• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

What “Abolish ICE” Really Means

August 4, 2019 | FlaglerLive | 18 Comments

abolish ice
Not the warmest acronym around these days. (ICE)

By Rachel Hodes

As I stepped inside the Cannon House Office Building on a Tuesday in July, I felt like I was taking a step towards a more just world. The night before, when I told my mother I planned to participate in a “Never Again” protest as part of #JewsAgainstICE, she had one question: “What exactly are their demands?”

That question was answered in the Cannon Building’s rotunda, as we chanted:


“Never again means close the camps.”

“Never again means abolish ICE.”

“Never again is now.”

To most of America, “abolish ICE” is a cry of the far left. Even Americans who dislike Trump’s attacks on undocumented immigrants wouldn’t necessarily tell you that ICE should be abolished; that seems far too radical.

They’re forgetting that ICE is actually pretty new. It was only created in 2003, replacing the Immigration and Naturalization Service (the same agency responsible for the internment of Japanese-Americans in the 1940s).

Since its creation, ICE’s budget has almost doubled, and its activity has expanded to triple the number of agents it employs. This expansion is shocking — and unwarranted. All evidence suggests that immigrants are far from the national security threat the Trump administration claims they are. Regardless of status, they’re more law-abiding than native-born citizens.

And time and time again, immigration has been shown to have a net-positive effect on the U.S. economy, from growing tax receipts to increasing wages for native-born residents. In fact, undocumented immigrants typically pay more of their income in taxes than your average millionaire.

other-wordsMore noteworthy than the economics, however, is that the individuals targeted by ICE are people — and all people are entitled to basic conditions of safety and for themselves and their families.

When the majority of these immigrants are fleeing violence with roots in U.S. intervention in Central America, the moral responsibility to offer safe haven becomes even more pressing. When government agencies neglect this responsibility, we all lose some of our humanity.

What calls to abolish ICE actually do is beg the question: Why do we need an immigration system dedicated solely to terrorizing immigrant communities?

Threats of ICE raids prevent undocumented people from going to work or sending their kids to school. Those in detention are denied access to basic hygienic products, subjected to severe overcrowding, and experience all manner of abuse. Several children have died.

We spend about $7 billion a year on ICE. What would happen if we instead invested those funds in resettling asylum-seekers, or hiring more staff to process asylum applications? What if families fleeing violence in Honduras or Guatemala had to wait only a few weeks to find out if they could immigrate legally, as opposed to the current average of almost two years?

The U.S. carried out over a quarter million deportations last year. The $7 billion that funded these actions could have been used instead to resettle at least that many refugees (over 11 times what the U.S. accepted last year). It could also almost triple the funding of the government office that naturalizes around 700,000 new citizens each year.

Which is more radical: Investing in communities that strengthen our country and honoring basic human decency? Or continuing to fund an agency that’s literally caused the death of children?

As a concerned Jewish American, I believe none of us are safe until we’re all safe. We should be focusing our resources on welcoming new immigrants and helping them access the rights of citizenship — not subjecting them to detention and deportation.

A better world, for immigrants and for everyone, is within our reach. ICE just isn’t a part of it.

Rachel Hodes is a Next Leader at the Institute for Policy Studies.

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. South Florida says

    August 4, 2019 at 7:23 pm

    It’s best to leave ice in place and a lot of illegals aren’t found to be law on citizens. Leave it to the voters hopefully American citizens.

  2. capt says

    August 4, 2019 at 7:44 pm

    The people that want to abolish ICE do not understand what is involved and the many departments of ICE>

    There is :
    ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO)
    ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)
    The HSI’s Investigations Intelligence Office (HSI-Intel)
    The National Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Coordination Center
    The National Security Investigations Division (NSID)

  3. Q'ed says

    August 4, 2019 at 9:19 pm

    What part of legal vs. illegal immigration don’t you understand? Trump will get re-elected because of the ignorant propaganda that you promote. Thanks.

  4. Brandon Cross says

    August 4, 2019 at 10:08 pm

    I am befuddled…?
    What are you proposing?
    It seems like you are saying we should have no borders? Ergo… anyone attempting entry in our country should be admitted without question.?
    PLEASE show me My Wrong Thought!!!!

  5. Willy Boy says

    August 5, 2019 at 1:24 am

    Is there no end to the number of people this country can sustain? Free everything for everyone is a pipe-dream.

  6. layla says

    August 5, 2019 at 3:57 am

    We are a nation of laws which are no longer being enforced. That should terrify all. ICE and the border patrol are the only federal agencies interested in protecting Americans right now. When they are gone and all laws are no longer enforced, we will become the same as those countries which these people are leaving. The role of ICE is to go after only those criminal aliens which are here. Come to America legally and you have nothing to fear. When we create a class of people who are immune to federal law, this country will collapse.

  7. kc says

    August 5, 2019 at 7:52 am

    I oppose illegal immigration. I do not oppose immigration. Immigrants, including my grandparents, helped make this country great.
    Lawbreakers do not.
    Instead of an article asking what Abolishing ICE means, how about asking what ILLEGAL means?

  8. CB from PC says

    August 5, 2019 at 8:24 am

    The author probably meant to say Illegals pay a GREATER portion in income taxes than millionaires, not more taxes.
    But how do Illegals file if they have no Social Security number?
    Clearly another BS article.

  9. Trailer Bob says

    August 5, 2019 at 8:28 am

    There IS a way to come into this county, as there is in every country. Jumping fences is not the way. So I guess I agree with the comments of the article about 90%.

