By Miles A. Pomper and Vasilii Tuganov
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has raised fears among the public about the use of nuclear weapons in Europe or against the United States. This level of concern has not been seen since the end of the Cold War.
NATO countries have been taken aback by Russian President Vladimir Putin’s implied threats to use nuclear weapons against “whoever interferes with us” in Ukraine, and his placement of additional nuclear officers on shifts under a “special regime of combat duty.”
Both Russia and the U.S. have thousands of nuclear weapons, most of which are five or more times more powerful than the atomic bombs that leveled Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. These include about 1,600 weapons on standby on each side that are capable of hitting targets across the globe.
Those numbers are near the limits permitted under the 2011 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, often called “New START,” which is the only currently active nuclear arms control treaty between Russia and the U.S. Their arsenals include intercontinental ballistic missiles, better known as ICBMs, and submarine-launched ballistic missiles, as well as missiles launched from specialized aircraft. Many of those missiles can be equipped with multiple nuclear warheads that can independently hit different locations.
To ensure that countries follow the limits on warheads and missiles, the treaty includes methods for both sides to monitor and verify compliance. By 2018, both Russia and the U.S. had met their obligations under the New START, and in early 2021 the treaty was extended for five more years.
Both nations’ nuclear arsenals also include hundreds of shorter-range nuclear weapons, which are not covered by any treaty. Currently, Russia has nearly 2,000 of those, about 10 times as many as the United States, according to the most widely cited nongovernmental estimates.
About half of the roughly 200 U.S. shorter-range weapons are believed to be deployed in five NATO countries in Europe: Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey – though the U.S. does not confirm or deny their locations. In wartime, allied planes would take off from those locations and fly toward their targets before dropping the bombs.
Two other NATO members, France and the United Kingdom, also possess their own nuclear arsenals. They have several hundred nuclear weapons each – far fewer than the nuclear superpowers. France has both submarine-launched nuclear missiles and airplane-launched nuclear cruise missiles; the United Kingdom has only submarine-launched nuclear weapons. Both countries have publicly disclosed the size and nature of their arsenals, but neither country is or has been a party to U.S.-Russian arms control agreements.
The U.S., U.K. and France protect other NATO allies under their “nuclear umbrellas” in line with the NATO commitment that an attack on any one ally will be viewed as an attack on the entire alliance.
China’s nuclear arsenal is currently similar in size to the U.K. and French arsenals. But it’s growing rapidly, and some U.S. officials fear China is seeking parity with the United States. China, France and the U.K. are not subject to any arms control treaties.
India, Pakistan and Israel have dozens of nuclear weapons each. None of them has signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, in which signatories agree to limit the ownership of nuclear weapons to the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, each of which possessed nuclear weapons before it was signed.
North Korea, which also has dozens of nuclear weapons, signed that treaty in 1985 but withdrew in 2003. North Korea has repeatedly tested nuclear weapons and the missiles to carry them.
There used to be nuclear weapons in other places, too. At the time the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the republics that became Belarus, Ukraine and Kazakhstan had former Soviet nuclear weapons on their territory. In exchange for international assurances for their security, all three countries transferred their weapons to Russia.
Fortunately, none of these weapons have been used in war since the U.S. bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. But as recent events remind us, the risk of their use remains a frightening possibility.
Miles A. Pomper is a Senior Fellow at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. Vasilii Tuganov is a
Graduate Research Assistant at the center.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Jimbo99 says
End of the day, the WW2 generation saw 1st hand of the destruction a nuclear war would bring. Nukes have been dropped on people twice, ever, & the USA has that distinction. As Hydrogen replaced Atomic, you almost hope the idiot that is the world leader that decides to use one going forward, is taken out by his own people before that button gets pressed. When the 1st Atomic weapons were used, USA & Russia were on the same side fighting Germany, China didn’t have them, really nobody did until the USA, maybe the Russians were developing their’s ? Obama & Biden provided Iran with nuclear, just a matter of time before they develop nuclear warfare capability. There’s a difference between tariffs and sanctions, apparently Biden isn’t aware of that like Trump was. Removing Putin is a coup under Biden’s 1st year & this is where we are for it. We all lived thru the “Russia, Russia, Russia” thing of impeachments, the D’s never got over a “fair” election where HRC lost, that much is evident.
DaleL says
Germany surrendered on May 7, 1945. Hiroshima was bombed on August 6 and Nagasaki on August 9. The USSR declared war on Japan on August 8, 1945. So in fact, the USA and Russia (USSR) were NOT on the “same side” fighting Germany when the 1st atomic weapons were used. That part of WW2 was over. Also, the USSR did not enter the war against Japan until AFTER the first atomic bomb was used against Hiroshima.
No American President has wanted nuclear proliferation, especially with respect to North Korea and Iran. President Bush, by invading Iraq and the associated neocon (new conservative) rhetoric of regime change, provided a strong incentive for such countries to obtain nuclear weapons. Mr. Obama, in concert with the EU, had a deal with Iran to slow and/or stop Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Mr. Trump ditched the deal. Now, Mr. Biden is left to clean up the “mess” as to Iran. Mr. Trump, for all of his grandstanding, did NOT dissuade North Korea’s nuclear weapons program.
Hillary Clinton did lose to Donald Trump by 304 to 227 Electoral College votes in 2016. However, Donald Trump LOST to Joe Biden by 306 to 232 Electoral College votes in the 2020 election.
The introduction of the Mueller Report’s first volume reads as follows: “The Special Counsel’s investigation established that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election principally through two operations. First, a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Second, a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations against entities, employees, and volunteers working on the Clinton Campaign and then released stolen documents.”