Franklin Delano Roosevelt was still in his first term when Jules Kwiatkowski was born. So was Barbara Sgroi. He’s 85. She’s 83. They’re the senior-most elected officials in Flagler County, older by a few years than their next-oldest competitor, Bunnell City Commissioner Bill Baxley. They sit on the East Flagler Mosquito Control District board.
Kwiatkowski and Sgroi are both running for re-election for one of the least-known offices in the county. The mosquito district is a three-seat elected board with control over a $2.2 million budget and one mission: to massacre mosquitos in Palm Coast, Bunnell and the barrier island. Most Flagler County taxpayers pay a share of their property taxes to the district, albeit a very small one. The typical home valued at $175,000 and homesteaded at $50,000 pays about $30 a year. Still, it’s not a negligible agency. Its mission is central to the quality of life of local residents. Its responsibility to run a financially sound and environmentally safe operation requires oversight and transparency.
The agency was in crisis in 2017 when it overspent on building a new headquarters at the south end of the Flagler County Airport, was suddenly faced with a $1.1 million hole, required a retrenchment in its workforce, required a manpower bailout from the county administration, which sent its own finance hands to help, drew a state audit, and caused its long-time director, Joe Cash, abruptly to retire in that summer after some 39 years on the job.
Nevertheless, the board papered over scandal and hole by determining that it was mostly an accounting error, though the accounting error did not account for the job cuts, the county bailout or the overspending on the new building. The audit did not find malfeasance but did find a long list of irregularities.
After Cash’s retirement, the job went to Mark Positano, a sharp-eyed manager whose tenure has been quieter. The three-member elected board has been down to two members since February 2019, with just Sgroi and Kwiatkowski, who are not as sharp-eyed as their director, and generally not assertive or questioning: in meetings surrounding the financial breakdown and shortly thereafter, they moistly acquiesced to whatever was presented to them.
The third seat has been vacant because its former occupant, Florence Fruehan, the former physician, is now a felon, joining Kimberle Weeks, the former supervisor of elections, in that category of former Flagler elected officials: Fruehan a little over a year ago pleaded guilty to felony battery on a person older than 65 after a state investigation led to his physician’s license being yanked after the state found him to have groped women in his practice. Fruehan had sought the seat on the Mosquito Control District to bring some accountability and oversight to the board. It didn’t last. (Somehow Fruehan was still listed as an active voter in a recently acquired database of eligible voters in the county, though as a felon still on probation, he is not eligible to vote.)
Kwiatkowski initially ran for a seat in 2004. He lost in a three-way race. In 2008, he beat Barbara Sgroi by 4 percentage points out of more than 34,000 votes. He was not challenged in 2012, but that year Sgroi beat Konnie Rea by just 138 votes out of 35,240 cast for Seat 2. In 2016, the year Fruehan was elected, neither Kwiatkowski nor Sgroi were challenged.
Now, for the first time since 2008, all three seats on the mosquito board are being contested simultaneously, a direct reflection of the board’s troubled few years. Sgroi and Kwiatkowski are fighting for re-election.
The races are ostensibly non-partisan, though few really comply with or believe the pretense: all three races are being followed by the two parties, with a Democrat and a Republican in two of them and two Republicans in the third.
Kwiatkowski, a Democrat, is a retired mailman and longtime, now retired, volunteer firefighter. His challenger is Perry Mitrano, 62, is the former Bunnell director of solid waste and the water utility. That race has generated the most interaction between candidates, reflected in their exchanges in the pages of the Palm Coast Observer. (See below.)
Sgroi is being challenged by Michael Martin, 71. Both are Republicans. Neither is much for words, neither having posted a profile of his or her candidacy on the elections supervisor’s site or on social media. Martin’s campaign tag line appears to be from his son: “Vote for my dad!” (Martin corrected us: the line is attributed to his dog, Bob. See his comment below.) And in an inexplicable error, the website listed for his campaign, on the supervisor of election’s website, is actually Mitrano’s Facebook page.
Martin Brabham, 58, a Realtor for 22 years, was the 2018 president for Flagler County Association of Realtors and has been a Palm Coast resident since 2001. He said he decided to run because the seat was open and he got encouragement to do so from others, though like his opponent, Ralph Lightfoot, he’s running a word-of-mouth campaign: neither has filed financial contribution documents because neither raised or spent money on the campaigns.
