• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Palm Coast Council Abolishes Secret and One-Sided ‘Difficult Citizens List’ Kept Since 2016

June 1, 2021 | FlaglerLive | 10 Comments

The City Council this evening abolished a "Difficult Citizens" list the administration kept since 2016. (© FlaglerLive)
The City Council this evening abolished a “Difficult Citizens” list the administration kept since 2016. (© FlaglerLive)

Apologizing for it, the Palm Coast City Council this evening abolished an all but secret and plainly intrusive “Difficult Citizens List” the city administration started in early 2016, under the previous city manager, and filled with new entries until May 6, two years into the tenure of the current city manager–who resigned last week, effective at the end of June.




Dan Priotti, one of the people on the list, had his assistant read a statement, placed the blame on the previous city manager (Jim Landon) and commended the current city manager (Matt Morton) for a culture he described as “the most positive he’s seen in 20 years” as he asked for the list to be abolished.

City Council member Ed Danko, who compared the list to something out of East Germany (a notorious police state before the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989) put the blame on both Landon and former Mayor Milissa Holland, which is not accurate: the list was started in March 2016. Holland was elected later that year and was not seated until that November.

Danko and other council members said they had been unaware of the list (as Holland has since its revelation). Council member Nick Klufas said the list was unacceptable but said the matter of employee safety requires “some type” of system that enables employees to know if and when they’re going to a property that may be problematic. Other council members agreed, but said it should not be secret.




The list, which has made the city vulnerable to lawsuits, cited allegedly “difficult” residents by name, usually listed their addresses, and at times included their pictures. The list included four entries this year and 33 entries going back to the first in March 2016. Some of the individuals on it were cited repeatedly.

All entries were the result of resident interactions with city staffers–code enforcement officers in the field or customer service representatives at City Hall. Many of the entries reflect distasteful, at times dangerous, almost always offensive behavior by residents–at least the way they are described in the “Difficult Citizen List.” But the entries can also be vague and general. In 2016, one resident allegedly “Directed Profane or Vulgar Language” at city staff and displayed “Harassment or Continued Disruptive Behavior,” though the behavior is not further described nor is its context. The same entry includes a reference that the resident’s “current residence has multiple code violations”–which is irrelevant to an individual’s behavior in the cited incidents: numerous people carry code enforcement violations.

On the other hand, the same resident was said in the list to have “sent an e-mail indicating that [he] will ‘exercise my American rights’ if employees ‘step foot’ on his property. He indicates that that is ‘his domain.’ Use Caution and if you have need to be there, do not hesitate to contact the Sheriff’s Office for escort.”




The most recent entry on the list describes an alleged case of sexual harassment. A resident approached the front desk at City Hall to make a payment. The man, who is identified by name in the list, “slowly unbuttoned his pants, then he unzipped them. The top portion of his jeans were folded down and he proceeded to reach across his body and put his hands into his pants,” reads the description of the incident. “He reached his hand in and slowly comes out with a debit card. I proceeded to process the payment and afterwards he put the debit card back into his pants, slowly zipped them up and then buttoned them. He stayed around the bump out attempting to make conversation until another customer approached and was waiting.”

City Hall has had its own armed security guard since spring. It isn’t clear why the security guard was not summoned. In many instances of conflict reported on the list, a sheriff’s deputy is made aware.

For all its unquestionably disturbing allegations, the list is entirely one-sided, as is the process that led to it and its continued use. Those on it never knew that they were on it. They never had the chance to contest either the description of the alleged incidents described by city staff or contest being on the list. As a matter of due process, they had none.

The list was not, strictly speaking, a secret–it could be obtained by public record request, as the News-Journal did when it first reported the issue last week. City Manager Matt Morton had indirectly alluded to the process weeks ago, leading the News-Journal report to inquire about it. But in effect, it was a secret list: the city never let on that it maintained it nor took any steps to be transparent about it while it was being populated.




Council member Eddie Branquinho, speaking by Zoom from Portugal, who also said he was not aware of the list, suggested a discussion with the sheriff on how to proceed with cautioning employees about problematic residents. However, he said, “everybody should be notified” about “dangerous” citizens, because if they can be dangerous to city employees, they could be dangerous to “everybody,” Branquinho said.

Morton, the city manager, said the list was conceptualized by a former city council member in 2015 who was privy to abuse leveled at employees. He said problems with residents need to be documented in police reports rather than in spreadsheets, and proposed a process that would ensure due process, including several steps, well before an individual was placed on such a list.

