on death row until, following a change in law, his lawyers successfully argued for a commutation to life in prison. Snelgrove, whose mental competency was always in question, may not have been capable of achieving the same result had he represented himself. (© FlaglerLive)

The Florida Supreme Court is considering a proposal that would allow Death Row inmates to represent themselves in certain court proceedings, an idea that has drawn opposition from defense attorneys, prosecutors and mental-health advocacy groups.




Justices last week scheduled a Feb. 10 hearing on the proposal, which centers on circuit-court proceedings that take place after defendants have been convicted and sentenced to death. The “post-conviction” proceedings often involve issues such as whether defendants received adequate legal representation in their trials or whether newly discovered evidence could clear them.

  • grand living realty

The proposal, which was released in May, has spurred opposition from a wide range of groups that argue Death Row inmates are not qualified to represent themselves in the often-complicated proceedings, including many inmates who have mental illnesses.

“Florida law does not protect capital defendants with serious mental illness from execution despite significant obstacles to their ability to fully participate in capital proceedings,” said a document filed in August by the Florida Mental Health Advocacy Coalition. “This problem is heightened in capital post-conviction, a particularly complicated part of the capital process, even for the most experienced lawyers. It is also the final opportunity for a capital defendant to prove to a court that they should not be killed. The proposed amendments ignore this reality and must be rejected.”




Five state attorneys filed comments in September opposing the proposed change. Miami-Dade County State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle, for example, wrote that it is unlikely defendants “could competently represent themselves in a capital post-conviction setting” — a view echoed by the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

“A defendant sentenced to death who wants to proceed pro se (representing themself) cannot be expected to have the education and legal expertise that this (Supreme) Court requires of an attorney who would represent that defendant,” the defense lawyers group wrote in October. “A large portion of inmates on Florida’s Death Row also suffer from mental health disorders, adding to the complication related to self-representation.”

The proposal does not detail why the Supreme Court is considering the change. But in 2014, when the Supreme Court adopted a rule that included preventing Death Row inmates from representing themselves in such proceedings, Justices Charles Canady and Ricky Polston dissented from that part of the rule.
Canady, now the chief justice, wrote in a brief dissent that he did not support “prohibiting defendants in capital post-conviction proceedings from representing themselves.”

The Supreme Court has undergone a major ideological shift to the right during the past three years, after Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis was able to replace longtime Justices Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince, who were required to retire in January 2019.

Pariente, Lewis and Quince helped make up a generally liberal majority, and the conservative Canady-led court has shown a willingness to revisit death-penalty legal precedents.

Criminal defendants generally have a right to represent themselves in court, but that right has not been extended to the post-conviction proceedings in death-penalty cases. The proposed change would involve amending a rule of procedure for the courts system.




Attorney General Ashley Moody’s office, which handles large amounts of death-penalty litigation, has not submitted a filing to the Supreme Court taking a position on the proposed change.

The Florida Department of Corrections also has not taken a position, but it submitted comments in August that said the “proposed changes would entail significant logistical and security challenges for FDC (the department) in pro se proceedings.”

“An inmate proceeding pro se in capital post-conviction litigation might require additional resources, as well as additional access to law library materials beyond what is contemplated in (the Florida Administrative Code),” the department said in the filing. “Documents are commonly provided to defense counsel in electronic format, which would require increased technology access for a pro se inmate to review. For example, (the Florida Administrative Code) governs inmate property and for security reasons does not contemplate allowing inmates to possess disks, memory cards or other electronic storage media. Storage of files and legal materials by inmates is limited in quantity and might be found to be insufficient for the needs of a pro se capital post-conviction litigant.”

–Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Concerned Citizen on Flagler Sheriff’s Sgt. Breckwoldt, In Charge of Narcotics Unit, at Center of Abuse of Power Allegation
  • Dennis C Rathsam on Flagler’s Property Values Still Rose Robustly, Continuing Potential Windfall For Local Governments
  • The dude on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Travis on Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody Wants Supreme Court to Kill Recreational Pot Initiative
  • Jimbo99 on 251-Unit Wilton Apartment Project Breaks Ground in Town Center, Employing 300 During Construction
  • sean on 251-Unit Wilton Apartment Project Breaks Ground in Town Center, Employing 300 During Construction
  • YankeeExPat on Voters Approved an Amendment For Racial Equity in Districts. DeSantis Wants It Ignored.
  • One term and done on As Investigation of Principal Paul Peacock Nears Conclusion, His Absence from Reappointment List Draws Speculation
  • Dennis C Rathsam on Palm Coast’s Belk Converted Into One of 16 Outlet Stores as Company Struggles
  • Joshua Rosenbloom on Ron DeSantis Is in a War With Disney He Cannot Win
  • Jay Tomm on Flagler’s Property Values Still Rose Robustly, Continuing Potential Windfall For Local Governments
  • pete on Flagler Replaces Confusing Letter-Based Evacuation Zones With Neighborhood Names as Hurricane Season Begins
  • Day One. on Flagler Sheriff’s Sgt. Breckwoldt, In Charge of Narcotics Unit, at Center of Abuse of Power Allegation
  • Day One. on Flagler Sheriff’s Sgt. Breckwoldt, In Charge of Narcotics Unit, at Center of Abuse of Power Allegation
  • anon on Upside of Unrequited Survives Book Ban at FPC, But 57% of Challenged Titles Were Removed From Flagler Schools This Year
  • Mark Huston on 240-Unit Apartment Complex Planned Next to BJ’s Wholesale Club on State Road 100 in Palm Coast

Log in