• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

After Ridiculing County’s Sales Tax Revenue Compromise, Palm Coast Now Wants to Deal

October 16, 2012 | FlaglerLive | 9 Comments

Palm Coast City Manager Jim landon at a May meeting with the county and other cities, where Landon and Palm Coast Mayor Jon Netts (to Landon’s left) rejected a county compromise on sharing sales tax revenue. Now Palm Coast wants that compromise re-enacted. County Commissioner Nate McLaughlin, in blue in the distance, sat next to Charlie Ericksen, who was subsequently elected to the commission. (© FlaglerLive)

Palm Coast is discovering a taste for audacity.

Back in spring, the county and the city were renegotiating the terms of their mutual sales tax revenue. The county wanted to increase its share in line with a state-sanctioned formula, rather than with an agreement it had with Palm Coast dating back 10 years. The city said no. The county offered a compromise. It would move toward the state formula over several years. Palm Coast still said no. And did so derisively, as if the county’s proposal wasn’t worth considering.

Click On:


  • Going Nose to Nose, Palm Coast and The County Remain Split on Half-Cent Sales Tax
  • Gap of Dollars and Concerns Splits Flagler County and Palm Coast Over Sales Tax Renewal
  • In a Blow to the County, Palm Coast Explores Switch from Sales Tax to New Utility Taxes
  • Tea Party’s Tom Lawrence, Back to His Roots, Endorses ½-Cent Sales Tax Before 135 Partiers
    $250,000 for Flagler Jail Planning Lands On List of 84 Florida Tax Watch “Turkeys”
  • After Joint Meeting, Palm Coast and the County Remain Far Apart Over Sales Tax Renewal
  • Flagler County Government Faces Potential $3.3 Million Gap as Stresses and Needs Endure
  • Gap of Dollars and Concerns Splits Flagler County and Palm Coast Over Sales Tax Renewal
  • In a Blow to the County, Palm Coast Explores Switch from Sales Tax to New Utility Taxes
  • Facing $1.6 Million in New Cuts, Flagler School District Is Looking for “Big Ideas”

Palm Coast’s decision made it impossible for the county to seek a renewal of the half-cent sales tax by referendum: without Palm Coast’s backing, the county commission feared the measure would fail at the polls. But commissioners were not willing to end the sales tax, which represents some $1.8  million a year in revenue for the county. Two weeks ago the county commission enacted a variation on the half-cent sales tax, by a super-majority vote of the commission (that is, a majority of four of its five members), stretched over 20 years. Palm Coast and other cities would still be getting a share of the $4 million in annual revenue, but in accordance with the state’s “default” sharing formula. Palm Coast’s share will fall from $2.6 million a year to $2.1 million a year.

Here’s the audacity part. Earlier today, the Palm Coast City Council agreed to go back to the county and ask if the offer of a revenue-sharing compromise was still on the table.

“Have we settled what we’re going to do knowing we don’t particularly want the default formula right now?” Frank Meeker, one of the Palm Coast City Council members, asked. He spoke of an eight-year “drawdown” that had previously been proposed by the county, meaning an eight-year phase-in of the state formula. The eight-year timeline is inaccurate: Barbara Revels, the county commission chairman, had proposed phasing in the county-favored revenue share over five years.

Meeker is running for a county commission seat—and could end up deciding, as a county commissioner, the very issue he was re-starting as a city council member. (He’s running against Independent candidate Abby Romaine to fill the seat being vacated by Milissa Holland.)

“My understanding is the county approved the small-county half-cent sales tax with the default formula. No drawdown,” Palm Coast Mayor Jon Netts said.

He’s right. The commission approved a resolution that had no exceptions. It would have to approve a separate agreement with Palm Coast if the formula it voted on Oct. 1 were to be changed. Meeker at the time said he was supportive of the county’s vote.

On Tuesday, Meeker suggested “writing a letter or having some discussions with them to see if that is exactly the case. I still believe that there’s a willingness to maybe consider a different option, and that we ought to go back and say that we would be in favor of the eight-year draw-down, or something like that. It doesn’t hurt to contact them. If the answer is no, we’re still stuck with the default formula, but if the answer is yes, we come out in better shape.”

