No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Legality of Bunnell’s Government Prayers, Via Greece

| June 24, 2013

Pray to the hand. (Salvation Army USA West)

Talk to the hand. (Salvation Army USA West)

By this time next year, Bunnell’s practice of starting its city commission meetings with a prayer will either be declared unconstitutional or given the U.S. Supreme Court’s blessing.

For the first time in 30 years, the court agreed to revisit the matter of prayers at public meetings on appeal from a case in New York, where the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled unconstitutional a town’s practice of having clergy deliver a prayer at the beginning of its government meetings.

Click On:

The case bears numerous similarities with Bunnell’s practices. Those local practices have gone unchallenged until now. But they remain among the most brazen displays of expressly Christian prayer at government meetings, being conducted not by clergy or invited guests but by city commissioners themselves.

The case the Supreme Court agreed to hear originated in the Town of Greece, a suburb west of Rochester, N.Y. Its five-member Town Board meets monthly. Until 1999, meetings began with a moment of silence. That year, Town Supervisor John Auberger began inviting local clergy to deliver a prayer—after the Pledge of Allegiance, but also after the meeting is formally called to order. The clergy member making the prayer, termed the “chaplain of the month,” usually asks audience members to stand, bow their head and join in the prayer. One of them asked the assembly to recite the Lord’s Prayer together. Another criticized those who objected to the practice as “ignorant” and in the “minority.” The prayer is listed on the agenda. It’s noted in the meeting minutes.

The process is virtually identical to that of the Bunnell City Commission, down to the noting of the prayer in the minutes, with the exception of the commissioners leading the prayer.

As in Bunnell, Greece has no formal policy on who will present the prayer, on what constitutes permissible content of prayers or any other aspect of the practice. Greece claims anyone may request to give an invocation, of any religion, including atheists or those who do not adhere to a particular religion. The town says it has never denied such a request. Nor had it granted one until some residents started to complain: the town’s unwritten policy was neither spoken nor publicized.

So from 1999 to 2007, every prayer-giver was Christian. In 2008, residents Susan Galloway—who is Jewish—and Linda Stephens—an atheist—complained about the practice. To appease them, the city scheduled three non-Christian prayer services in 2008, the year the two women filed the lawsuit. The town then returned to Christian prayers exclusively, with repeated references to “Jesus,” “Jesus Christ,” “Your Son,” or the “Holy Spirit,” and always delivered from behind a podium adorned with the town’s seal and spoken through the city’s public address system. In Bunnell, commissioners sit below their seal and deliver their prayers into the record.

For many Greece town officials, attending the meetings is mandatory.

“We need not ‘embark on a sensitive evaluation’ or ‘parse the content of a particular prayer,’ []to recognize that most of the prayers at issue here contained uniquely Christian references and that prayers devoid of such references almost never employed references unique to some other faith,” Judge Guido Calabresi wrote for a unanimous panel of three judges of the Second Circuit in a 2012 ruling. Calabresi quoted from the last Supreme Court decision to take on prayer at government meetings.

“We ascribe no religious animus to the town or its leaders,” Calabresi’s ruling continued. “The town’s desire to mark the solemnity of its proceedings with a prayer is understandable; Americans have done just that for more than two hundred years. But when one creed dominates others—regardless of a town’s intentions—constitutional concerns come to the fore. There is no doubt that the town seeks to convey respect for the invocations given at its meetings. But efforts to show respect for a belief espoused in a legislative prayer entail a concomitant obligation to demonstrate respect for the beliefs of others.” (The full decision is below.)

That Supreme Court’s 1983 decision found that the Nebraska state legislature’s tradition of paying a (Presbyterian) clergyman to offer a prayer at the beginning of legislative sessions was constitutional.

“In light of the unambiguous and unbroken history of more than 200 years,” a 6-3 court had ruled then, “there can be no doubt that the practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer has become part of the fabric of our society. To invoke Divine guidance on a public body entrusted with making the laws is not, in these circumstances, an ‘establishment’ of religion or a step toward establishment; it is simply a tolerable acknowledgment of beliefs widely held among the people of this country.” But the court also noted that the “content of the prayer is not of concern to judges where, as here, there is no indication that the prayer opportunity has been exploited to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief.”

All nine members of that court have since died or retired.

But Rev. Robert Palmer, the Presbyterian chaplain at the center of the decision, is still alive, and contributed an amicus brief to the current Supreme Court case on behalf of the Town of Greece.

