With supporters saying a free-market approach would spur more competition and more choices for patients, a House panel Tuesday approved a proposal that would eliminate key regulations on building hospitals.
The bill (HB 31A), approved in a party-line vote, is part of a series of proposals that House Republican leaders have pushed to make changes in the health-care industry. The measure would eliminate what is known as the hospital “certificate of need” process, which requires state review and approval of building new hospitals, replacing hospitals and offering certain complex, costly medical services such as organ transplants.
House Health & Human Services Chairman Jason Brodeur, a Sanford Republican who is sponsoring the bill, argued that eliminating the regulations would spur more innovation in the hospital industry and competition for patients.
“This bill … removes a regulatory barrier that hinders competition and disincentives the innovation that we see happening in other industries,” Brodeur said. “It creates a free market with more competition and, ultimately, more options for those seeking health care.”
But critics said they are concerned, in part, that the bill would lead to new hospitals that would focus on attracting patients with health insurance, leaving behind uninsured patients at already-existing hospitals. Opponents included the Florida Hospital Association, the state’s largest hospital-industry group.
“No one wants to compete with us for uncompensated patients,” said Bill Bell, the hospital association’s general counsel. “They only want to treat the paying patients, and that’s why they would siphon off those paying patients, increase our costs, and we would have to shift those costs back to our paying patients and businesses.”
With lawmakers in the middle of a special legislative session called to pass a budget, it remains unclear whether the House certificate-of-need proposal has any chance of passing. The Senate has not filed a similar bill for the special session, though the Senate Health Policy Committee is slated to discuss the issue Wednesday during a workshop.
Nevertheless, the debate during the special session could be a step toward House Republican leaders pushing to eliminate hospital certificates of need in the future. The House Health Innovation Subcommittee voted 9-3 to approve Brodeur’s bill, with all of the panel’s Republicans supporting it.
The certificate-of-need process has long been controversial and can lead to legal battles within the industry.
As an example, the state Agency for Health Care Administration late last year gave preliminary approval for a certificate of need for Plantation General Hospital to build a replacement 200-bed facility near the campus of Nova Southeastern University in Broward County. But Memorial Healthcare System and Cleveland Clinic Florida Health System, which operate hospitals in the area, filed legal challenges in the state Division of Administrative Hearings. The challenges remain pending.
Supporters of the House bill argue that the certificate-of-need process limits competition, with Rep. Jose Oliva, R-Miami Lakes, likening it to government granting monopolies.
“The only thing CONs ensure is that when a hospital is somewhere, another one can’t show up and compete and provide a better service at a better rate,” Oliva said.
But Rep. John Cortes, a Kissimmee Democrat who voted against the bill, said he is concerned about the quality of care that would be provided to uninsured people if new hospitals cater to patients with insurance.
“I still have a concern for the people in my area, especially my area, who are the working poor who, for me, are not going to get quality care,” Cortes said. “The only ones who are going to get quality care are people who have insurance cards.”
–Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida
PeachesMcGee says
The healthcare system is broken.
No amount of new legislation will salvage it.
tulip says
I think it would be a good idea to have more than one hospital in a city. However, each facility would be required by law to take a certain amount of uninsured patients. This keeps the competition on a more fair playing field.
The way it is now, if there is only one local hospital, patients are at that hospital’s mercy, and the administrators don’t have to be all that concerned that much about the quality of care, cleaniliness, their staff etc. Right now a lot of hospitals are run like a big business, it’s main goal is money and patients are secondary. Perhaps with some competition, things would change.
Now I do realize that Gov. Scott and his wife are in the “medical business” and own clinics, so it wouldn’t surprise me if he approved this, as well as “profit sharing” amongst all the hospitals” to be in the best interest of his family. After all, he would have more ways of committing Medicare fraud like he did before.
Where I originally came from, there were 3 hospitals in a less than a 20 mile area.
My thoughts says
The Certificate of Need process was created in Florida because hospitals WERE popping up everywhere, couldn’t successfully function, and subsequently some had to close. The Certificate of Need means the proposed hospital needs to demonstrate that there is a sufficiently sick population that the other hospital isn’t/can’t treat (as opposed to won’t). No one wants to talk about why the certificate of need was created because it makes sense. Medicine isn’t a retail business where you can shop for a sale!
a tiny manatee says
I think total deregulation is the way to go, that way people that insist on “hurr the free market will solve all” can experience no frills healthcare. If you think the infection rates in the local hospitals are bad now, just wait until hospitals start reusing gauze and pay their workers even less to cut corners.
Anonymous says
I worked in hospitals most of my working life. If you think healthcare is bad now, just go ahead and give de-regulation a try. And, if Conservatives have their way and restrictive Tort Reform is passed, the healthcare consumer will have little to no recourse at all. Keep voting Republican and cheering on the elimination of Healthcare Reform. Sooner or later, Medicare recipients, that same level of “compassion” will visit you personally on your doorstep.