Why did he not take that position in May, when the county first proposed the compromise, Meeker was asked Tuesday evening? “Council wasn’t interested in that position back then,” Meeker said. “I was sticking with my council at the time. We were trying to have a unified front on what we thought was best for the city of Palm Coast. But now, what we’re concerned about, at least what I’m concerned about, is that the only option out there is the default formula, and I think that’s even worse.”

In proposing to reopen discussions with the county, Meeker was borrowing a page from the county’s playbook. Last month, Revels, with most of the commission’s backing, sent a letter to the Palm Coast City Council asking it to rethink placing red-light cameras on State Road 100. The council ridiculed that request.


On Tuesday, Revels was not thrilled by the city’s about-face on the sales tax sharing formula, but—speaking as just one commissioner, and not for the commission—she said the door may be open for some compromise, though not by changing the revenue-sharing formula.

“I have had thoughts that we wanted to assist the cities that were with us on trying to revise the formula, which would be Flagler Beach and Bunnell,” Revels said. Beverly Beach is not really a factor in the revenue sharing. “We would try to work with them on requests that they might have on capital projects. How that would work out with the city of Palm Coast, I don’t know.”

The requests would be dealt with on a project-by-project basis, but the revenue-sharing formula would not change.

“It’ll be interesting in this political season as to whether or not the request is made before or after the election season,” Revels said of Palm Coast’s proposal. “Obviously after November 6, we’re going to have a completely different county commission, so that commission could come up with changes in the formula that they would think would be appropriate.”

Romaine—Meeker’s opponent—saw the Meeker proposal as “politicking.”

“I think that’s all that is, trying to sound reasonable now, putting his reticence into some sort of reasonable action,”  Romaine said, referring to Meeker’s reticence to go along with the original Revels compromise. She called Meeker’s move “startling,” since he and the council were  “so adamant about not engaging in negotiations with the country, trying to work out some kind of arrangement. And now is it a sort of hat in hand gesture, ok, so you’ve made that decision, so let’s try and get back to the negotiating table? Or is he leveraging his position on the city council and potential seat on the commission.”

Meeker’s response Tuesday evening: “Does Abby not understand that there’s give and take between political organizations within the county? That happens all the time. I’m trying to get clarification on something.”

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jack Howell says

    October 16, 2012 at 8:02 pm

    I would have to agree with Mrs. Romaine. No question that Frank Meeker is politicking on this issue. The term “Flip Flop’ comes to mind when looking at Meeker’s voting record. Voters should do their homework on Meeker!

  2. DoubleGator says

    October 16, 2012 at 8:27 pm

    If this is representative of the “experience” Mr. Meeker proposes to bring to the table, I don’t think we need it. This on top of the red light camera scam, ugh. I think we need prople with new ideas and attitudes to build our community. It appears to me that we are very lucky Independent Abby Romaine is running for the open seat.

  3. PJ says

    October 17, 2012 at 7:03 am

    Well said DoubleGator!!!!!!

    Meeker please go away you are a politician.

    You see Mr. Meeker you know your a politician when you have to say something negitive about your opponet and do not offer a solution to the problem other than to delay the issue.

    As far as Palm Coast once again telling the County what to do. Let’s see, I think I can talk many things but the article speaks for it’s self.

    Thank God for Nate McLaughlin and Charlie Erickson folks that will not give in to the worst city management of all time.

    For us folks that live in Palm Coast we are slowly have the quality of life ruined for the need of money.

    Cameras to collect fees from us and the company that makes them to help fund the city. Fees for stormwater. Stop with the fees.

    Manage your city because you simply suck at it.

    The sales tax is not enough for Palm Coast because your over bloated with Management at the top and less employees working in the field. (e.g. clogged stormwarted drains) that you FEE us for.

    Cut you upper management staff merge some departments move people to the field to WORK not cause trouble like the CODE ENFORCEMENT people do, worrying about their jobs.

    So instead of trying to force the county to their knees you should cut you and your upper management payroll and TRY to improve the quality of life who moved here because we wanted to not because of a job like their city manager did.

    I like many others have a wanting stake to be here.

