No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Rejecting Lesser Term, Judge Sentences Jonathan Canales to Life in Prison in Attempted Murder of Ex-Girlfriend

| November 29, 2018

Jonathan Canales this afternoon in court, just before his sentencing. (c FlaglerLive)

Jonathan Canales this afternoon in court, just before his sentencing. (© FlaglerLive)

When a Flagler County jury in mid-October found Jonathan Canales guilty of attempted first degree murder of his ex-girlfriend, the judge’s and the lawyers’ assumption was that he faced a mandatory life sentence. The judge had no discretion. Sentencing would be a formality.

But as today’s sentencing hearing began, the defense and the prosecution told the judge that they’d erred: the life term was not mandatory. There was a minimum mandatory floor of 25 years on two charges. But the judge had discretion to sentence Canales to 25 years to life on the attempted murder charge, and to just 25 years on the aggravated battery with a firearm charge.

For a moment it was like a jolt of hope for Canales and his family: his mother and father were in the audience a few feet behind him. Their statements to the court might not be in vain after all.

But they were in vain. The judge was not moved. Or perhaps he was more moved by the presence of Canales’s victim, Tiffany Norman, the mother of Canales’s young son, the mother of three boys, who sat next to her mother, recovered from the .22 gunshot wound in the neck that, the prosecution argued, Canales had fired after a history of bullying, threatening and controlling her. He fired that shot the night of Nov. 15, 2014, in the couple’s Mondex trailer, after Norman had put her three children to bed and was having dinner, after Canales had lurked behind her, telling her he could shoot her and nobody would know.

Circuit Judge Terence Perkins sentenced Jonathan Canales to life in prison, no parole. He also sentenced him to 25 years on the aggravated battery with a firearm charge, a sentence in effect rendered moot by the life term. Canales turns 32 just before the new year. Perkins gave no preamble to his decision, as many other judges do, as he spoke the sentences one after the other, no differently than if her were sentencing a young man to a few months in jail for a minor drug charge. Canales, in his orange jail garb, his hands and feet shackled, stared ahead. His mother gasped. Norman cried.

Local law enforcement officials have occasionally grumbled about Perkins’s light touch in drug sentences, finding him too permissive. They wouldn’t be complaining regarding the Canales sentence.

Moments before the sentence Canales had addressed the court.

“This person in the video that you guys have portrayed on this trial, it’s not my character,” he told the judge, referring to an agonizing, hours-long video of his interrogation with a Flagler County Sheriff’s detective the night of the shooting. Canales came off as his own worst enemy in the video, a man unhinged, paranoid, angry, meanly resentful of Norman and barely showing even a hint of sympathy for her or much thought for his or her children, but displaying relentless self-pity. “This is not my average every day situation, there’s a lot here that I really couldn’t go into because I don’t believe it and I don’t expect you to, because there’s a lot of weird things that happened in my life.”

Canales said he’ll “always feel bad about the situation I’m in now, and I feel a lot of remorse for what happened to Tiffany, but I’m not going to say I’m guilty, because I don’t believe that I am.”

He’s maintained his innocence throughout. He’d twice claimed in that terrible interrogation that had he wanted to shoot and kill Norman, he’d have used a bigger-caliber gun, and he’d have finished the job. It was statements like that that probably sealed his fate with a jury that did not in the end buy his claim that Norman was attempting suicide, that she shot herself, in an odd part of the neck, below the ear, as he was whipping the gun away from her.

This afternoon, he told the judge he was trying to become a helicopter medic–an ironic choice, considering another lurid part of the night of the shooting, when his arrest report detailed how he’d denied and delayed medical care for Norman, leaving her bleeding in a bathtub as he, according to the prosecution, rushed about the house, cleaning evidence of the shooting. “And now I’m probably not going to be able to do that because I’m going to prison.” He begged the judge: “Don’t take the good people out of this world, take the bad.”

Assistant State Attorney Melissa Clark, who tried the case, asked for life. Gary Wood, Canales’s attorney, asked for 25 years with almost two years’ credit for time served.

Click On:

“At the end of the day, what he did here was incredibly violent, incredibly serious,” Clark said, contrasting her argument with Wood’s description of Canales as a veteran who served in Iraq, was wounded, and was placed on full disability for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. His war service and the injuries he sustained, including mental injuries–he was held in a psychiatric hospital for nearly two years and considered incompetent to stand trial during that time–had no effect on the sentence, though it would have been in the judge’s discretion to consider his mental capacities in a way he could not have during the trial.

The judge heard from both families’ representatives.

“I am basically asking for Mr. Canales to be sentenced to life. He has no regard for human life, he did not care what happened to my daughter,” or to the children in the house, Norman’s mother said, addressing the court. “He basically thinks he’s above the law, he’s god, and he’s nothing, he’s wasted space.” She described her daughter as smiling again only since Canales was back in jail. But “she still has nightmares.”

