• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
    • Privacy Policy
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2024
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

Juvenile Detention Cost-Shifting Arguments in Appeals Court, With Implications for Counties

May 15, 2013 | FlaglerLive | Leave a Comment

The question is: who pays?  (1FlatWorld)
The question is: who pays? (1FlatWorld)

An appeals court Tuesday heard arguments in a long-running dispute over how the state and counties should divide juvenile detention costs.

Click On:


  • As Florida Eases Harsh Approach, Study Shows Locking Up Juveniles Makes Them Likelier Adult Criminals
  • Life Without Parole for Juveniles: Florida Struggles to Comply With Supreme Court Ruling
  • Dispute Over State’s Shifting Juvenile Detention Costs to Counties Simmers Again
  • Harsh Outlier: Florida’s Sentencing Laws Still Lock Up More Juveniles Than Any Other State
  • Duping Court Ruling, Florida Replacing Life Juvenile Sentencing With 50-Year Minimum
  • Bad News for Counties: Juvenile Detention Costs Would More Heavily Burden Locals
  • Judge Sides With Counties Again Over Juvenile Justice Costs Florida Is Passing On
  • In Juvenile Detention for Girls, Health Care Is Shoddy, Absent or Geared Only to Boys
  • Abu Ghraib Brutality in Florida’s Youth Prisons: Suit Charges Rape and Other Abuses
  • Florida’s Juvenile Justice Eliminating 1,200 Jobs and Closing 3 Youth Prisons
  • Florida Lockups Lite: Closing Prisons and Boot Camps, Privatizing Inmate Healthcare

The case concerns a 2004 law that requires counties to help pick up the tab for detaining underage offenders. Under the law, counties are supposed to pay for “pre-dispositional” detention – that is, costs associated with juveniles waiting for their cases to be resolved in court and those charged with probation violations.

But just what “predisposition” means as been in dispute, with counties challenging the law in 2010, arguing they’re footing too much of the bill. Tuesday’s arguments before the 1st District Court of Appeal revolved around the complicated formula by which the cost of a juvenile’s case is determined to be the responsibility of DJJ or the county in which the offense took place.

Appellate Judge Nikki Ann Clark, a former juvenile division judge, queried DJJ attorney John Milla on the meaning of the term “final disposition” as it applies to the cost-sharing formula, asking whether a final court order disposing of the case was what was meant by “final disposition.”

Milla said it was not that simple.

“For purposes of the statute, the disposition of probation is not a final court disposition,” said Milla. “If that’s the final court disposition, for purposes of determining fiscal responsibility for a detention stay, then this is off by millions – by tens of millions of dollars. As the department has interpreted it…there would be a discrepancy between the days and the money of, basically, couch change.”

The counties argue they currently pick up 75 percent of the costs, but should be paying less. DJJ has said in court filings that the Legislature actually intended for the counties to cover more – 89 percent of the costs.

“It is true that the department’s interpretation makes the counties responsible for the large majority of detention stays,” said a document filed in the case in January by department Secretary Wansley Walters. “But there can be no doubt that this is precisely what the Legislature had in mind, and the proof is found in the funding. The Legislature initially funded detention cost sharing so that the counties would be responsible for 89 percent of detention costs and the state would be responsible for 11 percent.”

Attorney Gregory Stewart, representing the counties, argued that they “are in fact subsidizing the state’s share…Days (of a juvenile’s detention) that were the responsibility of the state have now been shifted to the counties.”

Stewart said under DJJ’s new rule, if a juvenile is found not guilty but must remain in detention until picked up by a parent or guardian, those days are charged to the county.


As to the interpretation of “final disposition” as it applies to a juvenile’s case, Stewart argued “the entire history of the statute interpreted that provision as common sense tells you it should be interpreted.”

The counties’ position is that anything after a disposition hearing – similar to a sentencing hearing – is DJJ’s responsibility. At that point, either the juvenile is committed to a DJJ facility or a DCF-licensed facility and sent home pending placement, detained pending placement, or the juvenile is committed to probation.

DJJ spokeswoman Meghan Speakes Collins said the state “doesn’t become responsible for detention stays until a youth is committed to the custody of the Department, and the detention is only necessary because the Department does not yet have an available residential bed for the youth. Youth who are served in their local communities – who are not committed – remain the responsibility of the Counties for any other detention stays.”

Some counties have looked for other solutions to paying their juvenile detention costs. After the passing of a 2011 law, a county that opts to provide juvenile detention services is exempt from statutory requirements to contribute funding to the state for the operation of DJJ detention centers. Currently, Marion, Polk and Seminole Counties are operating their own detention centers.

–Margie Menzel, News Service of Florida

Support FlaglerLive's End of Year Fundraiser
Thank you readers for getting us to--and past--our year-end fund-raising goal yet again. It’s a bracing way to mark our 15th year at FlaglerLive. Our donors are just a fraction of the 25,000 readers who seek us out for the best-reported, most timely, trustworthy, and independent local news site anywhere, without paywall. FlaglerLive is free. Fighting misinformation and keeping democracy in the sunshine 365/7/24 isn’t free. Take a brief moment, become a champion of fearless, enlightening journalism. Any amount helps. We’re a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donations are tax deductible.  
You may donate openly or anonymously.
We like Zeffy (no fees), but if you prefer to use PayPal, click here.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Conner Bosch law attorneys lawyers offices palm coast flagler county
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Primary Sidebar

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • Bob Zeitz on Metronet Contractor Punctures Flagler Beach Water Main for 2nd Time in 24 Hours, Again Affecting City’s Water
  • B on Metronet Contractor Punctures Flagler Beach Water Main for 2nd Time in 24 Hours, Again Affecting City’s Water
  • CrazyTown on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Mothersworry on Metronet Contractor Punctures Flagler Beach Water Main for 2nd Time in 24 Hours, Again Affecting City’s Water
  • Call me disappointed on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Atwp on Judge Gary Farmer, ‘Discriminatory, Offensive, Sexually Charged, and Demeaning,’ Fights Suspension
  • Larry on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • justbob on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Fernando Melendez on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Jim on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Jim on If Approved, Religious Charter Schools Will Shift Yet More Money from Traditional Public Schools
  • William Hughey on Mayor Mike Norris’s Lawsuit Against Palm Coast Has Merit. And Limits.
  • Kenneth N on Last of Palm Coast’s City Manager Candidates Withdraws, Clearing the Way for Pause and Reset Months from Now
  • JimboXYZ on Metronet Contractor Punctures Flagler Beach Water Main for 2nd Time in 24 Hours, Again Affecting City’s Water
  • Alic on Metronet Contractor Punctures Flagler Beach Water Main for 2nd Time in 24 Hours, Again Affecting City’s Water
  • aw, shucks on DeSantis Stands By Attorney General’s Defiance of Federal Court Order Halting Cops’ Arrests of Migrants

Log in