No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Parent at Old Kings Elementary Hires Full-Time Armed Guard at Her $12,000 Expense

| January 21, 2013

What would Martin Luther King do? (© FlaglerLive)

What would Martin Luther King do? (© FlaglerLive)

Laura Lauria has a close connection to Old Kings Elementary. Her daughter is a sixth grader there. She’s been a member of the School Advisory Council. She is an involved parent. And she’s not waiting for the school district to decide when and how to address security concerns she has at her school. She told School Superintendent Janet Valentine that she wanted to have a sheriff’s deputy posted permanently at Old Kings Elementary School from now until the end of the school year.

And she paid for it herself, through her company.

The school district received a check from Police Services Inc., an obscure, Ormond Beach- and Bunnell-based company that also does business as BrightAssLights.com, for $11,776, which covers two months’ worth of deputies’ time, at $32-an-hour, six hours a day, five days a week. Lauria pledged additional installments to cover the rest of the year.

Deputies at the Flagler County Sheriff’s Office work the school shift as cops—as Flagler County Sheriff’s deputies—not as private security. But not as trained School Resources Deputies, either. They do so by “volunteering” for the overtime the opportunity provides. They do not have authority to go into classrooms and teach students about such things as drug abuse, for example, as SROs do. While their presence is scheduled to be permanent, the individuals filling that presence are not, making the development of much rapport with students—a major selling point of assigned SROs—difficult.

A deputy began shifts at the school Monday (Jan. 14), according to Old Kings Elementary Principal Nancy Willis, who is very happy with the arrangement and also worked out details with Lauria. “I think we’re very lucky to have them here,” Willis said.

A Unique Arrangement

Many schools and school districts across the country are taking a closer look at their security arrangements. Some are hiring private security or expanding the ranks of their school resource officers (SROs).

One parent buying full-time security for an entire school, and with a pledge to do so for the remainder of the school year, appears to be a situation unique to Flagler County so far. (It may not be, but we’ve been unable to locate such an arrangement elsewhere). Flagler’s case may spur the school district to act faster regarding security: that’s one of Lauria’s hopes.

But it also raises implications about individuals or companies buying a service for public school outside the prescribed channels, and in this case outside the perimeter of a very detailed contract between the sheriff’s office and the school district, outlining how and where SROs are to be used, and with what authority. The arrangement was carried out with virtually no public input or school board oversight, with no input from the school board’s attorney, with little transparency, and in the absence of any policy controlling such arrangements. For all its generosity, it also sets one elementary school’s security apart from others in the county, in a state where, legally, schools’ essential services (including funding) are required to be on a relatively equal footing.

Circumventing the School Board

The arrangement was negotiated between Lauria and the sheriff’s office. None of the school board members were aware of it until a few days ago, after the deputy postings began at the school. The school district serves as the fiscal agent: Lauria submitted the check to the district, which then wrote a check to the sheriff’s office, Finance Director Tom Tant said. Valentine thought the check came directly from Lauria, not from a company. In her discussions with Lauria, Valentine said, she was never under the impression that the payment would be from a company—and learned of it only on Thursday, after a reporter had inquired about it.

The issue never went before the Flagler County School Board, whose members have only now began learning about it, or about the presence of a deputy at Old Kings. The board met on Jan. 8 and devoted 20 minutes to an update on security district-wide, but that matter was never broached. Andy Dance, the school board chairman, only learned about it Wednesday (Jan. 16), at the end of a meeting he had with Valentine and Deputy Superintendent Jacob Oliva. “The parent stepped forward to donate the money,” Dance said, “as I understood to pay for the security guard for the remainder of the school year at Old Kings, that was her wish. She dealt with Ms. Valentine on that.” (Dance later said that he may have heard about the deputy issue earlier in the week, but wasn’t sure when or from whom.)

Dance knew Lauria from a recent encounter: Lauria had placed a bid on a fund-raising auction for Carver Gym, and won a gift certificate for some landscaping at her house, which Dance provided. Dance didn’t know about Police Services Inc. or the nature of the arrangement for a school cop. Winnie Oden, the principal at the district’s alternative school and long its liaison with the sheriff’s office, also worked out the arrangement with Lauria, but refused to talk about it when asked Wednesday.