Brabham is a Republican. His opponent, Ralph Lightfoot, is a Democrat (and a former head of the local Democratic Party). Lightfoot retired from IBM as an IT manager there for 27 years, and has lived in Palm Coast since 2004. He tried to win an appointment to the mosquito control board after Fruehan had to relinquish the seat, but no appointment was made. So he is now running for the seat.
Over the past few weeks the Palm Coast Observer ran letters by Kwiatkowski, Mitrano and Sgroi about the race. The letters were not intended as an exchange, but turned into one after Mitrano decided to answer Kwiatkowski, and the Observer subsequently gave Sgroi a chance to address claims by Mitrano. The Observer gracefully gave us permission to run the exchanges below. They appear as published in the Observer, without additional editing but for minor quirks (Sgroi chose to write each paragraph of her response in quotes. We removed the quotes) and with the addition of an editor’s note that fact-checks a claim.
Yard signs don’t get votes. You get votes by the merits and service you give to the voters. I have served 12 years as commissioner and chairman of the East Flagler Mosquito Control District. I have kept the ad valorem tax the lowest it has been since 2013, and it keeps going down. I think I have earned your vote. Remember, mosquitoes don’t bite, they suck.
Editor’s note: Kwiatkowski is making a misleading claim about the district’s tax rate. The tax rate the district has just enacted, which applies to next next year’s tax bill, will be the lowest, by a thousandth of a cent, since 2015. But the board has raised the tax rate four times in the last 10 years of Kwiatkowski’s tenure, including in 2017 and 2018, the years surrounding the district’s financial crisis. The tax rate has not kept going down, as Kwiatkowski claims. The rates of the last 10 years are as follows:
$0.2038 in per $1,000 in taxable value in 2011
$0.2540 in 2012
$0.2533 in 2013
$0.2423 in 2014
$0.2376 in 2015
$0.2395 in 2016
$0.2403 in 2017
$0.2518 in 2018
$0.2458 in 2019
$0.2375 in 2020
Perry Mitrano:
I would like to rebut my opponent’s letter to the editor. Here are somethings Mr. Kwiatkowski fails to mention in his letter.
Let’s start off by saying I’m not going to bash or demean my opponent and or the rest of the East Flagler Mosquito Control District Commission by saying anything about their person. I have met them both my opponent and the other incumbent in Seat 2. They are very nice folks, but that’s it.
I am campaigning for Seat 1 because of the mismanagement of this current board of commissioners. Read these articles to hear a different story:
https://flaglerlive.com/133720/state-audit-flaglers-mosquito-control/
https://flaglerlive.com/110790/flagler-mosquito-control-crisis/
In this article, it has several other links that made me so alarmed that I waited three years for this election. In my opinion as a taxpayer, all three of these commissioners should have resigned due to their own internal audit found the commission to be “complacent.”
This caused Sen. Travis Hutson and Rep. Paul Renner to call for a state audit that found a mess. I’m not sure if the commissioners back then realized, but we almost lost the East Flagler Mosquito Control District. As a result of their poor judgment and mismanagement, a director was retired, the office manager resigned, four jobs were cut from the budget, and a setback of reserves was nearly wiped out.
My opponent went on to say “I wasn’t aware of the situation” and the number two seat said, “It’s just a little issue.” I’m not making this stuff up.
So I’m appalled, angry, and disgusted by what I heard; however, nobody on the commission resigned.
Since this mess, one commissioner was removed due to personal issues by the agricultural commissioner, but nobody was replaced by special election. I was told that the reason for this was the cost to do so about $90,000. They could not afford to do it at the time because the budget was nearly broken. Instead, they have been functioning at a two-member board for the last three years — unheard of because there is nobody to break a tie. If someone gets sick, the district could not technically pay their bills.
Recently, on one of the conference call meetings, I even heard one of the commissioners say they never used to get financial statements from the past director, and she complimented the current director on the fine job he is doing. That’s the only refreshing part: The current director and staff are doing great.
I say, as a taxpayer, vote the complacent board out. Time for some new blood for the mosquitoes to look for, but the difference is the “Mosquitoes don’t bite they suck” as my opponent says. I say “Fight the Bite,” vote Perry Mitrano for East Flagler Mosquito Control District Seat 1 because I promise to be engaged.
