• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
    • Marineland
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • First Amendment
    • Second Amendment
    • Third Amendment
    • Fourth Amendment
    • Fifth Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Eighth Amendment
    • 14th Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Privacy
    • Civil Rights
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
    • Sponsored Content
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2026
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Why Plastic Recycling Is Failing Catastrophically

April 20, 2026 | FlaglerLive | 9 Comments

Flagler Beach's Sanitation Department is now in the cardboard baling business: it placed 18 tons of cardboard, or 24 bales, on a truck last month when the new system kicked off. (Rob Smith)
No plastic, please. (Rob Smith)

By Jordi Diaz Marcos

As good citizens, we diligently fill the recycling bins provided by our local authorities with all manner of plastic trays, boxes, bottles and bags. But as these bins fill up quicker and quicker each week, an awkward question arises: is all this effort actually doing any good?

Many of us would answer with a sceptically resigned “of course not”. The facts unfortunately support this increasingly common view. In Europe, only around 15% of plastics are recycled, while in the United States the figure drops to 9%. The remainder ends up in incinerators, landfills or, in the worst of cases, in the natural environment.

The question we must answer is therefore not whether plastic recycling has issues, but why the system we have all trusted for decades is failing so catastrophically.

Problems begin before the bin

To understand what’s going wrong, it’s worth taking a step back and looking at how we actually use plastic. Around half of all plastics are used for single-use products: containers, packaging, bags, agricultural sheeting and so on. Between 20% and 25% are used in long-term applications – pipes, cables, building materials – and the rest is used in consumer goods with an intermediate lifespan, such as vehicles, furniture and electronic devices.

In the EU, post-consumer plastic waste already reached 24.6 million tonnes in 2007, and has only grown since then. Packaging is still the main source but others – such as electrical waste and vehicles at the end of their lives – are taking up an increasingly large share.

Recycling is failing for many reasons, all of which are interconnected.

Why plastic recycling is failing

We can break the assortment of reasons for this failure – and the potential solutions – into 12 main points.

1. Inefficient recycling plants

During important processes like cleaning, fragments of plastic are lost as microplastics. This means the system itself creates plastic waste, and we urgently need to rethink the design and operation of these plants.

2. Recycled plastic is expensive

At the moment, virgin plastic is usually cheaper to produce than recycled. Without financial incentives, taxes on virgin plastic or greener public procurement, market forces will keep gravitating towards the cheapest option.

3. Low quality

Polymers degrade, and this limits their potential for reuse. Investing in new sorting, washing and regranulation technologies is key to closing the loop here.

4. Inefficient collection

Losses and pollution start at the source. Optimising collection – bins, logistics, incentives – are just as important as industrial processing plants.

5. Hidden workforces

In many places, waste collection and sorting is precarious and invisible work. Training, job stability and recognition are not just a social issue – they also affect efficiency.

6. Workers exposed to dangerous chemicals

People who work with plastic waste are overly exposed to toxic substances. Fixing this is an urgent question of public health.

7. Exporting waste

For decades, wealthier countries have sent their waste to countries with lower environmental management capacities. As well as being an injustice, this is shortsighted, as environmental damage doesn’t have any respect for borders.

8. Incompatible plastics

Mixing incompatible polymers drastically reduces the quality of recycled material. Accurate sorting is a critical bottleneck.

9. Overly generic policies

There are no universal solutions here. Recycling policies must be adapted to suit local contexts, infrastructures and consumer habits.

10. Unrecyclable products

Multi-layered products, mixed polymers, complex adhesives and black plastic are just some examples of this. While plastics can be sorted into seven main families, in practice only PET and HDPE are commonly recycled. Almost all of the rest end up incinerated or in landfill.

alt
Recycling different types of plastic: PET, HDPE, PVC, LDPE, PP and PS.

11. Reliance on individuals

Properly separating and cleaning waste and following recycling symbols is a help, but it can’t be the only thing we do. Placing all responsibility on the consumer is both unfair and ineffective.

12. Not all waste gets recycled

Impurities such as food scraps, moisture, paper, textiles, metals, or polymer mixtures drastically reduce performance in a recycling plant. The amount that goes in always exceeds the amount that comes out as new material.

We can liken this to cooking. When you make, for instance, a vegetable omelette, you invariably produce waste in the form of eggshells and peelings. The same thing happens in recycling, only on an industrial scale.

alt
12 approaches to plastic recycling.