She was not alone. Willis would disclose the origin of the money, though the finance department revealed it. Kristy Gavin, the school board’s attorney, was also not in the loop.

“All I knew was there was a parent wanting to pay for security, that’s all I knew,” Gavin said on Wednesday, “and I said well, we’d have to know more information, and I’ve never been provided with any more information.” Gavin had had only one brief conversation about it with Tant, the finance director. “I’m not sure how any of this has been laid out,” she said.

Donor’s Cageyness

This particular arrangement raises additional issues: Repeated attempts to contact Lauria through her company were unsuccessful, as were repeated attempts to learn about the company bearing the name on the check buying the service. A third-party web site refers to the company as specializing in “vehicle security systems” and “custom emergency lighting products for vehicles and motorcycles.”

Jim Levi, who identified himself as a member of Police Services Inc.’s “legal department” (but not a lawyer), would not give further details about the company. He said Lauria had not issued the check of her own, but had appeared “before the board” of the company, which approved the check in the name of the company. But the company has no board aside from Laura and Anthony Lauria. He said he was not authorized to speak for them, but later issued an emailed statement that identified Police Services Inc. as “a private manufacturer of safety minded products for our BrightAssLights.com division.”

BrightAssLights.com has the same phone number and Post Office box address as Police Services. The statement said that “many of our company’s employees have a vested interest at Old Kings Elementary,” and that the hiring of the deputy (referred to as an SRO in the statement) might spur the community “to all come together to put a permanent plan in place and help keep our children safe at school.”

 

Parents and businesses make donations to schools routinely, but the donations are generally channeled through school-based or district-based boards or overseen by policies. Monetary donations for school-based personnel are unheard of. School Board member John Fischer has been trying to set up a fund for teachers, to enable donations that could supplement teachers’ salaries or classroom needs, but the idea has been hung up by legalities.

An Offer They Could Not Refuse

District officials, including Dance, board member Colleen Conklin, and Valentine, are welcoming the donation—saying, one way or another, that they could not turn down such a large check—but adding caveats: that the district itself is developing a comprehensive approach form security and analyzing the feasibility of having more cops in elementary schools. They used to be there, but were removed when Don Fleming became sheriff eight years ago, as part of the sheriff’s and district’s cost-savings.

“You do need to kind of go through this whole process of setting precedent, legal responsibilities and actions,” Conklin said, “but again, I think it’s a temporary fix, we can’t do for one and not do for the other, and we can’t let a parent pay for one school while the district pays for the other schools.”

Conklin added: “We can’t expect one private citizen to cover the costs indefinitely for one school. But it may be a catalyst for us to come up with alternative to solutions for funding.”

The district has six school resource deputies divided between the two high schools and the two middle schools. Palm Coast pays for one of the six. The district pays 74 percent of the deputies’ cost, with the sheriff’s office picking up the balance. When Jim Manfre was first sheriff before 2005—and when deputies were in elementary schools–the sheriff’s office picked up the larger share of the cost. But there were three fewer schools then. The district’s total cost for SROs this year is $286,572.

The Sheriff’s Take

Manfre, too, while supportive of additional security at Old Kings, described the current measure as a “band aid.”

“I understand the parents’ concern and appreciate their wanting some additional security,” Manfre said, “but for it to be cost effective for the parents as well as the school district, we need to have an overall plan for all the elementary schools.” Manfre said getting SROs back in the schools was one of his campaign promises. “You have to ask Janet what the schools can afford. I’ve commented before, we want to be a better partner. When I was a sheriff, the sheriff’s department paid 75 percent and the schools paid 25 percent.” Manfre said a 50-50 arrangement could be worked out.

“SROs in the elementary schools I think need to be had,” Valentine said during the board meeting earlier this month, when she was already aware of Lauria’s initiative. “We know people are willing to volunteer, we know people want to help us come up with solutions to this. As soon as we get our plan in place, you agree to that full plan, then we’re going to move forward on how we’re going to fund it.”

Inevitably, Dance said, the board will have to make choices between the added cost of security and other priorities, including academic initiatives.

