No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Supreme Court Turns Down Red-Light Camera Appeal, Leaving In Place Restrictions On Who May Issue Tickets

| April 15, 2015

Time after time in court, the legality of red-light camera programs like Palm Coast's has been spattered and battered . (Paul Sableman)

Time after time in court, the legality of red-light camera programs like Palm Coast’s has been spattered and battered . (Paul Sableman)

The Florida Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal on a red-light camera case with a direct bearing on Palm Coast’s traffic-enforcement program. Five justices concurred in turning down the appeal, without explanation, as is customary when the court turns down a case.

When the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal ruled on the case October, it declared a key part of then-existing systems of issuing red-light camera tickets illegal. That ruling, once issued, stood as the law for all of Florida, and forced cities like Palm Coast, which had such illegal structures, to revamp their red-light camera programs and contracts. In Palm Coast, the upshot was that the city reduced its red light cameras from 43 to five, and shortened its contract with American Traffic Solutions, the private company administering the program, by two years. That program ends in 2017, instead of 2019.

Until the court ruling, ATS was issuing the initial Notice of Violation to drivers who had committed infractions, a $158 ticket. If that ticket wasn’t paid within 60 days, ATS issued a second ticket, that one a $264 Uniform Traffic Citation, sending the case to the Florida court system for adjudication. The Fourth Circuit ruled that while ATS was allowed to issue the initial Notice of Violation, Florida law forbade it, as a private entity, to issue a Uniform Traffic Citation. By law, UTCs must be issued by a government agency only, the court ruled.

Palm Coast almost immediately suspended that part of the program. It continued to issue Notices of Violation, but stopped ATS from issuing UTCs. Drivers who refused to pay the $158 issued as notices of violation could then let their tickets lapse, never see a UTC, and avoid paying a fine altogether.

Click On:

The case originated at the City of Hollywood, which was sued by driver Eric Arem. Arem won at the trial level and the appeal level. The Fourth Circuit’s decision was never contradicted by another circuit. Arem’s attorney used that fact to dispute the Supreme Court’s justification to hear the case, since the court generally hears cases to arbitrate conflicting rulings between lower courts. “Since this is a case of first impression regarding the statutory authority granted to a municipality and its agent, a private vendor, regarding red light camera infractions,” Louis Arslanian wrote in his brief to the court on behalf of Arem, “the Fourth District’s interpretation or conclusion cannot possibly be in conflict with any interpretation by another district court of appeal or this Court.” The justices appear to have agreed.

By turning down Hollywood’s last appeal, the Supreme Court, in effect, affirms that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal remains the law in Florida. It also means that tens of thousands of drivers who were forced to pay UTCs in the past can sue the cities that fined them–and are suing: as part of its amended contract with ATS, Palm Coast will have some of its legal bills in the case paid for by the company. Still, the court’s April 13 action is the latest in a series of set-backs for Palm Coast and other cities that have run red-light camera programs. Palm Coast has run one since 2007. The Supreme Court last summer, in a separate case, ruled that cities’ red-light camera programs installed before 2010 had broken the law. Those programs, too, triggered a spate of lawsuits. The court had ruled that absent a state law that codified such systems in 2010, cities and counties had no authority to run red-light camera programs.

The Florida League of Cities had signaled to the Supreme Court its intention to file a brief supporting Hollywood (and other cities with traffic camera programs), but never did so before the court declined to hear the case.

As another consequence of the ruling, Palm Coast now must devote more time and manpower to the administration of the red-light camera program, as it is responsible for administering the UTC portion. But as of last week, the Clerk of Court had yet to receive a red-light camera related UTC from Palm Coast.

A bill is making its way through the Florida Legislature to further restrict how cities run their red-light camera programs. The bill originbally would have prohibited the issuance of red-light camera tickets for turns on red. But that part of the bill was scrapped when it ran into opposition in committee. What remains is a relatively enfeebled bill, from its sponsor’s perspective (Rep. Bryan Avila, a Hialeah Republican). It would require cities to spend their red-light camera revenue on public safety programs exclusively, and would require cities to send out notices in certified mail. The fate of the bill is uncertain.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

8 Responses for “Supreme Court Turns Down Red-Light Camera Appeal, Leaving In Place Restrictions On Who May Issue Tickets”

  1. hello says:

    SOL to all the people that actually paid the tickets.

  2. confidential says:

    I would like to get back my $158 paid in 2007 without contest to avoid points in my license as I was busy on work traveling and had no time to be in court! In the internet photo provided I could not really tell if was my car or myself, but my good income then, did not leave time free for court appearances.

  3. Joe says:

    Does it really matter? We are stuck with ATS until 2017 because the brains of the city entered into a contract without an escape clause!!!!! Shaking My Head!!!!

  4. M.O. says:

    If I don’t pay a ticket what will the consequences be? Seems to me the City was just trying to collect as much as they could as long as they could and they had a partner in crime–ATS.

  5. mrb says:

    yes have to agree we have brainless city government ,the city need to put their big boy pants on and just pay to end this crape with camera and refund all the people that got tickets ,but hell will freeze for the government to refund ,the money is gone by now ,to build a new city hall to make them look important. when the government need to work to help the people ha ha

  6. Anonymous says:

    Class,action lawsuit! !!!

  7. #1 Gator Fan says:

    Twenty years from now this will have turned out to be the dumbest,most absurd,costly,and waste of the tax payers and/or citizens time and money imaginable. I was dumbfounded when I first moved here in early 2010 that this “city” had 40+ red light cameras. When they finally figured out that the residents hated the program and wanted to recall every commissioner and Mayor,the city finally relented by trying to weasel out of the contract but obviously ATS had attorneys as well and threatened to sue PC,thus the “reduction” of cameras. I have paid two tickets but I can assure you if I ever get another one I will toss it in the garbage.

  8. Charles "Bub" Robson says:

    Red light Cameras= Cash Register Justice, totally unconstitutional . Lets take back this country back at the Polling places in the upcoming elections!

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in