No Bull, No Fluff, No Smudges
Your news source for
Flagler, Florida and Beyond

Flagler’s Most Civilized Local Political Race in Years

| October 26, 2016

The Last Supper by half: From left, Jason DeLorenzo, Charlie Ericksen, Barbara Revels, Dave Sullivan, George Hanns and Donald O'Brien, last night at the Flagler Votes forum. (© FlaglerLive)

The Last Supper by half: From left, Jason DeLorenzo, Charlie Ericksen, Barbara Revels, Dave Sullivan, George Hanns and Donald O’Brien, last night at the Flagler Votes forum. (© FlaglerLive)

The Chamber of Commerce’s Flagler Votes forum featuring the six candidates for Flagler County Commission last night at the Hilton Garden Inn in Palm Coast drew the smallest audience of any political forum held there in at least the past three cycles—50 people, including the candidates themselves and their supporters. Discount those numbers, and I think there were three or four people who had nothing to do with the campaigns. Two of them were reporters.


That’s too bad because it was a remarkable forum—not for what the candidates said. There was not much news there so much as a series of position statements. But because it was the most civil, most policy-focused, least distasteful or ideological local forum we’ve had in years. The group of candidates reflected the sort of collective quality we should have in most elections, but haven’t had in years in too many of our local elections.

That’s thanks to these six candidates and incumbents: Charlie Ericksen and Jason DeLorenzo in District 1, Barbara Revels and Dave Sullivan in District 3, and George Hanns and Donald O’Brien in District 5. No talking points, no empty generalities borrowed from talk radio, no pandering or empty promises about taxes or jobs or allegedly broken government. The questions were grounded in immediate and everyday concerns—a taxing district for Marineland Acres, the future of the Agriculture Museum, A1A and beach restoration, Palm Coast-county relations, public transportation, contending with a rising population again—and the candidates stayed grounded.

pierre tristam flaglerlive editor's blogSo have their campaigns. Unless they’re being scurrilous on deep, deep background, none of these candidates has taken to those shoddy electoral tactics we’ve become too familiar with—the ambush mailers, the whisper campaigns on social media, the sinister robocalls. The respect they have for each other is unusually sincere, or at least seems that way, and none of them has given me any reason to think he or she is not being genuine. When I speak with them I’m not intolerably harassed by the urge to rush to the nearest bathroom and wash my hands three times.

Sure they sling the occasional verbal arrow: DeLorenzo has subtly referred to Ericksen’s age, O’Brien is going after Hanns’s eternal tenure (he’s been on the county commission since roughly the 16th century) and Hanns himself has always very capably wielded a streak of snide behind that who-me? bonhomie. It’s still politics, not a Rotary lunch. But compared to this year’s other local races, these six candidates have been a model of—well, Rotarian civility and service. It’s how elections should be. It’s also dispiriting that it’s the exception, a once-in-a-decade phenomenon, rather than the rule.

Palm Coast elections about a decade ago used to produce that consistently high caliber of candidates, people genuinely interested in public service and not very good at the politics of it. That’s fallen off considerably. The last two Palm Coast elections have drawn their share of oddballs and shrill-flam, though the electorate so far has done a good job weeding it out in time. Going back to the primary these same county commission races drew several candidates who weren’t really prepared, but again voters saw through it.


Rare collective civility in a year of slime.


What we ended up with is six candidates and incumbents who should give voters a hard time for the best reason: They’re all qualified, they all have histories of public service, none of them is particularly good at back-slapping, and most if not all of them haven’t figured out how to stoop down to the level of tweets and social media’s many other black holes of substance. Their intelligence won’t allow it. Without necessarily knowing it, they have at least partly redeemed and elevated the local level of political discourse, and if we’re lucky they’ll serve as a point of reference for elections to come.

Their own qualities aside—or maybe because of their own qualities—they’ve also done something else to get to this point: they’ve thrown partisanship out the window. I don’t know if it’s a terribly good thing that I couldn’t tell the difference between the Democrats and Republicans in the race. Partisanship is not in and of itself a bad thing. It’s the necessary dialectic of politics without which we stagnate, as long as the dialectic actually works as intended. But it hasn’t worked. All we get is the toxicity of opposition for the sake of opposition, so if the alternative is partisanship emasculated for the sake of more pragmatic governance, I’ll take it.

