No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Senate Leaders Propose Compromise in Budget Impasse, Gov. Scott and House Reject It

| May 26, 2015

florida senate health budget compromise

The Florida Senate holds out for a compromise. (Artie White)

Senate leaders floated a revised plan Tuesday in an effort to break the logjam over extending health insurance to hundreds of thousands of Floridians, but the proposal was swiftly rejected by House leaders and Gov. Rick Scott.

Senate President Andy Gardiner and his lieutenants touted the proposal for a Florida Health Insurance Affordability Exchange, or FHIX, program as a compromise — but within hours, no one else seemed to be willing to take the deal the upper chamber was offering.

Under the new version of the proposal, the Senate would skip an interim period in which the state would put people in Medicaid managed-care plans, a change aimed at addressing House criticism that FHIX is simply an expansion of oft-criticized Medicaid. The interim period was originally designed to provide coverage while the state waited to hear whether the federal government would approve using Medicaid-expansion funding to help lower-income Floridians purchase private health insurance.

The FHIX plan, which includes a work requirement for recipients, would require the state to get a waiver from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The new Senate bill would also require any “significant changes” made to the waiver by federal officials to be approved by the Legislature before the plan takes effect.

The Senate made the proposal just days before Monday’s scheduled start of a special session to reach a budget agreement that eluded lawmakers during the spring regular session.

“There’s no agreement on any of this,” Gardiner, R-Orlando, conceded to reporters in a meeting Tuesday. “I think what we’re just trying to show here in the Senate is that we’re willing to have an open mind and put forward different ideas and suggestions, and then we’ll see what happens next week.”

Gardiner and his supporters have pitched FHIX as a way to make hospitals whole in light of the federal government’s decision to reduce a program known as the Low Income Pool from $2.2 billion this year to $1 billion in the next budget year, which begins July 1. The so-called “LIP” program sends money to hospitals and other medical providers that care for large numbers of low-income patients.

But Scott and House Republicans have repeatedly said they have no interest in using Medicaid expansion funds that come from the federal Affordable Care Act, commonly known as “Obamacare.”

“A budget that keeps Florida’s economy growing will cut taxes and give Floridians back more of the money they earn, not inevitably raise taxes in order to implement Obamacare and grow government,” Scott said in a statement issued by his office.

House Speaker Steve Crisafulli, R-Merritt Island, also slammed the proposal. He reiterated a common House talking point: The work requirements that are part of the Senate plan and give it a more conservative sheen are unlikely to be approved by federal officials.

“When you remove the Senate’s ‘conservative guardrails’ that the Obama administration fundamentally opposes, all you are left with is a costly and inefficient entitlement program to serve able-bodied working age adults with no children,” Crisafulli said.

“I would say, let’s find out,” Gardiner said earlier, anticipating the criticism.

Meanwhile, the Scott administration seemed to offer its own solution to the plan, picking up on space provided by the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services.

In a letter last week saying the state could expect $1 billion in LIP funding, federal officials suggested the state could also use leftover local dollars that have flowed into the program as matching funds to draw down other Medicaid money. Those dollars would not be a part of LIP, but could help close the shortfall.

“Thank you again for all of your assistance and work to keep Florida’s Medicaid program whole,” wrote Justin Senior, the state’s Medicaid director. “Your guidance has been essential to ensuring that there is no major fiscal impact to Florida health-care providers who support the needs of low-income families in our state.”

Gardiner, though, said in a statement issued by his office that that approach would be “shortsighted,” in part because LIP is scheduled to fall again in the 2016-17 budget year.

Earlier, meeting with reporters, Gardiner said he was optimistic that the Legislature would fulfill its one constitutionally required duty of passing a budget. Asked whether he would allow a spending plan to go through even if FHIX failed, Gardiner responded: “I think we fully intend to pass a budget.”

–Brandon Larrabee, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

3 Responses for “Senate Leaders Propose Compromise in Budget Impasse, Gov. Scott and House Reject It”

  1. theevoice says:

    this legislature and gov are awful and could care less about the populous..remember this at the voting booth this year..

  2. Obama 2015 says:

    Alot of poor republicans will have to keep paying more money for healthcare then they should. Thanks RICH Scott.

  3. Vincent Neri says:

    The Florida house speaker uses the term “able-bodied” in his argument against expanding medicaid. It is important for everyone to understand what that term means. It simply means for the purposes of medicaid that one is not 100 percent disabled under the rules set forth by the Social Security Administration in determining elgibility for Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability.. However , it does not mean that an individual is 100 percent healthy. An individual could be partially disabled and have many challenges to working yet not be determined disabled by the state agency for disability determinations. Under the rules you are either 100 percent disabled or you are able-bodied. Therefore, It is in my opinion a midleading argument. It misleads because someone could be under the rules of vocational rehabilitation “significantly disabled’ but not “most significantly disabled” and therefore be ruled able-bodied. The rules pertaining to getting medicaid or medicare are so difficult to navigate that it has sparked a whole speciality where attorneys deal with nothing but these type cases. Mr. Cristafulli uses the term able-bodied but never explains what the term means to lead people into thinking that it means that this group of people are fully able to work and have nothing medically wrong with them. The heart of the argument Mr. Cristafulli makes is to use a word in a midleading fashion and therefore the argument lacks validity. Validity means does it measure what is says it measures. Does able-bodied mean healthy? The clear answer is no.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in