In a contentious meeting where proponents and opponents talked about God, homosexuality and government intrusion, a Florida Senate panel Tuesday approved a bill that would require minors to obtain permission from their parents before having abortions.
The 6-3 vote by the Senate Health Policy Committee followed a hearing that lasted more than 90 minutes. Chairwoman Gayle Harrell, R-Stuart, tried to balance testimony between people on both sides, but the legislation (SB 404) sparked passionate debate.
“He (God) does say that the shedding of innocent blood is an abomination. And it brings a curse upon the land and upon the individual that stands for that,” said Wendy Gallegos, a pastor from Marion County who supported the measure. “So I would just encourage you today to really, prayfully consider your vote because not only does it affect the state of Florida, it affects you individually and your family, what you do with this situation.”
But American Civil Liberties Union of Florida legislative director Kara Gross testified against the measure, saying it would place an undue burden on the constitutional right of young women to have abortions.
“If a parent won’t consent and a minor isn’t able to go to court or isn’t able to convince a judge, under the bill the child would be forced to have a child,” Gross said. “No child should be forced to have a child against her will. There is no greater governmental intrusion.”
Florida law already requires parents to be notified if their daughters plan to have abortions. The law also provides for a judicial waiver process that allows pregnant teenagers to circumvent the requirement.
But the bill, sponsored by Sen. Kelli Stargel, R-Lakeland, would go further by requiring parental consent, rather than notification. Similar to the current notification requirement, the bill would allow exemptions for teens who already are parents or are in medical emergencies.
According to a staff analysis of the House version of the bill (HB 265), 224 petitions for waiver of the parental-notification requirement were filed in 2017. Courts granted 205 of them. In 2018, minors filed 193 petitions, with 182 granted.
Similar to the current notification requirement, the consent bill would allow exemptions for teens who already are parents or are in medical emergencies.
Parental-consent bills were considered during the 2019 legislative session, but the issue stalled in the Senate and did not pass. Senate President Bill Galvano, however, has indicated his support for the measure during the upcoming 2020 session. He told reporters in October, “I have said, ‘yes,’ that’s something that I have an interest in and have looked at.”
Meanwhile, a House health care panel already passed its version of the parental-consent bill, and that measure is poised to be considered by the full House during the 2020 session, which begins Jan. 14.
Supporters and opponents of the legislation agree that, if passed and signed into law, the measure could become a test case for the reconstituted Florida Supreme Court, which struck down a parental-consent law in 1989.
The current Supreme Court is decidedly more conservative than previous courts, after longtime justices Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince stepped down in January because of a mandatory retirement age.
Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis appointed more-conservative justices Barbara Lagoa, Robert Luck and Carlos Muniz to replace them, though Lagoa and Luck have since been appointed by President Donald Trump to a federal appeals court. That will lead to DeSantis making two more appointments.
Abortion debates always spark fierce debates in the Legislature. At one point Tuesday, Florida A&M University student Imani Hutchinson, an opponent of the parental-consent measure, tried to link Sen. Dennis Baxley, an Ocala Republican who supports the bill, to a white-supremacist theory.
That led Sen. Debbie Mayfield, R-Rockledge, to cut off Hutchinson.
“We do not attack you. And we would appreciate it if you would not attack us just because you disagree with our policies,” Mayfield said.
Meanwhile, Charlene Cothran, a self-identified “former homosexual” said people who support homosexual lifestyles and support abortion rights “are in the same board room.”
“I believe that when they remove a parent’s right to be informed that that is also going to go over to removing a parent’s right to be informed about a child beginning puberty blockers. About a child beginning transsexual operations by Planned Parenthood or whoever else is going to be performing them,” Cothran said. “And so we have to remember that this is just a stepping stone to homosexuals’ so-called equality rights.”
–Christine Sexton, News Service of Florida
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Dennis says
America was founded on religious freedoms and the belief of God. Maybe it’s time to put God back into this country. The democrats and the American Civil Liberties Union want God out of America. America has lost its way with cupcakes that are offended by nearly everything and politicians that demand control of our life’s. A minor should be treated as a minor, not just on something’s. It’s a parents obligation to make decisions fir their children. Not just some decisions. A child that d3cides to have an abortion, may not consider the self destruction with that decision.
Florida Voter says
First off, YES, God should be part of our country, but that’s the responsibility of the Church, not government.
If putting “God back into this country,” means basing laws on non-medical, non-universal religious beliefs, then that is exactly the type of law that our religious freedom is supposed to protect us from. Wendy Gallegos’ comment about a “curse upon the land” is a perfect example of the type of justification that should be ignored when considering laws … at least according to the idea of “separation of church and state.”
Also: yes, a parent should USUALLY be informed, and the child and parent should come together on a decision, but there are sometimes some VERY GOOD reasons to remove the parent from that process. With this new bill, how many kids will skip the legal options and just use a coat hanger? How many kids will wait until much later to go to their parents? Not all parents are kind and supportive.
SydTheKid says
These people sound totally out of touch with reality. A “former” homosexual is nothing but someone that is full of self-hate and “chooses” something other than her natural way of life. If people say you can “choose” to be homosexual, you can certainly “choose” not to be and live a different life. I am so over this God/Gays/Abortion argument in almost the year 2020. Not everyone believes in a book written by men during a time when women had no rights and manipulation was key to advancing your own agenda (i.e controlling the masses). You do not own my body. My body is my temple. I choose what to do with it, not some legislature that needs to keep their hands off my uterus and stay out of my bedroom. Why is is Republicans scream bloody murder when they fear Democrats are making choices that affect their livelihood but they are the FIRST ones that want to dictate what I can do with my body and who I can do it with. If you ask me THEY are the ones with issues, not me. This world is full of crazy people and somehow they all end up in charge of key issues that affect people’s lives. Put condoms in schools. Give out birth control. Stop this abstinence BS that doesn’t work and teach prevention–you will have far less abortions that way if you prepare teens/young adults and give them the proper “tools” needed. Ignorance is bliss for certain folk.