No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Judge Declares Unconstitutional Attempt By Scott To Forbid Early Voting On College Campuses

| July 24, 2018

voting florida early

A perfect place for voting. (Fernando Sanchez)

Calling it a “ham-handed” effort to keep young voters from casting ballots, a federal judge Tuesday struck down as unconstitutional an opinion issued by Gov. Rick Scott’s administration that barred early-voting sites on college and university campuses.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker found that the Florida Department of State’s prohibition against campus early-voting sites “is facially discriminatory on account of age,” and that it “imposes significant burdens on plaintiffs’ rights weighted against imprecise, insufficiently weighty government interests.”

The lawsuit, filed by six University of Florida and Florida State University students, the League of Women Voters of Florida and the Adam Goodman Foundation, hinges on a 2013 law that expanded early-voting sites and on a subsequent opinion by state Division of Elections Director Maria Matthews that interpreted the statute.

The expansion of early-voting locations came a year after long lines caused voters to wait for hours before being able to cast their ballots in the 2012 presidential election.

The 2013 law allows elections supervisors to “designate any city hall, permanent public library facility, fairground, civic center, courthouse, county commission building, stadium, convention center, government-owned senior center, or government-owned community center” as early-voting locales, but it does not expressly authorize sites at colleges or universities. Lawmakers did not approve amendments that would have included campus locations when they passed the legislation.

In January 2014, Matthews issued an opinion saying that the University of Florida’s J. Wayne Reitz Union was not an eligible early-voting facility because the “terms ‘convention center’ and ‘government-owned community center’ cannot be construed so broadly” to include college or university facilities.

Because of the Matthews opinion, the state’s public college and university students are “categorically prohibited from on-campus early voting,” Walker found.

“The opinion lopsidedly impacts Florida’s youngest voters,” he wrote in Monday’s order invalidating the state department directive. “The opinion has the effect of creating a secondary class of voters who defendant (the state) prohibits from even seeking early voting sites in dense, centralized locations where they work, study, and, in many cases, live. This effect alone is constitutionally untenable.”

Florida supervisors have to finalize a list of early-voting sites by Sunday for the Aug. 28 primary elections. They may not have enough time to add on-campus sites by then, Walker noted.

“But the benefits of barring supervisors from having that choice pales in comparison to the voting rights of 830,000 young voters,” he wrote.

Voter turnout throughout the country “is at less than impressive levels,” and turnout among young voters is lower than among older voters, the judge noted.

“Throwing up roadblocks in front of younger voters does not remotely serve the public interest. Abridging voting rights never does,” he wrote.

Concluding his 30-page order, Walker wrote that he “is not the Early-Voting Czar” and that his ruling “does not order the supervisors of elections to designate a single early voting site on a single college campus.”

Instead, his decision “removes the handcuffs” from county elections supervisors and “restores their discretion” in determining early voting sites, Walker concluded.

Scott, who is seeking to unseat U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson in November, “is proud to have signed the largest expansion of early voting in the state’s history,” McKinley Lewis, a spokesman for the governor, said in an email.

Scott’s office is reviewing the ruling, Lewis said.

Nelson hailed Walker’s decision in a Twitter post, calling the state policy “a direct assault on student voting” that “shows just how far Florida’s government will go to keep some groups from the polls.”

The state’s lawyers argued, in part, that Matthews’ opinion was advisory in nature and had limited reach.

But Walker rejected that, relying on the testimony of Ion Sancho, who served as Leon County elections supervisor for nearly three decades. Sancho, who has retired, said supervisors generally treat written opinions of the division “as authoritative” and “give broad and substantial deference” to such opinions.

Matthews issued her opinion after a group of University of Florida students asked the Gainesville City Commission to approve an early voting site on campus, prompting the Gainesville city attorney to seek guidance from the Division of Elections.

Walker — who likened the Matthews opinion to banning court workers from decorating their offices with stuffed animals because “non-official animals” are banned on federal property — conceded that early voting is a convenience for voters.

“Constitutional problems emerge, however, when conveniences are available for some people but affirmatively blocked for others,” the judge added.

Walker also agreed with one of the plaintiffs’ experts, who found that college and university students — many of whom don’t have access to cars — have disproportionately longer travel times to early-voting sites than the general population.

The state argued that the distance from the nearest early voting site at the University of Florida was a 24-minute walk or an eight-minute bicycle ride.

But Walker mocked the state for using the “very edge of campus” to calculate the distance, saying the university “is like Hogwarts, which proscribes on-campus apparating — or instantaneous teleportation.”

Expanding on the reference to Harry Potter, the judge observed: “Students do not and cannot apparate within the campus.”

