Note: This article originally published on Feb. 18, and is being reposted ahead of the March 8 election. See also: “In Unusual Break with Meeting Customs, a Flagler Beach Commissioner Blasts Another Over Campaign Claims.”
The Flagler Woman’s Club on Feb. 15 hosted a forum for the three candidates running for Flagler Beach City Commission–incumbents Jane Mealy and Rick Belhumeur, and newcomer James Sherman–giving voters their best chance, short of a one-on-one with the candidates, to seize up their choices.
Voters know Mealy and Belhumeur well, Sherman less or not at all. He’s only recently started attending commission meetings. He says Commissioners Deborah Phillips and Ken Bryan encouraged him to run. Bryan has been giving him a crash course in city issues, though he has a long way to go.
Sherman can command an audience with his humor and presence, if not his height. He’s the upstart, the challenger, the guy who, at 36, would be the young Turk on a commission where the average age is 65 (excluding the non-voting mayor, whose birth in the first months of the Reagan administration skews the average down to 61; Mealy was born the month Franklin Roosevelt was logging 25,000 miles in the Middle East during World War II, meeting with Churchill, Stalin and Chang Kai-shek. Sherman was born the year New Coke was released.)
But Sherman’s grasp of city issues is still not in evidence, as his hour before the Woman’s Club audience showed: the two incumbents had years of records to go on and glided on those years., while Sherman powered himself with self-assurance and the implicit generational contrast, which he mentioned in an interview a few days before the forum: “I’d like to represent the newer generation coming into Flagler Beach,” he’d said. But to what end was less clear.
Sherman did not make it clearer on Tuesday evening, though he projected the sort of intelligence that suggests he’d make a quick study of anything he’d face. Governance of a city not being rocket science, his background as something as close to a rocket scientist as the commission has known will likely serve him well should he make it on one of the two seats up for contention. The top two vote-getters will be elected.
Sherman was born outside of Atlantic City, N.J., moved to Volusia County when he was 6, grew up in South Daytona, served in the Marines from 2004 to 2008–an association he milked for everything it was worth at the forum, in a county that fetishizes the military–and earned his B.S. and a master’s in aeronautics from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. His in-laws have been in the area for 40 years. He is the assistant registrar at Embry-Riddle’s worldwide campus and has a 4-year-old daughter. He got involved in the city by serving on its personnel review board. He’s tried, but hasn’t been picked, to serve on the planning board, and has not been serving on civic boards for lack of time. “There’s only 24 hours in a day,” he said.
“No, there’s more than that,” Mealy schooled him in the only jab she permitted herself against him Tuesday evening (she had many more for Belhumeur, a colleague she nevertheless respects and works well with).
He summed up the theme of his campaign this way: “Responsible fiscal spending, community and environment.” He sees expensive infrastructure costs ahead, but has a curious way of looking at tax increases: “I don’t want to see our taxes go skyrocketing through the roof. I would like to see a steady progression.” He wants to bury the city’s power lines, a proposal not recently heard from candidates in any of the county’s cities, and would do so with that holy grail of new candidates for office: grant dollars. He punned on the word butts when talking about the initiative to get cigarette butts off the beach, and joked about Brazilian peppers, pledging to–if he wins–shear off anyone’s Brazilian peppers on request.
Mealy, 78, was raised in Queens, N.Y., and taught in Long island for 36 years before moving to Flagler Beach in 2001 where she said she “failed retirement.” She became almost immediately involved in community and civics groups, started attending commission meetings and was elected in 2006: she is, with Colleen Conklin on the school board and Catherine Robinson, the mayor of Bunnell, the third-longest serving elected official in the county.