Jules Kwiatkowski:
After many months of interviews and thousands of documents, the state has not found any monetary discrepancy. The only errors were they found that we made some change orders with out following Florida regulations. We are not CPAs.
If I may respond to Commissioner Kwiatkowski’s selective understanding of the state audit report requested by Rep. Paul Renner and Sen. Travis Hutson. The only part of the dozen or so audit findings found against the board was the fact there were no illegal activities. What about the rest of the story conveniently forgotten by Commissioner Kwiatkowski?
On that footnote, the rest of the findings uses the term “The Board” referencing the current Board of Commissioners’ consistent failures to follow, use or even train for policies that would have prevented this egregious audit.
For 12 years, Seat 1 Commissioner Kwiatkowski — and eight years for Seat 2 Commissioner Barbara Sgroi — they only reacted to the audit. Neither uses any type of outreach to the general public other than the grand opening of the new facility shrouded by reporters’ questions on the $1.1 million oversight.
I guess that outreach is not important to these commissioners, only that the rates were kept low. Very shallow on their part to only speak of the only thing they have done: keep taxes low. It makes me suspect on how they may have even come to the numbers. How did they calculate the number with their problematic bookkeeping?
Mr. Editor, here is the summary of the findings as written and copied from your own news article by staff writer Jonathan Simmons February 25, 2019:
The following state of Florida Auditor General operational audit summary findings and the East Flagler Mosquito Control District management’s responses are compiled from the audit report.
State audit finding 1: Contrary to State law, the District did not use a competitive selection process to obtain architectural services for the Consolidated Facility Construction Project.
East Flagler Mosquito Control District management’s response: As stated in the Auditor’s findings, the District utilized the “piggy back” method of contract procurement when soliciting the services of the design firm. ”Piggy backing” is a common practice utilized by local governments when the selection process has already been undertaken by another agency, in this case, Flagler County. The District will develop policies and procedures before considering any such projects in the future.
Finding 2: The District did not maintain records evidencing professional liability insurance required by the Consolidated Facility Construction Project architect contract.
District management’s response: The District concurs with the finding. Proper contract management by a qualified project manager should have included a procedure for verification of insurance coverage. The District will develop policies and procedures before considering any such projects in the future.
Finding 3: The Board had not established policies or procedures for evaluating the suitability of proposed construction sites prior to obligating District resources for site leases.
District management’s response: The District concurs with the finding. The Lease with the County Airport should have included a clause for cancellation had the site not been suitable for the project. The District will develop policies and procedures before considering any such projects in the future.
Finding 4: Contrary to State law, the District did not retain all records identified in the construction contract agreement.
District management’s response: The District agrees with the recommendation. The former Director should have retained and cataloged all documents related to the project. The District will develop policies and procedures before considering any such projects in the future.
Finding 5: Although the Consolidated Facility Construction Project was completed a year after the planned completion date, District records did not evidence consideration of damage assessments against the contractor for delays.
District management’s response: The District agrees with the recommendation. Many circumstances delayed construction, as mentioned in the Auditor’s findings. Determining if the contractor bore any responsibility for delays would have required legal action. The building was completed, with a reasonable delay because of change orders and Hurricane Matthew without additional cost related to delays. The District will develop policies and procedures before considering any such projects in the future.
Finding 6: District procedures for monitoring construction project change orders could be improved.
District management’s response: The District agrees with the recommendation. Again, the former Director should have retained and cataloged all documents related to the project. The former Director should have also followed the District’s purchasing policy for approving purchases and properly informed the Board when required. The District Attorney will provide an evaluation for construction damages reimbursement.
Finding 7: The Board did not have policies and procedures for direct purchases of construction materials and the District did not take advantage of sales tax exemptions by making direct purchases of construction materials or document why such purchases would not result in cost savings to the District.
District management’s response: The District agrees with the recommendations. Options for the direct purchase of materials should have been formally documented and cost savings from sales tax exemption for supplying materials should have been weighed against the assumed risk of directly supplying materials to determine if there was any economic feasibility to this option.
Finding 8: The Board had not established policies and procedures for budget development and monitoring.
District management’s response: In the past, the District had followed a simple manual provided by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services to prepare and track the budget, just as many mosquito control programs around the State do. The District has in the intervening time researched and prepared an anti-fraud policy, 5-year capital outlay plan, Capital assets policy, revised purchasing policy, purchased and implemented new accounting software, enhanced financial reporting so that the Board has better information with which to make decisions, and retained the services of a CPA to serve as a part-time CFO and is another check on financial monitoring and process improvement. We will continue to strengthen our policies and procedures in this area.
