By Ralph Nader
The Republican Party lost ground in the Congressional and state elections earlier this month, but the GOP continues to triumph in the all-important contests over words.
Republicans have been winning the “war over words” for years. First, the hard core political right wingers symbolically claimed the Bible and the American flag, turning them upside down. To them the Bible meant anything but the Golden Rule and compassion for the “poor,” so frequently noted in the Scriptures. They brandished the flag as a patriotic symbol to gag dissent, as a bandanna for waging war crimes, and as a fig leaf to hide the shame of their cruel domestic policies in the U.S.
During the late Forties, few Americans chose to call themselves “conservatives.” “Liberals” were ascendant, coming out of the FDR years. Under incessant associational attack on the word “liberal,” few politicians now brandish their beliefs as “liberals,” while many tout some of their views as “conservative.”
Given American history, this is quite a twisted linguistic victory. Tories (the conservatives of the Revolutionary era) sided with King George III against the American Revolution. Conservatives supported slavery, women’s disenfranchisement, and stood against the great progressive reforms by farmers and industrial workers in the late 19th and early 20th century. Conservatives opposed progressive taxation, social security, Medicare, labor union rights, and more recently, the civil rights, consumer rights, and environmental protections. Liberals led in support of these expansions of justice in our country.
Yet liberals are timid about using the liberal label. Instead they either often cite their “conservative” credentials, for example on spending, or use the word “progressive,” as their chosen new label. Liberals are not progressives on issues of war and peace, Wall Street and corporate welfare entitlements—to just name two differences.
When Hillary Clinton accepted her Party’s nomination for President of the U.S. in 2016, she explicitly called herself a “progressive.” Not even close for such a war-monger, who embraced the war outlaw Henry Kissinger, who was also a Wall Streeter, coddling the corporate supremacists with huge crony capitalism (corporate welfare). Clinton accepted huge speaking fees from Goldman Sachs and other mega-corporatists amounting to $200,000 or more for each closed door speech she gave.
Conservatives put “liberals” on the defensive by stigmatizing them as “big spenders” and for “expanding public deficits.” Never mind the conservative mega-deficits. “Liberals,” compromised by their campaign cash paymasters, were reluctant to accurately accuse the conservatives of building the burgeoning “corporate welfare” bonanzas or supporting runaway unaudited military budget waste arising from their 2017 tax cuts for the corporations.
When it came to voting, the Democrats played the same game as the Republicans. In 2017, 60 percent of the Democrats voted for a larger military budget than even Donald Trump requested from Congress.
Over the years, enhanced by Ronald Reagan’s rhetorical repetition, Republicans took away the words “liberty” and “freedom” from the liberals, who were left only with the crucial, bedrock word “justice” that they didn’t often want to hurl against the Republicans. Too bad, because the hardest word for the Republicans to hijack is “justice.” Note its rarity in that Party’s speeches and writings. Without “justice,” of course there is little “freedom” or “liberty.”
More recently, Republican extremists and the media have usurped the word “populist” to misuse it as a pretext to “divide and rule,” while the corporatists laugh all the way to the megabanks that are “too big to fail.” Populism was a political movement against gigantic concentrated corporate power of the banks and railroads over 100 years ago, on behalf of all the people. That is what the farmers and workers were driving their populist revolts to achieve.
The latest verbal usurpation is making “globalism” into a dirty word, as former Wall Streeter, Steve Bannon has done. Notice the absence of any qualifying adjective. There are different types of globalization. The word is used to identify financial/corporate transnational creators of a global world order opposed to nationalism. In reality, the other globalism brings together people who believe in global unity. This includes beneficial global treaties, normal commercial laws, and disaster rescue efforts.
Above all, there is civic globalization where the forces of just democratic societies unite with environmental (eg. climate disruption), worker, consumer, cooperative and charitable missions. Given the interdependencies of the natural environment and the mutual reinforcements of justice initiatives, we should talk much more about civic globalization as a counterweight to globalized corporations strategically planning and advancing their commercial priorities.
Civic globalization recognizes that the nation state remains, economist Herman Daly has noted, the main defense against global corporate predators.
Turning “globalists” and “globalization,” without any adjectives, into pejorative stereotypes fosters other forms of prejudicial propaganda.
The Republican wordsmith, Frank Luntz has scoffed at the Democrats’ verbal ineptitude or indifference. Luntz coined the phrase “death tax” to replace “estate tax”, and with the media’s repetition almost got the Congress to repeal this tax that is overwhelmingly on the wealthy. Fortunately, in 2002 the Democrats blocked this all out Republican effort in the House and the Senate. Once when asked, what would he have called the “estate tax” were he a Democrat, Luntz smiled and immediately said “the billionaires’ tax.” His gift to the Democrats was not adopted as a moniker in this continuing plutocratically-driven struggle over mind-shaping words and phrases that so often serve to obscure contrary deeds.
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate, lawyer, and author. His latest book is The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future. Other recent books include, The Seventeen Traditions: Lessons from an American Childhood, Getting Steamed to Overcome Corporatism: Build It Together to Win, and “Only The Super-Rich Can Save Us” (a novel).
Thanks for nothing mr spoiler.
Conservatives love to privatize profit (tax cuts, tax exemption etc.) and socialise liabilities (budget deficits),
Government is a subsidiary of Chamber of Commerce for all practical purpose.
And all the left can do is call the right, anti immigrant (they are not, they just want it done legally), homophobic (they really don’t care who you want to spend your life with, just be happy), racists (no they are not regardless of how many times you say it and try to play the “race card”), and the list goes on and on and on and on. You can try to spin the mid term election how you like. There was no blue wave not even a ripple. The left performed miserably and are now set up to lose again in another two years. You need to figure out how to help the people of America, not ignore. and disenfranchise them. Get your crap together democrats, where is the powerful party of the past?
Conservatives are like well trained, starving attack dogs. 1st, there came low information voters. Then, the onset of NO information voters. Finally, in the new anti-evolutionary paradigm — the negative information voters … and the extinction of the human race.
Traveling Rep says
How wonderful reading a Ralph Nader rant about those pesky republicans and their colossal wins. Isn’t this the same guy that got in Al Gores way back in 2000? I guess we should be thankful for him giving us yet another “W” back then…
Thank you, Mr. Nader, for pointing out the truth of what conservatives truly are. Anti-Bible, anti-society, pro-slavery, pro-tax, pro-own-profit-only…
LOL The political LEFT hate that they have to say what they truly want. So they vilify Rs or conservatives to deflect from their anti constitutional ways.. Im a registered R because in FLA one must be such to have any real vote in primary’s. Rs want immigration just legal immigration. Ds dont see a difference in that. Rs are FOR equal rights for ALL individuals. Ds want special rights for some groups. Most Rs hold their religious beliefs close and want to express them openly without forcing others to bend to them. Ds want nobody to voice their belies on religion other then ones against religion and look to force that belief of no gillion on others. Rs believe in the Constitution and what is actually within it and the original intent of our republics laws within it. Ds dont care what is actually within it they look to twist it any way they can to fit their political ideology. I f a d disagrees with me we just have differing opinions. When i say I disagree with them they say in all sorts of vile things to personally attack me as a bad person for not agreeing.