Meanwhile, Back In the Schools

When Oden updated the board on security last week, she said the district’s safety team had met with the command staff of the new sheriff, established a clear chain of command at each school, and was preparing presentations to be delivered at each school (what those presentations would consist of is not clear). Teams of school staff and cops would also be visiting schools to analyze vulnerabilities (without telling schools ahead of time that they’re coming). Oden also spoke of the color-coded system (four colors) that will define security conditions at any given school.

“The most important thing when you talk about safety is that there has to be really uniformity in your words and your actions,” Oden said, “so that all the players involved in the situation come to understand what these words mean, there’s standardization, and I think we’ve really done a good job with that.” Oden spoke repeatedly about transparency to the board, but would not answer a reporter’s questions about the arrangement she had helped work out at Old Kings, as the district’s liaison with the sheriff’s office.

Other districts meanwhile are wrestling with similar issues, and approaching those issues in a variety of ways. Last week the board of education in Danbury, Conn., contracted with a national security firm to install private security guards at all its elementary schools. On Tuesday, the Lee County school district in Florida added 10 school resource officers to its ranks, to patrol the district’s 45 elementary schools on a rotating basis. Tuesday evening, the Plano, Texas, school board, which oversees 55,000 students, voted to hire armed, private security guards to patrol 71 school campuses, at a cost of $2.7 million, all from the district’s savings.

But The Hillsborough County school board turned down its superintendent’s $3.7 million plan to add armed guards at every elementary school by next year. “There were two armed officers on the campus of Columbine,” School board member Candy Olson said. “Ronald Reagan had at least four police officers and a whole bunch of secret service agents, all of whom were armed, and he was shot.” The board was willing to keep talking about the issue, however, but insisted that it would not be pressed into making a hasty, knee-jerk decision on security.

Print Friendly

61 Responses for “Parent at Old Kings Elementary Hires Full-Time Armed Guard at Her $12,000 Expense”

  1. Shell says:

    I have two children at OKES and next year will have three. I don’t have any problem with an armed guard, of whatever stripe, patrolling the school. I do look askance at the way it was done and thank FlaglerLive for digging into the details. Keep on ‘em.

    One thing from the article I must address. Whether the guard is “merely” a deputy renting out his authority or a “trained SRO” is immaterial. They’re not there to be bestest buddies with the children (though they should be pleasant in demeanor and approachable), they are there to defend their lives if necessary. The children should be taught two things about them (and it should be made clear that this applies to all police officers and the like) – they’ll help you if you need it, and it’s not a good idea to mess with them.

       2 likes

  2. lilith says:

    This is a great solution! Kudos to the parent

       4 likes

  3. Anonymous says:

    Is she going to put an armed guard at every movie theater too? Or maybe the public park where her child plays? What right does any one individual have to make a decision regarding 1000 other children? I have 2 children in 2 different schools here in the county and I don’t want armed guards in the school. My children both feel very safe at their schools without the guards or the parents paranoia.

       7 likes

  4. Lone Wolf says:

    I have been a law enforcement officer in this county for years and also a proud parent. Well, I think its great to have a law enforcement presence at the school. To all of the people yelling about the trained part, all of the deputies receive the same high liability training (ex: active shooters, EVOC, CPR, Firearms training, etc) as the S.R.D.’s. The only difference between a regular deputy and a S.R.D. is the School Resource Officer school, which is geared to teaching kids in the classroom and nothing to do with the high liability areas.

       5 likes

  5. Binkey says:

    Our elementary schools are very large. Just look at Wadsworth/Buddy Taylor campus. Not sure if one security guard will do.

    I think money could be better spent securing the school’s perimeters and adding safety and security features to the facilities.

       9 likes

  6. w.ryan says:

    Jon…are you blue in the face yet? Why is it so hard about understanding that it’s about protocols. How do we evaluate and use this money to the best interest of everyone involved. The sky is blue just like your face. Never mind everyone else’s interpretation. The sky is falling according to this majority.

       3 likes

  7. amom says:

    This is crazy. Unless the intruder happens to be right where the guard is, and the guard has his gun drawn, It will not be any help. In Newtown , even if the principal had bee armed, she could not have stopped the massacre, unless she had been walking around with her hand on the trigger.
    I understand the fear, but this is not the answer.

