Nearly as old as the railroad that slices through this southern Illinois city just east of the Mississippi River, St. Elizabeth’s Hospital has been a downtown bedrock since 1875.
Started by three nuns from a Franciscan order in Germany, the Catholic hospital still seeks “to embody Christ’s healing love” to the sick, the aged and the poor, according to its mission statement. It is so tied to the city that when the local economy slumped in 2009, the nonprofit St. Elizabeth’s gave $20 to every employee to spend on Main Street, sending hundreds of shoppers out to the mostly mom- and pop-owned stores.
But St. E’s, as locals call it, now faces its own financial troubles, largely a result of the costs of maintaining an obsolete facility and of treating more low-income and uninsured patients from Belleville and neighboring East St. Louis, one of the poorest cities in the Midwest.
After a decade of losing money, St. Elizabeth’s officials are taking a radical step: Like a small but growing number of hospitals around the country, they plan to close the 303-bed hospital and move elsewhere. They are seeking state approval to build a $300-million facility seven miles northeast, in O’Fallon, a wealthier city that is one of the fastest-growing communities in the St. Louis region with new subdivisions, proximity to a regional mall and quick access to Interstate 64.
Describing plans to leave behind some services, including a walk-in clinic, St. Elizabeth’s CEO Maryann Reese insists the hospital is not abandoning the city or the poor.
But that’s exactly how many residents, community leaders and clergy see it. If St. Elizabeth’s leaves downtown, they say, it will limit care for many poorer residents, especially those dependent on public transportation, and lead to overcrowding at the city’s one other hospital, which is downsizing. Many also worry about the loss of jobs and of the visitors to the hospital who patronize local shops and eateries.
Geri Boyer, who runs a bed and breakfast and an engineering firm on Main Street, said that as a Catholic, she’s “appalled” by the hospital’s plan. “I do think they are putting profit motivations over the mission of serving the poor. I am upset and embarrassed for [them].”
“Communities can be tipped by the loss of a vital medical institution,” Belleville Police Capt. John Moody II wrote in a scathing letter about the plan to a state review board. “There is too much at stake and the loss will be catastrophic and I fear unrecoverable.”
Geography Is Destiny
Hospitals have moved to follow population migrations before, but the relocations are becoming more common. That’s partly due to the aging of many facilities built in the 1950s and 1960s, and the desire to attract better-paying patients. A 2012 Health Affairs study found that hospitals in 12 markets used geographic expansion strategies, including building new hospitals or adding freestanding emergency departments, to “capture” well-insured patients.
“Where you choose to place new facilities almost always involves moving to an area where there is a substantial privately insured population,” said Paul Ginsburg, chairman of medicine and public policy at the University of Southern California.
Currently, hospital relocations are planned or underway in South and Central Florida, eastern Tennessee, central Georgia, Birmingham, Ala., and northeast Ohio. Some have stirred controversy, as in Belleville:
— Just west of Fort Lauderdale, HCA Inc., a for-profit hospital chain, plans to close Plantation General Hospital and open a new hospital seven miles away in more affluent Davie, near a medical school. “It’s all about greed,” said Plantation Mayor Diane Bendekovic. When HCA offered to keep some outpatient services in town, she told them: “Don’t throw Plantation any crumbs.”
— Tennova Healthcare is moving its flagship Physicians Regional Medical Center near downtown Knoxville, Tenn. closer to higher-income suburbs eight miles west. “Clearly …they want to be near the better zip codes” said Tony Spezia, CEO of Covenant Health, owner of Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center, which will become the last general hospital downtown. Tennova is owned by Community Health Systems, a large for-profit hospital system.
— Just outside Cleveland, Lakewood Hospital in Lakewood, Ohio, which is managed by the Cleveland Clinic, is slated to close in 2016, and patients will be directed to the Clinic’s newer Fairview Hospital three miles away or to another facility being built in Avon, 13 miles away. Both Fairview and Avon are higher-income towns. Lakewood officials say losing the hospital and its 1,000 employees could have a prolonged impact.
Hospital officials point to their aging, landlocked facilities and argue it is cheaper to build, rather than renovate. What they don’t say publicly is how geography is often economic destiny for a hospital, especially at a time of increasing financial pressure as a result of Medicare funding cuts, including penalties that may result from new pay-for-performance measures in the Affordable Care Act.
By moving to wealthier areas, hospitals can reduce the percent of uninsured and lower-paying Medicaid patients, while increasing the proportion of privately insured patients – what hospitals refer to as attracting better “payer mix.” That’s also why they locate outpatient centers and medical offices in affluent suburbs. But relocations often spark anger from those left behind, who worry about loss of jobs and of access to care, particularly for the poor.
