No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Brazil 3, Croatia 1: An Undeserved Gift To the Host Nation | World Cup 2014

| June 12, 2014

brazil croatia flags world cup

It was neither order nor progress on the Brazilian pitch tonight.

Not long into the first game of this World Cup half the lights went off at Arena Corinthians Sao Paulo, unnervingly so if you believe in providential intervention, as most of Brazil does: Brazil had come out against Croatia as if it were playing an afternoon pick-up game on Copacabana Beach instead of the opening game of the 2014 World Cup in front of half a billion souls. It packed as much intensity in its attacks and defending as if it were France defending the Maginot Line. And it paid the price.

pierre tristam flaglerlive editor's blogEleventh minute, a cross into the Brazilian box, a scramble in font of the goalkeeper, the Brazilians badly pulling off imitations of Fred Astair on a basic-cable talent show, and Marcello, who two weeks ago was part of Real Madrid’s 4-1 crushing of Atlético Madrid in overtime in the Champions League final, own-goals it. The last time a Latin American scored an own goal in a high-profile match, he was shot dead. Murdered. That was the Colombian Andrés Escobar back in 1994, whose goal helped the United States eke out a 2-1 victory and make it through to the next round. When Escobar returned to Medellin, Colombia’s drug-cartel Mecca, a carte bodyguard shot him.

Marcello won’t have to worry.

World Cup 2014

  • Goals So far: 150
  • Matches: 55
  • Average: 2.78 (2010: 2.27)
Brazil 1, Chile 1 (Brazil on PKs) | USA 0, Germany 1: Small Loss for a Big Win | USA 2, Portugal 2 | USA 2, Ghana 1 | France 3, Honduras 0 | England 1, Italy 2 | Costa Rica 3, Uruguay 1 | Colombia 3, Greece 0 | Chile 3, Australia 1 | Spain 1, Netherlands 5 | Mexico 1, Cameroon 0| Brazil 3, Croatia 1

Not wanting to have any blood on their conscience, the Brazilians finally began showing up about 20 minutes into the game. Neymar, the superstar, the hope of the nation, the Number 10 wearer (that’s Pelé’s number) equalized with a junior-high dribbler that nevertheless had the exquisite accuracy of a post-teaser that bounced the right way, just out of reach of Stipe Pletikosa, the Croatian goalkeeper. The lights by then had returned in full force, as had the 68,987 Brazilians in the stadium, to the consternation of the 13 Croatian fans.

Maybe if Croatia defender Josip Simunic was there the ball would have found his foot instead of the net, but Simunic’s had his foot in his mouth, and will have it there for the duration of the tournament, since he was banned for 10 games–the entirety of the World Cup–after leading fans in a Nazi chant after helping to qualify his team for this World Cup, in a 2-0 playoff win against Iceland last November. No one’s ever said beautiful footballers can’t be racist dumb asses: Europe is full of them, as is the continent’s football stands. Croatia wins the trophy for bigotry: its fans managed to outdo the Ukraine’s in the 2012 European Championship.

But stopping the ball wouldn’t have made a difference. Brazil had a ringer, a 12th player on its side: Japanese referee Yuichi Nishimura, one of only five refs brought back from the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, among a group of 25 referees in Brazil in total. He may not referee another game. Brazil’s Fred was supposedly roughed up by Croatia’s Dejan Lovren in the box (he wasn’t), he faked a drop to the blades below and managed to fake out the ref into ranting a penalty. An utter gift to Brazil. Neymar of course took it. Th goalkeeper guessed right, the entire stadium, minus those 17 Croats, thought he’d saved the shot, but somehow the ball kept pulling in. 2-1.

Brazil was ahead, but it did not deserve to be. This isn’t the sort of team that could win the World Cup, or could even make it past a quarterfinal match. It lucked out. Croatia had many chances, took them and had no luck, its 11 shots more imaginative than Brazil’s 14, even though Brazil’s were more often on target. The Croatians of course, being the boors of the Balkans, racked up 20 fouls to Brazil’s five, and would very much have liked to foul the referee, not to mention the line judge whose raised flag disqualified what would have been a Croatian equalizer. This was not Croatia’s day.

Finally in the 90th minute Brazil’s Oscar, a 22 year old who plays for Chelsea, saved Brazil’s honor and diminished the post-mortem about that penalty with a dribbler of his own that managed to find the net against a decidedly unimpressive Croatian goaltender. Cue the celebration.

As an opening match it didn’t lack entertainment or tension, two of the absolute requisites of any football game, but it lacked skill, it lacked spontaneity, it absolutely lacked poetry–an essential element of Brazilian and African football–and therefore beauty. This was not an artful opening to Brazil’s campaign, groaning more with the nation’s social angst than its joy for life. Our dear old American commentators on ESPN played down the social protests a bit too much, sidelining them instead of analyzing them for the ironies and betrayals they represent to one of the most populous nations on the planet. Bob Costas must not have been able to go to the network on loan from wherever he is at the moment.

Don’t get me wrong: I’m swooning for this World Cup. It certainly deserves to be in Brazil more than in most nations, especially after a 65-year absence, and I’m rooting for Brazil as much as I have since I was barely taller than some of the grass on those fields, even though I have zero connection to Brazil–though we did catch the glimpse of a quite-large Lebanese flag in the stands tonight, evidence of that still-resilient and numerous community of Lebanese expatriates who have been terrorizing Brazil’s business and commerce scene with their ruthless and Odyssean guile for the past century and a half. But that doesn’t preclude being as clear-eyed about what’s happening outside the stadiums as what’s happening within them.

