By Garen Wintemute
Gun sales have risen in recent years, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. On Feb. 28, 2022, SciLine interviewed Garen Wintemute – an emergency medicine physician at the University of California, Davis, Medical Center and director of the California Firearm Violence Research Center – about what’s driving this change and what gun usage and culture looks like in America two years into the pandemic.
The Conversation has collaborated with SciLine to bring you highlights from the discussion, which have been edited for brevity and clarity.
What does the research tell us about who owns guns in the United States and why?
Garen Wintemute: The traditional population of gun owners are white, non-Hispanic men. But for several years, the demographic profile of gun owners in the United States has been broadening as women and members of underrepresented groups started purchasing firearms. People buy guns more for protection than for all other reasons put together. The second-biggest reason is use in sport hunting and target shooting and so on.
Can you discuss recent increases in gun sales and factors driving the surge?
Garen Wintemute: An absolutely unprecedented increase in firearm sales has occurred over the last couple of years.
It started in January 2020 with the news of the emerging COVID-19 pandemic, and it grew through the spring of 2020 as people became concerned about the advent of violence in late spring and summer, continuing right through the fall. There was a federal election in 2020, which always drives gun purchases. And that election was accompanied by violence. Purchases reverted to expected levels only in the last couple of months of 2021 and now in the beginning of 2022.
What is known about the links among gun prevalence, gun purchasing trends and gun violence?
Garen Wintemute: We’ve known for a long time that the more access there is to firearms in a society, the more firearm violence there is likely to be. It’s been shown in comparisons of societies and U.S. states with different levels of firearm ownership.
During the pandemic, as purchasing picked up across the country, we learned there was – at least early on – a relationship between an increase in gun purchases above expected levels and a later increase in violence above expected levels. As 2020 went on, that signal was lost, except for domestic violence, because many other things were contributing to increases in violence.
Which demographic groups are harmed the most by gun violence?
Garen Wintemute: A very good and accessible source of information on this is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s injury mortality data tool, WISQARS.
If we are talking about violence between people, men are at much greater risk than women, and men of color are at much greater risk than are white, non-Hispanic men. In particular, young Black men are at highest risk for homicide.
But if we talk about suicide, risk is higher with older age, not lower. Gender is related. Males are, again, at greater risk, but the group at highest risk is white, non-Hispanic men.
What should people know about “ghost guns” and other recent developments?
Garen Wintemute: “Ghost guns” is shorthand for privately manufactured firearms. They are firearms that are produced with no serial number so they’re not traceable if they’re used in a crime. And that’s where the term ghost guns comes from. In major cities in California, law enforcement agencies are reporting that 30%, 40%, 50% of all the guns they recover following use in a crime are these anonymously produced ghost guns.
[Like what you’ve read? Want more? Sign up for The Conversation’s daily newsletter.]
I believe they’re going to be a huge problem nationwide, as they are in California. They can be manufactured by individuals in their homes. There’s a special milling machine that’s about the size of a desktop laser printer. I could have 10 of them in my office, and each one of them would produce the key component for a ghost gun about every 30 minutes. I can buy all the other parts on the open market.
What gun violence trends are you following?
Garen Wintemute: There has been a rapid growth in the acceptance of the idea that violence is going to be necessary in order to keep America on the proper path. I’ll quantify: 10% of adults, about 25 million people, endorse the statement that violence is justified now to put Donald Trump back in office. Thirty percent of adults endorse the statement that President Biden was not legitimately elected.
People who study terrorism and violent extremism are very concerned that in this federal election year, and in 2024, we may see the advent of large-scale political violence.
Watch the full interview to hear more about the future of firearm research.
Garen Wintemute is Distinguished Professor of Emergency Medicine and Director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at the University of California, Davis. SciLine is a free service based at the nonprofit American Association for the Advancement of Science that helps journalists include scientific evidence and experts in their news stories.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!
Timothy Patrick Welch says
What does gun ownership have to do with Donald Trump…Let it go man.
Black on Black violence seems to follow patterns associated with the breakdown of family structures.
When politicians and celebrities give up their personal protection details, and the Federal Government eliminates our military, then I may consider a constitutional change concerning gun control. The world is not a safe place, keep on guard.
Pierre Tristam says
From the article: “10% of adults, about 25 million people, endorse the statement that violence is justified now to put Donald Trump back in office. Thirty percent of adults endorse the statement that President Biden was not legitimately elected.” (Are you one of them?) That’s what gun ownership has to do with Donald Trump. As for the warmed-over Moynihanism, I’ll leave that to someone else to address.
Justsayin says
Funny how the BLM roits are not part of the story. Even left wing USA today claims it did.Maybe the defund the police movement had something to do with it also.
Fredrick says
I do believe that too many idiots have guns and getting a concealed carry is way to easy (not enough learning safety and practice). I was raised with them. I learned from a young age how to handle, respect and use them. That is not not necessarily the case any longer. But the solution is not to take the guns away from those that are owned legally. Get them out of the hands of those who have them illegally. Enforce the laws on the books before you start trying to create new ones.
Roy Longo says
Normally I would never comment on this type of article but I there is a gapping hole in the story that is not being addressed.
Garen Wintemute: “The traditional population of gun owners are white, non-Hispanic men.”
Then a few questions later:
Garen Wintemute: “A very good and accessible source of information on this is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s injury mortality data tool, WISQARS.
If we are talking about violence between people, men are at much greater risk than women, and men of color are at much greater risk than are white, non-Hispanic men. In particular, young Black men are at highest risk for homicide.
But if we talk about suicide, risk is higher with older age, not lower. Gender is related. Males are, again, at greater risk, but the group at highest risk is white, non-Hispanic men.”
The gap between who’s buying guns and who’s getting shot is as large as the Grand Canyon. What’s not being discussed is where are the guns coming from that are being used to perpetrate the violence against “men of color” and “young Black men.”
When there is a solid link between the white man’s gun and the black man’s homicide, we can then have that conversation. Until then, let us stop inferring the link.
Michael Cocchiola says
We are the victims of our own delusions. We buy guns to protect ourselves from violence, we cause the violence with those guns and then buy even more. And over and over again until we’re all either the frightened, the killers, or the dead.
And to the most delusional 2nd amendment advocates among us, when was the last time citizens had to arm themselves to protect against a repressive government? The Revolutionary War was fought a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.