• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Data Company Seeking Easements Discovers Flagler Beach Commissioners Won’t Be Cowed Into Submission

June 28, 2024 | FlaglerLive | 11 Comments

The significant portion of Veterans Park in Flagler Beach that DC Blox, the data company, was seeking an easement for is demarcated by the sidewalk, going north toward the monument and State Road 100. (© FlaglerLive)
The significant portion of Veterans Park in Flagler Beach that DC Blox, the data company, was seeking an easement for is demarcated by the sidewalk, going north toward the monument and State Road 100. (© FlaglerLive)

The Flagler Beach City Commission will not grant a data-center company a perpetual easement over almost a third of Veterans Park in the heart of the city as a landing point for undersea internet cables. The easement would have prevented the city from putting that part of the park to many public uses, just as a convenience for the company, DC Blox, which could achieve its aims by building a landing site elsewhere, but at greater expense to its bottom line.

The company was attempting to save money at the city’s expense. City commissioners explicitly called out the scheme, tabling the proposal until DC Blox returns with a feasible proposal to use South 6th Street as a landing site, without disrupting the city-owned parking lot there or compromising its future value to the city. A second landing site on 11th Street is drawing no opposition, because it runs through a public street and the parking lot of Santa Marial del Mar, the Catholic church.




The city is also directing its consultant, an attorney, to negotiate fees with DC Blox. The city is also interested in replacing a perpetual easement with a term-limited easement. (It is very unlikely that undersea cables will be perpetually part of the internet’s backbone as the technology goes skyward to satellites.)

“I’m not hearing anyone express opposition to the project I’m not hearing that at all,” Commission Chair Scott Spradley said. “We’re talking about preserving one of our busiest and most cherished asset, which is the park, and secondarily the city parking lot. So it’s not the project itself. It’s just trying to find the right place.”

It is also still unclear how much the company will pay the city for easements. It was proposing a paltry one-time, $100,000 fee for each of the cables that may link to its landing sits, with capacity for up to eight, though a company official said it’ll more likely be five or six. Some commissioners find the offer too low.




DC Blox, through its local subsidiary, DC Orchid, is planning to build a large data center in Palm Coast’s Town center, a project it has been working on, secretly, with Palm Coast and county government, with the complicity of both to keep it all secret under a provision of state law that gives companies that option. The data center would be the end point of up to eight undersea internet cables, which are part of the backbone of the global internet. The center would then fan out that data on the mainland.

Company and Palm Coast officials claimed the center would be greatly beneficial economically. In fact, it would employ only a handful of people. It could be greatly beneficial to the city as a tax revenue source, if Palm Coast had either a utility franchise fee or an electric service tax. Since the data center would very likely be one of the city’s largest, if not the largest, consumer of electricity, its service tax or franchise fee tax would also be among the largest. But Palm Coast has neither an electric franchise fee nor a service tax, and four attempts to enact one or both have failed since 2011. No such attempt appears likely to pass in the near future, unless voters approve in a referendum. No such referendum is scheduled. All of which makes the future data center all but an economic non-entity for Palm Coast, the company’s and the city’s chest-beating bluster aside.

Nevertheless, city and county officials have been pressuring Flagler Beach officials, through back channels to get out of the way of DC Blox and approve its easements, while DC Blox’s own company officials have been lobbying city officials behind closed doors. The company officials have not been shy to end-run around the elected officials and use city staff to their purposes–until they were told on Thursday that nothing city staff does matters until it is ratified by the commission.

City commissioners could not understand why the company would not find a location for its second landing site that would be less disruptive than upending Veterans Park.




Chris Gatch, executive vice president of DCB Orchid, tried to make the case Thursday in only his second appearance before the commission since the end of March. He told the commission of the millions of dollars in investment ahead, of the “long time” he’s spent negotiating with the administration, and how city staff’s preference was for using Veterans Park, not South 6th Street. There would be no road closures there, though he said at least one lane of 6th street and a good portion of the 6th Street parking lot would have to be closed for three to six months of construction, much of which was news to commissioners.

There was audacity verging on arrogance in Gatch’s remarks. He was asking to use public rights of way and disrupt public property, yet he was using pressuring language that made it appear as if the city were an obstacle to something his company was entitled to: “We’re willing to be flexible,” he said, as if that were a favor his company was extending the city. “The timing for us is very important. We’ve been working on this for a very long time with the city,” he said. “And we’re approaching a point where timing is very important for us. We have prospective customer requirements that need to be constructed in this landfall.”

Jeff Uphues, the company’s CEO, took a more condescending approach, describing himself as a “small town guy” then lecturing the commissioners about what he learned in school in Iowa (“you got to build trust with people, internally and externally, no matter where you go”) as if what they had learned in school or how they exercised their responsibilities on the commission were somehow different. “You have to communicate with transparency,” he said, a startling statement considering his company’s insistence on secrecy whenever it could.