Danko motioned to immediately cease using the list then move on to figuring out “how to do this properly.” The list itself may not be destroyed–not for many years–since it is a public record. But the list will no longer be used. Klufas was concerned about eliminating the cautions about specific individuals that the list enabled. But Morton said a corrected process could be forthcoming in a matter of weeks. The vote to eliminate the use of the list was unanimous.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. DP says

    June 1, 2021 at 8:26 pm

    And what proof we as citizens ask, has been provided that this list has been deleted, abolished, or what ever you can call it?. Having worked in the environment of computer’s there’s someone, somewhere, or computers that will still have a copy. !!!!!! And before they claim it was a hand written document, I’d call BS!!!!!

    Reply
  2. Lance Carroll says

    June 1, 2021 at 10:12 pm

    I gather that the regular citizens call that a ‘target list.’ I imagine that list was made up of folks with legitimate complaints against the municipality. Back to the old phrase: “can’t fight city hall.”

    Reply
  3. Steve says

    June 2, 2021 at 12:20 am

    A List. Wow FPC gets more bizarre by the week. Damn straight you set yourselves up for a Lawsuit. What a brilliant Idea. Not

    Reply
  4. Wow says

    June 2, 2021 at 7:24 am

    Hard to tell the difference. Is it a Difficult Citizens List or candidates for County office. Bad behavior all around, sometimes problematic, sometimes electable.

    Reply
  5. Michael & Diane Cocchiola says

    June 2, 2021 at 9:39 am

    The council needs a process to be document abusive behavior, particularly threats. Not a list as such, but a documented incident report. Signage should forewarn citizens that threatening behavior will be reported to FCSO.

    This will be an added burden on staff, but we know from incidents around the country that there is a very thin line between shouting out and acting out.

    Reply
  6. Old Guy says

    June 2, 2021 at 10:41 am

    In this day and age some method to warn city workers of potential threats is necessary. However, when a citizen has been so labeled they should know this upfront and be able to contest it through due process. Frankly I’m surprised the now dismantled list had so few individuals on it.

    Reply
  7. Michael Pikiel says

    June 2, 2021 at 7:51 pm

    This list should not be destroyed, but published. Let the residents listed to decide if they want to take legal issue against the City. Also lets determine who initiated this list, who approved and maintained it.

    Reply
    • Hmmm says

      June 3, 2021 at 2:02 pm

      The list was to protect employees from citizens that have displayed violence or threatened physical violence towards city employees. It wasnt a secret, just not advertised. So now a city employee will go blindly to an address not knowing the last person that was there feared for their life. Good job!!

      Reply
    • Eva says

      June 3, 2021 at 4:19 pm

      Agreed! Also, let the city publicize what behavior got them on the list! Behaving badly has consequences, and we all know how bad the behavior is of the unruly children still mad they lost elections. Boohoo, who are snowflakes now lol! Inn any event, the FCSO must be harder on threatening bullies trying to disrupt our government proceedings. Same crowd that bussed their way up to the insurrection or supported those who did. So over it.

      Reply
  8. Dlee says

    June 6, 2021 at 5:43 pm

    No City should ever have such a list. That’s 1st grade behavior and ridiculous for adults who are running our city to participate in such an act. Any potential threat or harm should be taken up by the Sheriffs immediately. I’ve been here over 20 years and never thought I’d be experiencing the problems in Palm Coast Politics. This was a great place to live before becoming a City. Since a mayor and other officials had to be elected it became a back stabbing community of corruption and not seeing any end to it. That list should have NEVER been put into action and it should be burned up in the faces of the ones who started it

    Reply
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents
  • grand living realty

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Pierre Tristam on Why Will Furry Is Demolishing the Flagler Youth Orchestra
  • Jimbo99 on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • Suzanne Kenna on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • Laurel on Potentially Toxic Algae Bloom North of Bull Creek Campground Results in Urgent Health Alert
  • Robin on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • Definitely not Mike OMeally. on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • T on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • LAW ABIDING CITIZEN on Wadsworth Elementary’s Paul Peacock Is Told He’s Done in Flagler Schools; New Principal To Be Named Later
  • Katie Berry on No, Flagler Beach Isn’t Asking for Money. It’s Asking for Cooperation from County and Cities.
  • Anwp on In Surprise Victory for Voting Rights, Supreme Court Rejects Redistricting Map Diluting Black Vote
  • JimBob on After Deadlock on Rape Charges, New Trial for Monserrate Teron Set for July 24
  • Long time Palm Coaster on Resident of Palm Coast Assisted Living Facility Stabs Roommate
  • Jimbo99 on The Hung Jury Got It Right in the Monserrate Teron Trial
  • ASF on Resident of Palm Coast Assisted Living Facility Stabs Roommate
  • Deborah Coffey on In Surprise Victory for Voting Rights, Supreme Court Rejects Redistricting Map Diluting Black Vote
  • The dude on The Hung Jury Got It Right in the Monserrate Teron Trial

Log in