No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Court Rules Brevard County Commission’s Prayer at Meetings Discriminatory Against Non-Believers

| July 9, 2019

broward commission prayer

Bernard Wright, a Titusville pastor, reading a Christian prayer at the Feb. 7, 2017 meeting of the Brevard County Commission. “We thank you god for this gathering of this great, grand, and august body,” he said. (© FlaglerLive via SCGTV)

A federal appeals court Monday ruled that the Brevard County Commission has violated the U.S. Constitution by using a discriminatory procedure to select the people who give invocations at commission meetings.

A three-judge panel of the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a 45-page opinion, made clear that government bodies can open their meetings with prayers. But it said the Brevard County Commission has improperly discriminated and that commissioners “may not categorically exclude from consideration speakers from a religion simply because they do not like the nature of its beliefs.”

“In this case, Brevard County has selected invocation speakers in a way that favors certain monotheistic religions and categorically excludes from consideration other religions solely based on their belief systems. Brevard County’s process of selecting invocation speakers thus runs afoul of the Establishment Clause (of the U.S. Constitution),” said the opinion, written by Judge Stanley Marcus and joined by judges Britt Grant and Frank Hull. “As it stands, members of the Brevard County Board of Commissioners have plenary authority, on a rotating basis, to invite whomever they want to deliver invocations, with no consistent standards or expectation of inclusiveness. From their testimony, it is abundantly clear that most if not all of the commissioners exercise their discretion in a way that discriminates among religions based on their beliefs, favoring some but not all monotheistic and familiar religious sects over those faiths that fall outside the ‘mainstream.’ ”

The Atlanta-based appeals court issued the ruling in a case filed by atheists and secular humanists, with plaintiffs including individuals and the Central Florida Freethought Community, the Space Coast Freethought Association and the Humanist Community of the Space Coast. A U.S. District judge also had ruled against the county.

Opening prayers are common at government meetings across Florida, from the state House and Senate to city councils and county commissions. Monday’s ruling said invocations were offered at 195 Brevard County Commission meetings from Jan. 1, 2010, through March 15, 2016, with all but seven given by Christians or containing Christian content. Six were given by Jewish rabbis while one was described as “generally monotheistic.”

The ruling focused on the process for selecting people to give the invocations, rather than details of the prayers.

“To be clear, the constitutional problem is not that the Commission lacked a formal, written policy or that the selection of speakers was left to the discretion of individual commissioners,” the ruling said. “The issue lies in how the commissioners exercised their discretion in practice. Brevard County’s haphazard selection process categorically excludes certain faiths —- some monotheistic and apparently all polytheistic ones — based on their belief systems. Most commissioners do not appear to have employed belief-neutral criteria in selecting which invocation-givers to invite.”

The court barred the county from continuing the current speaker-selection practices but did not order that the plaintiffs in the case be allowed to offer invocations.

Williamson v Brevard County

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses for “Court Rules Brevard County Commission’s Prayer at Meetings Discriminatory Against Non-Believers”

  1. Michael Cocchiola says:

    Good call by the court. This is not a Christian nation. We are multicultural and have the freedom to believe or not. If people are going to pray before meetings, there must be equal time for all religions and non-believers.

    That’s life in our democracy, for now anyway.

  2. Agkistrodon says:

    So then it would seems that the Swearing in one takes when on the stand in Court should ALSO be determined the same. Can’t have one, without the other.

  3. Concerned Citizen says:

    @ Agkistrodon

    You make a very good point. And one that hasn’t been discussed yet.

    If I am elected to office as an Atheist and have to be sworn in doesn’t that violate my rights? If I refused would that prohibit me from taking office? Or could the oath be modified and the bible be replaced?

    Our nation is supposed to be a nation that provides constitutional protection of rights. Those rights are supposed to apply regardless of who you are or what what you believe. Yet you don’t see a whole lot of tolerence these days.

  4. Trailer Bob says:

    Sure, just keep on killing God. Look where is has gotten us so far. Are there not more important issues here on earth to deal with? I guess we will have to throw out the Pledge of Allegiance as well,,,hey?

  5. Dave says:

    This is great, pray in your car before the meeting if you would like but not where everyone is exposed to it, most do not want to hear you pray. Also we need to throw out the pledge of allegiance and the oaths taken by elected officials and rewrite them to make more sense for 2020

Leave a Reply

FlaglerLive's forum, as noted in our comment policy, is for debate and conversation that adds light and perspective to articles. Please be courteous, don't attack fellow-commenters or make personal attacks against individuals in stories, and try to stick to the subject. All comments are moderated.

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive

FlaglerLive Email Alerts

Enter your email address to get alerts.


support flaglerlive palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam
news service of florida
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in