Finding 9: The beginning fund balance for the 2016-17 fiscal year original budget was overstated by $1.1 million because the estimates used by District personnel did not consider the most current available data.
District management’s response: The Auditors’ findings are consistent with what our independent auditor initially reported. Specifically, that $1.1 million was not misspent but was a budgeting error that should have been found and corrected by previous staff early on. Consequently, incorrect information was reported to the Board. The District now uses only Reserve and untapped contingency funds to estimate the beginning fund balance for the following year, which is a far more conservative method than the previous. The District will continue to improve its’ policies and procedures on budget preparation and monitoring.
Finding 10: District policies and procedures did not require and ensure that budget amendments that increase the budget are posted on the District Web site within 5 days after adoption and remain there for at least 2 years.
District management’s response: Previously, only the current year’s Budget documents were posted to the District’s website. Budget materials will remain on the website for at least two years.
Finding 11: District records could be enhanced by using capital projects funds to separately account for construction projects.
District management’s response: The way in which the expenditures for the capital projects were reported may have been cumbersome but did not negatively affect the tracking of expenditures, as this is a separate issue from the incorrectly stated estimate for the beginning fund balance. As stated, earlier in this report, budget preparation was the critical component for error. The use of separate funds will be further considered for capital outlay projects.
Finding 12: The Board had not adopted policies and procedures establishing the minimum unrestricted fund balance for the General Fund.
District management’s response: The District concurs with the recommendation. The GFOA recommendation may not be sufficient since the fiscal year begins October 1 and the intervening months until December when ad valorem revenue is collected to fund the current year’s budget are prime hurricane months. This potential for extreme storm events, as has happened in the past two years in a row, necessitates a greater fund balance to ensure services. A policy for replenishing funds is possible. As long as a policy for maintaining fund balances is in place as part of an overall budget policy, the Board can make decisions as to how to address replenishing funds as they see fit based on current circumstances as raising funds is the sole discretion of the Board at that time.
Finding 13: As of March 2018, the District had not established any anti-fraud policies or procedures.
District management’s response: Anti-fraud policy was adopted on April 16, 2018, and is based on the model policy available from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Staff will receive training on this annually. To be clear, no fraud has been detected or reported.
Mitrano continues in his words: Ultimately, the board are the bosses, and the district director is the employee. The director must manage the day-to-day operation, and the board answers to us, the taxpayers.
Let’s make this clear to everyone that pays the East Flagler Mosquito Control fee: You have a choice. Vote for your current board that was the root cause of the negative audit findings as per the actual audit, or vote for change.
Barbara Sgroi:
We moved to Palm Coast 23 years ago. Through the years, I volunteered with many organizations, including Palm Coast Fire Department, COPS, Flagler County Sheriff’s Office. I now serve on the East Flagler Mosquito Control Board Seat 2.
I would like to address some of Mr. Mitrano comments. Most are past tense. At that time, the former director was in office. Things have changed for the better.
First of all, we’ve been accused of having too much cash through overtaxing. But it would be irresponsible to not have adequate reserves as stated in our policy, which is based on the Government Finance Officers guidance.
We are rebuilding our reserves after keeping tax rates low for many years because of the recession and now have them at acceptable levels and can adequately address the growth we are about to embark upon in and outside the district. Contrast our prudent reserves and no tax increase this year with the county’s and city’s increases with the county’s keeping the same tax rate in excess of the roll-back rate; the county’s reasoning was to rebuild their reserves.
Specifically, we will start the fiscal year with a reserve at $1,005,368. This amount is comprised of:
Capital Outlay Reserve: $251,737
Cash Reserve: $692,119 (adding $42,119 from revenue this year for future helicopter maintenance of engine turbines estimated cost $71,500 for two years)
Sick and annual leave: $61,512
Cash Reserves: These funds are to be used when unexpected costs arise beyond what has been planned with contingency. They also provide funds to spend at the beginning of the fiscal year before ad valorem revenue is collected in December.
Future Capital Outlay: These funds are to aid in the purpose of items on the five-year capital outlay program and for long-term capital considerations. The district is heavily reliant on equipment to accomplish our mission planning for replacement of current equipment and acquisition of new types of equipment is a critical part of planning the budget.
