By Holly Thorpe, Jack Byrne, Jaimie Veale and Lynda Johnston
When Laurel Hubbard was announced as the first out transgender woman athlete to compete in an individual sport at an Olympic Games, controversy wasn’t far behind. One prominent commentator even called it a “disaster for women’s sport”.
In Aotearoa New Zealand, the topic was hotly debated across television, radio, newspapers and social media. And earlier this week there was a protest outside the New Zealand High Commission in London against Hubbard’s inclusion in the weightlifting team.
The arguments are emotive and polarizing, and often ignore key facts — in particular that Hubbard qualified through processes outlined by the International Weightlifting Federation and the International Olympic Committee.
More broadly, the language deployed has real consequences beyond this specific debate. It is important, therefore, to consider the impact this can have on the mental health and well-being of transgender athletes, and transgender communities in general.
Whose voices are heard?
Sadly, the perspectives most often absent from these debates are those of transgender athletes themselves.
But the backlash against Hubbard following the 2018 Commonwealth Games, echoing now in the lead-up to the Olympics, contributes to a climate in which transgender athletes don’t feel safe speaking to the media.
By protecting their own mental health and well-being, their stories, their humanity and their courage are largely lost from the media narrative. That is a loss to us all, leaving the wider discussion about transgender people’s participation in sport to centre around often ill-informed fears.
This has serious implications, as the power of the media to reinforce or sometimes challenge stereotypes and misunderstandings about transgender athletes is well established.
Preliminary analysis of 111 articles on the day of Hubbard’s Olympic inclusion shows 33 (mostly from the UK) “deadnamed” her — meaning they deliberately used her pre-transition name. Referring to people as they choose to be known should be a basic principle of media ethics.
Discriminatory language, underpinned by fear, phobias and characterization of transgender athletes as “cheats” or worse, is likely to contribute to the already very high levels of psychological distress and suicide among transgender communities.
We need to be careful about other aspects of the language being used to argue against Hubbard’s inclusion in the Olympics, and transgender participation in sport generally.
Often this language plays on fear and misinformation, rather than being based on well-founded evidence. For example, there is a tendency to selectively cite research focused on testosterone levels, although the science on this is far from settled.
Other research has shown many variables contribute to sporting performance and achievement. Bodies come in all shapes and sizes, and testosterone is just one part of a much bigger picture of what builds sporting greatness.
Many researchers and experts are encouraging approaches that go beyond physiological criteria to better recognize the complex social (rather than strictly biological) understandings of athletes’ gender experiences.
A growing body of research also shows the importance of ethics and human rights as the basis for developing sporting policy and law that enable transgender people to participate in sport at elite and community levels.
The importance of listening
Unfortunately, the entire topic is too often approached from a position of ignorance rather than curiosity and compassion. As one researcher has argued:
Those persistent in their views that trans women ought not to compete with cis women in elite women’s categories would benefit from talking to trans women, getting to know trans athletes, and reading the qualitative research that delves deeply into trans athletes’ experiences, motivations and reasons for participating in sport.
This was reinforced in a recent report from the United Nations independent expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity:
All persons who struggle against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity have in common certain lived experiences that should provide a notion of the importance of seeing each other, listening to each other and acting towards each other with kindness and compassion.
The report specifically challenged the belief that the inclusion of trans women threatens women’s sport. It called instead for evidence-based approaches to ensure sports promote the development of all girls, including those who are trans.
A teachable moment
Meanwhile, mainstream debate is still too often bound up in polarizing rhetoric and confused argument. At this important moment in the history of sport, that needs to change.
Hubbard’s groundbreaking Olympic inclusion offers a genuinely teachable moment that allows us to work towards a more constructive dialogue. The work being done by researchers and activists with online resources such as Proud2Play in Australia and Athlete Ally in the US is particularly helpful here.
Finding new ways of speaking about the topic can flow into developing more inclusive and supportive policies and practices in sport at elite and community levels.
More than anything, we need to remember those most directly affected by current media debates and campaigns. That includes the trans girls and young women who simply want to be able to play on their school or club sports teams.
Holly Thorpe, Professor in Sociology of Sport and Physical Culture, University of Waikato; Jack Byrne, Senior Research Officer, Trans Health Research Lab, University of Waikato; Jaimie Veale, Director, Transgender Health Research Lab, University of Waikato, and Lynda Johnston, Professor of Geography, Assistant Vice Chancellor Sustainability, University of Waikato.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation U.S. seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone.
Unless Hubbard absolutely dominates the competition, what difference does it make really.
Unless your someone who was unable to qualify in the Olympics because Hubbard took her spot. Your dream and hard work cast aside because Hubbard was allowed to compete.
John Loms says
Let’s just combine men’s and women’s sports then Rxx. What’s the difference? The difference is, if you’re an athlete, that had the advantage of going through male puberty, you will forever have that advantage over athletes that have not done that. That is 100% based on science. So Hubbard took a spot from a biological female and if she wins a medal, she will take that medal away from a female.
Chris Kirsten says
Hes a guy who couldn’t make it against men, so now hes “magically” a woman…..its a pathetic, all too real joke that’s becoming more common thanks to the transgender mentall illness becoming normalized.
Lol some guy is going to win big in women’s sports. Take that feminists!
There is nothing difficult about this. Males play with the males and women play with the women. Simple. If there is a question ask the science. X or Y chromosomes. Simple.
I don’t care what she or he wants to be. As far as sports is concerned, Hubbard is a man. She is physically stronger than a woman. Let her compete against men as a transgender. It is just not fair to other competing females.
I will say this one more time, have women compete against other women, have men compete against other men and have transgender compete against other transgender. Simple as that! If they don’t like those conditions then don’t compete.
It’s really very simple: a muscle-bound trans-gender female running against a female athlete is unfair regardless of how it makes the muscle-bound female feel. You don’t need a PhD dissertation to understand simple facts. And of course, it’s the feelings of the .01% that always seem to trump those of the other 99.99%.
There’s really only one way to counter this ungodly act, and that is to have all the women in that arena to not show up. It’s sad to say, but if the women refuse to complete in any sport that allows misfits to compete, it will end. Now we even have a thing as miss Nevada in the miss America pageant. Holly crap. What is wrong with the world?
Transgender humans take hormones to suppress and/or enhance their changes. Educate yourself before making comments, people!
Insane Jolt says
So, wouldn’t or shouldn’t that qualify as PEDs (Performance Enhancing Drugs)? We’re disqualifying an athlete for smoking weed, which is literally the opposite of “performance enhancing”. Seems the IOC ought to be disqualifying these folks too for the same reasoning.
Not a woman! Science is your friend.
Yer Mahm says
This article is a joke. Sounds like it was written by someone who has never played sports in their life. This is simple. I cant understand how people dont get it.
People with xx chromosomes compete with other xx. People with xy compete with other xy.
I just remember the old long time saying, God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve. If he did the world would only be ‘TWO”. But these are new weird times when everything is out of control.