No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Opposing “Medicaid in Disguise,” Florida House Set to Kill Senate Health Plan Friday

| June 4, 2015

florida legislature

The 2015 Florida legislative session, so far. (Dario Sušanj)

Despite several changes made in recent days to assuage the concerns of the Republican majority, the Florida House remains poised to defeat a health-care expansion plan backed by a bipartisan group of senators.

More than two hours of questioning on the House floor Thursday gave little reason to believe that the bill (SB 2-A) would survive a vote scheduled for Friday. For all of its new provisions, House Republicans said, the so-called Florida Health Insurance Affordability Exchange, or FHIX, remains Medicaid expansion in disguise.

The plan, approved by the Senate on Wednesday in a 33-3 vote, would use Medicaid expansion funding from the Affordable Care Act — commonly known as “Obamacare” — to help lower-income Floridians purchase private health insurance. If approved by the federal government, the plan would also give the state increased federal funding levels for the newly eligible Floridians.

That, GOP House members said, is proof enough of nature of the idea.

“If the plan is dependent on the 90 percent federal match rate outlined in the ACA (Affordable Care Act), and it’s a requirement that we serve the exact population defined by the ACA, would you not agree that this plan is truly Medicaid expansion as envisioned by the ACA?” asked Rep. Matt Caldwell, R-North Fort Myers, questioning Rep. Mia Jones, D-Jacksonville.

Jones was thrown into the unusual role of defending a bill she hadn’t crafted and openly admits is flawed. No Republican from the House majority could apparently be found to present the measure, though a few are expected to vote for it Friday.

“I call this the Florida expansion,” Jones said during the discussion of the bill. “It does not immediately or at any point put the participants into Medicaid.”

Shortly before the debate began, the White House Council of Economic Advisers issued a report saying Florida could insure an additional 750,000 people and bring in an extra $5.9 billion in federal funding by adopting Medicaid expansion, though it wasn’t clear exactly how those numbers might be different for FHIX.

Supporters say as many as 800,000 Floridians would meet income limits for health care under the plan, though work requirements likely mean that only 400,000 to 500,000 people would actually be eligible.

The White House report also rebutted the notion that states could end up paying more under Medicaid expansion. According to an analysis by the state House Majority Office, the new FHIX plan would save money initially but then cost the state an additional $66.3 million in its tenth year.

“States electing to expand their Medicaid programs are likely to realize large savings in other areas of their budgets that offset even the modest increase in state Medicaid spending after 2016,” the White House report says.

In any case, Republican and Democratic leaders said they don’t expect the bill to pass the House. Republicans hold an 81-39 majority, though some members of both parties are out of town, and could afford to have about 20 members defect without losing the vote.

Still, some Republicans hammered away at FHIX.

“How can we and most people not see this as a potential massive tax hike on the people of this great state of Florida?” asked Rep. Blaise Ingoglia of Spring Hill, who doubles as chairman of the Republican Party of Florida.

Jones and House Minority Leader Mark Pafford, D-West Palm Beach, said the measure is not what they would have proposed, but represents the best chance to get something like Medicaid expansion done during the ongoing special legislative session, which was called to deal with health care and the budget.

“I don’t think there’s a single member of the Legislature that’s happy with this bill, including us,” Pafford said. “We’re not thrilled (with) the way it’s written.”

House Speaker Steve Crisafulli also seemed to rule out a compromise idea that Senate leaders had proposed Wednesday, when they suggested that some reforms House leaders have pushed could be added to the bill and approved by the Senate. The House is looking to revamp insurance coverage for state workers and overhaul some longstanding health-industry regulations.

But Crisafulli, R-Merritt Island, said that wouldn’t be enough to get House leaders to accept the Senate plan.

“No, it’s still got its flaws,” he told reporters. “It’s Medicaid expansion, regardless of what others say.”

13 Responses for “Opposing “Medicaid in Disguise,” Florida House Set to Kill Senate Health Plan Friday”

  1. Merrill Shapiro says:

    Floridians are dying while our Republican dominated legislature plays their fiddles. Can someone convince me that our legislators care about those of us they represent?

  2. groot says:

    Playing national politics on the state’s time. They should have just expanded Medicaid. It makes more sense than the Robin Hood approach of the ACA. It appears the state will get it’s federal share for LIP dollars and this is probably only because of hospital industry lobbying. Otherwise, Scott was going to try and run LIP like MLB.

  3. Flatsflyer says:

    When will the people of Florida finally realize that the “Kochsuckers” they elected to represent them are really Terrorists and are only interested in destroying the American way of life. These criminals are fully supportive of and endorse Sheria Law being pushed by the Religious Right.

  4. Ben Casey says:

    “How did a crook get elected to Governor?” Well, it’s a rhetorical question at this point.

    Q: How many uninsured Floridians die daily while these scumbag politicians play God?
    A: About six people a day.
    Who cares? What’s a life worth? “ZERO” according to the Tea-Baggers (body-baggers).

    Tea Party: fringe group of bigoted selfish, indifferent people who can’t spell, and prop up
    thieves as political candidates.

    Shame on you.

  5. YankeeExPat says:


    Definition of constituent by Merriam-Webster

    : Any one of the people who live and vote in an area: a member of a constituency

    Get back to Work, Do your Job, You are required by Oath to represent all citizens regardless of Income level or whether they voted for you or not!

  6. Cali says:

    How about Mr. Shapiro & Groot ask someone who has an income of 137% poverty level, that is currently insured through Obamacare (thank heavens for those subsidies & cost sharing otherwise it would not be any type of affordable!) how they feel about medicaid expansion–as they would LOOSE their Obamacare insurance and be thrust into medicaid. Wow! What a shocker! How cool was it for folks to lose their insurance when Obamacare came into law? No one liked it. Why should someone who is capable of paying for their Obamacare insurance (with the assistance provided) be forced into medicaid because of their income level–that is what will happen, that is how the law was written. The State House is right in rejecting this. Medicaid expansion will help those who fall below the income level to get assistance for Obamacare, but it will hurt many more and bloat the rolls of medicaid with people who are capable of paying for their insurance with a little assistance.

  7. Newbie says:

    It is very simple. The legislators will kill this bill because their employers (the voters in their districts) want it killed.

  8. PCer says:

    It is up to each and every one of us to contact our Representative to let him know what you think. Complaining about it here won’t get you anywhere. Our Rep is Paul Renner…

  9. Ramona says:

    They are wasting time and our tax money. The Feds are going to make FL take Medicaid expansion by not-so-slowly cutting off federal funding for hospitals. Rural and perhaps some mid-size city hospitals will close if this happens. They know this but are politically grandstanding . . .

  10. groot says:

    It’s cheaper to just put them on expanded Medicaid. Assigned the enrollees to a Medicaid Managed Care Plan, capitate them and that’s the end of it. The managed care plans accept the risk, they get a set amount from the state and it’s done. Almost all Medicaid enrollees are on managed care now anyway.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Medicare for everyone! Why should only old and the disabled get it? They are the ones bankrupting the system more than anyone but you don’t hear other people saying; who cares, cut them off, they are a drain and they deserve to die.

  12. groot says:

    As I said they’ll end up capitated and on the Medicaid Managed Care rolls and the managed care plans accept the risk. They’ll also be on share of cost so, they’ll have some hefty deductibles. This has been political grand standing by Scott.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
news service of florida

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in