No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Flagler Democrat Heather Beaven Declares For Congress in Newly Drawn 6th District

| March 14, 2012

Heather Beaven

Heather Beaven is running for Congress again from Flagler County.

John Mica’s challenger two years ago, the Flagler Beach resident lost in her first race for public office with 31 percent of the vote to his 69 percent. She’d been hesitant to jump in again, with her husband’s impending deployment to Afghanistan in summer and two young daughters she’s raising. But the opportunity of running in an open seat in the newly drawn 6th Congressional District, ostensibly free of Mica’s incumbency and enormous money advantage, and what she describes as strong support from the state and national Democratic Party, were too much to resist.

“I was going to sit out because of Doug’s deployment, but with an open seat and with extra support, both family and party-wise, it just seems more doable,” Beaven said in an interview this afternoon.

Rumors that he might yet change his mind again aside, Mica decided to run for re-election in the newly drawn 7th Congressional District, closer to Orlando.

Beaven, 43, is the first Flagler County candidate officially to declare for the seat. Two Republican declared from St. Johns County: Ron DeSantis, a Harvard Law School graduate, Iraq war veteran and military prosecutor, and Richard Clark, who lives in St. Johns County and has been a member of the Jacksonville City Council since 2005. Two Republicans have declared from Volusia County: Fred Costello, the Republican House member and ex-mayor of Ormond Beach and Craig Miller, the ex-CEO of Ruth’s Chris Steak House who two years ago lost in the Republican Primary against Sandy Adams (who went on to defeat Suzane Kosmas).

The new 6th district includes all of Flagler and all of St. Johns, most of Volusia County and half of Putnam County. The district’s population totals 696,000, with 545,000 eligible voters. Most of that population—362,000, with 300,000 of that as eligible voters—is in Volusia. Some 82,000 people in the district are black or Hispanic. Overall, 36 percent of the district’s voters are Democratic, 40 percent are Republican, and 24 percent are independent, giving a moderate Democrat a chance only as long as he or she can win over independents.

Beaven defines herself as a “Navy veteran, army wife, mom,” and politically, as “a very independent-leaning Democrat. I don’t vote straight-party ticket, I don’t even give my money straight-party ticket. The one label she’d subscribe to, she said, “would probably be Third Way,” a centrist attempt at shedding the more polarized interpretation of Republicans and Democrats. Centrists in Congress, however, are an increasingly rare breed, as more of them drop out. And she is loyal to standard Democratic issues: she’s pro-choice on abortion, she would repeal the Bush-era tax cuts, starting with the rich but exempting the middle class, she favors the regulation compelling insurers to provide contraception coverage, and has no patience for what she sees as scaling back women’s rights.

“I obviously support a woman’s right to access any medicine that she needs to protect her health,” Beaven says, “and to say that this is just about contraception is inaccurate, obviously. There are many, many, many reasons why a woman takes birth control pills. This has been a topic of conversation for what, a few decades now, that woman are charged more for insurance, they’re denied basic services, tests, medications, because we have female reproductive organs that aren’t covered. I think that’s a completely uneven playing field. And let’s be honest: women still make less than men. We’re still at 70 cents on the dollar. We can’t afford to have insurers gouging us because of the sex we were born into.”

Beaven refuses to grade President Obama. She’s no effusive fan, either. “I admire him tremendously,” she says, “I think he’s not had it easy. I respect his diplomacy in how he deals with people, I respect how he keeps his cool under pressure.” But she has more admiration for Bill Clinton. She explains that as a matter of circumstances: he was president—commander in chief—when she was in uniform.

She is also cool to two signature issues of the Obama administration: the stimulus package of 2009, and health care reform, both of which she says were poorly cobbled together (she describes the health care law as a “platypus”).

She would have wanted the stimulus package to stay more focused on infrastructure projects and be better tailored to realities on the ground. “It was large enough,” she says of the $800 billion package, “but it was done by people who don’t understand how to get a project to the ground.”

She has no issue with the health care mandate as law: she wants the U.S. Supreme Court  to find constitutional the requirement that Americans buy health insurance or pay a fine if they don’t. “I do support the government’s right to mandate coverage when it’s for the good of the country,” she says. “If we don’t mandate coverage on car insurance, then somebody hits you, you have to bear the full cost of that. That’s not fair. If we don’t mandate that people have access to preventative care and to insurance when they have pre-existing conditions, then we end up paying for that on the back end anyway, because at some point they’ll go bankrupt and they’re on Medicare, Medicaid.”