“I make no decisions based on emotions, always on research and facts,” she said, citing the change in the land development code that will bar more high rises in the city unless voters opt to scrap the ban. She remains involved in refining the code. She portrayed herself–with a voluminous record to prove it–as a supporter of residents and businesses, of the city’s fire and police departments, and of the city’s autonomy from the county or other governments: Mealy has fiercely defended the city’s identity, whether through the preservation of its traditions (such as the July 4 fireworks), the autonomy of its services (such as building inspectors), and home rule, speaking up, at times directly to the county’s legislative delegation, against Tallahassee’s frequent encroachments on that score.
Her foresight protected the city from more recent attempts to undermine local authority, as she explained: “The fact that the then-seated commission of which I was chair and the voting part had the vision to create the short term rental ordinance in 2008 has protected our residential areas from being affected by having new groups of people renting next door on a daily or weekly basis,” Mealy said. “Over the last several sessions the state legislature has enacted new laws regarding this issue but thus far has grandfathered cities like ours.”
The Legislature in 2011 drastically loosened vacation-rental regulations, and in 2014 enacted a new law that restored some local authority–thanks to the lead Flagler government took in pushing for that law–both times grandfathering local government ordinances that predated 2011, like Flagler Beach. Every year since 2014, legislators have tried again to return to the 2011 standard, but every year their attempts have fallen short.
Belhumeur, 68, introduced himself by describing his “overwhelming love for this city” and told a family story he’s fond of: how he was part of the family vacation that passed through Flagler Beach in 1966, when his father fell in love with the town, building several rental homes there by the time he retired in 1985, and getting involved in city issues, pushing successfully to get the police department unionized and becoming a city commissioner for two terms in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Belhumeur himself “went to my first commission meeting in 2010 and was immediately addicted,” he said, as Mealy, a fellow-addict, chuckled. “I have missed very few meetings since then. And by attending I learned that I could get involved.” He started serving on city boards. He also served on the county’s affordable housing and parks and advisory boards, then the city’s planning board.
He was elected to the commission–without opposition–six years ago. He had a two-year learning curve, he said. It was a clever dig at Sherman, his implication being: why vote for the new guy when you have one all trained up. It was also an indication of Belhumeur’s nervousness about the new guy. “Now after serving as one of your commissioners for six years, I understand how things are done in city government,” he said.
He then described his fiscal conservatism: “I expect you’ve all seen my signs,” he said. “They have different messages. One is, stop the extravagant spending.” His frequent votes against budgets have kept him in the minority on three of the six budgets he’s voted on. For instance, I voted on six budgets. “I voted no on three of them,” he said. “We need to change the current spending habits in the city. We’re not a big city and we have to quit trying to compete with a small city with limited resources.”
Belhumeur wasn’t speaking in the abstract, as candidates often do: In 2016 was elected on the strength of his opposition to the fire department’s buy, at the time, of a new fire truck. He was again opposed to the department’s buy of another truck this year. That one drew far less opposition, but Belhumeur said it was the sort of spending that the city could do without, since the department had two fully capable fire trucks and could rely on the county and Palm Coast for mutual aid. He was not thrilled about the city’s police department acquiring license plate readers, either, given the sheriff’s network of them.
Since the questions came from the audience, he was later asked for examples of extravagant spending. He cited unnecessary fire trucks, a more expensive roof for the police department than necessary (Belhumeur managed to bring that price down), and a replacement schedule for city vehicles that went faster than necessary. “You don’t need a Cadillac when you could get away with a Chevrolet,” the commission’s bluest collar said, “and that’s how the city’s survived as long as it has, with so few few people paying the bills, is because we’ve always spent modestly, and I think we’re getting away from that.”
“I remember a code enforcement officer, two code enforcement officers having a car where her foot went through the floorboards because we never replaced it,” Mealy countered. “Now that’s not exactly safe.”
At the same time, it’s also true that Belhumeur voted against the budgets when he well knew that the budgets would be approved anyway, giving him the luxury of a no vote that did not risk jeopardizing the city’s financial stability–a stability the last two city managers have been keen on protecting, after several years of unsustainably low taxes. In other words, the city has been paying bills left unpaid in the early and the middle part of the last decade.
