No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Gov. Scott, a Big-Spending Liberal? Not So Fast.

| February 12, 2013

He'll do dishes, too. (Gov. Rick Scott)

He’ll do dishes, too. (Gov. Rick Scott)

By Lloyd Brown

As everyone anticipated, the attack on Gov. Rick Scott by liberals has begun. No surprise there, as he is the next conservative in the cross-hairs. But at times it borders on the absurd.

Take his budget, for example.

Critics complain that he is spending too much!

Yes, the tax-and-spend crowd, who have never met a pork-barrel project they don’t like, protesteth that Scott’s budget contains a 6 percent increase in spending.

florida voices columnists flaglerlive

Scott says he has submitted the three smallest budgets of the past decade during his term, when adjusting for population growth and inflation — and that his budget for next year achieves $1.2 billion in savings. He also says the state debt would be paid down in the 2013-2014 budget for the first time since 1994.

Perhaps the most impressive numbers in his budget are these: There were eight state workers per 1,000 Florida residents in the third budget presented by Gov. Jeb Bush. In Scott’s budget there would be 5.2 workers.

If services remain comparable, that is increased productivity. In business, increased productivity is what elevates living standards. In government, it saves Florida families money, which elevates their living standards.

Scott plans to eliminate 3,647 state positions. To liberals, this is a cardinal sin. They measure progress by growth in government and consider every job in government to be an irrevocable entitlement to someone irreplaceable.

Scott’s budget also eliminates business taxes for 80 percent of Florida businesses ($19.7 million). Another cardinal sin. Hiding taxes on Florida families by driving up the cost of goods and services is a favorite liberal tactic.

Of course, Scott’s budget has to be approved by the Legislature, so legislators earn credit for any improvements and must accept blame for anything they do to make it worse.

But Florida legislators over the past 10 to15 years have been fairly good stewards of the people’s money. They are likely to take a critical look at some of the items in Scott’s budget, such as his proposal for an across-the-board pay raise for schoolteachers, regardless of performance.

The news media rarely bother to inform the public about teacher salaries, other than to suggest they are at poverty level, but in Jacksonville the average salary is more than $47,000 for a 180-day job, and rising steeply. A teacher making $30,000 in 2000 and getting raises based on inflation would have been making $40,000 in 2012. In fact, that teacher was making $50,000.

State Sen. John Thrasher says it isn’t really sensible to start spending every available dollar just because the economy is improving. When the sun is shining, you should be putting money away in reserves for the rainy days ahead.

This seems especially prudent when the federal government has the economy teetering in a jobless recovery. Closer to home, there is the ever-present threat of a major hurricane, which could leave Florida in financial ruin.

Truthfully, the liberal angst actually is not about excess spending, but excess saving. If Scott were a Democrat, the clamor would be that he is not spending enough.

Lloyd Brown was in the newspaper business nearly 50 years, beginning as a copy boy and retiring as editorial page editor of the Florida Times-Union in Jacksonville. He can be contacted by email here.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses for “Gov. Scott, a Big-Spending Liberal? Not So Fast.”

  1. Bob Z. says:

    “Students” are required by State law to attend school for 180 days but teachers have to work 196, and most if not all work additional hours/days outside of their classrooms. And where have teachers been getting inflation-based raises?

  2. Sherry Epley says:

    After reading this, I came away with the impression that Mr. Brown has written in incredibly divisive article here! His word choice is just short of combative name calling.. His so called “facts” appear to be half truths and biased at best. This is the kind of journalism that fans the flames of discord in our nation. While he just may have some good points, his lack of a balanced, reasonable perspective is unworthy of his past profession.

  3. Outsider says:

    First of all, kudos to Flagler Live for printing an opposing viewpoint. I’m sure some of your regulars will be upset, ala Sherry’s response above. I find the article to be laced with common sense and generally factual. In spite of what many liberals believe about conservatives, we are not all hateful, racist, bigoted xenophobic Neanderthal leftovers. We enjoy dealing with facts, and this article clearly makes the point that whether or not you like our governor, the fact is this state is in good financial shape with a balanced budget. I wish I could say the same for the federal government, which is a perpetual state of delusion, apparently on a mission to destroy itself through it’s unsustainable, reckless policies.

  4. Sherry Epley says:

    Ahhhh. . . yet another example.

  5. Outsider says:

    Another of example of what? Could you mean a divisive article that is biased? I would point you to some of the other pieces printed here by other than the Flagler Live staff that could be be described the same way. And surely you’ve read the comments posted by the readers here with terms like “tea baggers, homophobes, racists,” and the like to describe those with whom they have a differing opinion. Now, suddenly you are concerned about divisive, biased articles that fan the flames of discord? Give me a break!

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive


suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
fcir florida center for investigative reporting
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in