• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Law Be Damned: Some Insurers Still Refuse to Provide Coverage for Contraceptives

August 22, 2014 | FlaglerLive | 8 Comments

Merck's NuvaRing, the transparent, larger ring in the image, is a form of contraception.  (Zane Selvans)
Merck’s NuvaRing, the transparent, larger ring in the image, is a form of contraception. (Zane Selvans)

How much leeway do employers and insurers have in deciding whether they’ll cover contraceptives without charge and in determining which methods make the cut?

Not much, as it turns out, but that hasn’t stopped some from trying.

Kaiser Health News readers still write in regularly describing battles they’re waging to get the birth control coverage they’re entitled to.

In one of those messages recently, a woman said her insurer denied free coverage for the NuvaRing. This small plastic device, which is inserted into the vagina, works for three weeks at a time by releasing hormones similar to those used by birth control pills. She said her insurer told her she would be responsible for her contraceptive expenses unless she chooses an oral generic birth control pill. The NuvaRing costs between $15 and $80 a month, according to Planned Parenthood.

Under the health law, health plans have to cover the full range of FDA-approved birth control methods without any cost sharing by women, unless the plan falls into a limited number of categories that are excluded, either because it’s grandfathered under the law or it’s for is a religious employer or house of worship.  Following the recent Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby case, some private employers that have religious objections to providing birth control coverage as a free preventive benefit will also be excused from the requirement.

In addition, the federal government has given plans some flexibility by allowing them to use “reasonable medical management techniques” to keep their costs under control. So if there is both a generic and a brand-name version of a birth-control pill available, for example, a plan could decide to cover only the generic version without cost to the patient.

As for the NuvaRing, even though they may use the same hormones, the pill and the ring are different methods of birth control. As an official from the federal Department of Health and Human Services said in an email, “The pill, the ring and the patch are different types of hormonal methods … It is not permissible to cover only the pill, but not the ring or the patch.”

Guidance from the federal government clearly states that the full range of FDA-approved methods of birth control must be covered as a preventive benefit without cost sharing. That includes birth control pills, the ring or patch, intrauterine devices and sterilization, among others.

But despite federal guidance, “we’ve seen this happen, plenty,” says Adam Sonfield, a senior public policy associate at the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health research and education organization. “Clearly insurance companies think things are ambiguous enough that they can get away with it.”

If you are denied coverage, your defense is to appeal the decision, and get your state insurance department involved.

“The state has the right and responsibility to enforce this law,” says Sonfield.

–Michelle Andrews, Kaiser Health News

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. OMG says

    August 22, 2014 at 1:28 pm

    So tell me why the Insurers need to follow the law when the President does not and changes it whenever he pleases. Especially for his special interest groups!

    Reply
  2. Michael Randazzo says

    August 22, 2014 at 3:20 pm

    1. Why does the left consider a pregnancy a sickness? It is as natural as the birds and the bees.
    2. What is the baby’s choice in this? How about men keep it in their pants and woman keep their legs closed?
    3. The “ACA”/ Obamacare is an unconstitutional law and as far as I am concerned should be struck down completely.
    4. If you can show me in the Constitution where it is lawful for the Government to take my money to fix your screw up (and I do mean screw up) I will gladly fork over my hard earned money to pay for your slutty (female) and dirtbag (male) irresponsible behavior.

    Thank you for listening.

    Reply
  3. Bunnell Resident says

    August 22, 2014 at 4:21 pm

    Since the President picks and chooses which laws he will follow or enforce including knowingly and willingly breaking his own law under Obamacare, there should be no surprise that employers/ insurers may be tempted to pick and choose also. The President has set a poor example which has caused a decreased respect for the law. Is anyone surprised? When leaders lead followers will follow, when leaders fail to lead, followers do whatever the hell they choose.

    Reply
  4. OMG says

    August 22, 2014 at 5:14 pm

    See what I mean. Obama just changed the Law again… http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/08/22/administration-offers-new-accommodations-on-birth-control-after-obamacare/

    Reply
  5. A.S.F. says

    August 23, 2014 at 11:51 pm

    I notice whenever birth control options are excluded for any reason, by any group, it is always the options open to women that are targeted. Why are vasectomies never excluded, either by name or with such gusto? If sexual mores and behavior are the issue for so many of the upright Christian soldiers among us, why do I hear no such protestations mentioned for Viagra and Cialys prescriptions for men? I mean, if the Lord WANTED you to be able to have an erection…(fill in the blank.)

