• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
MENUMENU
MENUMENU
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • FlaglerLive Board of Directors
    • Comment Policy
    • Mission Statement
    • Our Values
  • Live Calendar
  • Submit Obituary
  • Submit an Event
  • Support FlaglerLive
  • Advertise on FlaglerLive (386) 503-3808
  • Search Results

FlaglerLive

No Bull, no Fluff, No Smudges

MENUMENU
  • Flagler
    • Flagler County Commission
    • Beverly Beach
    • Economic Development Council
    • Flagler History
    • Mondex/Daytona North
    • The Hammock
    • Tourist Development Council
  • Palm Coast
    • Palm Coast City Council
    • Palm Coast Crime
  • Bunnell
    • Bunnell City Commission
    • Bunnell Crime
  • Flagler Beach
    • Flagler Beach City Commission
    • Flagler Beach Crime
  • Cops/Courts
    • Circuit & County Court
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • Federal Courts
    • Flagler 911
    • Fire House
    • Flagler County Sheriff
    • Flagler Jail Bookings
    • Traffic Accidents
  • Rights & Liberties
    • Fourth Amendment
    • First Amendment
    • Privacy
    • Second Amendment
    • Seventh Amendment
    • Sixth Amendment
    • Sunshine Law
    • Third Amendment
    • Religion & Beliefs
    • Human Rights
    • Immigration
    • Labor Rights
    • 14th Amendment
    • Civil Rights
  • Schools
    • Adult Education
    • Belle Terre Elementary
    • Buddy Taylor Middle
    • Bunnell Elementary
    • Charter Schools
    • Daytona State College
    • Flagler County School Board
    • Flagler Palm Coast High School
    • Higher Education
    • Imagine School
    • Indian Trails Middle
    • Matanzas High School
    • Old Kings Elementary
    • Rymfire Elementary
    • Stetson University
    • Wadsworth Elementary
    • University of Florida/Florida State
  • Economy
    • Jobs & Unemployment
    • Business & Economy
    • Development & Sprawl
    • Leisure & Tourism
    • Local Business
    • Local Media
    • Real Estate & Development
    • Taxes
  • Commentary
    • The Conversation
    • Pierre Tristam
    • Diane Roberts
    • Guest Columns
    • Byblos
    • Editor's Blog
  • Culture
    • African American Cultural Society
    • Arts in Palm Coast & Flagler
    • Books
    • City Repertory Theatre
    • Flagler Auditorium
    • Flagler Playhouse
    • Flagler Youth Orchestra
    • Jacksonville Symphony Orchestra
    • Palm Coast Arts Foundation
    • Special Events
  • Elections 2022
    • Amendments and Referendums
    • Presidential Election
    • Campaign Finance
    • City Elections
    • Congressional
    • Constitutionals
    • Courts
    • Governor
    • Polls
    • Voting Rights
  • Florida
    • Federal Politics
    • Florida History
    • Florida Legislature
    • Florida Legislature
    • Ron DeSantis
  • Health & Society
    • Flagler County Health Department
    • Ask the Doctor Column
    • Health Care
    • Health Care Business
    • Covid-19
    • Children and Families
    • Medicaid and Medicare
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Violence
  • All Else
    • Daily Briefing
    • Americana
    • Obituaries
    • News Briefs
    • Weather and Climate
    • Wildlife

In Victory for Local Governments, FPL Loses Appeal Over Having to Bury Power Lines

February 27, 2017 | FlaglerLive | 2 Comments

fpl power libes
Bury them. (© FlaglerLive)

The state Supreme Court on Friday turned down an appeal by Florida Power & Light in a case about whether the utility could be required to install underground transmission lines as part of a nuclear-power project in Miami-Dade County.


Justices, as is common, did not explain their reasons for declining to take up the case. But the decision was a victory for local governments, including the city of Miami, that have tangled with FPL about the transmission-line issue and local development regulations.

