No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

GOP Plan Scraps Individual Mandate Only to Create New, 30% Penalty For Laggards

| March 23, 2017

Paul Ryan's version of Obamacare does not eliminate penalties so much as it redefines them. (Tony Alter)

Paul Ryan’s version of Obamacare does not eliminate penalties so much as it redefines them. (Tony Alter)

The Affordable Care Act’s tax penalty for people who opt out of health insurance is one of the most loathed parts of the law, so it is no surprise that Republicans are keen to abolish it. But the penalty, called the individual mandate, plays a vital function: nudging healthy people into the insurance markets where their premiums help pay for the cost of care for the sick. That has required Republican lawmakers to come up with an alternative.


The GOP approach is called a “continuous coverage” penalty. It increases premiums for people who buy insurance if they have gone 63 consecutive days without a policy during the past 12 months. Their premiums would rise by 30 percent and that surcharge would last for a year. While the ACA assesses a fine for each year people don’t buy insurance, the GOP plan would punish those who decide to purchase it after not being in the market.

Much is at stake. If this approach fails to prod enough healthy people into buying insurance, rates for everyone else in the insurance pool will rise, destabilizing promises by President Donald Trump and GOP leaders to make their Obamacare replacement more affordable. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that millions fewer people will buy insurance if the individual mandate is repealed and replaced with a continuous coverage surcharge.

Why people allow their insurance to lapse

Some simply can’t afford the premiums, like Sheila Swartz. She and her husband, Don, who has a heart condition, dropped their policy in December after learning monthly premiums were going to increase by about $140 to $530. “You can’t get blood out of a turnip,” said Swartz, who lives outside Nashville, Tenn., and works as a house cleaner. “If you can’t afford that premium, you can’t afford that premium.”

Others stop paying premiums when they lose a job or are hit with unexpected costs in other areas, such as major home or car repairs. “If you have to pay rent or health insurance, you are probably not going to choose health insurance,” said Bruce Jugan, a health insurance broker in Montebello, Calif.

Some people try to game the system, taking the calculated risk of going without insurance until they get sick or know they need expensive medical care, such as for maternity or an elective surgery.

Both the Affordable Care Act and the GOP proposal include a deterrent by limiting people from enrolling anytime they want. People must wait for annual enrollment periods, usually in the final weeks of the year, meaning that some people might have to wait months before getting coverage. (People still can get insurance during special enrollment periods if they lose a job, get divorced or have another specified major life change.)

How tough is the GOP penalty compared with the individual mandate?

Under the ACA, the average individual mandate penalty in 2015 was $442, according to the Internal Revenue Service.  The GOP penalty would vary based on cost of premiums but generally would be more expensive than paying the mandate’s penalty. A 40-year-old with annual premiums of $4,328 would pay an extra $1,298 because of the GOP surcharge.

“It’s got teeth,” said Cheryl Damberg, a Rand Corp. economist. “In some ways, it’s a more punishing penalty, and it’s going to hit people who are least capable of financially affording it.”

Seth Chandler, a law professor at the University of Houston Law Center who has been critical of the Affordable Care Act’s insurance markets, said he is skeptical the GOP surcharge is high enough to make people enroll. “I am concerned that the Republicans are succumbing to the same softness of heart as the Democrats succumbed too when they set the individual mandate [fine],” he said. “If you start to see insurance companies object or drop out of the markets, that’s a sign this thing is miscalculated.”

Two conservative economists at the American Enterprise Institute, Joseph Antos and James Capretta, argue the penalty is “far too small” to be effective. “Healthy consumers are likely to take their chances,” they wrote. “With the repeal of the individual mandate, and the retention of the ACA’s insurance rules, the overall effect would be significant market turbulence, starting immediately in 2017.”

The CBO predicts that there would be a brief increase in the number of people holding insurance in 2018, as roughly 1 million people buy coverage to avoid the surcharge. In most years afterward, however, about 2 million fewer people would buy policies, either because of the surcharge or because of the requirement they provide documentation proving they had been insured. The CBO said healthy people in particular would be more likely to avoid buying policies.

