No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Not So Fast on Killing Teddy: Conservationists File Suit to Stop Bear Hunting in Florida

| August 1, 2015

Teddy's friends to the rescue. (© FlaglerLive)

Teddy’s friends to the rescue. (© FlaglerLive)

Conservation groups want a judge to shoot down the return of bear hunting in Florida and to halt the pending sale of bear-hunting permits.

With permits for this fall’s hunt going on sale Monday, the Seminole County-based group Speak Up Wekiva filed a lawsuit in Leon County circuit court Friday challenging the constitutionality of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission-approved bear hunt.

“There is no evidence to support the supposition that hunting bears in remote wildlife management areas will reduce conflicts in suburbia,” the lawsuit contends.

Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission spokeswoman Susan Smith defended the commission’s ability to approve rule changes. However, she said the agency had yet to receive a copy of the lawsuit and doesn’t discuss the merits of pending litigation.

“I can say the commission validly adopted rules allowing for a limited bear hunt based on sound reasoning and with careful consideration of the issues involved,” Smith said.

The lawsuit doesn’t ask for a judge to halt the commission from offering the permits. However, Speak Up Wekiva and groups supporting the lawsuit — the Sierra Club, the Massachusetts-based Environmental Action, the League of Women Voters of Florida and the Center for Biological Diversity — want the state agency to suspend permitting until the lawsuit is settled.

“If they do sell the permits, and the hunt is ruled unconstitutional, they’ll have to pay everyone back, and that could be very time-consuming,” said Chuck O’Neal, a Longwood resident and member of Speak Up Wekiva whose name also appears on the lawsuit.

Smith said permitting remains on schedule to begin Monday.

Supporters of bear hunting derided the lawsuit as hindering efforts to reduce human-bear conflicts.

“The FWC is a constitutional body charged with ‘managing fish and wildlife resources for their long-term well-being and the benefit of people,’ “National Rifle Association lobbyist Marion Hammer said in an email Friday. “Political organizations that try to second guess the professionalism of the commission and the agency are interlopers who obviously put bears before the safety and lives of children.”

Opponents of the hunt have argued that Florida’s increased human population is expanding into wildlife habitat and that the state should further implement non-lethal rules, such as bear-proofing trash containers, prohibiting people from feeding wild bears and cracking down on the illegal harvesting of saw palmetto berries, which is a staple of a bear’s diet.

On Friday, those opponents pointed to ongoing efforts by the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission to get a better count of black bears in areas where the hunt will occur and said that opposition to the hunt stood around 75 percent during the public debate on the proposal.

“We welcome today’s lawsuit challenging the wildlife commission’s unconstitutional, unnecessary, and immoral black bear hunt,” the Sierra Club’s Florida Staff Director Frank Jackalone said in a release. “The commission must suspend the hunt immediately and work with scientists to protect Florida’s black bears, not kill them.”

The lawsuit contends the rules for the hunt go against the 1998 voter-approved constitutional amendment that created the commission as an independent body “to conduct management, preservation and conservation decision-making based upon sound science.” The complaint also claims the bear hunt is not based upon sound science and won’t reduce growing conflicts between bears and humans.

“The FWC is acting against the interests of Floridians, science, and Florida black bears,” said lawsuit supporter Jaclyn Lopez, Florida director for the Center for Biological Diversity. “It is not too late for it to hit the brakes on this ill-conceived plan.”

The hunt is scheduled to begin Oct. 24 and will last from two to seven days, depending upon the number of bears killed.

The commission approved the hunt in June as a step in managing the growing bear population in Florida.

The state agency expects about 300 bears to be killed in the four regions of the state where hunting will be allowed. The state isn’t putting a limit on the number of special-use bear permits being sold, but hunters will be limited to killing a single bear during the week.

The cost for a permit is $100 for Florida residents and $300 for non-residents. The permits will be available through 11:59 p.m. on Oct. 23. People who purchased a Lifetime License prior to July 1, 1998 — when those licenses still covered bear hunting — must still obtain one of the new permits, but are exempt from the cost.

Black bears were placed on the state’s threatened list in 1974, when there were between 300 and 500 across Florida. At the time, hunting black bears was limited to three counties. In 1994, the hunting season was closed statewide.

The bears were taken off the list in 2012.

Florida now has an estimated 3,150 black bears in four regions — the eastern Panhandle, Northeast Florida, east-central Florida and South Florida — where the hunts are planned. The numbers are based on 2002 estimates for the eastern Panhandle and South Florida and a 2014 count in the Northeast Florida and east-central Florida regions.

The hunt will be halted in each region — the FWC intends to communicate daily with hunters via text and email — once quotas for the areas are reached.

–Jim Turner, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

6 Responses for “Not So Fast on Killing Teddy: Conservationists File Suit to Stop Bear Hunting in Florida”

  1. David B says:

    It will be a control kill. It’s for the black bears best interest t0 control their population. If anybody is to be blame, its all these people moving to Florida, and destroying their habitant. Nobody complained when the State allowed Gator Hunts or for the starving deer in the everglades after Hurricane Andrew in 1992.

  2. Geezer says:

    I love the rationalizing that comes with defending unnecessary and
    barbaric hunts: “It’s in their best interest.”
    So if we develop a usable death ray and annihilate a good percentage
    of humanity – is it in their best interest?
    A warmongers dream – you think?


    Maybe some circular logic: it’s in their best interest because it’s
    in their best interest. Gee Yogi and Teddy, I love you – so now I must
    murder you in cold blood, or maybe wound your sorry ass while I
    enjoy some beers with the boys for extra shits and giggles.
    After you’ve bled and suffered for a day or two, maybe I’ll find you
    and finish you off! It’s for your own good.

    If I lived in the mountains of NC or in AK, I’d see the value of hunting
    a certain quota of meat and prepping for a long winter.
    But to kill for fun? Shit! What does that say about you?
    Again – compensating for something?

    Sport hunting or hunting for the fun of it is an activity for PSYCHOPATHS
    and abusers. If the animals shot back it would still be wrong. How I wish they could….
    I’d supply them with guns and ammo!
    Now that’s “for their own good.”

    • donna says:

      absolutely right Geezer. In Florida if you live in the woods you should respect the wildlife whose habitat you are invading. Learn how to live around them, not kill them off. Afraid of bears? Move to a condo in the city.

      I believe this “controlled Kill” is the result of media coverage on a story of a woman who was attacked by a bear in her garage. When I first saw the story on the news these were my thoughts:
      Garbage was left in the garage with the door open, which enticed the bear to enter the garage.
      The lady was a complete drama queen. My guess is that she freaked out when she saw the bear, thus freaking it out.

      Initiating a Kill on the bears will not stop human stupidity.

  3. Kevin says:

    The only interests for whom this hunt is intended are the special interests…The NRA and their primary funders the gun and ammo manufacturers. Anyone can read through the blather of the NRA spokeswoman as she heaps praise on the commissioners who she successfully lobbied. Florida, the best government money can buy!

  4. David S says:

    Its the humans fault for this problem,all of this b.s. could have been prevented.

  5. Kevin says:

    It seems that Florida has the best government money can buy. The NRA supported mostly by the gun and ammo manufacturers have successfully lobbied this state agency to allow for an unscientific and unethical slaughter of bears in the sunshine state. The blather of the lobbyist for the NRA Marion Hammer is nauseating. This hunt has nothing to do with public safety. The bears in the wild are not the problem and there are more humane ways of addressing the limited problem of bear interactions in developed areas. The NRA is simply using public scare tactics to support their economic ties to blood sport.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in