Commissioners didn’t let the verbal manipulations affect them, maintaining cohesion throughout, especially in representing what they anticipate to be public concerns.




Cooley wasn’t interested in the big money figures Gatch threw around. “That’s that’s not what this conversation is even about. We don’t need the money in the water with that,” Cooley said. He was equally skeptical about Gatch’s claim that the city in any way had a preference for Veterans Park, if it had not come before the City Commission. As it had not. The administration, he said, does not speak for the commission without commission direction. The bottom line, he said, was that the Veterans Park location favored DC Blox because it was DC Blox’s most direct and cheapest route to the ocean. “However, there’s many many other options that are not as direct and require more construction,” Cooley said, “that favor the city.”

As for DC Blox’s presumed flexibility, he said the company keeps returning with the same option, which does not indicate flexibility. Veterans Park, he said, is a park for memorials. An easement on a significant portion of the park would end that on that portion. “If you approve an easement, you can do nothing essentially, but have grass or some shrubs as long as the roots don’t interfere,” Cooley said. “So you’re taking a third of the park and making it unusable.” (Gatch minimized the limitations on the city’s uses of the easement area.)

Commissioner Rick Belhumeur was also skeptical. “You said you had brought this to the city a year ago. None of us had heard a word about it” until late March or early April, Belhumeur said. “As far as using a third of Veterans Park I’m 100 percent against it for all the same reasons that Eric has, plus a couple of others.” The city is planning renovations in the park, and has an irrigation system there, along with underground cabling. Commissioner James Sherman and Commission Chair Scott Spradley also had reservations.

Spradley wasn’t particularly opposed to the Veterans Park location, considering that the park had recently been slated to be a construction equipment staging area for the beach renourishment project. It would be temporary. But if less disruptive alternatives exist, then those should be explored, in his view. (In fact, the beach renourishment contractor changed the construction staging area to a parcel at the south end of the city for that very reason.)




“Six street in the right of way was a heavy conversation the last time around,” Cooley said, recalling that when the plans entailed using the street itself, without encroaching on other public property, was not as much of an issue. Mayor Patti King concern is how that would affect two restaurants in the area.

None of the commissioners is opposed to the project. They like it. The company’s methods or offers have not been as attractive. “We’re just trying to get our fair share,” Sherman said. “You’re coming here, and you’re running cable lines through our town, and we want to be sure that we’re taking care of.” Palm Coast and the county are getting their share, eventually, he said. The city? Not so far.

“I felt the board really worked together in expressing our views and those of our residents,” Spradley said this morning. “I was proud of how we were able to debate the issue and then come to a consensus, especially since the views of the commission members are similar but different. I feel that we delivered a strong message to DC Blox and our neighboring governmental units that the best interests of Flagler Beach are critical for this project to become a reality. But at the same time, we are not opposed to the project, per se. We just need to be a part of the discussion and not the recipient of decisions concerning the future of Flagler Beach, made in our absence. I feel we succeeded in giving DC. Blox some direction rather than just stonewalling and saying no to their ideas. Hopefully this will result in a productive meeting the next time the issue appears on the agenda.”

Click On:


  • Data Company Seeking Easements Discovers Flagler Beach Commissioners Won't Be Cowed Into Submission
  • Secretive Data Company Getting Stiff Resistance from Flagler Beach Over Perpetual Easement at Veterans Park
  • Data Company Wants to Use Veterans Park to Land Undersea Cables; Flagler Beach Wants Appropriate Payment
  • Why Is Palm Coast Backroom-Dealing Tax Incentives with a Private Company?
  • Company Planning Huge Data Center in Palm Coast for Undersea Internet Cables, But Flagler Beach Trips Over Easements
  • DC Blox website
  • DC Blox to develop 216MW campus outside Atlanta, Georgia
Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. gene piccolo says

    June 28, 2024 at 6:04 pm

    All I can say is Bravo. This data company has barked up the wrong tree.

  2. Manette Upson Metcalf says

    June 28, 2024 at 6:48 pm

    I appreciated the insightful comments and concerns voiced by Eric Cooley and other City Commission members regarding the DC Blox proposal. Although I personally would prefer there was no cable landing in the City of Flagler, it was a relief to see DC Blox directed to pursue a location other than Veterans Park. It sounds like DC Blox got a little ahead of themselves by purchasing property in Palm Coast for its data center before solidifying a location for undersea cable landing structures in Flagler Beach. DC Blox has put themselves in a time crunch, and should not be pressuring the City of Flagler to make a quick and possibly uninformed decision on such an important matter. I agree with Scott Spradley’s statement that the board really worked together in debating the issue and coming to a consensus. I am also thankful the board is choosing to honor the deed restriction placed on Veterans Park that it remain open for use as a public park, and that the board joined together in directing DC Blox to look at other locations..

  3. gw says

    June 28, 2024 at 7:07 pm

    DC Blox, go pound sand…

  4. Jane Gentile-Youd says

    June 28, 2024 at 7:29 pm

    Great news! Flagler Beach commissioners have their act together. Bravo!