Still, Beaven wishes—stretching the Supreme Court’s own mandate into an advisory role it doesn’t quite have—that the justices, who are due to rule on the health care law by June, give broader guidance to policy makers: “I want the supreme court to rule that we have a national conversation about health care, about health insurance system, really, because we have the best health care system in the world.”

Beaven criticizes the details of the health care law as she does the details of the stimulus package, saying it was poorly developed. But she doesn’t blame Obama for the poor job in either case. “I don’t think it says anything about his presidency. I think it says a lot about 535 people who were supposed to come together and for the good of the country have very difficult conversations,” Beaven says.

But isn’t that the leader’s job? “I don’t put that on any president. The Congress holds the purse strings,” she says, adding: “Holding only him accountable, she says, “alleviates the responsibility of the 535 people who were sworn to go to Washington and represent” their constituents back home.”

Beaven is placing some emphasis on her pro-military platform. Should she be elected, she says, she would be the only member of Congress—in the Senate or in the House of Representatives—with a spouse in the military. That her husband is heading to Afghanistan doesn’t affect what she’s thought for a while about the American military’s next step in Afghanistan: the war angle of the mission, she said, should have ended when Osama bin laden was killed last spring. The mission should have since transitioned to a humanitarian mission.

“It’s a much larger question of what does it mean for our country to go to war and who shoulders that burden and how much of that burden do they shoulder,” she says. “It’s an important perspective that we don’t have right now in Congress. When I vote on these important issues about how we treat our vets, where we go, where we don’t go as a military, I have a person in mind, a person that I am supposed to grow old with.”

Beaven is president of Florida Endowment Foundation for Florida’s Graduates, a Flagler Beach-based non-profit with statewide reach that prepares at-risk youths for the workplace. The congressional district boundaries have been approved by the Legislature, but they’ve not yet cleared court challenges.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

18 Responses for “Flagler Democrat Heather Beaven Declares For Congress in Newly Drawn 6th District”

  1. palmcoaster says:

    She’s got my vote!

  2. Angela Smith via Facebook says:

    She certainly can’t do any worse than the CURRENT crop of dimbulbs.

  3. Shawn Taylor via Facebook says:

    If she doesn’t vote for Obama maybe!!!!

  4. Sandra Reynolds via Facebook says:

    Way to go Heather! Just ignore the nay sayers! You will do great and you have many supporter behind you. And for those who are so critical why don’t you run for office? Flagler Live: Can you run an article about Heather’s qualifications? Thank you!

  5. Think first, act second says:

    This young lady seems to have some credibility, but she needs to get some of her issues better quantified. Auto insurance is not a federal mandate, it is a state issue, so there are 50 different types, not an all inclusive mandate.
    Women have access to medical services, including but not limited to contraceptives. Private insurance can be purchased, doctors will prescribe contraceptives if in their judgment they are necessary, and pharmacies will dispense them, so to say women don’t have access is incorrect. What the women she is referring to is the “nanny state” people who want someone else to pay for it for them.
    She doesn’t hold the President responsible because it is the responsibility of 535 individuals to represent their constituents. It is also the responsibility of the Senate to pass a budget annually but they have not in more than 3 years because the Democrat leader will not present one for consideration. How can she change that, please let us know?
    Thank you, Mrs. Beaven for the service you gave our country, you are very much admired for that and for supporting your husband and he has our hopes that he goes with God’s blessings and returns when he is scheduled to you and your family. Good luck with your campaign, you do have some issues, namely St. Johns & Volusia County voters and they unfortunately have Flagler out manned/womaned.

  6. PalmCoast says:

    Thus far this lady has my vote!
    I feel she has adequately addressed several important issues above for me to give her my support and vote thus far, as we progress to elections!

  7. Perry Mitrano says:

    I know the Beavens for the last 7 years as a neighbor. I would without question give Heather my vote! Good Luck!>Perry Mitrano

  8. Cindy Overstreet Tetreault via Facebook says:

    Let me be the first to call you Congressman Beaven!! Best of Luck and we are here to help anyway we can.