DeLorenzo and Revels are Democrats in name only anymore, and I’m not sure what Hanns is at this point (ostensibly an Illinois Democrat, he told me yesterday he’s voting for Trump, so go figure). Ericksen has often sounded to me like a closet liberal, and Sullivan, a former Republican Executive Committee chairman, has the good sense to openly and unequivocally condemn the sort of divisive tactics his successor (Anne Marie Schaffer) has been peddling in her soon-to-end reign of horrors at the REC. Her latest trick is a leaflet that calls the Democratic Party “the party of slavery, lynching, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan, Jim Crow Laws, racism, and forced sterilization” and that urges friends to pass it around and “Make America Great Again.”

On the other hand I wasn’t too thrilled by the email fund-raising invitation my colleague John Walsh at the Observer was circulating in September to “get Nick Klufas elected to City council or we lose majority to the council members who are loyal to the Crazies,” meaning former members of the now-defunct Ronald Reagan Republican Assemblies. It’s not that he doesn’t have a point about crazies: see the previous paragraph. But I’d hardly call Steven Nobile’s two years on the council the work of a crazy, as opposed to that of a necessary change agent, that necessary dialectic that partisanship at its best can produce: the council’s problem has been its clogged arteries and reverence for itself. More of the same won’t help on a council more interested in building a brand than a city.

But with Milissa Holland and Bob Cuff already elected, one is the best county commission alumni of the past decade and the other a bundle of understated brilliance. So whatever happens, it looks like both city and county will end up with sound, smart, civilized majorities.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Responses for “Flagler’s Most Civilized Local Political Race in Years”

  1. tulip says:

    We never saw any advertisements about this candidate meeting, which we surely would have attended had we known. Don’t know of any one else that saw anything either. Maybe that’s why attendance was so tiny. Too bad.

  2. Fredrick says:

    So Mr Hanns voting for a misogynist blow hard like Trump is worse than voting for an egotistical lying bitch that used her political office for her own benefit by providing access and favors for money for her “charity” and for herself? What cave did you grow up in? Both of those candidates are worthless and I wish that if we all would just promise to be good, we could go without a president for the next 4 years. But that is not an option. You and your liberal friends just do not get what a vote for Trump stands for. It is a vote that says enough of the bullshit. Enough of the underground games and who gives who money controlling everything. Enough of voting in people in congress who say they are going to do one thing and then do NOTHING. Enough of the lies, enough of the political correctness because someone will get there itty bitty feelings hurt. Enough of having one view that you voice when in front of the cameras but having another behind closed doors. These are problems on both sides of the aisle. A vote from Trump says ENOUGH BS. I have said it before it is the big middle finger to Washington “elites”. A vote for Hillary means nothing changes, nothing gets done, the thieves in Washington along with those lining their pockets will continue to not do what they are supposed to be doing, and we continue to print money and fund projects and programs we can’t ever possibly pay for. It will never end…….and you liberals will just continue to put your head in the sand and of course with your hand out for a freebee, and let it continue.

  3. anon2 says:

    George Hanns told Pierre Tristam that he’s voting for Trump? Please George, say it ain’t so. You just lost my vote. I guess George is angling for the Democratic vote and the Trump vote. What a deceitful crock that is.

  4. Fredrick says:

    Never did I think I would agree with Micheal Moore. Truly this must be the end of times.

    http://www.salon.com/2016/10/26/michael-moore-people-will-vote-for-donald-trump-as-a-giant-fk-you-and-hell-win/

  5. Charles F. Ericksen, Jr says:

    Great picture of the candidates , prior to the debate. All talking to each other … Looking to the left, Jason, just told me, that I was not bad for an older man, with a bow tie!!

Leave a Reply

Read FlaglerLive's Comment Policy | Subscribe to the Comment Feed rss flaglerlive comment feed rss

More stories on FlaglerLive
Loading

Get FlaglerLive Alerts by Email

Sign Up for email alerts to new stories.

ADVERTISEMENTS

suppert flaglerlive flagler live palm coast flagler county news pierre tristam florida
fcir florida center for investigative reporting

Recent Comments

Advertisement
FlaglerLive is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization | FlaglerLive.com P.O. Box 254263, Palm Coast, FL 32135 | Contact the Editor by email | (386) 586-0257 | Sitemap | Log in