The Matthews opinion violates the 26th Amendment because it “reveals a stark pattern of discrimination” against young voters, Walker decided.

“It is unexplainable on grounds other than age because it bears so heavily on younger voters than all other voters. Defendant’s stated interests for the opinion (following state law, avoiding parking issues, and minimizing on-campus disruption) reek of pretext,” he wrote. “While the opinion does not identify college students by name, its target population is unambiguous and its effects are lopsided. The opinion is intentionally and facially discriminatory.”

Saying he “does not lightly compare contemporary laws and policies to more shameful eras of American history,” Walker nonetheless lectured state officials about discriminatory voting practices, including a 1910 Oklahoma law that created exemptions to the state’s literacy test. The law was intended to keep black voters from casting ballots.

“While Oklahoma in 1910 abridged voting rights by choosing an invidious date to exclude African-Americans from voting, Florida in 2014 limited places to stymie young voters from early voting,” Walker scolded.

While state policymakers “were expanding ballot access across the board” with the 2013 law, the judge wrote, the Matthews opinion “stands as a shady contraction in a context of expansion and easier access — the only contraction, in fact.”

“This court can conceive of fewer ham-handed efforts to abridge the youth vote than defendant’s prohibition of on-campus early voting,” he wrote.

Walker’s ruling in the early-voting case is the latest in a string of voting-rights decisions against Scott and state leaders. Walker found that the state’s process of restoring voting rights to felons was unconstitutional because it gives “unfettered discretion” to the governor and the Board of Executive Clemency. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta will hear arguments in that case on Wednesday.

–Dara Kam, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

15 Responses for “Judge Declares Unconstitutional Attempt By Scott To Forbid Early Voting On College Campuses”

  1. Makeitso1701 says:

    Why are republicans always trying to suppress people from voting? Maybe because they are crooked and without the Putin’s help they don’t stand a chance in the upcoming elections, that’s why.

  2. Duncan says:

    Good and just ruling. We should be encouraging young voters to vote, not making it more difficult for them. I’m not even going to comment on the obvious political posturing by Scott and his administration.

  3. marty barrett says:

    Well done judge. Conservative Republicans are and always have been terrified of people voting. Nice try Scott, not this time. Now everyone be sure to go vote and remember to consider voting against those who consistently don’t want you to.

  4. Robjr says:

    Is voter suppression one of Scott’s methods to become a senator?

  5. Ben Hogarth says:

    If so powerful and popular Republicans are, why suppress votes?

    November can’t come soon enough for this nation. I fear too much damage has already been done.

  6. JustTheTruth says:


  7. JustTheTruth says:

    VOTE BLUE, forget Scott had enough of him.

  8. Agkistrodon says:

    I am a Conservative, but I am Libertarian, not Republican. But I do know many Republicans who feel the same way I do, EVERYONE who is LEGALLY allowed to vote should.So don’t put words in my mouth, thank you very much.

  9. Really says:

    The Alien needs to go and I wont vote for Scott nor Nelson.

  10. atilla says:

    The damage was done in the last 8 years of liberals trying to sell and destroy our country.

  11. Richard says:

    What good is our constitution, specifically the 15th Amendment, if it isn’t upheld in its entirety? Every legal US citizen should have the right to vote however I don’t believe in early voting unless it is through absentee ballot. If you can’t show up at your designated polling location then use an absentee ballot. Pretty simple and easy to do unless you don’t understand English and in those cases you had better live in an area where multilingual ballots are offered.

  12. rjs508 says:

    I have to believe that many of these college students end up voting twice. At campus and back in their home states. It is a fact that in New Hampshire 5000 same day registrations voted in 2016 election but less than 100 of these people actually ended up establishing residence later. They were simply sent there by DNC to register and vote and then drive back to wherever they came from.

  13. gmath55 says:

    Kind of childish telling people how to vote! VOTE BLUE, VOTE RED, LOL Like voters are going to listen to what you say? Voters should do their own research and then decide on who to vote for.

    A new survey out shows Gov. Rick Scott leading incumbent U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson by four percentage points in the race for U.S. Senate.

  14. Anonymous says:

    gmath55—Rick Scott is a dud and has cost us thousands obstructing access to public records. His scandal with Medicare will not. E forgotten. Rick Scott will not be elected to State Senate! Time for Rick Scott to pack up and get to work and not live off the tax payers and what he stole from Medicare

  15. gmath55 says:

    I know about Rick Scott and about not expanding Medicare and his scandals. I live in Florida and get the local news. I’m an Independent so I will vote for whoever I feel is qualified. HINT: It will not be Rick Scott. So, Anonymous you not telling me anything I don’t know. But, JustTheTruth is telling people to VOTE BLUE and that is just lame and not right.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in