• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Radiation Sickness: Florida Republicans Tiring of Up-Front Utility Rates for Nukes

February 22, 2013 | FlaglerLive | 1 Comment

Gouging on top of radiation. (Michael Hicks)
Gouging on top of radiation. (Michael Hicks)

Four Republican senators said Thursday they will try to revamp a controversial 2006 law that has led to utility customers paying hundreds of millions of dollars for nuclear-power projects — but stopped short of calling for a total repeal.

Click On:


  • For FPL Customers, Bills $20 Higher in 2013 for Nuke-Plant Construction That May Never Happen
  • Should You Keep Paying FPL and PEF For Nukes Plants that May Never Be Built?
  • Nuclear Socialism: FPL and Progress Energy Get $282 Million Rate Hike
  • FPL’s $18 Billion Nuclear-Reactor Plans Leak Unanswered Questions Before Florida PSC
  • Pass-Through Crock: How Progress Energy May Once Again Nuke Its Customers
  • Florida’s Nuclear Energy Scamming: It’s Not Rickover’s Atomic Power Program Anymore
  • FPL, Progress Energy, Florida’s Nuclear Fraud
  • Disaster Ready? 5 Nuclear Reactors in Florida, 3 Of Them Within 180 Miles of Palm Coast
  • Nuclear’s Glowing, False New Dawn

The senators are from the Tampa Bay area, where controversy about Progress Energy Florida’s nuclear costs became an issue during last year’s elections. The proposal calls for changes such as providing partial refunds to customers if utilities decide against finishing nuclear projects.

“This legislation brings accountability and common sense into our energy policy discussion,” said Sen. John Legg, a Lutz Republican who will be the prime sponsor of the measure. “Protecting ratepayers’ interests should be our primary concern. This will lead to a balanced approach to our state’s energy plan.”

Legg, who was joined at a news conference by St. Petersburg Republican Jeff Brandes, Clearwater Republican Jack Latvala and Trilby Republican Wilton Simpson, has not filed the bill. He said there is “plenty of room for conversation” on the details.

Past attempts to repeal the law have failed, as lawmakers and utility officials have argued that the measure is needed to help spur more nuclear power in the state. The law allows utilities to pass along costs to consumers as nuclear projects are developed, which is different from the usual process that involves recouping costs after other types of power plants are built.

Much of the controversy focuses on money that Progress and Florida Power & Light have collected for proposed nuclear plants that would not start generating electricity for another decade, if ever. The Southern Alliance for Clean Energy has challenged the constitutionality of the law in the Florida Supreme Court, which has not ruled.

Progress has proposed building two nuclear reactors in Levy County, while FPL has proposed adding reactors at its Turkey Point complex in Miami-Dade County. The utilities have collected money so far for expenses such as trying to get critical licenses for the projects.

While details of the bill still need to be finalized, one part of it would require utilities to refund what is known as their “rate of return” if the nuclear projects are not completed. Latvala said that money essentially would reflect utility profits on the projects. The bill would not require refunds of money spent on project costs.

Another part of the bill would require the utilities to begin construction by a still-to-be-determined date and show progress in building the new plants. If they do not meet those requirements, the 2006 law would go away.

//
//

The proposed legislation drew sharply different reactions Thursday, with utilities touting the benefits of the 2006 law and critics saying more-dramatic steps are needed to protect consumers.

Spokesmen for FPL and Progress said in emails that the law is important to efforts to develop nuclear power and diversify the state’s electricity supply, which is heavily dependent on burning natural gas. Also, the law has helped finance FPL projects to upgrade already existing nuclear plants.

“We believe the law is appropriate, and it is benefiting our customers today,” FPL spokesman Mark Bubriski said in an email. “We do not support any changes to the law.”

Progress spokesman Sterling Ivey said his company would review the proposed legislation and determine its impact before taking a position. But he also pointed to what the utility sees as the importance of the law.

“The nuclear cost-recovery legislation makes it possible for the company to pursue capital-intensive nuclear investments that will help ensure clean, affordable and reliable power for customers, both now and in the future,” Ivey wrote in an email.

But freshman Rep. Dwight Dudley, a St. Petersburg Democrat who said the nuclear costs were a major issue in his campaign last year, said the law needs to repealed and that the senators’ proposal doesn’t go far enough.

“To me, it’s eye wash and half measure,” Dudley said.

Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. RNYPD says

    February 24, 2013 at 5:28 am

    Nevermind that there are other options for clean dependable energy, lets go nuclear! Insane!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents
  • WNZF Creekside Festival

Recent Comments

  • Mike on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • Bee on Contrasting with Depa Case, Judge Dismisses Charge Against Autistic Female Who’d Assaulted Teacher at Matanzas
  • Ben Hogarth on The Supreme Court’s Conservative Supermajority Reconvenes. Beware.
  • endless dark money on No Plans Yet for Florida Health Departments to Offer New Covid Vaccine Even as It Rolls Out in Other States
  • public health supporter on No Plans Yet for Florida Health Departments to Offer New Covid Vaccine Even as It Rolls Out in Other States
  • Bee on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • cheryll murphy on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • Charles on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • TR on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • The Sour Kraut on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • kmaryday on No Plans Yet for Florida Health Departments to Offer New Covid Vaccine Even as It Rolls Out in Other States
  • Dennis C Rathsam on Town Center Fills In Slowly: Palm Coast Council Approves First 66 of 161 Homes at ‘The Retreat’
  • Robert Joseph Fortier on ‘Faith’ Bridge Over SR100 Goes from Maligned to Acclaimed as It Opens, But in the Absence of Its Champion
  • Skibum on No Plans Yet for Florida Health Departments to Offer New Covid Vaccine Even as It Rolls Out in Other States
  • Kathleen Lentino on Army Corps Issues Permit Notice for New, 828-ft Flagler Beach Pier, Detailing Construction and Seeking Public Input
  • Pat Stote on Taylor Manjarres, 20, Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for Her Role in Shooting Death of Zaire Roberts

Log in