    County don’t back down because Plam Coast is hard up for money……………………

  4. Lulz Daily says

    October 17, 2012 at 7:45 am

    Meeker’s response “Does Abby not understand that theres give and take between political organizations within the County?”.

    Hahahahah good one Frank! Just like in May when the County asked for some give and take on this exact same issue and you admonished them for the request. This guy has some knee slappers!!!!

  5. Jim Wingo says

    October 17, 2012 at 10:50 am

    Lulz Daily, you took the words out of my mouth.

  6. Maryjoe says

    October 17, 2012 at 11:31 am

    “I was sticking with my council at the time. We were trying to have a unified front on what we thought was best for the city of Palm Coast.” Either you agreed with them or you didn’t. If you didn’t then you should have been fighting for what you thought was right for the people of the City.
    Another one not getting my vote. :)

  7. Dawg says

    October 17, 2012 at 3:52 pm

    Snooze you Loose PC!!! Way to keep your eye on the ball Mr Meeker. Politics doesn’t look to be your calling.

  8. Ben Dover says

    October 18, 2012 at 4:27 am

    Too damn bad , Barbara Revels and the county should tell them to go to hell , their greed is so apparent, they should tell them Ok,… we`ll reconsider , but here`s the deal , you don t put the red light camera`s on 100 , and you don t add anymore in Palm Coast , where your scaring people away from shopping and visiting , and make them finally fess up, that the lights are rigged and for producing revenue and have nothing to do with safety.

  9. Frank Meeker says

    October 18, 2012 at 8:38 am

    Oh my how some will twist good intentions in an election cycle, and as of last night, even go to great steps in defacing my campaign signs too!

    But back to this issue. Look folks, I asked this question because due to a lack of communication between local governments, it was unclear to me exactly what formula we would using now that the ½ cent sales tax issue has been decided at the county level. Since the potential difference was over 2 million dollars to the citizens I represent (and maybe more), it seemed worth the effort to ask the question and get clarification. Now if the county commission wants to clarify their position and tell the citizens of Palm Coast they are going to keep it all and tell us to use the default formula, fine. Yes, that means some of the Palm Coast capital projects such as bike paths in Seminole Woods addressing safety concerns will have to be placed on the back burner, but Ok, fine, we have an answer. If they come back and say a five, eight or ten year scaling down is still on the table in the spirit of cooperation between local governments that too is fine. I didn’t see any other candidate offering up this issue, and we’re talking about a sizable chunk of change ($$).

    But come on, let’s be fair. Don’t go blasting me for asking a question for the sake of clarification on something of this importance to the citizens of Palm Coast I currently represent and call it a political stunt. Just because I’m leaving council in November doesn’t mean I have to shut down the thinking processes now. I’m just trying to continue providing a service to those that elected me, nothing more.

    Frank J. Meeker, C.E.P.
    Palm Coast City Council, District 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Enough is enough on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Nephew Of Uncle Sam on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Dakota on Palm Coast City Attorney Calls Mayor Norris ‘Unprofessional and Inappropriate’ 3 Weeks After Censure for Similar Behavior
  • Jaii Hein on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Laurie Jo Jo Bergman on Margaritaville’s Compass Hotel in Flagler Beach Opens in Buffett-Themed Celebration of a Downtown Remade
  • Kat on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Critical Eye on Palm Coast City Attorney Calls Mayor Norris ‘Unprofessional and Inappropriate’ 3 Weeks After Censure for Similar Behavior
  • JimboXYZ on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Grey Man on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • NJ on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Dave on Margaritaville’s Compass Hotel in Flagler Beach Opens in Buffett-Themed Celebration of a Downtown Remade
  • Canary on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • Canary on Palm Coast City Attorney Calls Mayor Norris ‘Unprofessional and Inappropriate’ 3 Weeks After Censure for Similar Behavior
  • More Blondes on Afrikaners are South African Opportunists, Not Refugees
  • America First on Danko No Longer District Director for Randy Fine; Congressman Calls for Nuking Gaza’s 2 Million Palestinians
  • No political affiliation on Palm Coast’s Golden Chopsticks Buffet Open Again 2 Days After Sanitation Inspection Ordered It Closed

Log in