By Robert Marsh
Amid news of lethal heatwaves across the Northern Hemisphere comes the daunting prospect of a climate disaster on an altogether grander scale. New findings published in Nature Communications suggest the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation, or Amoc, could collapse within the next few decades – maybe even within the next few years – driving European weather to even greater extremes.
The Amoc amounts to a system of currents in the Atlantic that bring warm water northwards where it then cools and sinks. It is a key reason why Europe’s climate has been stable for thousands of years, even if it’s hard to recognise this chaotic summer as part of that stability.
There is much uncertainty in these latest predictions and some scientists are less convinced a collapse is imminent. Amoc is also only one part of the wider Gulf Stream system, much of which is driven by winds that will continue to blow even if the Amoc collapses. So part of the Gulf Stream will survive an Amoc collapse.
But I have studied the links between Atlantic currents and the climate for decades now, and know that an Amoc collapse would still lead to even greater climate chaos across Europe and beyond. At minimum, it is a risk worth being aware of.
Amoc helps keep Europe warm and stable
To appreciate how much Amoc influences the climate in the northeast Atlantic, consider how much warmer north Europeans feel compared to people at similar latitudes elsewhere. The following maps show how surface air temperatures depart from the average at each latitude and highlight patterns of warm and cool spots around the planet:
Most striking in the northern winter (January) is a red spot centred to the west of Norway where temperatures are 20°C warmer than the latitude average, thanks to Amoc. The northeast Pacific – and therefore western Canada and Alaska – enjoys a more modest 10°C warming from a similar current, while prevailing westerly winds mean the northwest Atlantic and northwest Pacific are much colder, as are the adjacent land masses of eastern Canada and Siberia.
The weather and climate of Europe, and northern Europe in particular, is highly variable from day to day, week to week and year to year, with competing air masses (warm and moist, cold and dry, and so on) gaining or losing influence, often guided by the high-altitude jet stream. Changes in weather and climate can be triggered by events located far away – and over the ocean.
How ocean temperatures are linked to weather
Over recent years Europe has witnessed some particularly unusual weather, in both winter and summer. At the same time, peculiar patterns of sea surface temperatures have appeared across the North Atlantic. Across great swathes of the ocean from the tropics to the Arctic, temperatures have persisted 1°C-2°C above or below normal levels, for months or even years on end. These patterns appear to exert a strong influence on the atmosphere, even influencing the path and strength of the jet stream.
To an extent, we can attribute some of these sea surface temperature patterns to a changing Amoc, but it’s often not that straightforward. Nevertheless, the association of extreme seasons and weather with unusual sea temperatures might give us an idea of how a collapsed Amoc would unsettle the status quo. Here are three examples.
Northern Europe experienced successive severe winters in 2009/10 and 2010/11, subsequently attributed to a brief slowdown of the Amoc. At the same time heat had built up in the tropics, fuelling an unusually active June-November hurricane season in 2010.
In the mid 2010s a “cold blob” formed in the North Atlantic, reaching its most extreme in the summer of 2015 when it coincided with heatwaves in central Europe and was one of the only parts of the world cooler than its long-term average.
The cold blob looked suspiciously like the fingerprint of a weakened Amoc, but colleagues and I subsequently attributed this transient episode to more local atmospheric influences.
In 2017, the tropical Atlantic was again warmer than average and once again an unusually active hurricane season ensued, although the Amoc was not as clearly involved as 2010. Extensive warmth to the northeast in late 2017 may have sustained hurricane Ophelia, emerging around the Azores and making landfall in Ireland in October.
Based on just these few examples, we can expect that a more substantial reorganisation of North Atlantic surface temperatures will have profound consequences for the climate in Europe and beyond.
Larger ocean temperature extremes may alter the character of weather systems that are powered by heat and moisture from the sea – when and where temperatures rise beyond current extremes, Atlantic storms may grow more destructive. More extreme ocean temperature patterns may exert further influences on tropical hurricane tracks and the jet stream, sending storms to ever more unlikely destinations.
If the Amoc collapses we can expect larger extremes of heat, cold, drought and flooding, a range of “surprises” to exacerbate the current climate emergency. The potential climate impacts – on Europe in particular – should add urgency to our decision-making.
Robert Marsh is Professor of Oceanography and Climate at the University of Southampton.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Ben Hogarth says
I think where we are failing to educate the public is the degree to which these changes are rapidly occurring – which were largely predicted by the most liberal of models, but still fail to account for some of the acute unknowns. By this I mean, for decades, researchers studied the effects of global warming on the AMOC in the NORTH Atlantic. However, it was not until the last year that new science was provided by researchers studying the SOUTH Atlantic, that earlier incomplete and inconsistent data extrapolations were finally pieced together in a way that makes (mathematical) sense.
Specifically, more frequently warm Sea Surface Temperatures (SSTs) making their way from the meridional region of the earth, transgressing poleward (north or south), not only caused periodic and progressive glacial melts on the surface, but caused a more insidious melt UNDER the Antarctic glacier layers. This has perhaps caused a chain reaction (of events) including the creation and expansion of fissures within the ice at DEEP levels. Consequently, these fissures have (perhaps) provided an expeditious melting of ice (below the surface) and may account for the sudden amplitudes of change in the realm of nearly 7-sigma (seven standards of deviation). This level of deviation from any normal mean is indicative of an UNNATURAL conditioning. I.E. Human-induced changes to the environment (anthropogenic forcing).
In simpler terms, warm waters being transported from the center of the earth to the poles has caused a rapid escalation of glacier melt beyond what anyone has previously simulated. This rapid melt by way of fissures deep within the ice, compounds the RATE OF CHANGE by way of a feedback loop. As freshwater melts, the ocean around the poles become less dense in salt and the transport of this salt back to the meridian slows. This slowing has now been simulated (within the last year) to potentially stop altogether within the next 30 years, which will have a dramatic, catastrophic, unknown total effect on the earths climate balance.
I’m sure I could have worded this is all much better, but in other words – we are in very very big trouble. And we don’t just mean in terms of sea level rise, which can now happen on a much more expedited timeframe. We are talking worldwide fires, crop loss, and more. This isn’t a climate crisis – it’s a global mass extinction event and we are on the chopping block.
Laurel says
That was interesting, thank you Ben. Unfortunately, too many people on Earth (well, right there is the problem) do not profit monetarily by science, so they much prefer to ignore it. I think we have passed our tipping point, and the human species is the culprit, and will pay for it. Generations after us will suffer. The very children and grandchildren of those who profited.
“Silent Spring” was written sixty years ago, when we had the chance to do something about our path of destruction, but was ignored as tree huger stuff. What to some of us is flat out common sense, is to others a road block to wealth. Well, so here we are.
Banthegop says
But racist ron said that is woke