A collective challenge, not a silver bullet

There is no magic wand we can wave to eliminate all plastic from the planet, but there is enough knowledge to do much better than we are today. Recycling is not a panacea. It is an important but incomplete part of a broader approach that includes reduction, reuse, eco-design and the circular economy. The question is no longer whether we know what to do, but why we still fail to do it.

Technology is advancing, and the problems are clear. What’s missing now is not innovation, but the collective will to put words into action.

Jordi Diaz Marcos is materials department professor and microscopist at the University of Barcelona.

The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
See the Full Conversation Archives
Support FlaglerLive
The political climate—nationally and right here in Flagler County—is at war with fearless reporting. Your support is FlaglerLive's best armor. After 16 years, you know FlaglerLive won’t be intimidated. We dig. We don’t sanitize to pander or please. We report reality, no matter who it upsets. Even you. Imagine Flagler County without that kind of local coverage. Stand with us, and help us hold the line. There’s no paywall—but it’s not free. become a champion of enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization, and donations are tax deductible.
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.
If you prefer the Ben Franklin way, we're at: P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135.
 

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. duncan says

    April 21, 2026 at 7:19 am

    Great article. It’s unfortunate that we continue to squander our environment, and it’s difficult to understand why the health of the planet we depend on isn’t treated as a higher priority. It’s especially discouraging that, despite the effort many people put into recycling, only about 9% ultimately gets processed as intended.

    This is a solvable problem, but the economics clearly aren’t aligned. Meaningful progress will likely require stronger government involvement to correct those incentives and drive real change.

    8
    Reply
  2. Laurel says

    April 21, 2026 at 10:05 am

    We can personally start with small steps and build from there. The current admin makes fun of paper straws, as if they are some sort of threat to our rights. How absurd! I keep silicone straws, that come in fantastic, fun colors, are already bent for convenience, easily washed and usable over and over.

    We have our insulated, steel “cups” that hold ice water for as long as we need. Love ’em! Big ones for trips.

    Coffee grounds, egg shells and veggie scraps go in a kitchen bin, and transferred to a much bin later.

    Paper grocery bags are reused until they start to tear. Cloth bags last longer.

    The way I see it is we do what we can, and what the refuse companies do is on them. We also need to get more serious about legislation and stop silly comments about straws.

    7
    Reply
  3. BillC says

    April 21, 2026 at 10:55 am

    Re: #2 “virgin plastic is usually cheaper to produce than recycled.”
    Producers, not consumers, should bear the responsibility and cost of recycling their products. Then the true cost of virgin plastic won’t be cheaper anymore when the cost of recycling is added in. Also, make the recycle symbols much larger on the containers (i.e. 1 PET, 2 HDPE, 3 PVC, 4 LDPE, 5 6 PP and PS.
    And bring back the deposit system… it worked well in the past.

    5
    Reply
  4. R.S. says

    April 21, 2026 at 10:59 am

    We’re too much relying on “Out of sight; out of mind!” We feel good about dumping stuff into a bin and to forget about it. However, this planet is a small blue boat in the vast ocean of the universe: if that small boat dumps us, there isn’t one soul to cry after us. Responsible engineering must think about the entire lifecycle of a product–from creation to demise to waste. With plastic, none had thought about what to do with the dregs. It’s the same story with electronic waste and with the use of nuclear power for energy production. None knows what to do with the waste. Fortunately, there is an amoeba that replicates at 60°C. So, while our species will fall prey to the next major extinction created by our own soiling and frying our planet, the planet will be OK and life will continue without the human species.

    4
    Reply
  5. Pogo says

    April 21, 2026 at 11:01 am

    12
    Reply
  6. DaleL says

    April 21, 2026 at 11:36 am

    I don’t use a drink straw at home; I don’t understand why I need one at a restaurant. However, even with efficient recycling, some plastic will continually make it into the environment. Think about string (line) trimmers (weed whackers). The nylon line is constantly abraded during use and then chunks are shed when the line is extended from the spool.

    Incineration has been tried. Columbus, Ohio used to have a garbage/trash burning power plant. The joke, when I lived in Ohio, was that it was a “cash” burning power plant because of all the issues and cost overruns. Still, there is a lot of combustible energy in waste plastics, cardboard, and even food.