Brazil next plays Mexico on Tuesday, which should entail a nice collision of Catholics, and Mexico’s likely crushing. But the fun begins tomorrow with Mexico going up against Cameroon, those poets of West Africa, then the replay of the 2010 final between Spain and the Netherlands, and what could be a less colicky match up between Chile and Australia. See you then.

Pierre Tristam is FlaglerLive’s editor. Reach him by email here.

9 Responses for “Brazil 3, Croatia 1: An Undeserved Gift To the Host Nation | World Cup 2014”

  1. Johnny Taxpayer says:

    Crotia played well for an underdog, had they brought a quality goal keeper the match, even with the Ref on the side of Brazil, would have had a totally different outcome. Any other world cup caliber goalie that has the opportunity to put two hands on a ball, saves it 100% of the time. For that matter all 3 goals where savable..

  2. Steve Wolfe says:

    I don’t get soccer. To me, an NFL fan, a good soccer game is as low-scoring as a bad NFL game (which=boring). Same with baseball. Too much waiting for something to happen to keep a major-league couch potato interested. Maybe if I drank more during games….but I did sit through my first NASCAR experience at Daytona with only 1Miller Light. I realize it’s a steep learning curve. If I go to a few more, I’ll be ready when they make a right turn.

    • The Truth says:

      You have to appreciate the dynamics of the game to appreciate soccer. If you are only about the score, than there aren’t many sports that will interest you. I love watching soccer, I also enjoy watching the low scoring Baltimore/Pittsburgh games each year as well. I’m not much of a hockey fan but I watched NYR/LAK last night and it was very exciting even though in your terms it wasn’t very high scoring.

  3. confidential says:

    Croatia played pretty impressive and actually the score should have been Brazil 2 Croatia 0 simply because the first goal was and “auto goal” bad error of Brazil and the second goal was a very bad penalty call from the Japanese referee, as really there was no penalty from Croatia. What is wrong with that referee?
    Brazil will have to improve a lot to be able to win the championship and avoid the same mistakes made yesterday. Argentina has very good chances to win as has Mesi the current world wide best player on its team, as long as his team mates backing up well.

    • Daniel says:

      Confidential, you have got to be kidding. On both goals that Brazil scored other than the penalty, there were very clear fouls by the Brazilians which if called by this “referee” would obviously have meant that the goals would not have happened. The only call that this ref got right I think was anulling Croatia’s goal, there was a clear foul on the Brazilian goalie…….

  4. Tim says:

    You got it right; the Brazilians glimmering with the flair of fool’s gold and the Croatians reassured of their role as antagonists. Fred posing for an Oscar and Oscar…simply posing.
    The entire event probably should have been filmed with a police chase Jackie Chan style holstering comic relief with Brazil, in the end, getting the girl. The Editor (FIFA) made one mistake—Splicing out Hulk Hogan vs the ‘Nature Boy’ Rick Flair, Schwarzenegger’s run for Cali Governor, and the proof Area 51 harbors little green men! My hat’s off for the cast, crew, and all the very little people making last night’s spectacle at Mann’s Chinese Theater more Yakuza than any conspirator…in their wildest hallucinations….could ever conjure from a boiling pot of frog’s lymph nodes.
    Around Brazilian pool halls, dark alleys, and safe houses all ‘Family Business’ was settled at ‘Arena Corinthians! Now, where is the family silver? I have a date with a Pawn Shop before Brazil’s next “miss” Match!! Thank You

  5. Croat says:

    Please don’t write things you know nothing about it is insulting for Croatians and all others involved. What Joe Šimunić did had nothing to do with nazis or anything related to hatred. He was leading the fans into chanting in rough translation ‘we are ready for home’ which means we are ready to fight for our home and our country. The reason he was disqualified is because nazi collaborators(which were in substantial minority) have used the same chant that was used 200 years before nacism ever existed and was used afterwards as in Croatia it is NOT considered a naci parole.

    What he did was nothing more than showing patriotism and saying he is playing for his country and ready to leave his heart on the pitch. Fifa has punished him without having any insight into the problems and real situation in Croatia/Balkans or any historical understanding because some idiot found a half information and complained about it.

    • Pierre Tristam says:

      What Joe Šimunić did was as calculated a bigotry as the sort of calculated tackles that netted him three yellows and should have got him thrown out in that triple-booking game in the 2006 World Cup. There’s no excuse for what he did after the Iceland game no matter how you cut it, the chant and the salute executed being direct replicas of Croatia’s fascist Ustase movement in World War II–a movement that had the distinction, like today’s ISIS in Iraq, of having been so violent as to shock even Germany’s fascists (just as al Qaeda has repudiated the ISIS. So please: we weren’t born yesterday, and one need not be a Croat to know fascism from bullshit. Inexcusable and reprehensible.

  6. Daniel says:

    Quite some refereeing here, that’s for sure!!! The penalty was or not, different criteria. The fouls in the plays before the two regular goals that Brazil scored you could see a mile away! Not to mention the elbowing that Neymar did, that was a yellow card. If the referee did not call the penalty, he would have had to issue Fred a yellow card for attempting to deceive him. If there was enough contact to knock him down, the Croatian defender has no where near the physical size or strength to bring someone like Fred down. This was highway robbery. Brazil always has help in the WC, just check history……

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in