No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Zero Dark Thirty’s Tortured, Losing Premise

| February 17, 2013

Zero Dark Thirty's skewed representation of the role torture played in the hunt for bin Laden distorts rather than reflects reality.

Zero Dark Thirty’s skewed representation of the role torture played in the hunt for bin Laden distorts rather than reflects reality.

By Chris Toensing

Zero Dark Thirty is a movie the CIA wants you to see.

It tells a tale of the search for Osama bin Laden wherein the key lead comes from a man softened up by waterboarding, sleep deprivation, confinement in a coffin-like box and other forms of pain and humiliation. It shows CIA agents extracting subsequent clues by similar means or the threat thereof. It alludes to other evidence supplied by “the Paks” and “the Jords” that was also obtained from detainees under duress. It twice depicts CIA officials asking the higher-ups how they are to find bin Laden when, after Barack Obama’s election, “the detainee program” is taken away.

According to the film, in short, the United States couldn’t have tracked down and killed bin Laden were it not for the systematic torture of hundreds of alleged Islamist militants at the hands of the CIA and allied spy agencies.

Zero Dark Thirty doesn’t glorify torture, as some have complained. The torture scenes are graphic and hard to watch. The lead CIA interrogator is a sadist who feels no twinges of conscience and later vows to defend “the detainee program” against Congressional critics. The film’s message is more insidious: It says that torture is ugly, even corrupting, but necessary.

other-wordsThree senators, including John McCain, the Arizona Republican who was tortured in North Vietnamese prisoner of war camps, have labeled Zero Dark Thirty “grossly inaccurate and misleading.” The lawmakers say, correctly, that CIA torture did not yield the crucial nom de guerre that eventually led U.S. forces to bin Laden’s hideout. That name came from a detainee who was not in CIA custody. The film is just wrong on this point.

But once the debate is held on these grounds — whether torture “works” in specific instances — it’s effectively decided for the pro-torture side. Torture is illegal under U.S. and international law and it is utterly immoral. It doesn’t “work,” but that’s beside the point.

More disturbing than the waterboarding scenes is what the movie leaves out — the hundreds of people falsely identified as al-Qaeda fighters and shipped to Guantánamo Bay, the Arab travelers arrested on the basis of mistaken identity and tortured by U.S. allies, and the 166 “enemy combatants” still at the Guantánamo prison who cannot be tried in U.S. courts because they were tortured.

None of this heedless excess helped to catch bin Laden, but it made up the great bulk of the “detainee program.”

And that’s not to speak of the two invasions launched in the name of the “war on terror” and their countless Afghan and Iraqi civilian victims, or the ongoing drone strikes with those mounting body counts. In Zero Dark Thirty, the actual war on terror is white noise — a news snippet here, a snide comment there. Perhaps a single 157-minute film can’t cover all of the relevant facts, but screenwriter Mark Boal and director Kathryn Bigelow chose to incorporate only the background approved by the CIA.

The result is a series of fibs about torture wrapped up in a big lie of omission about the toll of the war on terror. Its Golden Globes and Oscar nominations notwithstanding, Zero Dark Thirty is ultimately a megaphone for that wily old whisper from the national security state: You don’t want to know what we do. But you need us to do it. Now let us go back to work in the shadows.

Chris Toensing is editor of Middle East Report, published by the Middle East Research and Information Project. Distributed via OtherWords.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses for “Zero Dark Thirty’s Tortured, Losing Premise”

  1. D W Ferguson says:

    Interesting point of view- The debate rages on- some defending others condeming the practice of enhanced interrogation technique effectiveness. In any event, the movie entertains, has a resounding ,Happy ending and despite Maureen Dowd’s critique and this article- go see the movie and Decide for your own peace of mind !

  2. Sgt Saber says:

    Oh yes…We would not want to “discomfort” any islamic militant because him and his friends just BLEW UP 3000 American citizens on our own home land. That would be just terrible. So how about we just drop a few tactical nukes down inside their “crap hole” of a country and melt the whole dam* tribe. That way we would not have to “discomfort” the terrorist by waterboarding them. Plus we could save money , No feeding them, No clothing them, no medical, No guards, No holding cells. All around the NUKE idea is just a much better answer ….Have a nice Day !!!

  3. Karma says:

    Did the movie talk about the doctor who is sitting in a Pakistani prison because he helped find Bin Laden? He has been left to rot away in a shit hole while Obama goes around spiking the football.
    Will they make a part two about the Charlie Foxtrot in Libya? Maybe they will call it 9-11-12 “Do Not Disturb “

  4. PIHOS says:

    We are talking about torturing Terrorist’s..not torturing the average man in the street.. they are people who believe that if they kill innocent men, women and children who do not insanely believe in Islamic princilples …that they will go to heaven and get Virgins ! Freakin Virgins !! C’mon Americans…get your heads outa the sand….they killed 3000 of us in one day on Sept 11……and are plotting to kill more of us everyday……..and we should politely ask them questions…if they laugh at us…well…..give them a nice meal and let then sleep on a nice cot in a comfy jail…….We should use whatever is needed to make them tell us what is needed to stop them !! Anything at all !! How can any one not agree with this ?

  5. Anonymous says:

    Why is it fine to KILL ones we think are terrorists but we can not use harsh interrogation. I do believe we need to be doing each. Remember dead men tell no tales so by not capturing and interrogating islamists we are not getting information that could lead to a stoping of the next 9/11.

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in