By Nancy Martorano Miller
There’s been a good deal of crying foul about what are being called anti-democratic new state laws that make it harder to vote.
But it turns out such laws might have little impact on voter turnout and vote margins in an election.
That’s according to a February 2022 analysis by Sabato’s Crystal Ball, a newsletter that provides nonpartisan election analysis.
The 2020 presidential election had the highest voter turnout of the past century, with 66.8% of citizens 18 years and older voting in the election.
Robust voter turnout could be the difference maker in the 2022 midterm election. Voter turnout for midterm elections is typically lower than for presidential elections.
All 435 seats in the House of Representatives and 35 of the 100 Senate seats will be up for grabs during the election. Democrats hold slim majorities in both chambers. If Republicans are able to increase the number, they will likely flip control of both chambers in their favor.
As a political scientist, I study state voting and elections rules. Voting is important to a healthy democracy because it is how we consent to being governed and let elected officials know what policies we want.
Voting laws also protect against voter fraud. Thanks to these laws, election fraud in the United States is very rare and typically has no impact on the election outcome.
Sometimes these rules can create burdens for citizens who want to vote. This can lead to citizens’ losing trust in their government. Citizens’ losing trust in the government can be harmful to our democracy.
It is too soon to say the full effect that these new voting laws will have in shaping the 2022 elections.
New laws might not make voting easier or harder
During the 2021 legislative sessions, 36 states adopted legislation that change the way citizens vote.
Most of these recent laws don’t make voting easier or harder. They make the process easier for the state and local officials who run elections.
For example, a new law in Utah improves communication between the Social Security Administration and election officials to ensure that dead voters are removed from voter registration lists.
States making it harder to vote
Nineteen states, meanwhile, enacted 33 laws that can make it harder for Americans to vote, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
In Texas, for example, a 2021 law requires voters to provide part of their Social Security or driver’s license number on their mail-in ballot request. The number must match the one voters used when they registered to vote. Two million registered voters in Texas lacked one of the two numbers in their voter file that they gave when they registered to vote.
A large number of mail-in ballot requests for Texas’ March 2022 primary have been rejected because of this change. Texas has also limited the hours for early voting locations and banned the popular trend of drive-through voting.
In Georgia, voters requesting absentee ballots must now provide a photo ID when they request a mail ballot and when they return it.
Georgia also joined Texas, Iowa and Kansas in passing a law forbidding county and state election officials from automatically sending mail-in or absentee ballot requests to registered voters.
In some cases, things are getting easier
Twenty-five states, meanwhile, have passed 62 laws since 2020 that could make voting easier.
Delaware and Hawaii joined 20 other states that now automatically register citizens to vote when they turn 18. Early research shows that automatic voter registration may modestly increase voter turnout.
Some states made it easier for specific groups of voters. For example, in Maine, students can use their student photo ID to vote. In North Dakota, students can share a letter from a college or university to vote. Indiana now allows a document issued by a Native American tribe or band to serve as valid ID to vote.
Ten states – including California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois and Kentucky – increased access to mail ballot drop boxes and locations in 2021.
Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, Nevada and Vermont passed bills that protect or ease voter access to polling places. Maryland’s bill requires counties to offer a minimum number of early voting centers based on population. Vermont will now allow outdoor and drive-up voting. Starting with the 2022 primary election, all voting in Hawaii will be by mail.
These changes give voters more options or simply make it easier to vote and may help increase turnout.
What will happen in 2022?
Many voting rights activists expect that turnout will decrease in states that made voting harder and increase in states that made it easier.
The answer may not be that simple.
Scholars don’t agree about how voting rules affect voter turnout. Studies don’t consistently show that individual voting laws lower voter turnout.
But a state’s overall collection of voting laws can have more sway during elections. Scholars call the combined effect of voting laws “the cost of voting.”
When the cost of voting grows higher, overall turnout decreases.
Turnout in the 2020 presidential election was unusually high, even with some state laws that voting rights advocates believe made it harder for people of color and other groups to vote.
Voting laws are not the only influencers of voter turnout. But adding extra hurdles to voting may lead to frustration that keeps some voters at home. The upcoming midterm elections will provide clarity about whether these new voting laws have a measurable impact on voter turnout.
Nancy Martorano Miller is Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Dayton.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Dennis C Rathsam says
If you have a photo ID there is no one stopping you from voting. Its really very simple.
Pierre Tristam says
No, it isn’t. ID requirements aren’t the issue. They’re bandied about as such by the likes of you who need a smokescreen for the more pernicious assault on voting rights, from reductions in early voting, elimination of drop boxes from all but supervisors’ offices, requiring police-state like displays of voter information outside of mail-in envelopes, to name a few. There are many more. (Do you read these articles or do you just click for the pictures?) But you go on pretending that your beloved electoral brown shirts are like Mother Teresas to voters. You do that. It’s of a piece with the systematic deceptions of calling black white and vice versa, color coding being an entirely other world of jimmying election laws with crow bars.
Deborah Coffey says
But, it isn’t just voting laws that can impact an election. Some red state legislatures have given themselves the power to “call” an election. America is in big trouble with today’s Republican Party. It’s gone off the democratic rails.