Norman herself testified briefly, though only to address the more than $3,300 in restitution she said she was owed for her medical bills. Perkins ordered Canales to pay the restitution.

Canales’s parents and a friend of theirs spoke on his behalf: it’s when the sincerity and heartfelt grief of a family’s love, innocent and admirable by definition, clashes irreconcilably with the consequences of an irredeemably violent act.

The friend described Canales as helpful with her and her family “without asking for anything in return,” as someone who “cares about other people” and donates to charities. She spoke of his service in wartime, “which leaves mental scars.”

When the judge asked Sue Canales if she was his mother, she replied from the witness box as few parents have in similar circumstances: “Absolutely, yes.” The statement, a sentence of her own, was as unconditional as the love she then described. She called her son “an inspiration,” and went on, her voice breaking: “His goodness always shines through. He has never given up on life” no matter what the difficulties, she said, noting how he was recognized for his marksmanship when he was in the military. “He is a good father, companion, friend and confident,” and has a “very much needed sense of humor.” She spoke of her unconditional affection. “John is and always will be a gift from god, my special faith-filled savior is you, my only son, and I am proud to say I am your mother.” She thanked the judge and got up to leave even before the lawyers had a chance to tell the judge they were done. But they were.

Ed Canales, his father, started at the very beginning: December 31, 1986, when “my son came into our lives.” He then spoke of sitting through the trial and hearing various claims he did not believe, until Wood, the defense attorney, had to stop him and tell him that the trial had been litigated. “We’re here for a sentencing,” Wood said.

Ed Canales continued, repeating what he had told a reporter before the hearing in the hall: “Jonathan has never, ever ever been a liar.” He repeated his son’s claim to innocence, saying his son had told one consistent story throughout. (In fact, the problem with the interrogation video was Canales’s bewildering series of changing stories.) he said. “He is my one and only, I love him to death.” That would not change.

After Canales, stone-faced, his head now shaved for the first time since the night of the shooting in the Mondex in 2014, was finger-printed, he was led outside the courtroom by the side door reserved for inmates, back to the county jail before he is processed out to the prison system. “I love you,” his father told him, twice.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8 Responses for “Rejecting Lesser Term, Judge Sentences Jonathan Canales to Life in Prison in Attempted Murder of Ex-Girlfriend”

  1. Really says:

    No one in jail/prison is guilty. You will fit right in. GL

  2. Josh Davis says:

    Judge Perkins does not sentence people on a whim. He’s one of a select few that sentences each individual based on his own merits. I would not want to make the decisions he makes. I do not always agree with the sentences he imposes. But I’ve never been before a better jurist. Those complaining should walk in his shoes for a day. Our criminal judges in Flagler are phenomenal and are well versed on the law. We’re extremely lucky to have them.

  3. ASF says:

    His parents raised a narcissist. They still speak of him as if he is a demi-God. This is the end result. Such a tragedy.

  4. Concerned Citizen says:

    Well score one for our judicial system. They actually did their job for once.

    Now this dude won’t have a chance to abuse or try to kill Tiffany or anyone else for this matter. And hopefully he might get a taste of his treatment of women while he’s in prison.

    I have no sympathy for this man who chose to commit abuse then try to kill his girlfriend. It was a choice and not a mistake. He chose to ruin her life and then try to take it. Now he has to pay.

    Men take notice. If you’re going to beat on someone then try and kill them eventually you’ll have to pay the price. And hopefully it’s a steep one.

    Hopefully Tiffany is getting the help she needs to cope with the effects of his abuse. Hopefully judges will continue harsher sentences on these crimes.

  5. Richard says:

    Finally a judge “gets it”! Canales can now enjoy the rest of his life looking at fences topped with razor wire.

  6. Kip Durocher says:

    Good one pierrJumpoline next line down can you read the end of sentence. Space. Next line how far is this,
    and good coverage

  7. Ronald D. Pomplun says:

    I’m a very close friend of Tiffany’s family, my wife works with her mother. I can tell you with 100% certainty, Tiffany would not try to kill herself and was truly scared of him. I’ve known Tiffany since she was a little girl.
    Yes he got what he deserved for sure and for being a vet and doing that I hope he’s ashamed of himself for the rest of his life!!! He’s an embarrassment to the rest of us vets!!!!!

  8. SSG US Army says:

    I was his supervisor for 3 years in a combat support unit. This man had no restraint and sense then and has none now. I don’t think any man really DESERVES life confinement but his actions are his own and not the values of the people who taught, trained, and lived beside him. Many have tried, you JC did not listen and now you will reap what you have sown.

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in