No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

When Flagler’s Judicial System Makes a 10-Year Error In a 40-Year Prison Sentence

| October 24, 2017

William Copeland would be released at the earliest in January 2049, when he will be 58.

William Copeland would be released at the earliest in January 2049, when he will be 58.

In November 2012, a jury that had deliberated into Saturday found William Copeland, then a 21-year-old resident of Bunker View Drive in Palm Coast, guilty of attempted murder in the shooting of Accursio Venezia–the grandfather of Copeland’s child, who was 11 months old at the time. He was sentenced to 40 years for attempted first-degree murder and 40 years for aggravated battery with a  firearm, and 15 years for firing or throwing a deadly missile into a building. The sentences were to run concurrently.

Then mistakes emerged, showing how a person’s sentence may not be what it seems at first and explaining why the case was reopened, and has yet to close.

When defendants are sentenced to jail or prison time, they typically–and by law–are given credit for whatever time they may already have spent in jail awaiting the disposition of their case. Copeland was given 572 days’ credit after he was arrested in Volusia County on May 21, 2011, held at the Volusia Branch jail for two days, then transferred to the Flagler County jail. But his credit did not reflect those two days in Volusia. He moved to have them restored and reflect 574 days’ credit. Judge J. David Walsh, who has since retired, granted the motion within days.

It was a seemingly insignificant number in a 14,610-day sentence. But while inmates don’t want to spend one more day in jail than they have to, judicial errors can reflect a carelessness or a casual contempt for precision that undermines a system premised on justice.

That was certainly the case for Copeland, one of whose 40-year sentences was wrong by 10 years. The correct term, used in court papers, is an illegal sentence.

Copeland, who has sought to represent himself at many steps along the way, filed a motion that both his larger sentences were illegal. He was denied on the sentence for first-degree attempted murder. But the Fifth District Court of Appeal on June 19 found in his favor on the second 40-year sentence. That sentence was vacated and the Fifth District ordered Copeland re-sentenced on that count.

That’s what to have taken place this morning before Circuit Judge Dennis Craig, the third judge to contend with the Copeland case (Raul Zambrano, now the chief judge in the circuit, presided over the trial and pronounced sentence).

It didn’t happen.

Craig was there, so was Bill Bookhammer, Copeland’s public defender, and Jason Lewis, the State Attorney’s ace prosecutor. But Copeland wasn’t.

Unbeknownst to all, he had been moved from Century Correctional Institution, a state prison in the Panhandle, to Santa Rosa Correctional, another state prison, requiring a re-do on the transportation order that should have brought him to the Flagler County jail in preparation for the re-sentencing. As if that weren’t enough, Bookhammer twice tried to see his client and twice was denied–the first time because he had just been moved, the second time because Copeland’s wing at the prison was on lockdown, after a use-of-force incident (in which Copeland was not involved). Meanwhile, “This thing has been appealed and litigated and appealed and litigated,” Bookhammer said.

Craig, who is making a mark in criminal court as a judge who does not like cases to linger on the docket, set the re-sentencing for Friday, Nov. 17, at 9 a.m., during an  unrelated trial week. “We’ve got to get some of these things cleared,” Craig said. “Even if we’re going to trial that day or that week we can work around it.”

The original re-sentencing had been scheduled for half a day, to the surprise of the prosecution and the defense. Both side said they’d only need 10 minutes.

The outcome is foretold: Copeland will be sentenced to a 25-to-30 year term, knocking off at least 10 years off the sentence but on the second count only In effect, that may render the re-sentencing moot, since he would still have to serve out the years on the first count. But even that sentence of 40 years is, in fact, a mandatory-minimum 25-year sentence, making him eligible for some “gain time” for the 15 years following that mandatory minimum. Gain time means being eligible for earlier release based on good behavior. Inmates can get up to 15 percent of their non-mandatory time credited that way, thus reducing the 15 years to 12 years and nine months. Copeland would then be serving for 37 years and nine months.

The sentence is calculated from his first day of incarceration, which dates back–now that it has been corrected–to May 21, 2011. That makes his earliest-possible release to be January 21, 2049, or 32 years from now, when Copeland will be 58.

That’s assuming no further twists in the appeal process.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses for “When Flagler’s Judicial System Makes a 10-Year Error In a 40-Year Prison Sentence”

  1. Pat Patterson says:

    It seems to me Judge Craig just wants to push cases through the system. His sentences are usually very lenient with the benefit going to the criminal and not the victim(s).

  2. Gkimp says:

    Clear as mud!

  3. PCer says:

    This guy is bad news. Always has been, always will be.

  4. Ria francis says:

    Being a victim myself in this Court /County facing false criminal charges by LEO that only escalated by the torcure and bullying i recieved by LEO. i have found it in my best interest to relocate out of Flagler for all the injustice i have experience in such a small tow. Following a guilty verdict past Fruday of resisting arrest with violence, tho evidence withheld from the juros favouring the credibility of cop vs civilian is hard to prove. After the trial heard by Dennis Craig i am hopeful he will further investigate the case using good judgemt for reason for an Appeal. When your life depends on just one person to realise how difficult it can be when all odds are stacked against you trusting in the justice system even the innocent dont stand a chance if one choose to turn a blind eye on the facts/ lawys that disallow credible evidence for a fair and just trial that is a right to everyone who find themselves in this complicated courth system. Evident that day seeing questions being thrown to the judge that had him back in the books. For simple deffination as Knowingly, even questions that had him confused as how to answer. As the answer was detremental to the case. One in particulat that caused a lenghtly delay that had him again back in the books causing a lenghty delay after butting heads with the prosecutor etc. Its a Difficult job as i can imagine, to have someone life and freedom in your hands, when the purpise of yhe state is to fill jail cells. Hope for all who seek justice.

  5. FightforWilliam says:

    Nobody knows william, and nobody knows his true story. William is nor wasn’t a bad person. William was a father that felt like he was looking his little girl and the love of his life. William may have done wrong but he was still a kid he didn’t deserve to loose his entire life not saying the victim deserved it at all either. But William should still have some chance at life, he is still a son, a brother, a uncle, a cousin, a friend, and most of all a person. I love this boy as my own and I have seen the troubles he went through and I have seen the amazing person he has still become through it all. He still smiles and still has faith and that’s what matters and I will still fight this fight with him till then end bc he is still my family and he is still loved by many…

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in