  10. Traveling Rep says

    August 5, 2019 at 8:32 am

    One major flaw with this article, as with any other attempting to mount an anti ICE argument is that it makes no distinction whatsoever between illegal aliens and legal immigrants. Attempting to assert that “illegal aliens” are “more law abiding” than natural born Americans is a complete and utter fallacy. 100% of illegal aliens have broken the law, by definition. How laughable…

    Once again, if you come to our country legally by following the immigration procedures – you will be welcomed with open arms. However, if you cross our border illegally and expect us to turn a blind eye as you break our laws, you are wrong!

  11. The Realist says

    August 5, 2019 at 8:43 am

    “They’re more law abiding than native born citizens” Sorry no. They’ve broken federal law by skipping the immigration process and illegally entering the country. “typically pay more of their income in taxes” They don’t have social security numbers…they don’t pay income tax/ When leftists try to say they pay taxes…all they are talking about is the taxes they pay when they buy something at the store. They cant send their kids to our schools that they pay nothing for, they cant use our medical services that they pay nothing for…Keep it up ICE. Thank you for your service.

  12. B says

    August 5, 2019 at 9:08 am

    How about taking care of our own citizens first.

  13. Jane Gentile-Youd says

    August 5, 2019 at 9:12 am

    Am I missing something?

    Has the word ILLEGAL been removed from the dictionary? I welcome NOBODY who breaks the law into my home, nor my country. But its okay to put someone in jail for smoking God grown weed. I just don’t get it.

  14. larry krasner says

    August 5, 2019 at 11:43 am

    Undocumented alien is a democratic euphemism for illegal, started by Obama. And no one disputes most immigrants are law abiding. But the first thing an “undocumented” alien does is break the law by entering our country. Plus it only took 10 naughty people to take down the World Trade Center.

  15. Richard says

    August 5, 2019 at 11:50 am

    Waiting to hear what “Sherry” has to say about this left wing rhetoric article demanding that we have open borders and let anyone and everyone into our country. How about using that $7 Billion dollars to help our American citizens FIRST versus wasting it on illegal aliens who busted in over our borders and those circumventing the legal system.

  16. FlaglerLive says

    August 5, 2019 at 12:26 pm

    The etymological origin of “Undocumented immigrant” goes back to the latter years of the 19th century, its etymological origins among our presidents can easily and repeatedly be traced back, say, to Ronald Reagan, an enthusiast of legalizing the undocumented (“We think that we, with compassion, are going to recognize the problem of those undocumented immigrants to our country who have been here for a number of years, who’ve established a base and a home and put down roots, and we’re going to legalize them”–Reagan TV interview in Texas, July 2, 1984; “This law offers protections for more than a million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, many of whom are from Mexico. It provides a means for them to find legal employment in our country and to participate openly and freely in our society,” radio address, Feb. 13, 1988). Words applied to undocumented or illegal immigration have their ideological hangups. We prefer to take the more accurate rather than ideological approach, since there’s no such thing, grammatically speaking, as an “illegal alien,” or an “illegal immigrant,” anymore than there is such a thing as an “illegitimate child.” The fact that an undocumented immigrant is referred to as such doesn’t place him more or less on the right side of the law, nor is it a euphemism, particularly when it attaches to children, who make up close to a fifth of the undocumented population and who can;t be blamed for the crossings, or the desperation, of their parents. You’re welcome to keep using words as you choose. But don’t impose your tyranny on us. We’ll stick with Reagan English.

  17. Dave says

    August 5, 2019 at 8:45 pm

    Shut ICE Down!! They are seeing distrust withing our communities and tearing apart families. People who may have needed up here illegally are kind peaceful people.

  18. Jim O says

    August 8, 2019 at 5:20 pm

    Seems pretty clear to me that the people do NOT want open borders. No matter how you spin it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Laurel on Flagler County’s Beach-Saving Plan All But Killed by Opposition to Sales Tax Increase Despite Last-Minute Switch
  • Laurel on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 31, 2025
  • Gail D on Flagler County’s Beach-Saving Plan All But Killed by Opposition to Sales Tax Increase Despite Last-Minute Switch
  • Tired of it on Answering Lawsuit, Palm Coast Accuses Mayor Norris of Frivolously Weaponizing Court Against Gambaro’s Legitimacy
  • Shark on ICE Arrests More Than 100 in Raid of Construction Site Near FSU
  • Ed P on ICE Arrests More Than 100 in Raid of Construction Site Near FSU
  • Dennis C Rathsam on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 31, 2025
  • The dude on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 31, 2025
  • D W Ferguson on Answering Lawsuit, Palm Coast Accuses Mayor Norris of Frivolously Weaponizing Court Against Gambaro’s Legitimacy
  • R.S. on Ethics Opinion Recommends Restricting Flagler School Board’s Lauren Ramirez’s Business Activities in Schools
  • Jack on Local Police Collaboration With ICE Undermines Public Safety
  • MELENDEZ on Answering Lawsuit, Palm Coast Accuses Mayor Norris of Frivolously Weaponizing Court Against Gambaro’s Legitimacy
  • celia pugliese on Answering Lawsuit, Palm Coast Accuses Mayor Norris of Frivolously Weaponizing Court Against Gambaro’s Legitimacy
  • PC talks on Ethics Opinion Recommends Restricting Flagler School Board’s Lauren Ramirez’s Business Activities in Schools
  • Ray W, on ICE Arrests More Than 100 in Raid of Construction Site Near FSU
  • Ed P on ICE Arrests More Than 100 in Raid of Construction Site Near FSU

Log in