When the hospitals are nonprofits, like St. Elizabeth’s, questions loom larger because they are exempted from taxes in exchange for providing benefits to the community. “Hospitals were established in inner cities where the greatest needs were and now, essentially, that charity obligation has gone by the wayside as they are looking at their bottom line,” said Gerard Anderson, director of the Center for Hospital Finance and Management at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Even nonprofit hospitals want to be near wealthier residents. “You move to where the money is,” he said
‘Built For Health Care In The 1950s’
That doesn’t sit well with Belleville Mayor Mark Eckert, who was born at St. Elizabeth’s, drove an ambulance there when he was a teenager and now lives three blocks away where he can see the lights on the hospital helipad from his living room. He fears the move will leave barren whole blocks in the middle of the city, devastate the downtown economy and make it more difficult for some people to get care.
“They are definitely running from the poor,” he said.
St. Elizabeth’s officials deny that, noting that only a quarter of their patients come from Belleville and the new site will be closer to the majority who live in other communities, including eight of the 10 ZIP codes in their service area with the highest poverty rates. “Being more centrally located will also make care more accessible for everyone, regardless of income,” the hospital said in a statement.
But the hospital faces a perception problem, in part because Belleville is older and poorer than O’Fallon. Median household income in Belleville is about $47,000, compared to over $75,000 in O’Fallon. By moving northeast, the hospital also moves farther away from East St. Louis, though hospital officials say the interstate location shortens drive time. Eckert says many poor people don’t have cars and there is no direct public transportation to the O’Fallon site.
Eckert does not dispute that St. Elizabeth’s is under stress and needs to modernize. The hospital lost $10.5 million on $148 million in revenue in 2013, according to its latest audited financial statement. That same year, Springfield, Ill.-based Hospital Sisters Health System, which owns St. Elizabeth’s and 13 other hospitals in Illinois and Wisconsin, made $168 million on nearly $2 billion in revenue.
Most of St. Elizabeth’s operates out of a 60-year-old building that administrators say is difficult for many people to get to because of one-way roads. In addition, they say, patient rooms are too small and the waiting area for the emergency room is cramped.
“It is extremely challenging to operate a hospital that was designed and built for health care in the 1950s,” Reese, the CEO, told a state regulatory board that reviews major hospital projects at a January hearing. With several members absent, the board voted down the relocation. But under state rules, the hospital can respond to its concerns and a second hearing and vote are expected on April 21.
Eckert said the city offered to help St. Elizabeth’s rebuild downtown and even suggested another location adjacent to a college and a train line on the edge of town. But like so many other businesses that have left Belleville, hospital officials wanted quick access to the interstate. Hospital officials say they considered locations in Belleville, but settled on 114 acres of farmland they bought in O’Fallon in 2011 as a site to build a 144-bed facility.
Another vehement opponent is Memorial Hospital, a few miles from downtown and the only other hospital in Belleville. It, too, is targeting the more affluent population to the east of the city — building a 94-bed hospital in Shiloh, also just off the interstate and a five-minute drive from the proposed site for St. Elizabeth’s. State officials approved that facility in 2011— over the objection of St. Elizabeth’s, which claimed there was no need for it.
“As a nonprofit community hospital, we want to fulfill our mission — and meet our budgetary needs,” said Memorial CEO Mark Turner. “And to do that, there has to be enough money coming in to pay for that.”
Unlike St. Elizabeth’s, though, Memorial retained its Belleville hospital, albeit with fewer beds. Memorial officials say they fear that if St. Elizabeth’s moves, their Belleville hospital will be overwhelmed and will get most of the area’s uninsured and Medicaid patients. Memorial also worries the new St. Elizabeth’s will pull the best-paying patients from its new hospital set to open next year.
Most opponents support St. Elizabeth’s building a new hospital, but they want it in Belleville. “Why do you want to be further away from the people you are helping?” asked Stephanie Dorris, who helps lead a community group opposing the move, pointing to the empty lots around the hospital.
That was the same question some asked in South Bend, Ind. in 2009, when St. Joseph Regional Medical Center left its downtown location after 125 years for the richer and faster growing suburb of Mishawaka, seven miles away. In its final year in South Bend, St. Joseph lost $42 million.
In the years since, the nonprofit Catholic hospital has made about $50 million in profit, financial statements show.
But Karl Nichols, who heads the St. Joseph County Minority Health Coalition, said that hospital’s departure has hurt the poor. He said that those without cars have less access to care and the city’s remaining hospital is overburdened.
‘You Have To Be Prepared’
Driving through Belleville on a recent morning, police Capt. Moody raises other concerns. As he passes several elementary schools close to St. Elizabeth’s with children playing outside at recess, he worries about the unthinkable: how the loss of the hospital might affect response to, say, a mass shooting. “You have to be prepared,” he said.
