• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
    • Marineland
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • First Amendment
    • Second Amendment
    • Third Amendment
    • Fourth Amendment
    • Fifth Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Eighth Amendment
    • 14th Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Privacy
    • Civil Rights
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Open-Carry Leaves Flagler County’s Government Attorneys Grappling with Ruling’s Application to Public Spaces

October 1, 2025 | FlaglerLive | 5 Comments

The sign stenciled on the entrance door at the Government Services Building in Bunnell, where county and school district offices are located, and where students are routinely in the building. (© FlaglerLive)
The sign stenciled on the entrance door at the Government Services Building in Bunnell, where county and school district offices are located, and where students are routinely in the building. (© FlaglerLive)

Last Updated: 4:23 p.m.

Five days after a Florida appeals court ruled unconstitutional a state law prohibiting the carrying of guns unconcealed in public, a Palm Coast city employee walking into the Southern Recreation Center saw a man in the dog park with his dog, and with a sidearm in a holster, clearly visible. 

“In case we get questions, Does the new Florida open carry law [a]ffect the current no weapons allowed in any parks and recreation facility policy?” the employee asked a supervisor. 

The supervisor got an answer from John LeMaster, the Flagler County Sheriff’s general counsel. “In general, a private land owner (including the city) may prevent open carry on their property in this case a city park,” LeMaster wrote the supervisor in an email. The violator could be trespassed.  “However, this has larger ramifications and I am not prepared to opine on what ifs today.” 

And i fact when City Attorney Marcus Duffy checked on the law further as it applies to the city, it turned out the man with the dog was in his rights to carry a gun, as long as he was not intimidating anyone (contrary to an interpretation in an earlier version of this article). 

The employee’s question and the attorneys’ responses were a reflection of at least a measure of confusion or lack of clarity the Sept. 10 ruling restoring open-carry has created. LeMaster, along with Duffy and Assistant County Attorney Sean Moylan, have been fielding questions and exchanging emails to clarify the matter, though even they find themselves stumped by loopholes the new ruling appears to have opened in state law. They are looking to the legislature, which meets in January, to clarify the law. 

Meanwhile, questions continue to be raised about guns in public places, including Flagler County’s and Palm Coast’s public buildings and parks. 

A city spokesperson today at first confirmed that guns are prohibited in public parks then reversed course, and said they are prohibited at City Hall’s public meetings–but not necessarily in City Hall offices proper. The spokesperson said Duffy is not yet clear on the prohibition’s extension to the entirety of City Hall. Confusing as things are, the city intends to err on the side of permission, not prohibition. 

The state law spelling out the prohibition (and echoed in a city ordinance) was written to regulate concealed weapons. In its own wording, the law “does not authorize any person to openly carry a handgun, or carry a concealed weapon, or concealed firearm” in numerous public places that the law enumerates. 

The prohibition on open-carry has been nullified. Though the prohibition on handguns in certain public places continues to apply as it did for concealed weapons, the wording of the law does not necessarily make the prohibition as explicit regading rifles or long guns.

“Subpart (1)(a) specifically says concealed weapon does not include machine guns,” Moylan wrote LeMaster in a Sept. 16 email. (In the law’s words, “the term ‘concealed weapon or concealed firearm’ means a handgun, electric weapon or device, tear gas gun, knife, or billie, but does not include a machine gun.” 

On Tuesday, Rep. Christine Hunchofsky, the Parkland Democrat, introduced a bill aiming to close that loophole. (Parkland is the site of the 2017 massacre that left 17 people dead at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School). LeMaster has been working through the Florida Police Attorneys Association on proposing a similar legislative clarifications.

Courts are in the clear. “Our Court believes that chief judges continue to have the authority to prohibit weapons (including firearms) in courthouses and courtrooms,” Chief Justice Carlos G. Muñiz wrote all chief judges in the state in a Sept. 25 memo. 

Shortly after the open-carry ruling, Palm Coast defense attorney Marc Dwyer said the reasoning of the ruling was correct, but he predicted that it would create unexpected situations that would have to be sorted out by law enforcement and in court. The confusion was widespread. 

The First District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee issued the ruling, known as Stanley v. Florida, on Sept. 10. 

On Sept. 15, Attorney General James Uthmeier issued a “guidance memorandum” stating that the decision was binding across the state, since no other appellate court has ruled on the matter. So cops and prosecutors should refrain from taking action against people openly carrying firearms, he wrote. But he noted among other caveats that the “decision neither considered nor implicated Florida’s law listing certain locations where the carrying of a firearm—open or concealed—may be unauthorized.” 

“The same holds true for private property owners,” Uthmeier wrote, “who maintain the long-standing legal prerogative to compel individuals carrying firearms to leave their premises. Any person carrying a firearm who violates the private property owner’s warning to depart will be committing armed trespass, a third-degree felony.” 

On Sept. 18, the Flagler County Sheriff’s Office issued a “legal bulletin,” or directive, to its law enforcement officers summarizing the Attorney General’s guidance (and including the guidance for officers’ review). 