       9 likes

    • Helene says:

      amom, this was my point also, just put a different way. Same point as Binkey said. The Newtown killer came in guns ablazing. A lone cop with a gun would have been part of the carnage. The Newtown guy had miltary style weapons (as did the theater shoorter) – but that is a whole other topic.

         4 likes

  8. All about publicity says:

    Don’t expect us to pick up the tab to put other officers in any of the other schools by calling a special elections. Ask for donations from parents who have children in these schools—if they want it, they’ll pay for it. The presence of officers in the schools has NOT proven to prevent crime? Did the school in CT have an officer in that school? What makes elementary schools any more important than middle or high schools. Sound here like money talks and BS walks. The school board should have distributed this windfall between all the schools. Who is responsible for this officer, and why such a high rate of pay?

       2 likes

  9. ANONYMOUSAY says:

    Sorry Lone Wolf, You may be a good cop in the streets but that doesn’t make you or any other cop experienced in a gun battle with a bunch of little kids criss-crossing in your line of fire. This is the whole problem. Just because a cop (JOHN WAYNE) or a cop with a gun or ten guns is in the school doesn’t equal automatic safe kids, problem solved. If armed guards, police or whatever are going to be put in schools they need new training specifically for a mass shooting event, screened and evaluated. If this fear is so legit, the best needs to do the job. Just like after 911 and all the other increased training due to terrorism. New York City is now being sued because two cops panicked and shot eleven bystanders while attempting to take down a suspect. Being a cop isn’t an all out pass to give you the keys to the city or our kids lives.

       4 likes

  10. ANONYMOU says:

    too funny, I wish the parents were as involved with the kids as they are with expressing their opinion on this site.

    The parent involvement numbers in Flagler County is low as can be, there are lots of issues, but based on how the donor was cast as “questionable etc” could that over shadow the issue at the core?

    to secure or not to secure,

    My opinion

    as for a Flagler County Sheriff Deputy carrying a weapon, whats the difference between being at the school or a public event like the Potato Festival. To me it speaks to core issue of response time if there is an incident. No deputy, the response would be simply be slower but from the same people that would respond anyway.

       0 likes

  11. ANONYMOUSAY says:

    Obviously parents are paying attention that’s why they are upset over this maneuver. If it’s all the same than why is there a swat team??? Why are there different branches of law enforcement, Military??? Prevention is good one armed man walking amongst children is not. We’re seeing more and more taser incidents now because you get an overzealous cop who is there to intercept trouble, may not be a shooting but he will find trouble depending where the COPS head is at.

       0 likes

  12. Jon Hardison says:

    Yep. We’re all watching. And we all want what’s best for our kids. I think many including “amom” were right when they questioned the efficacy of this move. We’re also forgetting some of the other issues that can arise. What about 6 yo kids being tased? Remember that? That was right here in FL. The assaulted officer at the Matanzas fight a year or two ago. The special needs taser incident at FPC…

    To be clear, I’m not blaming our men and women in blue (Sorry) green. I’m simply saying that they can sometimes be a band-aid where stitches are needed.

    Reality Check said, “Parents want the schools to have an armed officer…”, but I’m not sure we do. What will REALLY be gained and what will be lost (other than money)? In the assignment of these officers what issue are we hoping to fix? Is it security or is it the appearance of security to calm justifiably shaken parents?

    I think many are right in that we don’t need committees and consultants at this juncture. We simply need to look at our own needs. How have we made it without the officers these few years? How have our lock-downs worked out? Are there security issues with the layouts of these campuses that also need to be resolved? (and was security a consideration when designing these structures?)

    I think we may run the risk of doing our community (including our kids) an injustice by assigning our finest to these posts without additional consideration, and in the hopes they’ll tip the outcome of the unthinkable in our favor. It’s not fair or advantageous to put them in that situation.

    So happy it’s really being talked about though. Both on here and by the FCSB.
    Colleen! Don’t let ‘em get to you. Some of us handle anger/fear better than others. ;-)
    Your service is very, very appreciated as is the service of the other members.

       1 likes

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive
Loading

ADVERTISEMENTS

palm coast pet clinic veterinarians
camera surveillance web watchdogs palm coast gospel gardens palm coast landscaping maintenance
support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
Advertisement
Log in
| FlaglerLive, P.O. Box 354263, Palm Coast, FL 32135-4263 | 386/586-0257