Sick and Annual Leave Reserves: The expected cost of leave payouts upon separation from employment can be estimated by average staff turnover and any planned retirement.
As far as the fiscal year 2020/21 operating millage rate district-wide is .2375 mills which exceeds the rolled back rate of 0.2375 mills by 0%.
For example: If your home is valued at $100,000, your taxes for the year would be $23.75.
In conclusion: The district is financially sound.”
The exchanges in the Observer end there. Today, Mitrano added one more response on his Facebook page, which he introduces by making a baseless claim against the Observer: “Although they printed my rebuttal, it just seems that along with cultural bias, race, and religion or, for that matter, who we might be as a person, there is just too much negative press they likely would not have engaged me unless I was causing controversy.” You can read his Facebook entry here.
Jan Reeger says
It isn’t enough to just be a nice person. The purpose of this Board is oversight and the members should be able to account for every penny. I never vote to replace incumbents just for the sake of change. But in this case, because of their history, it is time to elect all new members and that is what I plan to do. I do know Perry and I do know he will study and investigate every nuance. He will know the numbers.
Steve says
Time to make changes. Start with this Board. Fine job to the older Vets. but give up the ghost already.
Mike Martin says
I am Mike Martin, candidate for the East Flagler Mosquito Control District Seat 2, running against Barbara Sgroi. The error in the website listing on the Supervisor of Elections page is strictly their error, not mine, I do not have a web page. I am NOT a politician, just a concerned citizen. My “Tag Line”, as you call it, is not about my son, but my dog, Bob, who is well known in the L Section and usually accompanies me wherever I go. I have been at the Library most days since early voting started. I am using Facebook as my communications choice. I have a page “Mike Martin for East Flagler Mosquito Control District Seat 2”, and post regularly on 3 other Facebook pages. I have posted numerous videos as to why I am running, mainly because I believe Mrs Sgroi has shown her incompetence to be responsible for $2.2 Million of the taxpayers money, and also because no one was running against her. In her two terms of office she has shown herself to be merely a rubber stamp, approving whatever comes before her and never asking any questions. So I want to offer the voters a choice. An election with only one candidate for office is not an election, it is a coronation!
One additional issue. As I have been campaigning for Mosquito Commissioner I have been dismayed to learn of how many people don’t know the District even exists. They pay their taxes, but have no idea that there is a separate County Agency that will provide them with Mosquito spraying upon request. One of my goals, win or lose this election, is to make every person who lives in the District aware that it exists, that they pay taxes for it, and that they can request service at no additional cost. Why have the current Commissioners done such a poor job of publicizing a public agency?
Celia M Pugliese says
After the 2017 financial debacle is my opinion that we need Mitrano and Martin on the Board.
Abus Schlage says
I want to comment about the taxes. County Commissioner Mullins wants to bring mosquito services to the rest of the County, which means the people who already pay taxes for mosquito control could end up paying twice as much because there is no property value to tax outside of the current boundaries. Perry Mitrano, Mike Martin, and Martin Brabham are in the Mullins club. Vote for them if you want to pay more in taxes.
Maybe FlaglerLive can ask them about these plans?
FlaglerLive says
The candidates are welcome to address the question in this space.
Candidate Perry Mitrano says
Hello Abus Schlage,
Excellent question, and cool handle for a padlock!
First, let me say I’m not in anyone’s club with regards to favor.
I can’t be bought or pressured into something that does not cut through the litmus test of fiscal responsibility to the taxpayer and the East Flagler Mosquito District operations.
With all that said, let’s move on to what is happening now for the Westend customers.
This is the way I understand it to be operating, and remember, I am still an outsider to the District. I believe I have these facts correct for this explanation:
I say customers because, at this time, you have an on-call service with no established budget by your Commission. They budgeted 12k last year, but that number is included in your special assessment is shared with road improvements, swale work, and other services the County now provides to you all out there from the special assessment.
I never campaigned to service the Westend of the County, but growth seems inevitable everywhere. I’m sure that mosquito’s complaints go to your Commissioners.
It will take knowledge and experience to prepare the District for growth. I have those attributes.
The District will have to consider growth and the agreements that the County has with them currently; it’s like an as-needed service.
This question of Mosquito Control service comes up several times a year, especially if there are extensive rains. The County right now will call the District to service the area of complaints.