In any case Mealy, the commission’s shrewdest and often iron-flinted voice, didn’t let him get away with the statement unchallenged: “Yes, I’ve approved budgets,” she said, a bit later on, during the question period. “It’s very easy to say I will never raise taxes a-la-George Bush the first. It’s very easy to say that.” Mealy made clear she has no patience for the statement. “Issues come up and if you don’t have the money budgeted, you can’t do whatever it is the citizens want. So I think responsible budgeting is important. And it’s a challenge.”
Mealy twice returned to the charge later, in one case recalling how then-City Manager Bruce Campbell (she didn’t name him), a private-sector expat who’d never managed a government budget before, would start every budget season with orders that each department cut 10 percent, whether it was necessary or not. “It might sound good,” Mealy said, “but there [was] an awful lot of stuff that didn’t get done and we’re now catching up. Takes a lot to run this city. Yes, it’s a small town. Yes, we only have 5,000 residents. But we want the city to run well and so to me spending it wisely means, prove to me we need that, and I’ll support it.”
Sherman, ironically, spoke like Campbell when asked to answer the question about “extravagant spending,” speaking in private-sector terms that have no application in the public sector: “We have to look at it as a business, we have to run it as a business, as essentially: We need to look at the return on the investment on the spending that we’re doing. So sometimes you have to spend money to make money, and get that return on your investment.”
There is no “return,” of course, on the investment in a code enforcement vehicle, in a fire truck, in a garbage truck, other than the assurance to taxpayers that their garbage is being picked up, their homes are protected from fire, their neighbor’s grass is cut when they complain. None of those services make money, or are intended to make money, though some candidates for office almost invariably peddle the “run-it-as-a-business” line because it can occasionally resonate with taxpayers who don’t know better. Sherman was on stronger ground when he suggested that, as with the roof on the police station, a more expensive roof might last longer, or how a newer car might need fewer expensive repairs, only to revert to the money-making soundbyte: the city should “take a business approach to those and look at it from how are we going to make our money on that,” he said.
Belhumeur wasn’t done during his opening speech. “I will continue to scrutinize each and every budget to maximize tax increases,” he said (he misspoke: he meant minimize), then he turned to overt if unspecified criticism of the city administration: “Complacency among among many workers is a problem and I will urge our city manager to promote an atmosphere that heightens pride among all our city employees.” City Manager William Whitson was in the audience, a couple of chairs down from Police Chief Matt Doughney. “Demanding accountability is the city manager’s job, to hold his staff accountable when sometimes things go wrong. When that doesn’t happen, it’s the commission’s job to hold the city manager to account. Those are generally done by means of an annual evaluation.” Then he turned his criticism on the commission: “Commissioners need to take those evaluations more seriously, or we need to come up with a more equitable scoring system.” He got a round of applause.
Only then the questions began, the first asking the candidates about opportunities and challenges. Belhumeur took the iconoclastic approach, lending support to The Gardens, the development on John Anderson Highway in the county that the commission as a whole had somewhat been critical of, and wishing for the opening of a marina in the city. The biggest challenge for now, he said, was ending the dumping of effluents in the Intracoastal–a challenge the city will have to address regardless, by law, within a few years.
Mealy saw Whitson, the city manager, as the city’s biggest opportunity: “This man knows everybody in this state that we need to know that will help us with whatever,” she said. “Went to a conference in Orlando where he was speaking, so I said okay, I should go. Well, everybody just knew him.” She described similar situations at the city. “He’s only been here since May. He’s worn me out with all that he’s been doing. I told him he didn’t have to fix everything in the first week. But to take advantage of a man who has so much experience and knows so many people around the state and outside the state. I think it’s a great opportunity for us.”
As for challenges, Mealy reverted to the legislature’s assault on home rule. “The last year and this year have been extremely bad,” she said, taking away from the commission’s authority.