    2
    Reply
  7. Coat the world in plastic says

    April 21, 2026 at 11:46 am

    Consumers are not educated – at least not all of them – on what is and what isn’t recyclable. This is also an issue with recycling that needs to be addressed if any recycling issue is to be solved. For example, single use water bottles are a different plastic than the cap and they must be separated prior to going in the bin. So many just throw bottles with cap screwed on into the bin.

    Second, every plastic ever made will exist on this planet longer then a human life.. The tooth brush I was using at age 7 is in a landfill somewhere and will be in that same landfill 100 years after I pass. I also don’t think people understand that. Out of sight out of mind is dangerous candy.

    4
    Reply
  8. Sherry says

    April 21, 2026 at 2:29 pm

    In the bigger picture. . . we need to take “saving the ONLY world we have” OUT of the “Capitalistic” realm and calculus. All the things vital for saving our environment should NOT be required to make a profit! Recycling is just ONE of those small actions that each of us “should” be doing.

    As Laurel says, the best way to end plastic pollution is to limit their use to begin with. CHOOSE to buy unpackaged “fresh fruits and veggies”. CHOOSE to use less prepackaged and preprocessed foods. They are much healthier for you, and for the planet.

    Government needs to step up big time! We need to do much more, but here are examples from where we live in CA:

    California limits plastic and Styrofoam (expanded polystyrene/EPS) through a strict, state-wide ban on foam food service ware, which took effect January 1, 2025, alongside Senate Bill 54 (SB 54). This law mandates a 25% reduction in single-use plastic packaging by 2032 and requires all single-use packaging to be truly recyclable or compostable.

    Key Limits on Styrofoam (Expanded Polystyrene – EPS)
    Statewide Ban (SB 54): As of Jan 1, 2025, the sale, distribution, and importation of EPS food service ware (cups, plates, bowls, takeout containers, trays) is banned.
    Failed Recycling Target: The ban was triggered because producers failed to prove that EPS achieved a 25% recycling rate by 2025.

    Local Ordinances: Over 100 cities in California have enforced local bans, often stricter than state regulations.

    Key Limits on Plastic
    Mandatory Reductions: SB 54 requires a 25% reduction in the weight and volume of single-use plastic packaging and foodware by 2032.

    Mandatory Recyclability: By 2032, all single-use packaging must be recyclable or compostable.
    Higher Recycling Rates: The law mandates strict recycling rates for plastic materials, rising from 30% in 2028 up to 65% by 2032.

    Plastic Bag Ban: California was the first state to pass a plastic bag ban in 2014, with subsequent updates reinforcing the ban on thin plastic bags at checkout.

    “Upon Request” Law: Restaurants are restricted from automatically providing single-use utensils and condiments unless requested by the customer.

    Enforcement
    CalRecycle oversees these regulations, focusing on education first but allowing penalties
    daily for violations.

    2
    Reply
  9. Me says

    April 22, 2026 at 7:36 am

    I have a solution stop making plastic. Its bad for our health and bad for the environment.

    1
    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Skibum on Why Do Some People Treat the Magic Kingdom and Disney Adults Like Cultural Abominations?
  • Skibum on With Democrat David Jolly’s Exception, Most Gubernatorial Candidates Oppose Legalizing Recreational Pot
  • Pogo on Florida Democrats Are Getting Giddy. They Should Beware.
  • Pogo on Call Israel’s War Crimes and Genocide By Name
  • Pogo on Call Israel’s War Crimes and Genocide By Name
  • Skibum on Time to ‘Move On’ From Alligator Alcatraz, Ashley Moody Says
  • Laurel on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Sunday, May 10, 2026
  • Samuel L. Bronkowitz on Florida Democrats Are Getting Giddy. They Should Beware.
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Saturday, May 9, 2026
  • Jim on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Sunday, May 10, 2026
  • Sherry on Why Do Some People Treat the Magic Kingdom and Disney Adults Like Cultural Abominations?
  • Ray W. on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Sunday, May 10, 2026
  • Deborah Coffey on Why Do Some People Treat the Magic Kingdom and Disney Adults Like Cultural Abominations?
  • Mike Cocchiola on Call Israel’s War Crimes and Genocide By Name
  • Deborah Coffey on Time to ‘Move On’ From Alligator Alcatraz, Ashley Moody Says
  • PaulT on Call Israel’s War Crimes and Genocide By Name

Log in