“The McDaniels decision is not as far reaching as some may think,” the memo, drafted by LeMaster, stated. “While the decision does permit open-carry in public, where and when a person may legally carry can be conditioned not only by government entities but also by private businesses and landholders.” A violation is to be treated as a “property-rights/trespass issue rather than a firearm law violation,” the directive states. 

Prohibitions on weapons–including ammunition, tasers, stun guns and other weapons outlined in state law–still applied in public places such as schools or school-sponsored events, courts, college and university campuses and several other places. 

Questions lingered. “We have traditionally relied on [state law] to prohibit firearms in the GSB,” Moylan wrote LeMaster, referring to the Government Services Building in Bunnell, which houses county offices and the school district’s administration. “Given how the law is trending, including notably the harsh penalties against public officials in F.S. 790.33(3), it may be wise to reaffirm with school officials the degree to which students utilize the GSB and the degree to which school events are held here.”

The section of law Moylan cited referred to penalties against public officials who violate gun-rights laws. The penalties apply to them as individuals. The law prohibits their government from paying for their defense. 

By September 16, Mylan had “confirmed with the superintendent that the GSB is regularly utilized by students for school purposes. As such, we’ll maintain the policy we’ve had in Place.” Nevertheless, he added: “I’m worried the Legislature won’t clear up the statutory ambiguities for a number of reasons.” 

That leaves local regulations and local officials, should they exercise explicit prohibitions on guns in public places, vulnerable to litigation. 

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jay Tomm says

    October 1, 2025 at 4:10 pm

    This is completely WRONG!
    Section 790 outlines prohibited places. PUBLIC spaces are not private & cannot be regulated. Any local government can be held liable & fined for doing so per section 790.
    A PRIVATE business can decide to not allow open carry, or concealed carry, & a person can be asked to leave, & if they do not can be trespassed.
    As long as it’s not the court house, & commission meeting or a school sponsored event,(all are defined as prohibited carry) Flagler county can not ask someone to leave.

    Loading...
    2
  2. Oops says

    October 1, 2025 at 7:26 pm

    “… the term ‘concealed weapon or concealed firearm’ … does not include a machine gun. …”

    Loading...
    1
  3. Villein says

    October 3, 2025 at 2:57 pm

    Wow what a cluster. Do the people elected to represent us in Tallahassee have a medical condition that prevents them from forethought?

    Loading...
    1
  4. Deborah Coffey says

    October 3, 2025 at 5:59 pm

    @ Villein
    Yes, it’s a cluster. But, we can note that the same people with little forethought for all of us have indeed made sure they protected themselves! No guns in courts. No guns anywhere they work! The whole thing is sick and you don’t need to be a medical doctor to know it.

    Loading...
    1
  5. Armando Gomez says

    October 5, 2025 at 2:12 pm

    I don’t know why people keep saying this is a new law. Constitutional carry is a right given to us by the constitution. I can’t quite understand why people are up in arms. We have bigger problems in Palm Coast. Why are you concerned about a person having the ability to protect themselves . The city of Palm Coast should be more worried about individuals who are driving like lunatics all over our roads. More deaths come from car accidents than shootings in Palm Coast. The statistics are not even close. And now with the ongoing issue with the electric scooters overtaking our city, they’ll be even more deaths. Consider implementing the laws that are already in place. If the officials and city workers that are paid by taxpayer money can not support the constitution,I make a motion that they be replaced?

    Loading...
    1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • FYI on With Grave Concerns About Traffic, Palm Coast Approves Shopping Rezoning That’ll Add 1,000s of Cars to SR100
  • Tired of it on You May Soon Park Your Commercial Vehicle in Residential Driveways as Palm Coast Votes to Relax Restrictions
  • One salty sour property owner on County Completes $1.88 Million Buy of Marlow Property on Intracoastal for Linear Park Extension
  • Joe on DeSantis Ridicules Spate of House Proposals to Cut Property Taxes as ‘Political Game’
  • DeSanctimonious on DeSantis Ridicules Spate of House Proposals to Cut Property Taxes as ‘Political Game’
  • Ed Danko, former Vice-Mayor PC on With Grave Concerns About Traffic, Palm Coast Approves Shopping Rezoning That’ll Add 1,000s of Cars to SR100
  • Jane Gentile-Youd on Ending Property Taxes Is Tempting. It’s Also Practically Foolish.
  • YankeeExPat on With Grave Concerns About Traffic, Palm Coast Approves Shopping Rezoning That’ll Add 1,000s of Cars to SR100
  • DaleL on Cops Charge Woman Over Inflated Weenie
  • Ray W. on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, October 23, 2025
  • Rita on Flagler Commission Was Ready to No-Bid Sell Parkland for a Parking Lot. Then the County Attorney Intervened.
  • Ed P on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Thursday, October 23, 2025
  • Sherry on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Tuesday, October 21, 2025
  • Hammock Bear on The Real Reason Conservatives Are Furious About Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Gig
  • JC on You May Soon Park Your Commercial Vehicle in Residential Driveways as Palm Coast Votes to Relax Restrictions
  • Hammock Bear on With Grave Concerns About Traffic, Palm Coast Approves Shopping Rezoning That’ll Add 1,000s of Cars to SR100

Log in

%d