The dispute is rooted in a long-discussed FPL proposal to build two new nuclear reactors at its Turkey Point complex in Miami-Dade. In 2014, Gov. Rick Scott and the Cabinet, acting as the state’s power-plant “siting board,” signed off on the project.

But the 3rd District Court of Appeal sided with local governments and overturned the decision by Scott and the Cabinet. A key part of the ruling said Scott and Cabinet members erroneously determined they could not require underground transmission lines as a condition of the project approval.

“The court of appeal held that the siting board was required to apply the city of Miami’s applicable land development regulations, and that the siting board erred when it determined that it did not have the authority to require FPL to install the lines underground at its own expense,” attorneys for the city wrote in a brief to the Supreme Court.

In taking the case to the Supreme Court, FPL argued that the state Public Service Commission — not Scott and the Cabinet — has authority over issues related to installing transmission lines underground. It said the dispute involved 89 miles of transmission lines.

“This case directly affects FPL’s ability to install miles of transmission lines needed to supply electricity to millions of South Florida consumers,” the FPL brief said. “The (appeals court) opinion also alters the balance of power between the state’s highest elected officials, sitting as the siting board, and the PSC.”

The siting board also filed a brief last month asking the Supreme Court to take up the case and “reiterate the Legislature’s intent that only the PSC shall regulate rates and services of public utilities.”

“The 3rd DCA’s decision directly affects the previously exclusive powers of the PSC,” the siting board brief said. “The siting board and the PSC constitute a class of constitutional or state officers that will now separately and independently exercise the identical power to require utilities to underground transmission lines at the utility’s expense.”

The city of Miami, however, disputed such arguments.

“Relative to nuclear facilities, if the siting board has the authority to impose conditions on a power company (it does), then it can impose any condition without intruding on the PSC’s jurisdiction,” the city’s brief said.

–Jim Saunders, News Service of Florida

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
You and your neighbors collectively read our articles about 25,000 times each day (that's not a typo) with up to 65,000 daily reads during emergencies like hurricanes. Flagler County residents rely on FlaglerLive for essential, bold and analytical journalism that cannot be found anywhere else. But we depend on your support. Please join our December fund drive! If you donate the cost of a scoop of ice cream, you will be helping us continue to provide comprehensive local news and honest, serious journalism for our community. If you can donate more or become a monthly donor, even better. Donations are tax deductible since FlaglerLive is a 501(c)(3) non-profit news organization. Donate by clicking anywhere in this box. Think of it as buying a scoop, in every sense of the term!  
All donors' identities are kept confidential and anonymous.
   

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. PCer says

    February 27, 2017 at 6:33 pm

    I’d like to see new lines go underground. Above ground lines are unsightly and wreak havoc when we have a storm come through.

    Reply
  2. cls says

    March 2, 2017 at 4:39 pm

    In the sunshine state the focus should be on solar power plants vs nuclear power. One reason I didn’t like Hutchinson Island as a place to live was it had a nuclear power plant sitting right on the ocean. NOPE!

    Reply
  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Advertisers

  • grand living realty
  • politis matovina attorneys for justice personal injury law auto truck accidents

Recent Comments

  • G on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Sad Cookie Lover's Friend on Crumbl Cookies Opening Soon at Palm Coast’s Island Walk
  • Ahto Motive on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Mike the Texan on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Jimbo99 on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Mike the Texan on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Ben Hogarth on Flagler Sheriff’s Sgt. Breckwoldt, In Charge of Narcotics Unit, at Center of Abuse of Power Allegation
  • Anita on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • JOE D on He Was Convinced the School Board Was Pushing “Transgender BS.” He Was Arrested. And Emboldened.
  • djwhite077 on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Pogo on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Shirley on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Tired of it on Florida Will Publish Annual Index of Books Banned or Challenged in Schools
  • Hookah Smoking Caterpillar on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire
  • Edith Campins on Florida Will Publish Annual Index of Books Banned or Challenged in Schools
  • Jim on I’m Almost 67, I Worked 22 Years With Walmart, Yet Can’t Afford to Retire

Log in