This is not how the District likes to control mosquitoes as they use surveillance, science, and understanding the species to be sure the process is handled in an environmentally safe and friendly manner.
This is a much higher cost service that the rest of the Couthy is paying for today.
So, where does that leave off concerning your question?
If you think that just two commissioners can make the plan for everyone is not so likely.
Because that would trigger a violation of the ethics board, and I can assure you I would be the one making the complaint.
I am honest, have integrity, and will do the right thing; it’s as simple as that.
Will you get mosquito control out west?
That is up to you, your Commissioner, to request a workshop and a CBA (Cost-Benefit Analysis) presented by the East Flagler Mosquito Commission & Staff. If the County Commission favors the offer and like the value, you get the services.
It is not a decision only made by the East Flagler Mosquito Control District.
Until then, not much will change to your current service.
Yup, you heard it right, no side deals from this Candidate.
“Fight the bite!”
Sincerely, Candidate Perry Mitrano for Commission Seat #1
East Flagler Mosquito Control District
Mike Martin says
I am not in anyone’s club, and I do not take orders from anyone. I want to keep the Mosquito District as a separate agency, the way it has always been. One thing I will never vote to approve is adding areas to the current District that will not pay for services they need. I am a fiscal Conservative, and will never burden the current taxpayers of the District with additional taxes to pay for services to anyone else. This District has has enough of poor fiscal oversight! That is why I am running. I have spoken to Joe Mullins once, and I did not ask him to endorse me. He chose to do so. I will be happy to work with Joe and everyone else on the County Commission to ensure that everyone can receive service, but adding additional areas must be carefully considered, and must NEVER burden current taxpayers with additional costs when they will not be receiving additional benefits. Do not make false accusations!
Rusty says
What do the positions pay?
FlaglerLive says
$4,800 a year.
snapperhead says
I voted all Republican for EFMCD board. I don’t want mosquitoes like socialist countries Cuba and Venezuela. Them damn mosquitoes should go back to the countries they came from. Make EFMCD Great Again!
S.shiverdecker says
I voted for mitrano and Martin. Tired of my tax dollars being spent irresponsibly.
Celia M Pugliese says
To Mitrano and Martin my concern and to be clarified and resolved is: Our East Mosquito District covers north and south to Maryneland St Johns county line to Old Dixie Highway Volusia county line and west only to Rte 1, to eats our A1A ocean front and for this we Palmcoasters pay mosquito control in our ad valorem taxes once a year in my case $35.24 that if multiplied by maybe 35,000 Palm Coast homes generates maybe over $1,200,00 a year. Now did you Perry say above that the county contributes 12k for that on call service? If so is well underpaid meaning we Palmcoasters are getting thin out service to provide those in the unincorporated areas practically free spraying then as I do not see west of Rte 1 a Mosquito Control District on those tax bills on James Gardner FPA site, Can the Board clarify this to us right now? As the reason we voted to incorporate by referendum in 1999 was because this county was taking our services away in kind to serve the unincorporated areas and Palm Coast started looking like a dump, specially the Palm Coast Parkway maintenance neglected, as ITT left us in their hands. Now come to my mind why Coffey and his BOCC accomplices not only forced current and past Mosquito Control Board to build the unnecessary Mosquito Castle in county airport “lease land” and the helicopter purchase…as East Mosquito control paid by Palm Coasters is not enough large to justify any of two specially the chopper…unless they had in plans to use it for the west end right in “on call service” for ranchers and residents that do not have/pay West Mosquito Control District on their ad valorem once a year?I been told they are spraying and if so they are using for nickels the services for mosquito control that they are thinning out, if so to Palm Coasters that foot the bill. No wonder we have to call over mosquito swarms in PC all the time. I have a neighbor that moved from John Anderson and said mosquitos eat them alive there she couldn’t be outdoors gardening as she can now in Palm Harbor PC. We need answers to our questions as the foot of this county BOCC is still in Palmcoasters financial paid services. Then I expect to have an answer from both candidates Mitrano, Martin and also Pierre if can investigate further. Thank you in advance.
