No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

A Divided County Commission Votes 3-2 To End Support for Enterprise Flagler

| August 8, 2011

David Ottati, president of Enterprise Flagler, began his defense of the agency last January. Today, his campaign appeared to end in defeat before the Flagler County Commission. (© FlaglerLive)

Last Updated: 1:23 p.m.

In a remarkable if ultimately unsurprising turn-around, the Flagler County Commission voted 3-2 late this morning to end its support for Enterprise Flagler, the embattled public-private economic development partnership now almost entirely paid for with public dollars. With Palm Coast also close to bailing on the agency, Enterprise Flagler’s fate was essentially sealed.

David Ottati, president of Enterprise Flagler, sat before the commission after making his pitch for giving the agency another try under a new structure and a new funding mechanism. Each commissioner, following an at-times tortuous, 85-minute discussion that at times lacked clarity, took a stand, prompted by Commission Chairman Alan Peterson and Ottati’s own request for an up-or-down vote.

Peterson and Nate McLaughlin were unequivocal: it should be the end of the line for Enterprise Flagler. Barbara Revels was unequivocally behind the organization she’s been a part of since its inception in 2000. It was never clear where Gorge Hanns stood beyond saying that he liked what Revels had said, which left Milissa Holland with the final say on Enterprise Flagler’s fate.

“I think we need to take a new direction and would be interested in no longer pursuing our current path,” Holland said.

“New Board, then?” Peterson asked.

“Uhuh,” Holland replied.

“And as I said earlier I just think we have no choice but to try a different approach, so I would say a new board,” Peterson said.

The decision was made at 11:05 this morning.

Holland’s and Peterson’s caveats were just as clear: they would not support the Flagler County Chamber of Commerce having a say in the executive staffing of the new economic development council they are favoring. A plan presented by County Administrator Craig Coffey proposes just such a set up, with Chamber President Doug Baxter heading the staff. Rather, Peterson and Holland are looking at a county-led board with a county-based staff, independent of other agencies.

Ottai took the slug in his agency’s heart gracefully. “It’s helpful, because at least now we have the direction, so we’ll regroup within Enterprise Flagler, and we understand the position of this board. Because that’s the position most likely I’ll confer with our board. I doubt we will go to any cities, and we’ll look at what our next following steps. And I do appreciate your time for going through that. Again, this presentation came from 22 people that own businesses within this organization, has created hundreds of thousands–I mean, a lot of jobs, and are highly influential, but I’ll take that message back to them and respectfully let them know that that’s the decision of this county.”

The commission’s decision culminates months of uncertainty and debate over the direction of economic development in the county, though it’s unlikely to end the uncertainty wholesale as the political and financial nature of the new EDC remains hazy, and its ultimate power hazier still. What’s clearer is that the county and Palm Coast will go their separate ways even if Palm Coast retains a voice on the proposed Economic Development Council.

Informed of the county’s decision, Palm Coast Mayor Jon Netts was skeptical about that “new direction.”

“What’s different?” Netts said. “You change the name, you change the funding mechanism a little bit, you’ve concentrated the decision making in the county a little bit, but why is this new organization going to be any different than the old organization?” That answer is not entirely clear.

“I think the public perception of Enterprise Flagler throughout the county is that Enterprise Flagler has failed,” Peterson said. “That’s not a reflection on the hard work or the interest or the effort of anybody that’s been involved. In other words I think the players have worked hard but the perception is such that it is widespread that Enterprise Flagler has not worked, therefore I’d like to start over. I’d like an entirely new organization.”

Revels disagreed, preferring instead to go with Ottati’s plan.

“I’m greatly in favor of the restructuring of this proposal. I’m concerned that if we don’t bring everyone together in a team effort in the county, with all the cities, then we’re going to have individual efforts done by individual communities, and it’s going to make individual cities compete against each other, the county compete against the cities,” Revels said. “People will come to town and they’re going to have to shop from one city government to one county government to another city government, which one is going to sound the most favorable, which one’s got the best land use, which one’s got the least impact fees. They’re going to depend on professionals in the community and not one source of information. Right now Enterprise Flagler pulls all that information together.”

Revels disagreed with Peterson that Enterprise Flagler has failed, blaming “a few people” who say that it has, but that mostly, people don’t know what the partnership has done. “We’ve got to keep that team effort going. If we do not get cooperation with the cities and through restructure this board and funding, I believe that we’ll end up seeing a very dysfunctional and fractured system, and people aren’t going to come here when they have to fdo that, and it’s not going to have the fruition that Enterprise Flagler has.”

McLaughlin said at one point that he had heard Netts twice in public say that he would not fund Enterprise Flagler anymore. “I’m confident that Palm Coast is most likely not going to participate in anything beyond what they’re doing right now,” McLaughlin said. “I heard Mayor Netts twice in public meetings say, I will not fund Enterprise Flagler. He was directly asked the question. I can’t imagine he’s going to go to a third public meeting and go back on that. I think we’ve got to take this bull by the horn,. I think this commission has an opportunity.”

Netts this morning categorically denied saying that.

“No I did not. What I have said is that there is one city councilwoman who has unequivocally said she would not fund Enterprise Flagler,” Netts said. “For me to say that the city will or will not fund Enterprise Flagler would be extraordinarily premature and inappropriate.”

Nevertheless Netts conceded that at this point, he would no longer fund Enterprise Flagler–but that it was his first such definitive statement. “I don’t think I’ve ever said that publicly,” Netts said. “So if the county has made the decision that they’re not going to fund Enterprise Flagler, then we’re certainly not going to fund it in their absence. That’s my position. I can’t speak for anybody else.”