The incumbents, as expected, drew heavily on their experience for their answers. The unasked question with a challenger is always how he or she will handle the questions asked, as an outsider. Candidates, through no fault of their own, often bring a pie-in-the-sky approach to their inaugural campaigns, speaking in generalities and idealistic cliches for lack of more tangible experience in government. But even those answers can reveal a candidate’s disposition, making the difference between the serious and the crank. Sherman is no crank.
Sherman sees opportunity in the future pier, assuming it’s built. The current one is to be demolished and replaced with a concrete structure, with federal dollars. “I think it’s going to be a huge opportunity for us as a city to really capitalize on that and market and show off our new and improved pier,” Sherman said, speaking the once-trendy if shallow language of city governments as attention-hungry attractions rather than administrative operations: “ I really think we need to rebrand ourselves a bit, maybe we have some opportunities to really just kind of clean up our image a bit with our parks. I know we’re working in those directions with those things, but really, truly let’s take a deeper look and make that maybe one of our goals with when we hit our 100-year anniversary.”
He then spoke of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ dunes-reconstruction project slated for Flagler Beach as another challenge, although that project is largely out of the city’s hands. But it’s been in the news.
There were interestingly unexpected questions reflective of the evolving nature of energy and government costs: “Should the city look into replacing or using electric vehicles?” As questions go, it was a first in local government races–from forums or from media. Belhumeur took it as an opportunity to note that he drives a hybrid, though he said regarding city vehicles, “it’s a little bit early for that,” and too expensive for now. He gave it a five-to-10-year timeline, calling it “definitely something in the future we could maybe look into as prices come down on those and the technology improves.”
Mealy agreed, with a caveat: “Perhaps we could do one at a time.” But she said charging stations would have to come first. “I know the state legislature, that’s one good thing they’re working on this year. Maybe the only good thing they’re working on this year is putting in charging stations on the highways.” Sherman, borrowing a term from Belhumeur, said going electric is “extravagant spending” right now, and the problem of storing worn batteries has not yet been considered or solved.
There were the perennial–and nakedly tendentious–questions, such as: “Will you vow to keep the Flagler Beach Fire Department city controlled.” All candidates said yes, recognizing that any other answer would be suicidal to their chances. Mealy, the seasoned candidate, left the answer at yes. Sherman took advantage of it to lather a bit of flattery on the troops–always good for easy points. But Belhumeur knew he had some explaining to do, having thrown stop sticks in the way of every new fire department engine. “I’m not an enemy of the fire department, I hope they’re over here for quite some time,” he said. “However, we don’t need any more firetrucks anytime soon.”
There were the factually incorrect questions (not the moderator’s fault: she was merely reading them from the audience), such one wondering why the city was going to spend $1.2 million on a visitor center. It isn’t. The county’s tourism bureau is in conversations to buy a $1.5 million parcel south of the pier for a visitor center, a proposal that has triggered some controversy. Belhumeur dismissed the question: “That’s the county,” he said.
There were eye-rolling softballs among the questions, similar to those questions Chinese reporters asked athletes or Olympic officials in Beijing over the past two weeks. Mealy, on her home turf as a member of the Flagler Woman’s Club, was asked: “If elected, will you continue to offer the Citizens Academy?” Of course Mealy said yes, and even asked for the full two minutes to answer. It’s the city’s way of educating residents on city government. “You get to go to the sewer plant and the water plant,” she said. Most current commissioners have graduated. Covid has prevented more recent sessions, but it will resume in the spring.
Another softball, along the lines of “what makes you the champion figure skater you are,” must have been planted by one of the incumbents’ campaign fans: “What makes you an effective commissioner?” The question was unfair to Sherman of course, since it was directed only to the commissioners, who nevertheless answered accurately: both Mealy and Belhumeur, addicts that they are, do their homework, pour over background materials and–Mealy more than Belhumeur–speak to staffers when they need questions answered. Their deep background work shows at meetings.
