By Ian Hamilton and Suzi Gage
Dry January, the campaign led by Alcohol Change UK that challenges people to get through January without alcohol, is now in its tenth year. In that time it has grown from 4,000 people signing up in 2013 to over 130,000 last year – although it’s likely that a far greater number take part without formally registering.
Whether this is your first attempt at a Dry January or you are a seasoned participant, there are ways you can maximise your likelihood of getting to the end of January without drinking alcohol. Behavioral science offers some insights.
One study that’s useful to draw on is the influential “stages of change model”, created by two American psychologists, James Prochaska and Carlo DiClemente. Originally developed with smokers in mind, the stages of change model has been widely used to help people approach and work through change, such as cutting down or quitting alcohol.
Rather than viewing change as a binary process of either drinking or not drinking, the stages of change model suggests there are five distinct stages to the process. The first of these is “pre-contemplation” – where there is no intention to change and even a lack of awareness of the need to change. This progresses to “contemplation” where the need to change is recognized, although no action is taken. It is only once the “preparation” stage is reached that some planning about how cutting down alcohol might be achieved takes place. This is followed by the “action” and “maintenance” stages, but it is preparation that we will concentrate on here.
Preparation is key
Rather than waiting until the first of January, it’s worth thinking ahead. It’s harder both physically and psychologically to abruptly stop a regular pattern of behaviour, such as drinking alcohol. For those that are dependent on alcohol – it could even prove fatal. Your chances of success are improved if you incrementally reduce your alcohol intake before January, as this provides time for you to adapt physically and psychologically.
Of course, the challenge here is that just before January comes Christmas, and New Year’s Eve – celebrations that are often associated with alcohol consumption. Even if you don’t cut down your alcohol use over this period, being aware of the amount you’re drinking, the triggers that predict alcohol use, and thinking about how you feel afterwards can also be helpful preparation for cutting down or stopping alcohol use.
Telling someone that you intend to take part in Dry January creates a kind of contract that is more difficult to go back on than if you keep the intention to stop drinking to yourself. Although we often think of shame as a negative state, it can be helpful in this situation if it helps you commit and adhere to your original aim of having an alcohol free month. If you can persuade friends or family to take part with you, this can be even better.
For some, it might be just too tempting to have alcohol in the house. Even if you don’t think this would be a problem, it is worth removing not only the temptation but making it harder to access alcohol should there be that spontaneous urge. Although it’s difficult to avoid all the cues we associate with alcohol, given how widely available it is and the number of adverts and promotions we are all exposed to.
Another way to prepare is to put in place some alternative ways of relaxing and rewarding yourself. If alcohol has been your way of celebrating or winding down after work, then having another way to achieve the same thing will help reduce that feeling of missing out. You could meet friends at the cinema rather than the pub, reward yourself with chocolate rather than a glass of wine, or offer to be the designated driver to remove temptation.
It’s important to be prepared for a lapse in abstaining from alcohol, as it’s easy to catastrophise it. Usually, this can mean that after having just one drink, a person feels they have failed completely and that there’s no point carrying on with the original aim. This type of thinking creates self-approved permission to carry on drinking.
Rather than view that one lapse as a disaster that cannot be recovered from, try to view it as nothing more than one mistake. It can even provide useful insight on triggers or situations you need to be considered in future. This might be finding ways of celebrating that don’t include alcohol, for example.
If ever there was a year we needed a break from alcohol, this is it. Surveys show that during the pandemic some of us significantly increased the amount of alcohol we consumed. Given the stress, isolation and grief that many experienced during the past two years, it’s easy to see why people might have turned to alcohol as a way of coping or simply to mitigate unwanted thoughts and feelings.
This year’s attempt at Dry January will be improved if the preparation for it starts in December. That doesn’t mean making difficult sacrifices. Instead, it’s about making incremental changes that are likely to help maximise achieving your goal of getting to February without a drop of alcohol touching your lips.
Ian Hamilton is Associate Professor of Addiction at the University of York. Suzi Gage is Lecturer in Psychology and Epidemiology at the University of Liverpool.
The Conversation arose out of deep-seated concerns for the fading quality of our public discourse and recognition of the vital role that academic experts could play in the public arena. Information has always been essential to democracy. It’s a societal good, like clean water. But many now find it difficult to put their trust in the media and experts who have spent years researching a topic. Instead, they listen to those who have the loudest voices. Those uninformed views are amplified by social media networks that reward those who spark outrage instead of insight or thoughtful discussion. The Conversation seeks to be part of the solution to this problem, to raise up the voices of true experts and to make their knowledge available to everyone. The Conversation publishes nightly at 9 p.m. on FlaglerLive.
Dennis C Rathsam says
With Joe Biden as our president, I think more people will be drinking more this year, hell we dont even know who’s running the country? Who is responsable for the mess the countrys in ????? Co.mon man we dont even have enough tests, 2 years into this pandemic. More folks died under Biden than Trump…Even though Trump gave him the vaccines, Biden still dropped the ball!
Ray W. says
Dennis C. Rathsam, please make it your New Year’s Resolution to exercise more intellectual rigor before you type your erroneous conclusions into a comment.
Yes, Trump’s Operation Warp Speed was a scientific success. No, Biden did not drop the ball. He picked up a political fumble and tried to run with it through an obstacle course without end fostered by politicians who seek gain and hold power through the support of those who favor natural immunity. Trump is now being booed whenever he talks of people accepting initial vaccinations and booster shots. There is a significant percentage of this country that opposes Biden’s vaccination efforts, simply because Biden asks that same significant percentage of people to utilize all available vaccines. You, Dennis C. Rathsam, are blaming Biden for the spread of the omicron variant. A little intellectual rigor should persuade you that it is the unvaccinated who are the ones most responsible for the spread of this version of the virus. Which of the two most recent national administrations pushed harder for the general public to accept vaccinations? Which did not? Which of our current state administrations have remained silent about the public accepting vaccinations, in favor of relying on natural immunity as a medical strategy?
Is the rising demand for tests based on the recent and rapid spread of the omicron variant? Would demand be nearly so high had we, as a nation, adopted a far more complete and widespread acceptance of vaccines instead of state-by-state strategies of treating those who present to medical professionals after being infected by the virus, with the best option at that late date being the injecting of monoclonal antibodies, which are also in short supply?
One entire political party is trying to fight the virus by injecting more and more people with vaccines, which are designed to trigger the production of natural antibodies. The other political party is trying to respond to those already infected with the virus by injecting monoclonal antibodies into patients who lack natural antibodies. Who, Dennis C. Rathsam, is really responsible for the recent surge in coronavirus cases and the resulting shortage of testing kits? The party leading from the front or the party leading from behind?
The shortage of testing kits is Joe Biden fault. Biden TOO LATE on COVID tests, health experts say as White House faces criticism over Omicron prep https://www.tech-gate.org/usa/2021/12/22/biden-too-late-on-covid-tests-health-experts-say-as-white-house-faces-criticism-over-omicron-prep/