Nor, Netts added, would he be in favor of Palm Coast contributing $75,000 to the county’s Economic Development Council. Netts said only one government body serves the entire county, “and that’s the county commission, they’re responsible to all of us, they’re funded by all of us, they’re responsible to all of us,” so the county should be responsible for an agency. “The county does not have any source of funding independent of Flagler County. We pay 60 percent of the county’s ad valorem taxes, so to say that Palm Coast is not contributing is not correct. We are. We’re contributing the lion share. As long as you have pay to play issues, you’re going to have controversy.” He added: “If you’re going to take the position that we don’t pay extra, then I can’t be at the table, then if I can’t be at the table don’t collect taxes from me for this function.”

But that’s Peterson’s position, which he reiterated Monday: “I come down to the phrase: you have to pay to play.”

Coffey’s proposal that the chamber should have an executive role in EDC staffing appears to be a non-starter. “I know the chamber board had met and didn’t really show an interest in having that type of contractual agreement brought up,” Holland said, responding to McLaughlin’s support for a literal replication of the Tourist Development Council approach–which is staffed by contract with the chamber. “We have to develop again a county-wide strategy mimicking the different skill sets represented on a board. I think we have to make investment to hire somebody, and if that so in turn develops into an independent EDC or however we’re going to coin it, then, you know, I think that will happen over time, but I think we need to start and develop where it’s consistent with this collegial body first and foremost.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

10 Responses for “A Divided County Commission Votes 3-2 To End Support for Enterprise Flagler”

  1. Johnny Taxpayer says:

    about time, however I hope by “totally new direction” they don’t mean simply changing the name on the sign.

  2. Kendall says:

    “Holland’s and Peterson’s caveats were just as clear: they would not support the Flagler County Chamber of Commerce having a say in the executive staffing of the new economic development council they are favoring.”

    Thumbs up to Holland and Peterson for this. The Commission needs to be completely in charge of staffing the new council.

  3. lawabidingcitizen says:

    Tentatively hopeful this isn’t rearranging the deck chairs again and “economic development” gets tossed back to the private sector where it belongs

  4. SAW says:

    Ending support for Enterprise Flagler, not so ?

    Check the code words “new board” and “new direction” this appears to be just another shell game to continue business as usual. The present group evidently did not accomplish their job, so why would anyone think by changing the name,or the hats on a few individuals, will result in a better outcome ?

    They will still be chamber clones anyway, our elected officials should immediately stop spending the resident tax money on such a ludicrous endeavors.

    Much credit goes to the one city councilwoman who is thinking clearly.

  5. Jerry M says:

    Let’s leave economic development in the hands of the private sector. After all, private sector members involved in economic development don’t get paychecks every Friday, thus are more motivated to move things in a positive direction. Government should continue to do what they have always been responsible to do which is to support the private sector business owners who put their heads on the line day in and day out with the goal of continuing to grow this great Flagler County community of ours.

  6. Layla says:

    “You have to pay to play?” Really, Mr. Peterson? I thought YOU were elected to do the job Enterprise Flagler has failed to do.

    Small business in this community is going under and you are still trying to fund losing propositions such as this.

    Sounds to me like we need new life on the Commission.

  7. lawabidingcitizen says:

    Doncha love the quote in today’s NJ. “This wasn’t an official vote,” Rawls said in a telephone interview. “We’ve got to have a unified team, so I don’t think this is a dead issue.”

    What part of no don’t you understand Greg? Taxpayers are broke, the game is over — time for you to get a real job.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I applaud this outstanding vote of the majority of the County Commission. Very rewarding to see that they voted the wish of us “the people” they are supposed to represent.
    I resent Commissioner Peterson that ” we have have to pay to play” not further playing with our hard earned tax dollars. If Peterson wants to gamble use his own $$. I totally oppose the FCCOU…with D. Baxter at the helm to receive any public funds for ED. Let the private sector address ED. Lets county and cities invite the local businesses and retired professionals to volunter ideas and labor just few hours a week under the local government guidelines to promote ED. Just provide the designated groups with phone and internet lines and just use the printed media that government already has.
    Also these local government entities need to make sure that their buyers buy from Flagler County and its cities suppliers and stop outsourcing our local generated taxpayers contracts generating wealth and jobs elsewhere. The excuse of saving money to do so, is and old worn out distorted tale. Still a lot of work to be accomplished in this area. Please stop following the FCOC bad example that as a private entity can do and does that. Also our Adventist owned Flagler Hospital outsources quiet a bit. This is something that Mr. Ottati should look into and address as well. Please all keep up the good work.

  9. Sarah says:

    Sounds like “Anonymous” was fired by the FCCO! Can you say “sour grapes”?

  10. palmcoaster says:

    @ Sarah:
    Anonymous “didn’t taste any sour grapes”. I sure know it well. Maybe you have not been around here enough long yet, to really know about the FCCOC disservice in the last 6 years to their members and none. Not only they outsource also promote some of our tax funded government buyers to do the same not only out of county but as well out of state. Also they outreageously compete with some of their members small businesses. This local chamber represents only the special interest that makes possible to benefit only the elite administration within and few of their close neat large corporations partners. When have you seen ever this Chamber visiting businesses members or non members “unless is for soliciting more contributions or to become a member?” Fortunately neither Anonymous or I, likewise many of our businesses colleagues, do not depend of this FCCOC in our successful businesses, but our success does not prevent us from realizing the bias and unfairness plaguing this entity. Probably with a fair and un bias, non outsourcing County Chamber we will be able to employ more local workers and keep generated revenue in this county. This is why we, the taxpayers that we know the reality of their operation oppose any further hand out of our tax dollars to this FCCOC and specially Dough. Baxter assigned to manage that Economic Development, “waste of our monies”.
    The above just to set the record straight.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in