Mike Martin says
Hi Celia, I can only speak for myself. The Mosquito District purchased their helicopter 15 years ago. They use it to spray large areas of wetlands, salt marshes and other large open tracts where ground spraying isn’t feasible. They have more spray trucks than licensed operators, due to layoffs that occurred because of the more than $1.1 Million deficit that happened 4 years ago. Those positions were never refilled. So now there are only a few licensed operators that can use the spray trucks. This has resulted in less service. The District is still rebuilding their Reserve Fund, which was taken to help make up that $1.16 Million deficit. The District boundaries (which are available to the public on the web page “flaglermosquito.com” need to be looked at. Areas considered for inclusion must be able to pay their own way for service rendered to them. I will never (firm promise) vote to add additional areas to the District unless I am convinced that these new areas will have enough property value to pay for their own service needs. Poor financial oversight from the current Commissioners is why I am running. Poor public knowledge about the District is another of my main concerns. It is appalling to me that so many taxpayers living in the District have no idea it even exists. When I have told some people what I am running for they look at me as if I am joking. I hope this answers your questions. Please feel free to contact me directly: by phone 571-299-0034, by email [email protected]. I extend this invitation to anyone who is interested.
Candidate Perry Mitrano East Flagler Mosquito Control District Commission Seat 1 says
Hi Celia,
You are the perfect person to join the future class of the best outreach program if elected called “The Mosquito Academy.” I can’t take credit for this suggestion but I will support the out-reach program if they set it up. There those questions you are asking will be made clear and answered. Like what number do I call? Can I get a Tech to my home to see why I have so many mosquitoes? How does my tax assessment get calculated?
You know many of your questions could have been answered if someone asked the current Commissioners at the Mosquito District. NOBODY ever does, I put out more information since announcing my candidacy than the current Commissioners have done combined for the last 12 years.
Let’s point out a few things you did have a lot of points I’ll try my best to stay focused ok.
The East Flagler Mosquito Control District covers as you said Marine Land south to the Flagler Line west to the Railroad tracks. I can’t be perfect with the boundaries but you get the picture.
If you go to my FaceBook page I have the service area map there. https://www.facebook.com/VotePerryMitrano
ITT, the incorporation of Palm Coast, the new Mosquito HQ, the helicopter, etc are now in the past. As a candidate, I have to look forward and learn from their mistakes.
They need the chopper. There are areas not accessible by truck or even foot also, it covers more territory rather quickly. If elected I will ensure that a helicopter is in the CAPEX plan, forever.
Let talk about services. Everyone in the District is paying for a higher level of service than an on-call type. I often say they use surveillance, science, knowledge, and experience to keep the program effective that’s the most effective level of service we are paying for.
Outside of the district, it is a special assessment, as I pointed out in my post above the County includes other services like road maintenance, stormwater, and others. The special assessment is based on taxable road frontage and the millage. Remember agriculture is exempt from assessment but not the homesteads.
Right now us Palm Coasters are paying our fair share and are not expected to pay for the rest of the County. That’s not going to change. As the commercial for insurance on TV says “You pay for what you get.” On that note, any new business like sub-divisions will have to be included in the plan but based on many factors. I yet must learn how they calculate the cost.
For now, if you or your neighbors have mosquitoes call only the mosquito control district https://www.flaglermosquito.com/, or email them at [email protected], or better yet go to their FaceBook page to let them know. https://www.facebook.com/eastflaglermosquito
I hope I was informative and helpful towards your questions.
Sincerely,
Candidate Perry Mitrano
Celia M Pugliese says
Thank you Perry Mitrano for your reply. I sure call and they come when we have mosquito problems as I learned the system after ITT left us. and then mosquitos became a problem. They do have a very cordial and helpful tech that makes sure our problem is resolved. He also told me that the helicopter was needed for the swampy areas were there are more breeding environment and hard to access by land. Lets hope more info and transparency will be available when you and Martin get in hopefully. Remember East Mosquito Control is an independent district and the FCBOCC should not have any authority over that board as I believe and we need your boots down in the ground there even when the position pays so little is more volunteering than revenue geared. Good luck!
Wow says
And nothing to do with the 100,000+ per year salary in a county where the median Household salary is $52,466.00.
Mike Martin says
You are mistaken, a Mosquito Commissioner is payed $400 per month, $4,800 per year.
Candidate Perry Mitrano East Flagler Mosquito Control District Commission Seat 1 says
Where is the 100k job?
Celia M Pugliese says
I think they refer to the position paid to the last Manager of the East Mosquito Control that resigned a while ago after the budget deficit debacle.