    Reply
  6. Sherry Epley says

    August 24, 2014 at 9:15 am

    I agree completely ASF! I love the way you worded your comment! Also what about vasectomies?

    Also, not to confuse the loyal FOX lovers with actual facts, it is actually the Republican packed Supreme court that is changing the rules for the ACA!

    Reply
  7. What about them? says

    August 25, 2014 at 7:27 am

    Vasectomies are considered an elective procedure, and I know of NO insurance plans that cover them. If you’re so up-in-arms about having choices, it seems to me you would WANT vasectomies to be fully covered. That way more women could “choose” to NOT use birth control.

    Also, can you point out some insurance plans that cover ED prescriptions at no cost? I’m sure there are thousands of men that would like to sign up for it!

    Reply
  8. Sherry Epley says

    August 25, 2014 at 8:24 am

    Apparently good ole’ (NOT!) Hobby Lobby’s insurance still provides some coverage for vasectomies and ED drugs. I’ll bet they even have job openings IF you are the “RIGHT” gender and believe in the “RIGHT” God!

    This from the DailyElite:

    Hobby Lobby may no longer allow its female employees to pay for IUDs and Plan B pills with their health insurance, but men are more than able to pay for Viagra and their vasectomy procedures with Hobby Lobby’s current insurance offerings.

    If Hobby Lobby believes that IUDs, which actually prevent pregnancy in the first place, cause abortion, it’s interesting (and suspiciously convenient) that they don’t similarly hold that vasectomies don’t interfere with the creation of life as God intended.

    This revelation has also brought into question that the five all-male Supreme Court justices who comprised the majority opinion in Hobby Lobby’s favor might have ruled differently if it were their own reproductive rights and medical procedure payment options at stake.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents
  • WNZF Creekside Festival

Recent Comments

  • James on Rezoning Enabling Up to 850 Homes in Seminole Woods Causes Sharp Debate Before Palm Coast Approval
  • Ben Hogarth on ‘Faith’ Bridge Over SR100 Goes from Maligned to Acclaimed as It Opens, But in the Absence of Its Champion
  • BeachGuy on Felony Charge for Mom Who Left Child Alone With Dead Man After Night of Sex and Drugs at Hammock Resort
  • Right on Covid Deaths in Florida Near 91,000
  • Edith Campins on School Board Trio Will Hire an Attorney to Help Them Fire Board’s Attorney of 17 Years
  • BLINDSPOTTING on Rezoning Enabling Up to 850 Homes in Seminole Woods Causes Sharp Debate Before Palm Coast Approval
  • jeffery c. seib on 2-Hour Standoff Involving Threats of Gunfire on Brunswick Lane Ends with Arrest of Michael Wells, 57, on 4 Felonies
  • Flapharmtech on Covid Deaths in Florida Near 91,000
  • Angela Smith on A Mixed Bag in New Rankings of Florida’s Colleges and Universities as DeSantis Polarization Dims Luster
  • TR on School Board Trio Will Hire an Attorney to Help Them Fire Board’s Attorney of 17 Years
  • CH on Rezoning Enabling Up to 850 Homes in Seminole Woods Causes Sharp Debate Before Palm Coast Approval
  • Angela and others are fearful on Moms for Liberty: Joyful Warriors or Anti-Government Conspiracists?
  • CH on Rezoning Enabling Up to 850 Homes in Seminole Woods Causes Sharp Debate Before Palm Coast Approval
  • James on School Board Trio Will Hire an Attorney to Help Them Fire Board’s Attorney of 17 Years
  • Another Concerned Taxpayer !!! on School Board Trio Will Hire an Attorney to Help Them Fire Board’s Attorney of 17 Years
  • James on Rezoning Enabling Up to 850 Homes in Seminole Woods Causes Sharp Debate Before Palm Coast Approval

Log in