As a defendant in the 1983 case (Marsh v. Chambers), the brief states, Palmer “is concerned about recent cases, like the Second Circuit’s here, which retreat from Marsh’s holding. Rev. Palmer believes that legislative bodies which desire to exercise their First Amendment right of solemnly invoking divine guidance should not be impaired by court rulings that inject uncertainty and discourage assemblies from exercising that right. More directly, he believes that his own past practice lies within the American constitutional tradition, and that it—and other practices like it today and in the future across the Nation—are worth this Court’s continued vindication.”

A Florida case also argued in federal court tested that very issue when, in March, a three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over all of Florida—and is distinctly more conservative than the Second Circuit—ruled unanimously that the Lakeland City Commission’s custom of starting its meetings with a prayer was constitutional.

But the Lakeland commission had altered its custom significantly after residents began to complain. The prayer had been part of the meeting’s regular agenda. It no longer was, after the complaints, taking place before the first gavel, and not being recorded in the minutes. Those offering the prayer were invited guests, and never members of the commission. And the city developed an extensive database of members of the clergy in Polk County to draw from, leaving open an invitation to anyone else who would present an invocation. The commission, however, left silent any mention of non-religious members of the community, and the case did not address that silence.

In the Greece, N.Y. case, Galloway and Stephens are represented by Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, the Washington, D.C.-based organization. (Disclosure: Rabbi Merrill Shapiro, president of Americans United’s national board of trustees, chairs the FlaglerLive board of directors.)

“A prayer in Jesus’s name makes all non-Christians as though feel as though they are second class citizens or of lesser standing than those of he dominant religion, and that truly makes us feel as though we don’t belong,” Shapiro said. “We outsiders feel it’s fueled by dominionism, that is the belief that America is a Christian country and it is best governed by Christian laws, and that there are segments of Christianity–by no means all Christians–that it is the role of Christianity to dominate the government, the media, the military, education and business.”

A town council meeting isn’t a church service, and it shouldn’t seem like one,” said Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United in a release. “Government can’t serve everyone in the community when it endorses one faith over others. That sends the clear message that some are second-class citizens based on what they believe about religion.”

Americans United Legal Director Ayesha N. Khan, who directed the litigation for Americans United and will argue the Town of Greece v. Galloway case before the Supreme Court, said the justices should uphold the lower court’s ruling.

“Legislative bodies should focus on serving the community and stay out of the business of promoting religion,” Khan said.

The U.S. Supreme Court, which will end its current term later this week, accepted the case in late May. The case will be argued when the court reconvenes in October, with a decision rendered by June next year.

Download Galloway v. Greece: the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Decision, 2012

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

14 Responses for “U.S. Supreme Court Will Decide Legality of Bunnell’s Government Prayers, Via Greece”

  1. hitekrednek says:

    way to go,waste of a court rooms time….

    • Mr mondex says:

      I can’t believe I’m even reading this,,talk about trivial bull-crap. Worried about a simple prayer? Think about this what’s the first thing every one says as soon as there’s a traumatic issue? Oh my god! Or a loved one is dying or very sick? Please god help!,haggling over this is trash!!! Get down to important issues! Instead of worrying about where your fellow person worships! Or what religion they believe in look at any denomination of our American currency what does it read? In god we trust!, only in BUNNELL ,,oh! And Greece ny.

      • Rick says:

        Quite hypocritical, aren’t they. I see a huge ‘whatever’ just to suit their beliefs. Would there happen to be a pamphlet around someplace to keep up with this ignorant crap?

      • A.S.F. says:

        Perhaps some of the time currently devoted to praying could be redirected to dealing with city business…Talk about wasting time. The comissioners have plenty of time and opportunity to pray however they wish on their own time. They should not be doing it in a public, governmental forum (which is an endorsement, however way you might wish to rationalize it. ) I feel pretty certain that, if a Muslim citizen rose up in these meetings to offer up a prayer to Allah, or someone in the audience began to speak in tongues,these supporters of prayer would not be too happy You can use the first amendment to jusitfy about anything.

  2. r&r says:

    Just do it!! This country was built on “In God we trust” and prayers are part of it.. If the people in charge of certain club, assembies, commisions don’t have cuts to do what they believe in they should resign..

  3. Nancy N. says:

    Mr Mondex – Not “everyone” asks their god for help with trying situations in their lives. I can promise you that as a devout atheist I never have.

    There is no such thing as “a simple prayer” when the government is forcing it down the throats of people who do not believe the way that prayer calls on them to believe. It becomes coercive, exclusionary and offensive. You only find it acceptable because your beliefs align with the coercion. If that “simple prayer” were being conducted by an Imam, I bet you’d suddenly find it way more offensive.