With Mealy especially, no one who addresses the commission, or even staffers and the manager, can get much past her without her knowing the background. Belhumeur’s research adds field work: he likes to see problems with his own eyes, logging more miles on his truck than other commissioners as he crisscrosses the city almost daily. “I think a little bit outside the box and bring some fresh ideas that the other Commissioners don’t necessarily come up with,” he said, noting his involvement outside the city as well as he stays in touch with other elected officials. Belhumeur and Mealy are the most frequent presences at other governments’ events.
In their closing words, Belhumeur characteristically spoke unassumingly, quoting the note on his desk: “There are two primary choices in life: to accept conditions as they exist, or accept the responsibility for changing them. So that’s what I feel I’m doing, and I will continue to do so.” Mealy went over her recent resume with the city–the money secured for the pier, from the St. Johns River Water Management District for lining sewer pipes and from such sources as the federal Covid-aid packages (though no local government official had anything to do with that), her protectiveness of Flagler Beach’s environment–and her support for people who remove Brazilian peppers.
“I know this is my first time running but I’m going to give my all to you guys,” Sherman said, offering to meet with constituents over coffee–and, as if in counterpoint to Belhumeur’s desk quote, citing the Marines’ “semper fidelis,” or “always faithful,” motto. “And I promise you that if you elect me, I will forever be faithful to every last one of you all,” he said–a political promise as impossibility as 2+2=5, as any elected official learns in the first hours of service, but also as customary a promise of young candidates for office as the glimmering hopes of Election Day (in this case, March 8).
“And you know, and that’s all I have tonight,” he said, “and just remember my name: James Patrick Sherman on your ballots.” Or Jane Mealy. Or Rick Belhumeur.
Election Day: March 8
FLAGLER BEACH CITY COMMISSION CHAMBER ROOM
105 S. 2nd Street
Flagler Beach, FL
Polling hours: 7:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m.
No early voting will be held for this election. Vote by mail or in person on Election Day.
VOTE BY MAIL INFORMATION:
Any registered voter in the City of Flagler Beach may choose to vote by mail. The deadline to request a vote-by-mail ballot is February 26, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. Vote-by-Mail ballots must be received in the Elections Office no later than 7:00 p.m. on Election Day, March 8, 2022. Voters may place a request for a mail ballot by phone, (386) 313-4170 or online: Request a mail ballot. See the Elections Supervisor’s website.
Resident says
I’m just sick of politicians everywhere. The whole commission in FB needs to be voted out. However we don’t have any local people to pick from for new positions.
James Sherman says
Resident- come speak with me. I would like to hear your concerns. I have lived in Florida for over 30 years. For nine of those Flagler Beach has been my home. Let’s talk. [email protected]
The Villa Beach Walker says
I’m sorry I couldn’t attend the candidates forum. If I had I would have asked about issues like protecting our environment and our shores; both the beach and along the intercoastal. People parking on and abusing the dunes are eroding our beach from the A1A side. We need more and better parking barriers, signage, and parking enforcement along A1A. We need places (other than along A1A) where visitors to our beaches and our town can park. We need an improved plan for beach and town parking. Our parks along the intercoastal are overgrown and under used – and we are adding new parks. We need a better plan for these parks including fishing piers and canoe / kayak launches. We all know that when it rains in Flagler Beach; it pours – usually through our streets and out to the intercoastal. We need the city commision to be thinking about ; communicating; and implementing ways to avoid flooding that ruins homes on the west side when the intercoastal rises. Our city ‘owns’ a golf course. It’s a resource that has been put in the hands of a person currently serving time. It’s been this way for years. This inaction has to stop and the city commissioners should be doing something with that property. Finally, everyone in Flagler Beach should learn where all that stuff going down our drains goes. The cities sewage / water treatment plant’s age (in processing years) rivals that of our city commissioners. We need commissioners who are going to come with plan to modernize the plant without breaking our taxpayers backs.
Crusty Old Salt says
Lot’s to unpack here. First question, how high do you want our taxes to go in our little City of 5,000. Let’s breakdown your comments.
