• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Florida Officials Line Up Arguments Against Certain Felons’ Voting Rights in Court Case

September 23, 2019 | FlaglerLive | 3 Comments

Altering a constitutional amendment's direction. (Dean Terry)
Altering a constitutional amendment’s direction. (Dean Terry)

In a bundle of competing briefs filed with the state Supreme Court, Florida officials squared off this week against supporters of a constitutional amendment that restores voting rights to felons who have completed their sentences.

Gov. Ron DeSantis, Secretary of State Laurel Lee, and Florida House and Senate leaders filed “interested party” briefs defending a state law that implemented what appeared as Amendment 4 on the November ballot.

But critics of the law counter that part of it requiring felons to pay fees and costs to be eligible to have voting rights restored contradicts what more than 64 percent of Floridians thought they were approving last fall.

The constitutional amendment granted voting-rights restoration to felons “who have completed all terms of their sentence, including parole or probation,” excluding people “convicted of murder or a felony sexual offense.”

Voting rights advocates and civil rights groups filed a federal lawsuit shortly after DeSantis signed the law (SB 7066) designed to implement the amendment. The law requires felons to pay “legal financial obligations,” such as restitution, fines and fees, to be eligible to have voting rights restored.

The plaintiffs in the federal lawsuit allege the law imposes an unconstitutional “poll tax” and violates a number of other constitutional rights. But state officials maintain the terms of sentence include financial obligations ordered by courts.

In the midst of the federal lawsuit, DeSantis asked the Florida Supreme Court to weigh in on whether the law adheres to the wording of the amendment, an issue not addressed in the federal complaint.

The 10 briefs filed Wednesday by interested parties came in advance of oral arguments in the case, scheduled for Nov. 6.

In one of the briefs filed Wednesday in opposition to the state law, the Fair Elections Center said that costs and fees “are categorically not terms of sentence because they bear none of the hallmarks of sentencing,” in part because they are “non-punitive and simply serve to compensate the government for the costs of administering criminal justice.”

Although some court-related fees and costs may be part of a judgment or a condition of supervised release, “all of them share common features that render them non-punitive,” lawyers for the voting-rights group argued.

But under Florida law, “sentencing is synonymous with punishment: a sentence is the means by which punishment is imposed,” the lawyers wrote.

“Because sentencing and punishment are coextensive, which is to say that all terms of a sentence are punitive, if a requirement is non-punitive in nature then it is categorically not a term of the sentence,” they added.

But lawyers representing the Republican-controlled Florida House argued that fines and restitution are examples of non-imprisonment sentences under Florida law.

“A sentence can include a fine, restitution, fees and costs, and probation. Even a prison sentence can include a period of probation or parole, each with conditions that require full payment of restitution. All of these aspects of Florida’s sentencing scheme work in tandem to achieve Florida’s sentencing purposes,” the House’s lawyers wrote.

In a separate brief, lawyers representing a variety of civil-rights groups — the American Civil Liberties Union, the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law and branches of the NAACP — relied in part on the state’s history “of denying votes” to blacks to illustrate opposition to the state law’s linkage between finances and voting rights.

“Historically, Florida disenfranchised a higher percentage of its adult citizens than any other state in the United States, more than 10 percent of the overall voting age population, and more than 21 percent of the African-American voting age population,” the civil-rights groups’ lawyers wrote in a 67-page brief.

While the estimated number of Floridians affected by Amendment 4 varies, the civil-rights groups pointed out that many reports indicated that approximately 1.4 million Florida felons who are no longer serving time in jail or prison — referred to as “returning citizens” — became eligible to vote after the amendment’s passage.

Those people can’t register to vote until they settle outstanding legal financial obligations, the lawyers argued.

“The Florida Legislature and governor’s action reinstates a system of lifetime disenfranchisement for a large number of returning citizens — imposing precisely the system that Floridians clearly rejected when they overwhelmingly approved Amendment 4,” the civil-rights groups argued.

The groups asked the Supreme Court to refuse to answer the question posed by DeSantis, which they called “a discretionary” decision of the court.

The question of whether people with felony convictions must repay legal financial obligations “primarily concerns fundamental voting rights of private individuals,” and therefore is “more appropriately resolved in traditional, contested litigation rather than through an advisory opinion,” lawyers for the ACLU and others wrote.

But lawyers for DeSantis argued that “a plain language analysis” of the constitutional amendment “reveals that the phrase ‘completion of all terms of sentence including parole or probation’ includes fulfillment of all fines, fees and restitution imposed by the court at sentencing and contained in the four corners of the sentencing document.”

