By Taifha Natalee Alexander
Few topics in education have dominated the news over the past few years as much as efforts to ban critical race theory from the nation’s schools. The topic is so pervasive that researchers at the UCLA School of Law Critical Race Studies Program have created a new database to track attempts by local and state government to outlaw the teaching of the theory, which holds, among other things, that racism is not just expressed on an individual level, but rather is deeply embedded in the nation’s laws and policies. The Conversation asked Taifha Natalee Alexander, director and supervisor of the database, about the overarching purpose of the database and what it has shown thus far.
1. What prompted you to track efforts to ban critical race theory?
We launched the database shortly after President Donald Trump issued an executive order in 2020 that sought to outlaw federal agencies’ and contractors’ teaching what the administration described as “divisive concepts.” These concepts include the notion that “the United States is fundamentally racist or sexist.”
We anticipated that similar measures would follow at the local and state levels. And they did. One year after Trump’s executive order – formally known as Executive Order 13950 – was introduced, federal, state and local governmental agencies introduced 250 measures to outlaw the teaching of critical race theory. The theory is meant to explain how race and the law have been used to produce systemic racism in American society.
Although President Joe Biden has since revoked Trump’s executive order, today the number of efforts to ban critical race theory has grown to 619, according to our database – CRT Forward – which was formally launched in 2021. The database covers the period from the issuance of Trump’s order to the present day.
The overall purpose of the database is to track when and how these measures to ban critical race theory have spread across the nation. I believe this will enable people to better understand the breadth and scope of governmental assaults on critical race theory.
2. What does your database show?
The database does more than identify and track measures to ban critical race theory. It also contains an analysis of each measure. More specifically, each measure is reviewed to identify the type of institution being targeted. Examples of targeted institutions include K-12 schools, colleges and universities, and government agencies.
The analyses also look at the type of conduct that is being prohibited or required. For instance, if a measure relies on surveillance of school curriculum or classroom lessons, we note that. We also look at whether measures include potential penalties, such as loss of funding.
3. What noteworthy trends has the database has brought to light?
Recently, the Critical Race Studies Program at UCLA released “Tracking the Attacking on Critical Race Theory,” a report from CRT Forward’s Tracking Project. The report highlights five unique anti-CRT national and content-specific trends:
- 40% of anti-CRT measures mimic language in Trump’s executive order
- anti-CRT measures have been introduced in 49 states
- 90% of all measures, and 94% of all enacted measures, target K-12 education
- of the measures targeting K-12 education, 73% regulate classroom teaching and 75% regulate curricular materials
- of the measures introduced by state legislatures, 1 out of 3 include enforcement provisions that would withhold funding from school districts as a consequence for violations
When you take local efforts into account, the database shows that anti-CRT measures have been introduced in every state except Delaware. That means in 49 states, even if efforts to outlaw critical race theory were not introduced at the state level, they were introduced in at least one municipality or by a local school board.
Consider, for example, California. There, even though no critical race theory bans have been proposed at the state level, 11 have been introduced at the local level, seven of which have been enacted. As a result, the percentage of measures enacted against critical race theory in California is higher than in states like South Carolina, where 3 of 19 proposed bans have been enacted.
Taifha Natalee Alexander is CRT Forward Project Director at the University of California, Los Angeles.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Dennis C Rathsam says
What would you expect from someone who lives in that shithole called California, where people are leaving in droves to get away from all thier liberal bullshit, the taxes, $5.00 gas, add that to the murders, & violence! And lets not forget how much food cost on the left coast!
Samuel L. Bronkowitz says
You’re right, Dennis! California should be embarrassed by its attempt to ban critical race theory at the local level!
The increasing suppression of the free exchange of ideas is directly proportional to the increasing power of fascist dictatorships. We may disagree with one another; but when we stop fighting for the right of free speech of the ones we disagree with, we’re bound for the death of democracy. Typically, people who have nothing to stand on, persist in their lies, slander the other sides, and dig in their heels when challenged; unfortunately, such folks appear to be an increasing majority here.
JOE D says
Wow, if you focused on the minimal efforts to block Critical Race Theory in LOCAL California jurisdictions, and IGNORED the DATA in the article about the anti-Critical Race Theory in the rest of the country…..you REALLY missed the point of the RESEARCH and the ARTICLE.
I REMEMBER PERSONALLY the race related events, segregation, racist rules, regulations and the initial BLOCKED efforts at INTEGRATION. I’m SORRY if the TRUTH of those events are “upsetting “ to students and the public now….but sometimes the TRUTH HURTS….and without the truth being brought to light, we are going to repeat those travesties now ( and apparently ARE repeating them in MANY places)!
PS: before you jump back in personal attacks, I’m MALE, over 65, WHITE, DEVOUTLY CHRISTIAN, and lived through those TRULY sad days in our Country’s history in REAL time! We are doing our children NO FAVORS sweeping it all under the carpet because the TRUTH might OFFEND someone 50-60 years later!
It should OFFEND EVERYONE!
Old Guy says
I couldn’t agree with you more.
Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. Critical Race Theory is not about making people feel bad that there ancestors have owned slaves, that we decimated the Indian tribes, and at times have incarcerated populations intime of war. It’s about trying to acknowledge that “Yes. it Happened” and also the fact that we not those people. We have gone beyond that and moved into a better place. The problem is with those who would ignore the fact that these things occurred. There is an old saying. “Those that forget the past. are doomed to repeat it. Today we allow partisan politics and fear to determine how we act towards one another. The same things that allowed racism and bigotry in the past. I for one would prefer to accept what happened in the past and look toward a more peaceful future. if that means I am Woke. Then OK I accept that too.