The County is already working with the Corp of Engineers regarding protecting our Beach, including Flagler Beach. Perhaps you missed the coverage on Flagler Live.
Regarding the second part of your comment protecting homes along the Intracoastal. When a prospective buyer is looking to purchase a home along the Intracoastal, the first thing they should do is their due diligence. If the home is in a flood zone and the finished floor elevation is at a number where the home has flooded before, move on. The City cannot stop the Atlantic ocean from causing the Intracoastal to rise during hurricanes and flooding your home if you are at an elevation that is high risk. If someone were to ask me what elevation to build their finished floor elevation, I would suggest 8 to 9 ft. Unfortunately, their are a very high number of homes in our city that are built at a level that will flood during a hurricane, especially the older ones when sea level rise and stronger hurricanes were not on the radar screen.
If individuals park on the dunes in a no parking area they are ticketed. Their was a packed room full of residents not too long ago that did not want any more signs on our scenic Highway of A-1-A. Flagler live covered that also.
Regarding additional parking for tourist and beach goers other than A-1-A. What is your funding source? Should the residents of Flagler Beach pay for this through the increase in ad valorem taxes? Is it their responsibility to buy more property for parking lots on the barrier island or the mainland? When paid parking in Flagler Beach has been discussed in the past and studies have done, social media has blown up against this. Flaglerlive again.
Parks along the Intracoastal: Sometime individuals confuse which parks are county owned vs city owned and who is responsible for maintenance. I can’t address that issue specifically unless I know which specific parks you are referring to along the Intracoastal.
Golf course: Believe City is moving in the direction to resolve that issue. Also, considering purchasing abutting property which was part of the old driving range. Then can market golf course and adjacent property as a driving range the way it was decades ago.
Water and Sewer plant I also believe is in the process of moving forward with upgrades..
That is quite a wish list for a small City of 5,000. The final comment regarding not breaking the backs of taxpayers is somewhat paradoxical.
The Villa Beach Walker says
Let’s unpack your unpacking…
My point was that the City of Flagler Beach should be taking a much more aggressive role working with the County on getting the beach replenishment project moving. The City should be working with State DOT to beautify and preserve the drainage system that has been built on south A1A.
Many of the homes on streets along the intercoastal have swales in their front yards. These swales need to be maintained. That’s been a point of contention with some property owners for years. The City should be dealing with all residents and their properties equally.
People parking on the dunes ARE NOT being ticketed. FL law states that a vehicle should not be parked more than 12 inches from the edge of the pavement. Drive up and down A1A and note place where cars are parked 3-4 feet away from the edge of the pavement. Signs can only be deployed by the City Police. Not enough signs and more enforcement needed.
Ask the Funky Pelican operators about parking. The lot that their customers used to use is private property and the owner has decided to end an agreement with the restaurant and charge for parking there. That’s their right as it is their property but how does that impact the remainder of town center? How many lots or parking spaces are there between Moody and South 10th St? The City needs to address this.
Silver Lake Park at North 17th St. is owned and operated by the City. A new City owned park is being developed near the end of South Daytona. Take a look.
The current mismanagement of the has been going on for years. The operators were given a five year grace period to bring the course up to par. It’s not there. They aren’t reporting to the City. That’s supposed to be a revenue source.
You can believe all you want about the City owned waste water / sewage plant. These facilities have a lifetime and are tremendously expensive to maintain and rebuild / upgrade. Ever wonder why the State doesn’t permit taking of shellfish from the intercoastal anywhere near Flagler Beach? Ever go for a ride in a kayak the day after it rains?
You can snark about reading FlaglerLive all you want. All I ask is that these issues be considered by candidates for the City Commission.
Crusty Old Salt says
Thank you for your unpacking my unpacking response. Let me respond.