  9. Shannon says:

    Scary! One of the most unethical individuals that I’ve ever had the displeasure of getting to know. Scary – so very scary – enough said!

    • Ashley says:

      Shannon.. your credibility is quite questionable when you can’t even describe an example of the unethical behavior you were a witness to. Let the public know if you are privy to such information!

  10. Outsider says:

    I have a problem with someone who wants the Supreme Court to mandate the country have a discussion on any issue. That’s not within their powers. I would like to know if she would have voted for the healthcare reform bill and the stimulus bill, being she is not fond of it. I would also like to know if she considers the ORIGINAL Obama mandate requiring the Catholic Church to pay for contraception for it’s employees constitutional. Finally, I would like to know if she would vote for a bill just to find out what’s in it.

    • some guy says:

      She would have wanted the stimulus package – She has no issue with the health care mandate as law- she favors the regulation compelling insurers to provide contraception coverage, – Beaven defines herself as a “Navy veteran, army wife, mom,” and politically, as “a very independent-leaning Democrat. I don’t vote straight-party ticket,

      I like her personaly and her husband doug and their two kids BUT she does sound like one who would vote as the “party” wants her to vote.

  11. Will says:

    To Cindy:

    If we get so lucky, wouldn’t CongressWOMAN Beavan be more appropriate?

    I didn’t see anything about gender reassignment in the article. :)

  12. Will says:

    To Shannon:

    You called Beaven unethical, then said “enough said”.

    You’ve put it out there – don’t you feel a responsibility to validate your comment?

  13. Patty Jones says:

    @Shannon, I dont know Heather Beavan but I think your comment about her is hitting below the belt and just plain nasty. Unless you have some particular incident/s to share, as it stands, your comment is slanderous and mean and does not add anything to the debate. Just saying, as I like to play fair.

  14. Shannon says:

    Patty, Will and whoever else is working on her campaign. You have no idea what you got yourself into. Better spend some time researching your candidate. It will all come out eventually. Why she would drag her husband who by the way was suppose to be deployed during her last campaign and her little girls through this nightmare is beyond selfish to me. There are REAL military wives, who’s husbands have REALLY fought, who have lost their spouses or who are dealing with their third deployment and who are attempting to put their families back together again after serving. This woman should be ashamed of herself the way she manipulates her military experience and that of her husband. As one who highly respects our military and respects those REAL moms/wives who have lost loved ones, this makes me sick. She’s led way to many people astray. It will all unfold, let’s just hope it does so before the election. The cover of the book can be very deceiving. Believe me there are many, many individuals who know this and in time it will all come out. Excuse me now while I go vomit!

    • robert says:

      Shannon, do you have any verifiable facts with sources that you can furnish to everyone? I am extremely interested, but one must always be skeptical of unsubstantiated innuendo, and I have noticed that you have left similar comments at other sites relating to Ms. Beaven.

  15. Douglas Beaven says:

    Here’s a PSA from me.

    Please know that you loose credibility when you spout off things that are blatantly wrong and try to insert your beliefs as fact? Here’s an example of how one anonymous poster is so wrong that it may prompt her/him to log on under another anonymous name due to shame.

    After 9/11, I volunteered to serve in the military and signed up for another 6 year sting back in July of 2010. Currently, I am assigned to the 993rd Transportation Company, and during my wife’s last campaign, neither the unit nor I was to go overseas. And that can be easily checked people.

    When my unit & I land in Afghanistan, my first deployment will not get any more REAL than that. Why someone would dare to minimize our soon to be “REAL” situation is beyond rational thought. While we fully understand the tragedy other military families have suffered through mulitple deployments, loosing loved ones or for loved ones to come home broken, it doesn’t validate any sort of comment that this deployment won’t be REAL and my family won’t be realizing my proximity to harms way! Shouldn’t God be the one to judge?

    Also, if you have not served in anyone’s military chain of command, please refrain from inserting your foot into your mouth.

    Yes, we are all entitled to personal opinion, even if they differ greatly from others, but make sure its not full of vile, hate nor from a vengeful heart…give it up to God and get over it! The cover of this book is hard, too bad one adult needs crayons for theirs.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in