He credits St. Elizabeth’s with saving the life of a Belleville police officer who was shot in 2006 two blocks from the hospital. “People here feel secure knowing St. E’s is where it is,” Moody said.
Marilyn Lanter, 61, who works at Community Kindness Resale Shop on Main Street in Belleville, says she’s been treated at St. Elizabeth’s at least six times over 20 years. “It’s a place I trust with my life,” she said. “It’s comforting to have the hospital so close, particularly for people like me who don’t drive.”
The drive from the existing hospital in Belleville to the proposed location in O’Fallon takes 15 to 20 minutes, but it’s like going through a time warp. St. Elizabeth’s sits across from the gothic-style St. Peter’s Cathedral down the street from a post office, a Catholic school, a Boy Scouts office and the City of Belleville Parks and Recreation building. In contrast, the O’Fallon hospital site is behind a Hilton Garden Inn and just across the interstate from shopping centers that include a Target and other big box retailers.
Rev. Joshua Pittman of St. Paul’s United Church of Christ is philosophical about the proposed change even though it will cause pain. “Churches move too,” he said. “It’s what happens when saw mills close down and people move.”
But to Rev. Monsignor John Myler, rector of St. Peter’s, the plan seems a betrayal. “’Only seven miles is quite a distance for the poor, who have no means of transportation,” he wrote in opposition. “It is contrary to Francis to ask those in need to travel to him. Rather Franciscans are — and have been for centuries — right among the people, not in a well-to-do place, asking the people instead to come to them.”
–Phil Galewitz, Kaiser Health News
What? It costs money to maintain hospitals and keep up care? Yep. In other shocking news…there’s gambling in Vegas!
Wonder how much government regulations and supplements have increased expenses and decreased care? Let’s just continue along with our lives and ignore governments detrimental involvement in our health care system, shall we? Let’s ignore the extremely long waits, as in Jacksonville, for Vets in government VA facilities too. Nothing to see here, keep up the leftist mating call of “The government needs to do something!”.
a tiny manatee says
You know, I totally agree. I think Florida would make a fine testbed for a completely deregulated, free-market-solves-all hospital system. If hospitals had to seriously worry about the bottom line instead of sucking the teats of government assistance then I’m sure the quality of health care would go up. I know that one of the biggest costs with respect to the medical industry is the overhead involved in handing government-related insurance like medicare, so an easy fix is to just deny care to people that have it. Medicare serves people over 65 and people with disabilities, which are two groups that generally don’t contribute worthwhile to society or the free market in any worthwhile manner unless they are wealthy enough to pay as they go. Likewise, the free market will eventually solve issues like infection rates and medical negligence because people killed by them will just use a different hospital the next time they get ill. Hospitals can also choose to pay their employees less, which will help with the bottom line and make sure that their shareholder profits are maximized. Handling medical waste is expensive too, but if they just dump it in the trash like everything else then problem solved.
Sherry E says
Beyond the all too usual political “unfounded” statements. Let’s read some actual research from experts, regarding the life saving benefits of the ACA. This from the LA Times May 2014:
People asking the ultimate question about the Affordable Care Act–will it actually save lives?–now have an answer, and it’s yes.
The documentation comes from a team at the Harvard School of Public Health. Benjamin D. Sommers, Sharon K. Long, and Katherine Baicker conducted the most extensive study of mortality rates in Massachusetts following that state’s 2006 health insurance reform, which is the precursor to the ACA.
It is challenging to identify factors other than health care reform that might have produced this pattern of results
– Harvard study showing Massachusetts health reforms saved lives
They found that from 2007 to 2010, overall mortality among Massachusetts residents aged 20 to 64 declined by 2.9% relative to control groups in other states. Mortality from causes amenable to healthcare declined by 4.5%. Those causes include tuberculosis, cancer, cardiac disease–a full list is here. The reduction was even larger in counties with higher pre-reform rates of uninsurance and low income, which of course are the main targets of Obamacare.
The results, according to the authors’ calculations, mean that one death per year is prevented for every 830 people gaining health insurance. Harold Pollack of the University of Chicago performs what he calls a heroic extrapolation to conclude that if the ACA brings insurance to 20 million uninsured Americans, that means the reduction of 24,000 deaths a year.
What, Doctors are still among the highest paid professionals around and Pharmaceutical companies still make amazingly high profits of of American consumers, despite the amount of tax dollars that finance the development of the drugs they charge so much for? The government truly is against these humble civic minded entities!
How many aspirin do you have to dispense at $50. per pill to make a profit. With room charges of $2,000. per day, seems like there has to be some thieves running hospitals if they are losing money?
Sherry E says
Tiny Manatee. . . your sarcasm is priceless. . . but the points you make are Right On! When the “maximize profit motive” out weighs the health and well being of our citizens, our nation is doomed!