  5. Eva says

    June 28, 2024 at 8:17 pm

    Yes, Flagler Beach, THANK YOU! Bravo and Brava to all who speak out on this latest scheme! Stand firm please!

  6. Sick Of It Already says

    June 29, 2024 at 6:16 am

    BRAVO. I wish I could say that about Palm Coast!

  7. Tony Roy says

    June 29, 2024 at 9:33 am

    Way to go Flagler Beach. As an Army veteran, I would be highly opposed to the use of Veteran’s Park with a perpetual easement in place for DC’s benefit. We would be giving up a third of the park that gifted the City for the purposes of being a memorial and for community events. It would be naive to think there will never be another war or insurrection that might see the need for another memorial (though I hope I am wrong).

    DC Blox’s proposal gives the City limited compensation on a one-time basis and the industry standard is to also provide a royalty or franchise fee of some nominal amount, for the duration of the easement. So, DC Blox is being disingenuous by only offering one-time payment per cable landing. Move the project to the 6th Street right-of-way that already exists and pay Flagler Beach what it deserves.

    Lastly, DC’s CEO talked about transparency, but then why are you meeting with Palm Coast and the county in secret with non-disclosure agreements? What are you being less than transparent about. And don’t try to pull the wool over our eye by saying what a great economic endeavor this will be for Flagler Beach. When the data center is up and running, the only people benefiting economically will be the City of Palm Coast.

  8. James says

    June 29, 2024 at 10:02 am

    Did someone mention “electric utility fee” here?

    Yup, not my imagination.

    WE pay higher electric bills so this local government can reap revenue from this data center deal!

    The burden will fall disproportionately on the tax payer, who never had to pay an electric utility fee before, but will
    now do so into perpetuity… yet with little direct guarantees of anything beneficial to the Palm Coast community, particularly jobs.

    A prime example of a desperate city council working against the community they serve in secret.

    Just my opinion.

  9. Citizen Cares says

    June 30, 2024 at 9:22 am

    It seems to me that DC Blox reviewed the well-documented poor performances (willful ignorance, lack of transparency, infighting, etc), offered recently by several of the elected officials on the Flagler School Board, PC City Council & Flagler County Commission as they formulated their approach to FB on this issue. DC Blox clearly made the assumption that the FB City Commissioners were of the same quality as many other elected officials in Flagler. I am delighted to see DC Blox proved wrong.

    Yay FB City Commissioners! Thank you for being professional, fair, and consistent, and acting in a manner that provides a model for common sense, integrity, and good leadership in local government.

  10. Joe D says

    June 30, 2024 at 11:16 am

    I’d have liked to pick another word of praise for the decision of the Flagler Beach Commission to have DCBlox come back with a more acceptable site plan and financial remuneration, than the lowball and “Easy” site pick of Veteran’s Park, but BRAVO (again) seems to be the only appropriate response.

    PS: the “short time table” complaint by DCBlox is of their own making. If they wouldn’t have tried to work out this PALM COAST deal in secrecy with non-disclosure agreements (TECHNICALLY legal at the moment), for the last YEAR…maybe Flagler Beach would have had time to mull over the options, and alternatives. Instead of a RUSH on DCBlox’s part.

    I remember seeing a sign over my department secretary’s desk saying something like: “A lack of planning for a project’s completion on YOUR PART, does not constitute an EMERGENCY RESPONSE by me at the last minute, on MY PART.”

    Sounds highly appropriate in relation to this issue.

  11. Laurel says

    July 1, 2024 at 1:12 pm

    Good job Cooley and Commissioners! Remember, Flagler Beach holds all the cards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Pierre Tristam on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Bo Peep on Flagler County Will Buy 5.2-Acre Parcel on Intracoastal North of Hammock Dune Bridge for Preservation as Parkland
  • T on Palm Coast’s Fire, Parks and Road Impact Fees Are About to Jump 90 to 160% as City Capitalizes Future on Development
  • Alice on GOP Bill Would Kick More Than 3 Million Off Food Stamps and Shift $14 Billion In Costs to States
  • Bill Boots on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Joe D on Why Your Electricity Bill Is So High
  • Ben Hogarth on GOP Bill Would Kick More Than 3 Million Off Food Stamps and Shift $14 Billion In Costs to States
  • Laurel on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Sunday, June 1, 2025
  • Pogo on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Laurel on American Doctors Are Escaping to Canada. Guess Why.
  • Dennis C Rathsam on Why Your Electricity Bill Is So High
  • Al on GOP Bill Would Kick More Than 3 Million Off Food Stamps and Shift $14 Billion In Costs to States
  • Deborah Coffey on Why Your Electricity Bill Is So High
  • Pogo on Why Your Electricity Bill Is So High
  • Pogo on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, June 2, 2025
  • Dennis C Rathsam on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Monday, June 2, 2025

Log in