By George B. Cunningham
A couple of weeks after the close of the National Football League’s regular season, there is just one Black head coach and one Latino head coach left in the League – Mike Tomlin of the Pittsburgh Steelers, and Ron Rivera of the Washington Football Team, respectively. This follows the firing of Brian Flores by the Miami Dolphins and David Culley by the Houston Texans.
In other words, in a league in which most of the players are Black, almost all of the 32 NFL head coaches are white.
I have studied diversity and inclusion in sport for more than two decades, including the ways in which race and gender intersect to affect leadership opportunities for women and men. My research shows that biased decision-making, organizational cultures that value similarity, and societal forms of bias and discrimination are all to blame for the lack of diversity among NFL head coaches.
History of exclusion
The dismal numbers are nothing new. In 1989, Art Shell became the first Black head coach of an NFL team in the modern era. But his hiring did not break down the barriers other minority coaches face in the NFL.
Seeking to address its diversity problem, the NFL adopted the Rooney Rule in 2003, requiring teams to interview at least two minority candidates for their head coach openings. In 2021, the league expanded the rule to include general managers and offensive and defensive coordinators.
The policy had positive short-term effects, as the league saw an increase in Black and Latino coaches. The gains have since diminished, though, and the number of Black head coaches at the start of the 2021 season, three, was the same as in 2003.
In short, the NFL is back to where it started.
When looking for explanations, it is helpful to explore factors at the individual, organizational and societal levels. Research evidence shows some of these explanations are better than others.
Individual factors
At the individual level, people might not obtain a job if they lack skills or experience, don’t have contacts or don’t apply. There is no consistent evidence, though, that any of these explanations describe Black coaches.
For example, scholars have found that Black assistant coaches in college football were less likely to be promoted and had less career satisfaction than their white counterparts, but neither was a function of the coaches’ experience, skills or social networks. This is the case in the NFL, too, where sports economists have also shown that Black assistant coaches are equally as skilled as their white counterparts.
Other researchers have analyzed NFL data from 1985 to 2018 and found no racial differences in the performance of head coaches.
In short, there is no evidence that Black coaches are unqualified.
Organizations and leaders
On the other hand, research does show that leaders and organizations make a difference in who gets hired. For example, an analysis from Arizona State University’s Global Sports Institute shows that seven NFL teams have hired only white head coaches.
The types of positions Black coaches have access to also matters. Offensive and defensive coordinators are frequently in line for head coaching opportunities. But research at the NFL and NCAA levels reliably shows that white coaches are overrepresented in these coveted coordinator positions.
What’s referred to as “the glass cliff” offers another organizational explanation. This theory suggests that members of underrepresented groups are most likely to be hired by organizations that have a history of poor performance or that are in crisis. When performance continues to wane, the leaders are likely to be replaced by majority group members. Researchers have shown that race and racism also affect the glass cliff, including leaders in sport. Relative to white coaches, minoritized men’s basketball coaches were more likely to be hired to teams with a history of losing, and if they were unable to turn things around, they were likely to be replaced by white coaches.
These examples show that leaders clearly make a difference. A study of the Las Vegas Raiders further illustrates the point. Under former general manager Reggie McKenzie, who is Black, the Raiders had the highest share of Black players in the league, at 79.2%. In 2016, when McKenzie won NFL executive of the year, the Raiders also had the highest share of Black coaches, at 82.3%.
Following the 2018 season, the Raiders fired McKenzie and brought in a white head coach, Jon Gruden, and a white general manager, Mike Mayock. The percentage of Black players has decreased every year since. In 2021, in one of the most damaging blows to the NFL in recent memory, Gruden resigned after making racist and homophobic comments after an analysis of thousands of emails sent to NFL executives and others. Mayock was fired after the season. At the same time, the percentage of Black players on the Raiders roster dropped to 67.2%.
Though the study on the Raiders focuses on players, organizational scholars have consistently shown that people are most likely to hire others who are of the same race. Bias among decision-makers can affect the diversity of the organization.
Systemic racism
Finally, societal factors make a difference, the most prevalent of which are systemic forms of racism, meaning racial bias at the community, state and national levels. Societal factors reflect people’s collective racial biases, as well as the racially tinged laws, policies and norms embedded in societies’ institutions.
A focus on systemic racism moves beyond individual actors and prioritizes the societal patterns of prejudice and discrimination. For example, my colleague and I have shown that county-level racism is predictive of fans’ reactions to Black Lives Matter protests by NFL players.
Systemic racism has an enduring impact that can affect people years later. Researchers have shown that counties most dependent on slavery in 1860 also have high levels of racism today. As systemic racism increased in these counties, Black residents’ poverty rates increased and their social mobility decreased.
