No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Schools May Be Required to Digitize Half Their Textbook Budgets Within 2 Years

| April 4, 2011

Borges? Grass? Marquez? In Flagler County schools? (© Sarah Joo)

Ready or not, Florida school districts may be required to spend half of their textbook budgets on digital materials in just two years. But school districts are reluctant to embrace a mandate they say is too costly and doesn’t take into account students without Internet access.

Tucked into education funding bills in the state House and Senate are proposals that push school districts to convert from traditional, bulky hardback textbooks to electronic books, available on a computer or handheld device such as Amazon’s Kindle or Apple’s iPad. These proposals came after state education officials unveiled an ambitious plan in February to require all students in grades K-12 to use only electronic materials in the classroom by 2015.

Click On:

The 46-page House version (HB 5101) requires school districts to spend 50 percent of their K-12 instructional materials budget on electronic textbooks by the 2013-14 school year. It also deletes many references to “textbooks” in state law, replacing it with the more broad “instructional materials.”

On the Senate side, a less-stringent proposal (SB 7128) authorizes a school district to designate pilot schools to transition into using electronic textbooks. Those schools would be required to spend 50 percent of their instructional materials budget on electronic textbooks.

But school districts are pushing back, saying the House version doesn’t give districts enough time to make the transition. The Senate version is favored by many districts because it isn’t a mandate.

“We want to go to electronic. Everybody has a different vision of what that would look like and some districts are ahead of others,” said Joy Frank, a lobbyist for the Florida Association of District School Superintendents. “We all want to get there. The question is how soon because of the cost.”

Proponents of electronic textbooks say the cost will be similar to hardback textbooks because the expense of textbook development comes from the research and writing, not the publication. But there would certainly be an up-front investment required by some school districts in hardware, software and bandwidth capacity.

“It’s more than a laptop or Kindle or an iPad,” said school district lobbyist Vernon Pickup-Crawford. “It’s also having the infrastructure in place, which is the networking wiring so that if you have lots of kids online at the same time your network doesn’t come crashing down.”

That actually happened at Clearwater High in Pinellas County. The school was the first in the nation to offer all of its high school students a Kindle e-book reader to replace most of the school’s hardback textbooks. When students logged in the first day it overwhelmed AT&T cell phone towers and shut down local Internet access.

That first-day glitch aside, John Just, the assistant superintendent for Management Information Systems for the Pinellas County School District, said the project has been embraced by students. It cost $450,000 to purchase the Kindles, he said, and the textbook materials cost slightly less than traditional textbooks.

But Just said even Pinellas would struggle to implement a district-wide electronic textbook policy in two years.

Earlier in the legislative session, Sen. Stephen Wise, R-Jacksonville, floated a proposal (SB 1696) to require all school districts and all grades to shift to electronic textbooks by the 2014-2015 school year, in line with the agenda of the Department of Education. But last week he changed the bill so that it no longer deals much with electronic textbooks.

“We don’t have enough computers in the school districts right now and it takes lots of money,” Wise said. “We wanted to have the ability to make a policy that fits everybody and we couldn’t do it.”

Wise said the state should let the school districts move at their own pace for now.

“School districts are being aggressive, if you will, in terms of addressing digital concepts,” said Sen. Bill Montford, D-Tallahassee. “We are realistic in that we have to have money to do it. It’s very difficult to make that kind of a major shift. That’s a major shift and a difficult shift even if you had the money. That gives me some pause.”

Some critics of the budget proposals say they don’t take into account equal access to textbook materials.

“Our children need to be proficient in computer and technology to be successful in the world we live in,” said Rep. Marty Kiar, D-Davie, who voted against the House budget bill mandating spending on electronic textbooks. “With that said, my greatest concern is low-income children whose families don’t have computer or Internet access.”

Lawmakers concerned about equal access should consider the Clearwater High experiment, Just said. All students at the school were given Internet access through the Kindle, whether their parents were Internet subscribers or not.

“It’s been a great equalizer,” Just said.

Meanwhile, school districts are lobbying lawmakers to mend the budget bills to allow for a phased-in approach.

Both the House and Senate are expected to pass their budget bills containing the electronic textbook requirements this week. Any differences will be settled in negotiations between the two chambers in the coming weeks.

“What we have been espousing is a blended approach,” Pickup-Crawford said. “Nobody has any doubt that 10 years from now things will be much more digital than they are now. But you can’t just flip a switch.”

–Lilly Rockwell, News Service of Florida

7 Responses for “Schools May Be Required to Digitize Half Their Textbook Budgets Within 2 Years”

  1. Jim Guines says:

    I wish the lawmaker could find something else to go than make schools do different things. Schools and homes are not ready for this type of technology. This can only be a big mess and I can’t believe that somebody can’t see this.

  2. Elana Lee says:

    Sounds to me more like the makers of “Kindle” accomplished some very effective lobbying! Obviously somebody, somewhere owns Kindle stock! That’s the only part of it that makes sense.

    While personally I do not favor “electronic books”, opting instead for the heavy, hardback, bulky versions that have actual paper with words that I can physically hold in my hands, see, feel, smell, and savor, I realize other’s may not share my love of physical books. Still there should not be one manufacturer with the market cornered for the digital gizmos. Given enough time, more of these flat electronic/digital devices (that in time will be shown to cause cancer like cell phones, j/k) other than Kindles will be on the market, demand will drop and so will the prices. Until then, I’d say back it up and wait and bit. No big rush on this.

  3. Kyle Russell says:

    Elana Lee, there are alternatives, and prices have dropped. Off the top of my head, there’s the Kindle, Nook, Sony Reader, Kobo eReader, Adam, and Libre. Prices for the devices have fallen from the mid-200s to the low-100s in roughly the last year and a half. I assume the Kindle is simply mentioned so many times because it is made by Amazon, currently the most well-known online book seller.

  4. Dorothea says:

    I have to disagree with Elana Lee and Dr. Guines on this one. There are a number of ebooks on the market, not just Kindle. I see little kids carrying giant book bags to school and I’m sure they would appreciate carting their books around on a cell phone or ebook. All this technology is readily available and, although I don’t have any stats, it has to be cheaper to buy an ebook than an assortment of hard copy text books.

  5. Elana Lee says:

    Kyle and Dorthea, you both make very good points. It is probably inevitable that it’s going to happen. Probably it is nostalgia that causes me to cling with all my might to my hard cover books, covering every available surface in my room. I’d much prefer to use all that money to buy a little more “time” – Time for me to instill that love of real books, not e-books, or digital devices – into my granddaughter. What will happen to libraries? Plus there are very few pleasures as delicious as cuddling under a blanket, alone in the house on a rainy thundering day, with a cup of hot tea and a good book as opposed to “a good digital device”. Just not the same. We love and recognize “books” by their covers, by their individual appearances. I don’t think the e-devices will impart the same effect, but just my opinion.

  6. JR says:

    Unfortunately, as someone who loves books — the real ones — with all the intangibles that Elana Lee mentioned, everything will be digital — soon.

  7. JR says:

    However (continuing first post — see above — I’ll blame it on the Enter button), the convenience of digital books can be tremendous. If they are utilized effectively. Regarding the comment on book-bags, what are the physical dangers of carrying such wait on developing bones? If you have seen an elementary school student recently you will understand, they should not have to carry all that in their bags — but wait, I forgot, they need the textbooks to study for the FCAT. The bigger issue will be the infrastructure within the school itself. As the Pinellas example shows the IT environment will not support the digital devices yet. The costs though, continue to drop every year.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in