First paragraph: First of all, Mr. Hadeed, the County Attorney has been reporting consistently on a regular basis with updates regarding the beach holdouts. That is at the County’s expense. Why would you want our City Attorney to duplicate the legal process and our City incur unnecessary legal expenses? Secondly, A1A is a state maintained road as well as the drainage system and landscaping. The State tried to utilize native, salt friendly plants. While not the most attractive, it is a tough environment for survival. Could the City replant something more attractive and put in an irrigation system and weed the beds. Probably not since state owned. However, regardless how much do you want your taxes to go up?
Your second paragraph: The city addressed the swales and pipes in need of repair along a very long street along the Intracoastal I believe a couple of years ago at a cost plus or minus $500,000 to help with flooding issues. The city also worked on swales in the area of N11th, N12th, Palm Circle, North 10th and several other areas on the south end of town. Caused an uproar on South Daytona if I remember correctly. However, nothing the city can do to stop the flooding from the Atlantic Ocean backing up into the Intracoastal and causing the Intracoastal to rise several feet during a hurricane. This is also exasperated by rising sea levels. Wait, maybe they could build a wall around the city like Charleston is considering for a cost of 1 billion. Again, how high do you want your taxes to go?
Your third paragraph: Dune parking and ticketing. Don’t know about the state law you quote. However, with the traffic on A1A, I could not imagine the number of beach goers that would be injured or killed if they parked no more than 12 inches from A1A while exiting their vehicle. Years ago, we had three commissioners that wanted to ban parking on A1A to save the dunes. However, a letter from DEP stated parking on the existing east side of A1A would not harm the dune. I would assume keeping off the dune vegetation would be a qualifier.
Your Fourth paragraph: lack of Parking and adding more. Again, what is your funding source? I am all for it, as long as my taxes don’t go up to pay for additional parking. As mentioned previously, social media has blown up every time the discussion of paid parking has come up. How high do you want our residential taxes to go?
Your Fifth paragraph: in your original post you mentioned parks on the Intracoastal. Silver Lake park is not on the Intracoastal. However, it was developed with a grant to be a passive park only. However, it does have a viewing platform. I don’t think you could call that a fishing pier which probably would not have been allowed under the grant. Again, if the city wanted to add a fishing pier at their cost, if allowed, what is your funding source? How high do you want your taxes to go up? The new City owned park being developed on South Daytona, is it on the Intracoastal as you implied in your first response? If so, what is the funding source for a fishing pier per your suggestion in your first response?
6th paragraph regarding golf course: As mentioned, city is moving forward with taking action and negotiating to buy old driving range property next door.
7th paragraph: old Sewer plant: As mentioned, improvements are in the works. Yes, our water and sewer bills will be going up as a result. However, agree with you on this point. It is certainly time.
Regarding your closing remarks: My comments: We live in a very small city with very limited resources. Our population is roughly 5,000 people. Guesstimating between two to three thousand homes. Unless the city moves forward with a very, very significant tax increase with many, many residents unable to afford, I don’t see your wish list coming to fruition. They do the best they can with the resources and income they have to work with. Again, how high do you want our taxes to go up?
Bc knows says
Ms. Mealy is only revealing half the story here. In 2010, flagler beach had lost 500,000 dollars of assessed property values. We were having to manage the city with 2010 expenses while only receiving, let’s say, year 2000 general fund ad valorem tax revenue. We had the choices of raising taxes, cutting costs, or some combination of both. No one wanted to raise taxes so we looked for savings in each dept. That’s the rest of the story.
Crusty Old Salt says
First of all, I would not stereotype all politicians with such a broad brush stroke. Here are a couple of major examples of the foresight the Flagler Beach Commission has exercised over the years.
Flagler Beach has a 35 foot height limit that is in the City Charter because of our City Commissioners. No more high rises and resultant densities in our city, unlike other parts of the county or neighboring cities. PUD’s even are required to abide by our height ordinance. (Apartments on Robert’s Road as an example) The height ordinance can only be changed by a majority of the voters in our city. I do not see that every happening.