The plan has some parallels to Medicare’s late enrollment penalty, which is applied to premiums for people who did not sign up upon turning 65. But Christopher Koller, a former Rhode Island health insurance commissioner, doubts the GOP penalty would be as effective. “Medicare is an entitlement with the force of government behind it,” said Koller, now president of the Milbank Memorial Fund, a foundation in New York that focuses on healthy populations. “You get lots of notices about what your obligations are as you approach that age.”

What about people who can’t afford premiums?

The GOP surcharge contains no hardship exemptions, unlike the individual mandate, which allowed people to escape paying a penalty if premiums would have eaten up too much of their income (8.16 percent in 2017).

In 2015, 5.6 million people paid the individual mandate penalty, but another 11 million claimed a hardship exemption, according to the IRS.

Lower-income people are going to have even more trouble buying — and keeping — coverage under the GOP plan, experts said. The ACA’s premium subsidies are based on income, and millions of people on the poorer end of the spectrum do not have to pay anything for premiums if they choose the cheapest plan. The GOP plan would offer a flat tax credit that adjusts only for age. The penalties would make some even more reluctant to buy insurance — especially if they are relatively healthy.

“I think we would just end up with a lot more uninsured people, and they would clearly be the type of people who are less able to navigate and less able to afford insurance,” said Geoffrey Joyce, director of health policy for the University of Southern California Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics.

Republican lawmakers say their plan rightly places the responsibility on individuals. It is a view shared by some health insurance brokers like Helena Ruffin, a broker in Playa Vista, Calif. She said that a continuous coverage requirement would “limit those people who are not playing by the rules.”

“I am favor of the penalties,” she said. “Whether or not people are going to pay attention is another story.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

9 Responses for “GOP Plan Scraps Individual Mandate Only to Create New, 30% Penalty For Laggards”

  1. Knightwatch says:

    I’ve lost track. Just what problem with the Affordable Care Act is the Republican plan (aka TRUMPCARE) solving? What is so wrong with the ACA that Republicans are going to fix by reducing coverage, e.g, eliminating coverage for pre-existing conditions and eliminating coverage for children until age 26? How are premiums lowered by allowing insurers to charge the elderly five times – that’s 5X – the premiums of younger people? How is our cost burden reduced when the Republican plan virtually eliminates health insurance for 24 million – that’s 24,000,000 – people who will go back to free care in hospital emergency rooms at five times – that’s 5X – the normal hospitalization cost. And we – that’s all of us paying health insurance premiums – will foot the bill.

    Why do Republicans do things to hurt the most people? Because it’s more important to be Republican than to be smart, or helpful, or compassionate, or factual.

  2. Ws says:

    If your car insurance lapses you get a penalty. Seriously this should have already been in place with Obamacare. That is just simple common sense. Finally a government that can think clearly!

  3. #Bernie2020 says:

    It is, you get a fine when you file your taxes if you don’t have insurance. Trumpcare is just changing the wording.

  4. #Bernie2020 says:

    Knightwatch

    It’s all about money. Insurance companies and the rich aren’t making enough money so we need to pay more. Normal Republican line. Obamacare isn’t an entitlement. It is a tax break for anyone that makes less than 250K a year and they can’t stand that.

  5. The Ghost of America says:

    Here’s hoping that they push it through, because it’s going to literally fuck 90% of the republican base. Congrats, you finally get the healthcare you deserve. :)

  6. Sherry says:

    When will the American public finally understand that FORCING vital services through private “for profit” companies, like insurance companies, will always have our citizens paying too much? A plan for “Universal Healthcare” similar to Medicare is the only solution to driving DOWN premiums and raw medical costs. . . . while RAISING benefits overall! Leaving it to capitalism and “market forces” will only serve to “maximize profits” for the insurance and health care industries!

  7. RayD says:

    Good info, thanks.

  8. snapperhead says:

    7 years of votes to repeal….7 years to craft a replacement plan….too gutless to even let it go to a vote. Tired of winning yet?

  9. The Ghost of America says:

    Sad!

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive
Loading

ADVERTISEMENTS

support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida

Subscribe to FlaglerLive

Get immediate notification of new stories.

Advertisement
Log in
| FlaglerLive, P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135-4263 | 386/586-0257

FlaglerLive.com