    “In God We Trust” on our currency isn’t acceptable either. Every time I see it, I feel like my government is telling me I am not welcome in my own country because I do not believe in the god the government says “we” trust. The federal government endorses religion every time it prints another bill carrying that statement. The systematic exclusion of secular people in this country has to end.

    • Mr mondex says:

      Well nancy n. I tried not to use the (A) word but you have left me no choice ,yes I am a Christian an I knew most atheist’s would not agree with my post so your allowed to voice your opinion like wise so am I the in god we trust on money seems to trump your opinion as far as anything to do with the belief of that god exists I agree as a human being the age old question does a god really exist??it give us something in general to fall back on when the going gets rough,if an asteroid was heading for a collision course to hit earth.what would be the first thing out of the atheist mouth?? I’m curious??.

      • Nancy N. says:

        Why are you so hung up on the phrase “oh my god” as some sort of “proof” that anyone who says it must believe in a higher power? It’s a turn of phrase to some people, nothing more. I can say “what the hell? too…it doesn’t mean I believe there’s a hell. In fact, to a lot of believers, using a phrase like “oh my god” is considered blasphemous. All that name in vain stuff, remember. So saying “oh my god” could almost be PROOF of NON-belief to those people, because a true believer would never use that sort of casual phrase.

        And when did atheist become the “A-word” that we dare not speak? Newsflash – it’s only considered a pejorative by bigoted people like you who think that not believing in a higher power is akin to having some sort of scarlet letter.

  4. James says:

    This is what we are worried about, our founding fathers started all meeting’s with prayer. Our country needs to get back to God as we are going down the toilet as a country. You want something to complain about, go after the courts for releasing that low life that killed the little girl? He should be taken out and shot. Thats what you should be writing about and screaming at our courts about!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Sherry Epley says:

    While I am a deeply peaceful spiritual person, I personally have a problem with any organized religion that has a history of atrocities such as those shown in the history of Christianity. Let’s have just a tiny sample of the list shall we:


    * From the beginning of Christianity to 1484 probably more than several thousand.
    * In the era of witch hunting (1484-1750) according to modern scholars several hundred thousand (about 80% female) burned at the stake or hanged. [WV]

    Religious Wars

    * 15th century: Crusades against Hussites, thousands slain. [DO30]
    * 1538 pope Paul III declared Crusade against apostate England and all English as slaves of Church (fortunately had not power to go into action). [DO31]
    * 1568 Spanish Inquisition Tribunal ordered extermination of 3 million rebels in (then Spanish) Netherlands. [DO31]
    Between 5000 and 6000 Protestants were drowned by Spanish Catholic Troops, “a disaster the burghers of Emden first realized when several thousand broad-brimmed Dutch hats floated by.” [SH216]
    * 1572 In France about 20,000 Huguenots were killed on command of pope Pius V. Until 17th century 200,000 flee. [DO31]
    * 17th century: Catholics slay Gaspard de Coligny, a Protestant leader. After murdering him, the Catholic mob mutilated his body, “cutting off his head, his hands, and his genitals… and then dumped him into the river […but] then, deciding that it was not worthy of being food for the fish, they hauled it out again [… and] dragged what was left … to the gallows of Montfaulcon, ‘to be meat and carrion for maggots and crows’.” [SH191]
    * 17th century: Catholics sack the city of Magdeburg/Germany: roughly 30,000 Protestants were slain. “In a single church fifty women were found beheaded,” reported poet Friedrich Schiller, “and infants still sucking the breasts of their lifeless mothers.” [SH191]
    * 17th century 30 years’ war (Catholic vs. Protestant): at least 40% of population decimated, mostly in Germany. [DO31-32]

    All in the name of a rightous God/Jesus!

    Please, may we ask that you do your praying in private, and that we not be subjected to your religious hypocracy in any public place that is supported by our taxes.

    Thank You! Wishing you all joy, peace and love!

  6. Karma says:

    I do not believe in the Easter Bunny, should we have the supreme court rule that holiday is longer allowable because of my belief? Enough with all this non sense and worrying who is going to be offended.

  7. Raul Troche says:

    Our pledge of allegiance says “one nation under God. The Florida state motto is “In God we trust. Our founding fathers definately endorsed prayer.

  8. Jennifer S says:

    i might add…it is christians who make me not want to be one. perhaps they should keep to their own flocks, as their guidance tells them. fix your home grown problems and be wary of finding the splinter in another’s eye, it only makes the forest of timber protruding from yours more obvious.

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
fcir florida center for investigative reporting
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in