Years ago, our City Commissioners had the foresight to pass an ordinance in 2008 that would not open the floodgates to allow short term rentals, which many consider a commercial use in a single family zoned district. So far, it has withstood state efforts to overturn. As you are aware, the county as been wrestling with the state for years over this because the County Commission did not exercise this foresight. I might add our City was the only municipality in the area to do so. Passage of our ordinance in 2008 by the City of Flagler Beach Commission has kept the integrity of maintaining our neighborhoods from having a commercial use next door to our residences.
Our Land Development Regulations are written in such a way that will continue to protect the quaintness and uniqueness of Flagler Beach. They do not allow the densities you will see in numerous other communities for a reason. Although being re-written for clarity purposes, there are currently no outstanding discussions that will change the character of Flagler Beach significantly.
In closing, I would suggest to get involved and volunteer on one of our Boards if you live in our City. I believe by doing so, you will gain some insights and may cause you to re-think painting all politicians with such a broad brush stroke.
Ramone says
I’m looking forward to a fresh face on the City Council. One of my votes will go Mr. Sherman.
Concerned Citizen says
I admire the fact that someone wants to challenge the old guard.
But at the end of the day he won’t make it. This entire area is so resistant to change that folks will make it a point to elect what they already know. And yet they will continue to expect different.
A FB Resident says
As someone who actually lives in Flagler Beach I’d actually like to see action from our Commission. You have two on that ballot that are a couple of blow hands who seem to care more about the title of Commissioner than ever lifting a finger or firing off a brain cell to ever get anything done. And I’m not talking about Sherman.
Sorry to be ao blunt. I’m tired of inaction and excuses from elected officials and the media for that matter.
One of my votes will be going to Sherman tomorrow.
Crusty Old Salt says
FB resident,
Please be more specific on what you would like to see done. I am very active in the City as a resident and rather than issuing a blanket statement, details please.
Many of residents in the City volunteer in numerous ways, including myself. Maybe you could join one of the boards and you would have a better understanding of how many hours a week these commissioners dedicate “volunteering” their time. I say “volunteering” because the salary they draw does not compensate them properly for the hours expended.
Again, we can always use more residents of our city to volunteer for various projects and Boards. We welcome your participation.
Commissioner Mealy started the Citizens Academy. It should be coming up soon. That is a good place to learn the inner workings of the various departments. That would give you an insight what might be of interest to expend some volunteer hours.
Commissioner Bryan just started a bench project in Veteran’s Park to honor our veterans. He was seeking volunteers to assemble benches donated by Home Depot. That would have been another wonderful opportunity to volunteer.
In closing, rather than criticize, get involved. I think you will find there is much more to a Commission or Mayor seat than sitting in a chair up on the Dias a couple times a month.
A FB Resident says
You don’t know who you are speaking to. I can tell you I am VERY involved in this community, have been for a long time, and just don’t share my identity online because I don’t need the crazies stalking me.
The problem with this and many other cities is that too many refuse to provide constructive criticism to their local government. I’m tired of TALKING. Let’s get to DOING. I have not seen that from the good Ole boys (and girls) club of our commission that have served for many years. It’s time to retire. There’s nothing wrong with new blood voted in so long as they have the protection of our city’s roots at the forefront.
I hope that clarifies things enough for you ad far as my position. I do A LOT for my community. I am a social worker by trade and while I’d love to involve myself in politics, my heart and need is elsewhere. I rely on the politicians we elect to do that job for me…. which they are voted in to do.
Crusty Old Salt says
As I said in my initial reply, details please on what you would like to see done and the funding source to accomplish. Not asking you to reveal your identity.
Crusty Old Salt says
Also, is this quote from you above what you refer to “constructive criticism”. And I quote “you have two on the ballot that are a couple of blow hands who seem to care more about the title of Commissioner than ever lifting a finger or firing off a brain cell to ever get anything done.”
Again let’s be positive and see what each of us can do to better our city rather than offer “constructive criticism” such as above.