Palm Coast City Clerk Virginia Smith was closer to the mark when she estimated the cost of Palm Coast’s special election for mayor, and County Commissioner Dave Sullivan’s fears–and criticisms–were somewhat exaggerated. But it wasn’t a cheap election either way.
When the City Council set the July 27 special election in May, Smith told the council that the election would cost “probably upwards of $100,000.” The actual cost to the city–and to taxpayers: $127,983.15, according to documents provided by Supervisor of Elections Kaiti Lenhart.
In early June, Lenhart sent a cost estimate of $187,764 to the city, or $60,000 more than the actual cost. But that was a high-end estimate, Lenhart cautioned, and it was predicated on a high-turnout election mirroring last November’s. Neither proved to be the case, though Sullivan during a County Commission meeting indirectly chided former Mayor Milissa Holland when he claimed that it was “going to cost the city of Palm Coast $185,000 to run an election that should not have been necessary, and I know that’s a little touchy.”
Holland had resigned in May. The election drew six candidates who qualified. David Alfin won with 36 percent of the vote. But only 19,000 voters cast a ballot, a turnout of 26 percent, compared with the 79 percent turnout of the November election, when nearly 50,000 voters cast valid ballots in the mayoral election. (There were 4,000 undervotes, meaning that no vote was made for that particular ace on those ballots, according to the official tally).
Put another way, the special election cost $6.74 per vote cast.
Lenhart’s original estimate included 40,000 election day ballots, which would have cost $12,400. Only 3,106 voters turned up on Election Day itself. Sample ballot costs were initially estimated at $25,000. The cost was actually $11,800. Other ballot and mail costs were also lower. The bulk of the cost was in poll worker and election office staffing ($62,600), sample ballots ($9,000) and supplies ($46,500). See the detailed invoices here and here. The city had submitted a $25,000 deposit. The election was paid out of the city’s general fund.
Talk of a referendum among City Council members was quickly scuttled when Smith began talking about potential costs. The costs of the special election had not been disclosed. But council members were aware of the cost estimates in May. The referendum possibility arose when at one point three council members favored going that route to best learn where the public stands on allowing commercial vehicles in driveways.
Smith was in her office when the discussion of a referendum began. She immediately rushed to the council chambers to make sure the council didn’t wade back into troubled waters. She told them that a referendum would have to be scheduled at the next general election, in November 2022. (The city charter is slightly unclear on that score. It calls for referendums resulting from citizen initiative to be placed on the general election ballot, but leave silent council-initiated referendums, as this one would be.) Even then, she cautioned, if the addition of a city referendum on the ballot would add so much as one sheet, it would result in significant added costs to the city. And of course no council member was proposing to hold a referendum in a special election, incurring another six-figure bill. Either way, the referendum discussion died.
FlaglerLive relies on a strong core of donors. But they’re just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who daily depend on FlaglerLive for reliable, fearless reporting and analysis you cannot get anywhere else. If you’re still on the sidelines, we need you to join the Friends of FlaglerLive today. Elections, storms, the latest catastrophe - when dependable and factual local reporting will be more essential than ever, take a stand for integrity and have a direct voice in fostering serious journalism in your community. As little as $10 makes a difference, or better still, become a monthly donor: Become a "Friend of" FlaglerLive, a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible. Think of it as buying a "scoop", in every sense of the term!
Reader Interactions
Comments
Leave a Reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
palmcoaster says
Can we imagine how much costed the CA taxpayer the recall election requested by all these conspiracy cultist there? And for what next year they have to elect the Governor again and the peoples ballot of yesterday confirmed Newsome in his governorship. A big waste of money in CA that I believe we would not have had in Palm Coast, if also the same extreme cultist conspiracy believers would not have harassed our former Mayor Holland, thou like any human was not perfect as nothing is, but was better than her predecessors. Now I hope we do not go thru the same with new Mayor Alfin…and he will complete his term/s. Mayor Alvin, Council and Administrators do not give in to bullies harassment please. This extreme war of attrition against Democrats elected to office nation wide is a real shame and a stain on our Beloved USA in front of the whole world. In the same ballot of the 2020 election many GOP’s senators and congressmen won along Biden but they only want to recount and audit over and over Biden only, were the GOPS elected on the same ballot a fraud too ? What a joke! We GOP’s lost in good terms so sock it up and march on and maybe if the cult will leave our party we will do better in the future. I knew Newsome will win and the peoples vote will not change in 2022 as we do not want nut cases in the WH with their finger on the nukes button.
Celia M Pugliese says
Regarding the City of Palm Coast correct ordinance not allowing commercial vehicles on driveways I beg our council and specially Mayor Alvin which I spoke about it during his campaign as he promised not to change the ordinance as is part of what preserves Palm Coast beautiful. Lets stop the control and demands of a rowdy, vociferous and threatening minority in city council meetings and social media, versus the wishes and rights of the civil and silent majority that opposed the deterioration of our beautiful city! When I had a store front business I used a magnetic signs in the business vehicle only during the business hours trips and while parked in the business strip mall and was taken down before coming home. So why laziness and convenience of individual commercial business running owners do not agree with our current ordinance? We bought our homes in residential neighborhoods not in commercial strip malls or large malls or storage businesses or industrial parks then lets do not change our current ordinance. Imagine if now we have some in a single family home with 4 or 5 cars and a garage used to store junk making for insufficient parking that used the street, swale, absentee neighbors driveways etc. to park…what will be if allowed to park also their commercial vehicles…Then mayhem. We will have elections coming and in Palm Coast we have shown in the mayoral race that we do not want to be governed by the vociferous, threatening and uncivil minority, then I ask Mayor Alvin to remember who voted for him that will also elect Klufas and Branquinho as long as you preserve the wishes of the silent majority that shows results at the ballot box.
Celia M Pugliese says
Apologies to Mayor Alfin for misspelling his last name. Sorry Sir got it right now.