Given the impact of systemic racism across all elements of society, it is hardly surprising that NFL coaches, analysts and scholars – including those in media studies, sport studies, sociology, sport management, and behavioral science – point to systemic racism as a reason for the lack of Black coaches in the league.
The evidence is clear: Organizations, their leaders and systemic racism all contribute. Until structural change occurs, the pattern will continue.
Correction: The original version of this story misstated the number of coaches who are white. Of the 32 teams, two have non-white coaches. There are now eight openings, and the remaining jobs are held by whites.
George B. Cunningham is Professor of Sport Management at Texas A&M University.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
A.j says
Oh. we live in the USA. Why am I’m not surprised. No one should be surprised. This isn’t new, racism is alive and kicking, has been for years, will not change. Thank GOD a lot of the players are Africsn Americans and they earn a lot of money. Please start your own business, stay out of trouble.
Jimbo99 says
Texans 4-13-0, Jaguars 3-14-0 & Dolphins 9-8-0. In Flores case was 1-7-0 to start, they had to win out, got beat 34-3 the 2nd to the last game. Dolphins missed the playoffs 2 out of the 3 seasons they had a legitimate opportunity. Flores Dolphins weren’t a threat to the Bills. 2020 the Bills beat the Dolphins 52-26. The coaches that were fired were fired for a reason. Flores record with the Dolphins was 1 win better than Adam Gase’s & Gase coached them into the playoffs. I won’t defend the disparity in skin color, but when a coach loses to elimination in blowout fashion, there’s a moment the ownership has to really evaluate which direction the organization is headed. I think of the 2 black coaches fired Flores won’t be out there very long, perhaps Flores was meant to be the head coach of another franchise. Pete Carroll might even be fired shortly ? I tend to agree Culley needed a better opportunity, sometimes a team hires a coach to be the holding pattern until the next pool of fired coaches improves. Take the Lions coach, he was an interim with the Dolphins, wasn’t that bad either. But in the off season the Dolphins hired Gase, Sean Payton, Saints head coach noticed & hired Dan Campbell, until the Lions hired him.
David Culley, Texans. Black
Joe Judge, Giants. White
Brian Flores, Dolphins. Black
Matt Nagy, Bears. White
Mike Zimmer, Vikings. White
Vic Fangio, Broncos. White
Urban Meyer, Jaguars. White
Jon Gruden, Raiders (resigned) White
14 teams made the playoffs, 4 had black QBs, 3 of the 4 teams eliminated wild card weekend, Mahomes is the only black QB left, he’ll get a home game vs Buffalo. Anyway, it’s only a game, not like any of the rest of us are ever going to get an opportunity to coach the Jaguars even, regardless of our skin color. Flores made more money in 3 seasons with the Dolphins than a lot of folks make in a lifetime, I’m not worried about whether he has a job or not.
Dennis says
Another racist rant. The owners have billions invested and they want the best staff they can get. If they happen to be white, so be it. Hire because of race is racist. Get a life.
Cgm says
If blacks make up 13% of the population and there are 32 head coaching positions then there should be 3to 4 Black head coaches in the league and there are.
Stop the bs.
Pierre Tristam says
Cgm is incorrect. 30 of the 32 teams (not 34, as I had it initially–thank you for the correction) have white coaches, as the article notes, and the more relevant percentage is that of NFL players, close to 60 percent of whom are Black. Intellectual minstrelsy—and this applies to Dennis just as much—is no less revolting than the other kind.
Feddy65 says
When did the NFL add 2 extra teams? Only 32.
ASF says
Or maybe it’s because Black Athletes and people involved with the business of sports realize that that is not where the money is.
Deb says
I don’t care what business you are in, if you don’t perform and get results, black or white you will lose your job.
Timothy Patrick Welch says
Nope…
That “America” is gone.
American’s have lost the freedom to hire or fire anyone for any reason.
Pogo says
@Timothy Patrick Welch is wrong — as usual
Florida is an at-will state
https://www.google.com/search?q=Florida+is+an+at-will+state
Origin of right-to-work laws
https://www.google.com/search?q=Origin+of+right-to-work+laws
Harmonious One says
If it’s about diversity then maybe more whites should be playing on the field. Especially when it comes to the NBA.
But it’s not about race it’s about playing the best talent regardless of skin color.
It’s just the liberal democrats want to make everything about race and gender. Way to divide the country.
Pogo says
@Larger eye openings in your hood would improve your POV
us enlisted military by race
Characteristic Active-duty enlisted women Active-duty enlisted men
White 54.08% 69.86%
Black 28.92% 16.94%
American Indian, Alaska Native 1.39% 1.16%
Asian 4.97% 4.43%
https://www.google.com/search?q=us+enlisted+military+by+race