A “common-sense understanding also dictates in favor of the governor’s plain-language interpretation” of the amendment, DeSantis’ lawyers wrote in a 33-page brief.

“Case law and common understanding consistently recognize that courts impose fines, fees, and restitution as part of a sentence and thus as penalties for criminal acts,” they wrote.

–Dara Kam, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pogo says

    September 23, 2019 at 5:24 pm

    @Useful information

    Help Returning Citizens Pay Fines & Fees

    We at the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, as returning citizens ourselves, know first-hand how financial hardships can prevent people from fully engaging in their communities. So we created a fund to help returning citizens with outstanding fines and fees complete their sentence and move forward with their lives. 100% of your tax-deductible donation will go to those who have completed incarceration and probation but still have to complete financial portions of their sentence. Please give whatever you can and help us spread the word!
    https://wegotthevote.org/finesandfees/

    The more you think – and ask questions – the more you know:

    Amendment 4 requires addressing the criminalization of poverty | Opinion
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/commentary/fl-op-com-amendment-4-florida-passage-20190424-story.html

    South Florida felons owe a billion dollars in fines — and that will affect their ability to vote
    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/fl-ne-felony-fines-broward-palm-beach-20190531-5hxf7mveyree5cjhk4xr7b73v4-story.html

    Reply
  2. Richard says

    September 24, 2019 at 8:55 am

    This controversy has been going on for WAAAAY too long now. My position on this is if you do the crime then you do the time per YOUR the sentence that was handed down to you by the judge. If you can’t fulfill that responsibility then you should not have the privilege of voting restored to you or any other special privileges restored. While incarcerated you have plenty of time to work and earn money to start paying off your debts instead of wasting it away on illegal drugs, tattoos, cigarettes, etc. You also have plenty of time while incarcerated to learn a trade besides selling drugs, etc. so when you get out you can contribute to society and be a better person. Until then you have no right to vote as you are a felon and will always be a felon because of YOUR actions and you have no one to blame except YOURSELF. Get a life!

    Reply
  3. Franklin Clair says

    September 24, 2019 at 11:53 am

    When I voted for the restoration of voting rights for felons I expected that voting rights would only be restored once they had been released from prison and paid all fines and costs.

    Reply
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents
  • grand living realty

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • John on Behind the Divorce, a Bitter, Threat-Ridden Clash Between Waste Pro and Palm Coast Over Recycling Bins
  • Wow on Mom Arrested After Witnesses Report her Brutalizing Her 7-Year-Old Child on A1A
  • tulip on Voters Approved an Amendment For Racial Equity in Districts. DeSantis Wants It Ignored.
  • Fritz B. on Palm Coast Fines Waste Pro $125 For Every Recycling Bins It’s Taking Back and Threatens Litigation
  • Bradley Boyd on Its Streets Degrading, Palm Coast Looks for Electric Vehicles to Pay Their Fair Share of Road Taxes
  • tulip on Palm Coast’s Belk Converted Into One of 16 Outlet Stores as Company Struggles
  • The Geode on Voters Approved an Amendment For Racial Equity in Districts. DeSantis Wants It Ignored.
  • Jane Elizabeth K on Behind the Divorce, a Bitter, Threat-Ridden Clash Between Waste Pro and Palm Coast Over Recycling Bins
  • Pogo on The Daily Cartoon and Live Briefing: Friday, June 2, 2023
  • Tax on Liberal Resposibility? on Its Streets Degrading, Palm Coast Looks for Electric Vehicles to Pay Their Fair Share of Road Taxes
  • John Stove on Behind the Divorce, a Bitter, Threat-Ridden Clash Between Waste Pro and Palm Coast Over Recycling Bins
  • Tony on Behind the Divorce, a Bitter, Threat-Ridden Clash Between Waste Pro and Palm Coast Over Recycling Bins
  • Tony on Mom Arrested After Witnesses Report her Brutalizing Her 7-Year-Old Child on A1A
  • Shark on 251-Unit Wilton Apartment Project Breaks Ground in Town Center, Employing 300 During Construction
  • jake on Its Streets Degrading, Palm Coast Looks for Electric Vehicles to Pay Their Fair Share of Road Taxes
  • Kris on 251-Unit Wilton Apartment Project Breaks Ground in Town Center, Employing 300 During Construction

Log in